All Forums | Pro Football

Pittsburgh at Washington (11/03/2008)

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 11042
Posts: 221
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 1854
Posted: #126
Quote Originally Posted by Fpronk:

Oh I forgot to mention I had Cinci on the ML for 2K and took the PATS heavy for 5K. You see, I too can post picks after they happen.




 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 2062
Posted: #127
I just got the Steelers at +3.       
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2006
Posts: 8634
Posted: #128
Quote Originally Posted by Joke77:

Does anyone know who Dr bob is on tonight? He has a 3 star play....
3* WA Skins -2.5 or less
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2008
Posts: 664
Posted: #129
both teams beat up. wash looking forward to rest,don't you think they will be playing with a bit more abandon? hate going against long trends but IMO i think under here and J.C. can/will have people open to throw too using portis on play action. was knows they have to pressure big ben, if they can, i think was has a really good chance to stay on the field,burn some clock and have possesion advantage. the real key here is going to be field position, whichever team can capitalize will most likely win. defense showing up will be a factor also.  going against the grain, was/under for me!      P.S. fuck a bunch of idiots on here........
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 2352
Posted: #130
Quote Originally Posted by kurylyk99:

Quote Originally Posted by Fpronk:

Considering Washington hasn't beaten anyone by more than 8 points teasing Pittsburgh to +9 and UNDER 44 looks like a good play. Its more likely this game goes under 30 than over 44.
 
I'm new to this site and I'm confused already.  Why even bother teasing the game if "Its more likely this game goes under 30 than over 44?"  I was thinking about the over but now I'm confused.  Could someone help out?

Are you serious? Well, if you arent sure PITTS can cover the +2 then you could tease it 7 to +9. The REDSKINS have not beaten anyone by more than 8 this year and I don't think they start tonight. So if you're going to tease the game you might as well tease it with the UNDER...these are two high scoring offenses.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 1560
Posted: #131
i'm on the steelers to win this one tonight.  too many injuries for the skins on both sides of the ball.  the steelers are getting some key players back (parker from injury, holmes from suspension).  it's been a while since this unit has played together with all of its parts.  i was surprised to see my book having it listed at +2.5.  i bought the hook for insurance, but i would probably have taken this game if it were steelers -2.5.  GL
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2008
Posts: 664
Posted: #132
realize that was basic common sense, but, with the trend to over think mnf, thought a back to basics might be in order 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 1777
Posted: #133
Under 37.5
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 1777
Posted: #134
Under 37.5
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 1777
Posted: #135
Under 37.5
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2008
Posts: 2619
Posted: #136

Quote Originally Posted by danstyk:



New rule: if you are not going to use any words in a post, then you must have an avatar with a hot woman strutting and and showing her stuff to keep us all entertained.


 I SECOND THAT.....

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2008
Posts: 2619
Posted: #137
By the way, I like the Skins tonight, at home in front of a rowdy crowd. But I saw Fpronk and that tease he had. So I'm taking the Skins -2 and then tease Pitt +9 and over 29. (I hate unders!) Good luck to all...
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 46
Posted: #138
Quote Originally Posted by goinggone:

3* WA Skins -2.5 or less


seriously??? is that really his pick.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 148
Posted: #139
 
 
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 1718
Posted: #140
Quote Originally Posted by lilsickone:

I'M PUTTING 90% OF MY BANK ROLL ON STEELERS TONIGHT!  THEY ARE #1 AGAINST THE PASS AND #3 AGAINST THE RUN PERIOD.  THEY WILL BOTTLE UP PORTIS AND END HIS 5 GAME STREAK.  WASHINGTON DEFENSE IS SOFT AND SO IS THEIR SECONDARY.  MY BIGGEST PLAY OF THE YEAR.  ALSO WATCH OUT FOR JASON CAMPBALLS FIRST INTERCEPTION. 
 
STEELERS TONIGHT 90% OF MY BANK.  MY BIGGEST PLAY OF THE YEAR.  THAT'S JUST HOW I ROLL!!!! 

GEE WHIZ $ 90 dollars....go deep

I couldn't resist
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 8485
Posted: #141
Quote Originally Posted by almosthomeless:

i just noticed a spelling error.  i meant "now" instead of "know" and "e" should be "be"
 
i should not have mentioned my mistake.  with the collection of stooges looking at this site most of you wouldn't have caught it anyway.
 
Raulbloodworth.   i like your style.   showing your betting slip like that.   350.00 is a good size wager (at least for me) on a monday nighter.   i bet most of the prognosticators (bettors) who frequent this site feel the same way and i would venture to guess many of the "regulars" live in their momma's basement.
 
would like to confirm something from your earlier post, you went 6 out of 6 right, not 6 and 6.   if it was the later, i really hope you tease works.  
 
what do you bozos think about middleing games?  any of you got the sack to try it.   i know my man raulblodworth does.
 
another thing.   artie-lange - i hope you are who you say you are but i think not based on the real artie lange's aversion to computers.   looking forward to "too fat to fish"
 
goodbye for now.
 
 
You must be kiddin hombre Albert  Einstein couldn't spell and we all know what an idiot he was.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2006
Posts: 36
Posted: #142
First thing about teasers, and I've played quite a few, is they are definitly hit or miss. But Pitt + 9 and over 30 seems pretty solid. I'm going with Pitt plus the points or even moneyline straight up. I think the lack of pass rush by the Redskins will allow Big Ben to get the ball downfield to his receivers and with Parker back they should be better with their run game also. Bottom line Washington is not as good Defensively as Giants or Eagles.  PITTSBURG ALL THE WAY TONIGHT!!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 27
Posted: #143
Did anyone watch Mike n' Mike haha little info about the skins playing the day before the election and the voting trends. If the steelers when tonight Obama will win if the skins win tonight McCain wins.  Why campaign...watch the skins.... GO STEELERS
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 514
Posted: #144
I have been listening to all of you trashing each other,  kurylyk,n just leave Fpronk alone  he is only trying to offer advice and by the way, just what is a kurylyk anyway,...   Steelers will roll...........
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2008
Posts: 5485
Posted: #145
Ben Roth was sacked many times against the Eagles' and Giants' defensive lineman. Well, the Redskins' defensive line isn't as good as the Eagles and Giants, so Roth should have some time to pick his spots.  I see the Steelers pulling it out late in the game.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 2799
Posted: #146
Steelers +125 time for the Campbell bubble to burst.....POP!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 33
Posted: #147
This is a tough one...I think Im gonna ride with ColonelJ on this one.....
 
Taking the Steelers and the Ova.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 162
Posted: #148
Make money and take steelers and under
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2005
Posts: 735
Posted: #149
Steelers +3 (-130)
Washington -3 (+110)

 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 162
Posted: #150
steelers always play great MNF.  who the fuck is campbell?  he will go down tonight.  trust me on this one.
All Forums | Pro Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.