• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • NFL Prediction Prices
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
        • Back
        • UFC
        • Odds
        • Picks
        • News & Analysis
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
      • Politics
        • Back
        • Politics
        • Politics Home
        • Presidential Election Odds
        • Midterm Election Odds
        • House Midterm Odds
        • Senate Midterm Odds
        • Texas Midterm Odds
        • Michigan Midterm Odds
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • UFC
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Kalshi Referral Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • Polymarket Referral Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • Betr Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
      • Gemini Predictions Promo Code
    • U.S. Midterm Election
      U.S. Midterm Election
      • Midterm Election Odds Tracker
      • House Control Odds
      • Senate Control Odds
      • How to Trade Midterm Elections
      • Trump Midterm Odds
      • Texas Senate Prediction
      • Best Political Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | Pro Football

    Pittsburgh at Green Bay (02/06/2011)

    «First Previous 456 ... 121314 Next Last»
    danielbriseno
    jonfon
    Fusilli-Mondo
    stalker
    JerryWrasse
    ...
    Participants:
    Search
    Views: 47210
    Posts: 342
    «First Previous 456 ... 121314 Next Last»
     
    danielbriseno
    danielbriseno
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jun, 2008
    Posts: 56
    Posted: Jan. 25, 2011 - 4:03 PM ET #76

     

    Head to Head the score is 22/17 in favor of Pitt. Pitt on the road scores 24/15 in favor of Pitt, Greenbay on the road scores 20/14 in favor of GreenBay, Teams that made the playoffs this is how the Greenbay did against those teams the score averaged out to be 22/16 in favor of Greenbay, Teams that Pitt has played that made the playoffs the score averaged out to be 19/20 in favor of Greenbay. Pitt last 3 games averaged 32/17 and Greenbay last 3 games averaged 30/17.Teams that are similar to opponents Pitt has played during the regular season to a Greenbay team are Alanta twice, Jets twice, New England when those scores are averaged it is 22/18 in favor of Greenbay. The opponents similar to a Pitt team that  Greenbay has played are Alanta twice,Jets,Miami,Giants,Philly twice the scores averages out to 20/17 in favor of GreenBay. Both Pitt and Jets played some of the same opponents throughout the year those scores average out to be 31/26 in favor of Greenbay. When you average all the numbers it comes out to 20.5. For the Pitt but I will add 3 points to the Pitt to make the score which makes it 24 and when you average the scores for Greenbay is 24. Which means this will be a tight game possibly but one reason why I’m leaning toward Greenbay is when Greenbay went into New England and almost beat them with a back up QB 27/31and that same New England team went into Pitt and beat them 39/26. Greenbay leads Pitt in the post season 3rd down conversion, completion rating, and Defensive sacks. Extra points made, Defensive pass interceptions, forced fumbles. Also Greenbay has played over 70x on artificial turf to Pitt 16x. I don’t know how much of a factor that is but that’s a big difference to you numbers guys that averages out to 31/29 in favor of Greenbay. I didn’t add that into figuring out my final score thou but anyways this is my prediction I have Greenbay to win 27 to 24. Please let me know your thoughts. I'm sorry this my correct score 

    Reply

     

    Head to Head the score is 22/17 in favor of Pitt. Pitt on the road scores 24/15 in favor of Pitt, Greenbay on the road scores 20/14 in favor of GreenBay, Teams that made the playoffs this is how the Greenbay did against those teams the score averaged out to be 22/16 in favor of Greenbay, Teams that Pitt has played that made the playoffs the score averaged out to be 19/20 in favor of Greenbay. Pitt last 3 games averaged 32/17 and Greenbay last 3 games averaged 30/17.Teams that are similar to opponents Pitt has played during the regular season to a Greenbay team are Alanta twice, Jets twice, New England when those scores are averaged it is 22/18 in favor of Greenbay. The opponents similar to a Pitt team that  Greenbay has played are Alanta twice,Jets,Miami,Giants,Philly twice the scores averages out to 20/17 in favor of GreenBay. Both Pitt and Jets played some of the same opponents throughout the year those scores average out to be 31/26 in favor of Greenbay. When you average all the numbers it comes out to 20.5. For the Pitt but I will add 3 points to the Pitt to make the score which makes it 24 and when you average the scores for Greenbay is 24. Which means this will be a tight game possibly but one reason why I’m leaning toward Greenbay is when Greenbay went into New England and almost beat them with a back up QB 27/31and that same New England team went into Pitt and beat them 39/26. Greenbay leads Pitt in the post season 3rd down conversion, completion rating, and Defensive sacks. Extra points made, Defensive pass interceptions, forced fumbles. Also Greenbay has played over 70x on artificial turf to Pitt 16x. I don’t know how much of a factor that is but that’s a big difference to you numbers guys that averages out to 31/29 in favor of Greenbay. I didn’t add that into figuring out my final score thou but anyways this is my prediction I have Greenbay to win 27 to 24. Please let me know your thoughts. I'm sorry this my correct score 

     
    jonfon
    jonfon
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2008
    Posts: 176
    Posted: Jan. 25, 2011 - 4:08 PM ET #77

    tough one here

    you gotta pick your poison.


    do you take Big Ben who never loses playoff games?

    or

    do you take the packer offense which is the same as new england's...which if you remember dismantled the pitt defense by spreading them out

    like i said...Tough one

    Reply
    tough one here

    you gotta pick your poison.


    do you take Big Ben who never loses playoff games?

    or

    do you take the packer offense which is the same as new england's...which if you remember dismantled the pitt defense by spreading them out

    like i said...Tough one

     
    Fusilli-Mondo
    Fusilli-Mondo
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 662
    Posted: Jan. 25, 2011 - 4:20 PM ET #78

    [Quote: Originally Posted by jonfon]

    ok...let's put it out there right now and be done with such NONSENSE..........

    IN THE NEXT 2 WEEKS, anyone who brings up the Seedings (2 vs. 6)  has absolutely no credibility.

    they mean NOTHING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    don't waste our time please...thanks.

    They sure would have meant something if GB was seeded 7th...lol.
    Reply
    [Quote: Originally Posted by jonfon]

    ok...let's put it out there right now and be done with such NONSENSE..........

    IN THE NEXT 2 WEEKS, anyone who brings up the Seedings (2 vs. 6)  has absolutely no credibility.

    they mean NOTHING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    don't waste our time please...thanks.

    They sure would have meant something if GB was seeded 7th...lol.
     
    stalker
    stalker
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2008
    Posts: 467
    Posted: Jan. 25, 2011 - 4:29 PM ET #79

    Quote Originally Posted by danielbriseno:

     

    Head to Head the score is 22/17 in favor of Pitt. Pitt on the road scores 24/15 in favor of Pitt, Greenbay on the road scores 20/14 in favor of GreenBay, Teams that made the playoffs this is how the Greenbay did against those teams the score averaged out to be 22/16 in favor of Greenbay, Teams that Pitt has played that made the playoffs the score averaged out to be 19/20 in favor of Greenbay. Pitt last 3 games averaged 32/17 and Greenbay last 3 games averaged 30/17.Teams that are similar to opponents Pitt has played during the regular season to a Greenbay team are Alanta twice, Jets twice, New England when those scores are averaged it is 22/18 in favor of Greenbay. The opponents similar to a Pitt team that  Greenbay has played are Alanta twice,Jets,Miami,Giants,Philly twice the scores averages out to 20/17 in favor of GreenBay. Both Pitt and Jets played some of the same opponents throughout the year those scores average out to be 31/26 in favor of Greenbay. When you average all the numbers it comes out to 20.5. For the Pitt but I will add 3 points to the Pitt to make the score which makes it 24 and when you average the scores for Greenbay is 24. Which means this will be a tight game possibly but one reason why I’m leaning toward Greenbay is when Greenbay went into New England and almost beat them with a back up QB 27/31and that same New England team went into Pitt and beat them 39/26. Greenbay leads Pitt in the post season 3rd down conversion, completion rating, and Defensive sacks. Extra points made, Defensive pass interceptions, forced fumbles. Also Greenbay has played over 70x on artificial turf to Pitt 16x. I don’t know how much of a factor that is but that’s a big difference to you numbers guys that averages out to 31/29 in favor of Greenbay. I didn’t add that into figuring out my final score thou but anyways this is my prediction I have Greenbay to win 27 to 24. Please let me know your thoughts. I'm sorry this my correct score 

    I think some of your numbers are skewed. Green Bay played 3 post season games to Pitt's 2. Not sure if your numbers are totals or averages. Also, Pitt played against 2 top 10 defenses (1 of which is a division rival). Green Bay played against 1 top 10 defense (Chi and they are a division rival) and faced 2 defenses that ranked 20 or higher (Chi and Atl) against the pass during the regular season. Also Pitt didn't play ATL twice. Not that the game should really matter seeing how Pitt beat them without Ben and that both of these teams have had to change a ton of personnel due to injuriy throughout the year.

    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by danielbriseno:

     

    Head to Head the score is 22/17 in favor of Pitt. Pitt on the road scores 24/15 in favor of Pitt, Greenbay on the road scores 20/14 in favor of GreenBay, Teams that made the playoffs this is how the Greenbay did against those teams the score averaged out to be 22/16 in favor of Greenbay, Teams that Pitt has played that made the playoffs the score averaged out to be 19/20 in favor of Greenbay. Pitt last 3 games averaged 32/17 and Greenbay last 3 games averaged 30/17.Teams that are similar to opponents Pitt has played during the regular season to a Greenbay team are Alanta twice, Jets twice, New England when those scores are averaged it is 22/18 in favor of Greenbay. The opponents similar to a Pitt team that  Greenbay has played are Alanta twice,Jets,Miami,Giants,Philly twice the scores averages out to 20/17 in favor of GreenBay. Both Pitt and Jets played some of the same opponents throughout the year those scores average out to be 31/26 in favor of Greenbay. When you average all the numbers it comes out to 20.5. For the Pitt but I will add 3 points to the Pitt to make the score which makes it 24 and when you average the scores for Greenbay is 24. Which means this will be a tight game possibly but one reason why I’m leaning toward Greenbay is when Greenbay went into New England and almost beat them with a back up QB 27/31and that same New England team went into Pitt and beat them 39/26. Greenbay leads Pitt in the post season 3rd down conversion, completion rating, and Defensive sacks. Extra points made, Defensive pass interceptions, forced fumbles. Also Greenbay has played over 70x on artificial turf to Pitt 16x. I don’t know how much of a factor that is but that’s a big difference to you numbers guys that averages out to 31/29 in favor of Greenbay. I didn’t add that into figuring out my final score thou but anyways this is my prediction I have Greenbay to win 27 to 24. Please let me know your thoughts. I'm sorry this my correct score 

    I think some of your numbers are skewed. Green Bay played 3 post season games to Pitt's 2. Not sure if your numbers are totals or averages. Also, Pitt played against 2 top 10 defenses (1 of which is a division rival). Green Bay played against 1 top 10 defense (Chi and they are a division rival) and faced 2 defenses that ranked 20 or higher (Chi and Atl) against the pass during the regular season. Also Pitt didn't play ATL twice. Not that the game should really matter seeing how Pitt beat them without Ben and that both of these teams have had to change a ton of personnel due to injuriy throughout the year.

     
    stalker
    stalker
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2008
    Posts: 467
    Posted: Jan. 25, 2011 - 4:41 PM ET #80

    Quote Originally Posted by JerryWrasse:

    If you like Pittsburgh to win thats one thing, but how could anyone who watches football reasonabley expect Pittsburgh to be favored in this game.

    I wouldn't say it's outrageous to expect Pitt to be favored. They played in a tougher conference and have a higher seed. Pitt has the #2 overall defense and #1 scoring defense, GB has the #5 defense and #2 scoring defense. GB has the #9 offense and #10 scoring offense, Pitt has the #14 offense and #12 scoring offense (don't forget these numbers would probably be higher had Ben not been suspended 4 games).

    These teams are pretty evenly matched. I don't expect a blowout from either side here. If Pitt would've continued to pound the Jets in the 2nd half like they did in the 1st half I have no doubt in my mind that they'd be favored.

    And as PeteyRose pointed out the oddsmakers expect a good game as well- *here is a fun fact...in the last 20 superbowls, we only have had a spread of 3 once, and a spread of less than 3 zero times

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by JerryWrasse:

    If you like Pittsburgh to win thats one thing, but how could anyone who watches football reasonabley expect Pittsburgh to be favored in this game.

    I wouldn't say it's outrageous to expect Pitt to be favored. They played in a tougher conference and have a higher seed. Pitt has the #2 overall defense and #1 scoring defense, GB has the #5 defense and #2 scoring defense. GB has the #9 offense and #10 scoring offense, Pitt has the #14 offense and #12 scoring offense (don't forget these numbers would probably be higher had Ben not been suspended 4 games).

    These teams are pretty evenly matched. I don't expect a blowout from either side here. If Pitt would've continued to pound the Jets in the 2nd half like they did in the 1st half I have no doubt in my mind that they'd be favored.

    And as PeteyRose pointed out the oddsmakers expect a good game as well- *here is a fun fact...in the last 20 superbowls, we only have had a spread of 3 once, and a spread of less than 3 zero times

     
    danielbriseno
    danielbriseno
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jun, 2008
    Posts: 56
    Posted: Jan. 25, 2011 - 4:57 PM ET #81

    Head to Head the score is 22/17 in favor of Pitt. Pitt on the road scores 24/15 in favor of Pitt, Greenbay on the road scores 20/14 in favor of GreenBay, Teams that made the playoffs this is how the Greenbay did against those teams the score averaged out to be 22/16 in favor of Greenbay, Teams that Pitt has played that made the playoffs the score averaged out to be 19/20 in favor of Greenbay. Pitt last 3 games averaged 32/17 and Greenbay last 3 games averaged 30/17.Teams that are similar to opponents Pitt has played during the regular season to a Greenbay team are Alanta twice, Jets twice, New England,Baltimore 3x when those scores are averaged it is 20/19 in favor of Greenbay. The opponents similar to a Pitt team that  Greenbay has played are Alanta twice,Jets,Miami,Giants,Philly twice the scores averages out to 20/17 in favor of GreenBay. Both Pitt and Jets played some of the same opponents throughout the year those scores average out to be 31/26 in favor of Greenbay. When you average all the numbers it comes out to 20.5. For the Pitt but I will add 3 points to the Pitt to make the score which makes it 24 and when you average the scores for Greenbay is 24. Which means this will be a tight game possibly but one reason why I’m leaning toward Greenbay is when Greenbay went into New England and almost beat them with a back up QB 27/31and that same New England team went into Pitt and beat them 39/26. Greenbay leads Pitt in the post season 3rd down conversion, completion rating, and Defensive sacks. Extra points made, Defensive pass interceptions, forced fumbles. Also Greenbay has played over 70x on artificial turf to Pitt 16x. I don’t know how much of a factor that is but that’s a big difference to you numbers guys that averages out to 31/29 in favor of Greenbay. I didn’t add that into figuring out my final score thou but anyways this is my prediction I have Greenbay to win 27 to 24. Please let me know your thoughts. I'm sorry this my correct score. Thanks for the correction.

    Reply

    Head to Head the score is 22/17 in favor of Pitt. Pitt on the road scores 24/15 in favor of Pitt, Greenbay on the road scores 20/14 in favor of GreenBay, Teams that made the playoffs this is how the Greenbay did against those teams the score averaged out to be 22/16 in favor of Greenbay, Teams that Pitt has played that made the playoffs the score averaged out to be 19/20 in favor of Greenbay. Pitt last 3 games averaged 32/17 and Greenbay last 3 games averaged 30/17.Teams that are similar to opponents Pitt has played during the regular season to a Greenbay team are Alanta twice, Jets twice, New England,Baltimore 3x when those scores are averaged it is 20/19 in favor of Greenbay. The opponents similar to a Pitt team that  Greenbay has played are Alanta twice,Jets,Miami,Giants,Philly twice the scores averages out to 20/17 in favor of GreenBay. Both Pitt and Jets played some of the same opponents throughout the year those scores average out to be 31/26 in favor of Greenbay. When you average all the numbers it comes out to 20.5. For the Pitt but I will add 3 points to the Pitt to make the score which makes it 24 and when you average the scores for Greenbay is 24. Which means this will be a tight game possibly but one reason why I’m leaning toward Greenbay is when Greenbay went into New England and almost beat them with a back up QB 27/31and that same New England team went into Pitt and beat them 39/26. Greenbay leads Pitt in the post season 3rd down conversion, completion rating, and Defensive sacks. Extra points made, Defensive pass interceptions, forced fumbles. Also Greenbay has played over 70x on artificial turf to Pitt 16x. I don’t know how much of a factor that is but that’s a big difference to you numbers guys that averages out to 31/29 in favor of Greenbay. I didn’t add that into figuring out my final score thou but anyways this is my prediction I have Greenbay to win 27 to 24. Please let me know your thoughts. I'm sorry this my correct score. Thanks for the correction.

     
    JerryWrasse
    JerryWrasse
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2008
    Posts: 2594
    Posted: Jan. 25, 2011 - 5:07 PM ET #82

    Quote Originally Posted by stalker:

    I wouldn't say it's outrageous to expect Pitt to be favored. They played in a tougher conference and have a higher seed. Pitt has the #2 overall defense and #1 scoring defense, GB has the #5 defense and #2 scoring defense. GB has the #9 offense and #10 scoring offense, Pitt has the #14 offense and #12 scoring offense (don't forget these numbers would probably be higher had Ben not been suspended 4 games).

    These teams are pretty evenly matched. I don't expect a blowout from either side here. If Pitt would've continued to pound the Jets in the 2nd half like they did in the 1st half I have no doubt in my mind that they'd be favored.

    And as PeteyRose pointed out the oddsmakers expect a good game as well- *here is a fun fact...in the last 20 superbowls, we only have had a spread of 3 once, and a spread of less than 3 zero times

    The fact that the action is essentially split down the middle proves that the linemakers were correct to make GB a 3 pt favorite. If anyone thinks that Pittsburgh is clearly the better team and will win needs to pound the line.

    Of course the line was set to induce action on Pittsburgh. GB is the public darling. The line had to be set at where it is to prevent an overload of money being poured on GB. If the it opened at a pk over 70% would be on the Pack.

    I think we are looking at this 2 different ways. You see that Pitt is a better team and so the line should be indicative of that. I see it as a way to split the vote.

    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by stalker:

    I wouldn't say it's outrageous to expect Pitt to be favored. They played in a tougher conference and have a higher seed. Pitt has the #2 overall defense and #1 scoring defense, GB has the #5 defense and #2 scoring defense. GB has the #9 offense and #10 scoring offense, Pitt has the #14 offense and #12 scoring offense (don't forget these numbers would probably be higher had Ben not been suspended 4 games).

    These teams are pretty evenly matched. I don't expect a blowout from either side here. If Pitt would've continued to pound the Jets in the 2nd half like they did in the 1st half I have no doubt in my mind that they'd be favored.

    And as PeteyRose pointed out the oddsmakers expect a good game as well- *here is a fun fact...in the last 20 superbowls, we only have had a spread of 3 once, and a spread of less than 3 zero times

    The fact that the action is essentially split down the middle proves that the linemakers were correct to make GB a 3 pt favorite. If anyone thinks that Pittsburgh is clearly the better team and will win needs to pound the line.

    Of course the line was set to induce action on Pittsburgh. GB is the public darling. The line had to be set at where it is to prevent an overload of money being poured on GB. If the it opened at a pk over 70% would be on the Pack.

    I think we are looking at this 2 different ways. You see that Pitt is a better team and so the line should be indicative of that. I see it as a way to split the vote.

     
    forkball
    forkball
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2009
    Posts: 566
    Posted: Jan. 25, 2011 - 5:28 PM ET #83

    Reverse line movement on the totals.  Moneyline way off balance, and yet Vegas is trying to get even more Pitt money by raising the spread.

    Gee, maybe they know something. . .

     

    Reply

    Reverse line movement on the totals.  Moneyline way off balance, and yet Vegas is trying to get even more Pitt money by raising the spread.

    Gee, maybe they know something. . .

     

     
    FleshGordun
    FleshGordun
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2009
    Posts: 915
    Posted: Jan. 25, 2011 - 5:54 PM ET #84

    PIT vs GB season and play-offs vs 3-4 def. and 4-3 def. alignments.

    Season PIT 8-3 (727.) vs 3-4

    GB 4-3 (.571) vs 3-4

    Play-offs  PIT played against 2 teams 3-4

    GB played 3 succesive games VS teams using 4-3

    Reply

    PIT vs GB season and play-offs vs 3-4 def. and 4-3 def. alignments.

    Season PIT 8-3 (727.) vs 3-4

    GB 4-3 (.571) vs 3-4

    Play-offs  PIT played against 2 teams 3-4

    GB played 3 succesive games VS teams using 4-3

     
    babygus17
    babygus17
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2010
    Posts: 332
    Posted: Jan. 25, 2011 - 6:20 PM ET #85

    THE PATRIOTS TRASHED PITTSBURGH IN THE KETCHUP BOTTLE ON SUNDAY NIGHT FOOTBALL. THE PATRIOTS HAVE NO TALENT AT ALL EXECEPT #12 AND THEIR HEAD COACH. PITT ALSO LAYED AN EGG IN NOLA ANOTHER PRIME TIME TILT. SPREAD EM OUT AND WITH RODGERS BEING RAZOR ACCURATE THE CHAINS WILL BE MOVING ALL DAY. PITT HAS NOT FACED A DEFENSE LIKE GBS ALL YR. LOOK FOR GB TO WIN BY TD OR MORE.

    Reply

    THE PATRIOTS TRASHED PITTSBURGH IN THE KETCHUP BOTTLE ON SUNDAY NIGHT FOOTBALL. THE PATRIOTS HAVE NO TALENT AT ALL EXECEPT #12 AND THEIR HEAD COACH. PITT ALSO LAYED AN EGG IN NOLA ANOTHER PRIME TIME TILT. SPREAD EM OUT AND WITH RODGERS BEING RAZOR ACCURATE THE CHAINS WILL BE MOVING ALL DAY. PITT HAS NOT FACED A DEFENSE LIKE GBS ALL YR. LOOK FOR GB TO WIN BY TD OR MORE.

     
    DrDogs
    DrDogs
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2008
    Posts: 2093
    Posted: Jan. 25, 2011 - 8:25 PM ET #86

    Ben Roethlisberger is 14-7 ATS as an underdog.

    Ben Roethlisberger is 9-3 ATS in the playoffs (6-2 as a favorite).

    Everyone talking about how hot green bay is... 7-3 last 10 games. The steelers a little hot themselves 8-2 last 10 games. AFC clearly superior this year and the steelers have beaten all of the good afc teams minus a beatdown by NEW ENG and we all know where they are spending superbowl weekend!  Rodgers has just beaten his bad big game rap  and just won his first playoff game this year albeit three in a row. BIG BEN has been doing doing this just a little bit longer Pitt and OV for the large

    If you’re not large, you’re small - the DOC
    Reply

    Ben Roethlisberger is 14-7 ATS as an underdog.

    Ben Roethlisberger is 9-3 ATS in the playoffs (6-2 as a favorite).

    Everyone talking about how hot green bay is... 7-3 last 10 games. The steelers a little hot themselves 8-2 last 10 games. AFC clearly superior this year and the steelers have beaten all of the good afc teams minus a beatdown by NEW ENG and we all know where they are spending superbowl weekend!  Rodgers has just beaten his bad big game rap  and just won his first playoff game this year albeit three in a row. BIG BEN has been doing doing this just a little bit longer Pitt and OV for the large

     
    wackycracker
    wackycracker
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2010
    Posts: 483
    Posted: Jan. 25, 2011 - 9:31 PM ET #87

    Was just reading that to stand outside the stadium---it will cost $317 per person--and that's just to watch it on a big screen t.v.---Oh but you'll get a scarf,a program and aparking pass.----i'll take the over on the profit of 500 million---we might see jerry jones burying his face in a towel and crying tears of joy after this one!
    Reply
    Was just reading that to stand outside the stadium---it will cost $317 per person--and that's just to watch it on a big screen t.v.---Oh but you'll get a scarf,a program and aparking pass.----i'll take the over on the profit of 500 million---we might see jerry jones burying his face in a towel and crying tears of joy after this one!
     
    coversROTHSTEIN
    coversROTHSTEIN
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2010
    Posts: 108
    Posted: Jan. 25, 2011 - 10:09 PM ET #88

    Quote Originally Posted by bigcat33:

    A lott of negatives for Pittsburgh;

    - A rather suspect OL - Will Pouncey even play?

    - Suspect seconday even with Polamalu.

    - GB won't come out Flat as NYJ.

    But BUT! The Steelers have Ben and that Defense. 

     

    those negatives are huge. clay will have a field day on this oline.

     

    pitt secondary is terrible.. they are GREAT at stopping the run, PLAYING SMASH MOUTH FOOTBALL. Green Bay will be in 4 and 5 wide all day.     Taking away from Pitts NUMBER ONE STRENGTH.    Do they really want Woodley, Harrison, Farrior out there vs the spread... NOT GONNA HAPPEN. 

    Pitt also lacks what causes GB problems (ELITE PASS RUSHER)   ie, Peppers/Jared Allen.  

     

    I don't understand why people are all over Pitt- this game is in perfect conditions. Rodgers is UNREAL in domes. Highest QB rating in the NFL inside domes.

     

    You ppl want to bring up last years Pitt win.. WHY? lol.    You want to bring up a poor performance vs CHICAGO- A-RODGE had 150YARDS in the first HALF in terrible conditions on the WORST FIELD IN FOOTBALL.   2nd half didn't matter. GB knew they had the game in the bag. They dominated CUTLER- they knew that a 2nd and 3rd stringer wouldn't beat them.

     

    Every MAJOR angle favors GB.    

    PERFECT CONDITIONS

    ELITE PASS RUSH VS TERRIBLE O LINE

    ELITE PASS OFFENSE VS TERRIBLE PASS D.

    Pitt has ONE deep threat.

    is flozell adams really gonna stop clay matthews? lol.

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by bigcat33:

    A lott of negatives for Pittsburgh;

    - A rather suspect OL - Will Pouncey even play?

    - Suspect seconday even with Polamalu.

    - GB won't come out Flat as NYJ.

    But BUT! The Steelers have Ben and that Defense. 

     

    those negatives are huge. clay will have a field day on this oline.

     

    pitt secondary is terrible.. they are GREAT at stopping the run, PLAYING SMASH MOUTH FOOTBALL. Green Bay will be in 4 and 5 wide all day.     Taking away from Pitts NUMBER ONE STRENGTH.    Do they really want Woodley, Harrison, Farrior out there vs the spread... NOT GONNA HAPPEN. 

    Pitt also lacks what causes GB problems (ELITE PASS RUSHER)   ie, Peppers/Jared Allen.  

     

    I don't understand why people are all over Pitt- this game is in perfect conditions. Rodgers is UNREAL in domes. Highest QB rating in the NFL inside domes.

     

    You ppl want to bring up last years Pitt win.. WHY? lol.    You want to bring up a poor performance vs CHICAGO- A-RODGE had 150YARDS in the first HALF in terrible conditions on the WORST FIELD IN FOOTBALL.   2nd half didn't matter. GB knew they had the game in the bag. They dominated CUTLER- they knew that a 2nd and 3rd stringer wouldn't beat them.

     

    Every MAJOR angle favors GB.    

    PERFECT CONDITIONS

    ELITE PASS RUSH VS TERRIBLE O LINE

    ELITE PASS OFFENSE VS TERRIBLE PASS D.

    Pitt has ONE deep threat.

    is flozell adams really gonna stop clay matthews? lol.

     
    coversROTHSTEIN
    coversROTHSTEIN
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2010
    Posts: 108
    Posted: Jan. 25, 2011 - 10:10 PM ET #89

    Quote Originally Posted by jonfon:

    do you take the packer offense which is the same as new england's...which if you remember dismantled the pitt defense by spreading them out

     

    couldn't have put it any better.

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by jonfon:

    do you take the packer offense which is the same as new england's...which if you remember dismantled the pitt defense by spreading them out

     

    couldn't have put it any better.

     
    coversROTHSTEIN
    coversROTHSTEIN
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2010
    Posts: 108
    Posted: Jan. 25, 2011 - 10:16 PM ET #90

    and all this AFC is far superior than the NFC talk needs to end.

    You can say PITT dominated the AFC-  ok, even so. The AFC elite teams are all power teams with run orientated offense.    Too bad they are playing a spread offense with a lethal QB, whose style they have seen once all year and got blown out that game.

    Reply

    and all this AFC is far superior than the NFC talk needs to end.

    You can say PITT dominated the AFC-  ok, even so. The AFC elite teams are all power teams with run orientated offense.    Too bad they are playing a spread offense with a lethal QB, whose style they have seen once all year and got blown out that game.

     
    danielbriseno
    danielbriseno
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jun, 2008
    Posts: 56
    Posted: Jan. 26, 2011 - 4:04 AM ET #91

    This is for all you Pitt backers. The Saints are like a GB team and look at that final score 20-10. Rogers is going to have a field day on this field. Pitt has trouble with a spread offensive watch and see!!!!!!!!!
    Reply
    This is for all you Pitt backers. The Saints are like a GB team and look at that final score 20-10. Rogers is going to have a field day on this field. Pitt has trouble with a spread offensive watch and see!!!!!!!!!
     
    ZakRH
    ZakRH
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2006
    Posts: 606
    Posted: Jan. 26, 2011 - 8:29 AM ET #92

    This line should move atleast a point, no?.....I'm gonna take the packers for one reason, Rodgers....he is so cool in the pocket and can extend plays with his legs....i think both both defenses are about equal, close game.....GB 27...PITT 24    fun superbowl, i'll be getting hammered rooting for the packers
    Reply
    This line should move atleast a point, no?.....I'm gonna take the packers for one reason, Rodgers....he is so cool in the pocket and can extend plays with his legs....i think both both defenses are about equal, close game.....GB 27...PITT 24    fun superbowl, i'll be getting hammered rooting for the packers
     
    BreakaBookie
    BreakaBookie
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2006
    Posts: 1743
    Posted: Jan. 26, 2011 - 9:45 AM ET #93

    I like Pitt to win the superbowl....

    I'll take the experienced qb, better defense, and better run game...

     

    GL TO ALL!

    Reply

    I like Pitt to win the superbowl....

    I'll take the experienced qb, better defense, and better run game...

     

    GL TO ALL!

     
    stalker
    stalker
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2008
    Posts: 467
    Posted: Jan. 26, 2011 - 11:13 AM ET #94

    Quote Originally Posted by babygus17:

    THE PATRIOTS TRASHED PITTSBURGH IN THE KETCHUP BOTTLE ON SUNDAY NIGHT FOOTBALL. THE PATRIOTS HAVE NO TALENT AT ALL EXECEPT #12 AND THEIR HEAD COACH. PITT ALSO LAYED AN EGG IN NOLA ANOTHER PRIME TIME TILT. SPREAD EM OUT AND WITH RODGERS BEING RAZOR ACCURATE THE CHAINS WILL BE MOVING ALL DAY. PITT HAS NOT FACED A DEFENSE LIKE GBS ALL YR. LOOK FOR GB TO WIN BY TD OR MORE.

    Everyone should relax on bringin up these NE and NO games. Don't forget that PITT caught both of these teams after they both had just lost to a terrible Cleveland team when they were obviously looking ahead to PITT. Especially the NO game. Monday Night Football on Halloween Night in NO. That's a tough game for anyone to win.

    Anyone else could point out the trouble's that GB had with Detriot this year. And I know Rodgers got hurt late in the 2nd quarter in their loss but he also led them to 0 points before that happened.

    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by babygus17:

    THE PATRIOTS TRASHED PITTSBURGH IN THE KETCHUP BOTTLE ON SUNDAY NIGHT FOOTBALL. THE PATRIOTS HAVE NO TALENT AT ALL EXECEPT #12 AND THEIR HEAD COACH. PITT ALSO LAYED AN EGG IN NOLA ANOTHER PRIME TIME TILT. SPREAD EM OUT AND WITH RODGERS BEING RAZOR ACCURATE THE CHAINS WILL BE MOVING ALL DAY. PITT HAS NOT FACED A DEFENSE LIKE GBS ALL YR. LOOK FOR GB TO WIN BY TD OR MORE.

    Everyone should relax on bringin up these NE and NO games. Don't forget that PITT caught both of these teams after they both had just lost to a terrible Cleveland team when they were obviously looking ahead to PITT. Especially the NO game. Monday Night Football on Halloween Night in NO. That's a tough game for anyone to win.

    Anyone else could point out the trouble's that GB had with Detriot this year. And I know Rodgers got hurt late in the 2nd quarter in their loss but he also led them to 0 points before that happened.

     
    BreakaBookie
    BreakaBookie
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2006
    Posts: 1743
    Posted: Jan. 26, 2011 - 11:55 AM ET #95

    Quote Originally Posted by jonfon:

    tough one here

    you gotta pick your poison.


    do you take Big Ben who never loses playoff games?

    or

    do you take the packer offense which is the same as new england's...which if you remember dismantled the pitt defense by spreading them out

    like i said...Tough one

    Tom Brady > Aaron Rodgers

    plus GB doesn't have the tight ends that NE had....

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by jonfon:

    tough one here

    you gotta pick your poison.


    do you take Big Ben who never loses playoff games?

    or

    do you take the packer offense which is the same as new england's...which if you remember dismantled the pitt defense by spreading them out

    like i said...Tough one

    Tom Brady > Aaron Rodgers

    plus GB doesn't have the tight ends that NE had....

     
    lovetogamble
    lovetogamble
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2007
    Posts: 2113
    Posted: Jan. 26, 2011 - 12:18 PM ET #96

    PACKERS -2.5
    Reply
    PACKERS -2.5
     
    seaona
    seaona
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2006
    Posts: 728
    Posted: Jan. 26, 2011 - 1:55 PM ET #97

    PACKERS LAST 10 GAMES (INCLUDING PLAYOFFS) 7 wins -  3 losses - all loses were 4 points or less! that means they have almost won 10 in a row!  this team is always in it - rodgers has twice as many touchdowns as ben this season - and they were both out for a few games - rodgers has better passing rating and twice as many touchdowns - gotta go with the better qb in this one-
    green bay on money line (to risky with points) should get -135 at worst    laying big,,,,,---
    good luck all
    Reply
    PACKERS LAST 10 GAMES (INCLUDING PLAYOFFS) 7 wins -  3 losses - all loses were 4 points or less! that means they have almost won 10 in a row!  this team is always in it - rodgers has twice as many touchdowns as ben this season - and they were both out for a few games - rodgers has better passing rating and twice as many touchdowns - gotta go with the better qb in this one-
    green bay on money line (to risky with points) should get -135 at worst    laying big,,,,,---
    good luck all
     
    stalker
    stalker
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2008
    Posts: 467
    Posted: Jan. 26, 2011 - 5:20 PM ET #98

    Quote Originally Posted by seaona:

    PACKERS LAST 10 GAMES (INCLUDING PLAYOFFS) 7 wins -  3 losses - all loses were 4 points or less! that means they have almost won 10 in a row!  this team is always in it - rodgers has twice as many touchdowns as ben this season - and they were both out for a few games - rodgers has better passing rating and twice as many touchdowns - gotta go with the better qb in this one-
    green bay on money line (to risky with points) should get -135 at worst    laying big,,,,,---
    good luck all

    WORST POST EVER! Who cares what GB's record is their last 10 games. Pitt's last 10 games they're 8-2. And both QB's were not out a few games each. Ben missed 4 games and Rodgers missed 1.5. How can you even compare TD's with these two? Rodgers has no run game and is forced to throw 30-40 times a game in a pass happy offense. Ben passes maybe 20-25 times a game in a more balanced offense. Last year when Ben threw a lot more and passed for career highs in yards and TD's the Steelers finished 9-7. That's not how this team plays.  I've never seen so much disrespect given to a 2 time super bowl champion QB who is 10-2 for his career in the playoffs and so much love given to a guy that just won his first playoff game 3 weeks ago.

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by seaona:

    PACKERS LAST 10 GAMES (INCLUDING PLAYOFFS) 7 wins -  3 losses - all loses were 4 points or less! that means they have almost won 10 in a row!  this team is always in it - rodgers has twice as many touchdowns as ben this season - and they were both out for a few games - rodgers has better passing rating and twice as many touchdowns - gotta go with the better qb in this one-
    green bay on money line (to risky with points) should get -135 at worst    laying big,,,,,---
    good luck all

    WORST POST EVER! Who cares what GB's record is their last 10 games. Pitt's last 10 games they're 8-2. And both QB's were not out a few games each. Ben missed 4 games and Rodgers missed 1.5. How can you even compare TD's with these two? Rodgers has no run game and is forced to throw 30-40 times a game in a pass happy offense. Ben passes maybe 20-25 times a game in a more balanced offense. Last year when Ben threw a lot more and passed for career highs in yards and TD's the Steelers finished 9-7. That's not how this team plays.  I've never seen so much disrespect given to a 2 time super bowl champion QB who is 10-2 for his career in the playoffs and so much love given to a guy that just won his first playoff game 3 weeks ago.

     
    FleshGordun
    FleshGordun
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2009
    Posts: 915
    Posted: Jan. 26, 2011 - 6:02 PM ET #99

    Quote Originally Posted by seaona:

    PACKERS LAST 10 GAMES (INCLUDING PLAYOFFS) 7 wins -  3 losses - all loses were 4 points or less! that means they have almost won 10 in a row!  this team is always in it - rodgers has twice as many touchdowns as ben this season - and they were both out for a few games - rodgers has better passing rating and twice as many touchdowns - gotta go with the better qb in this one-
    green bay on money line (to risky with points) should get -135 at worst    laying big,,,,,---
    good luck all

    "they have ALMOST won 10 in a row" Brilliant analysis there!! lol

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by seaona:

    PACKERS LAST 10 GAMES (INCLUDING PLAYOFFS) 7 wins -  3 losses - all loses were 4 points or less! that means they have almost won 10 in a row!  this team is always in it - rodgers has twice as many touchdowns as ben this season - and they were both out for a few games - rodgers has better passing rating and twice as many touchdowns - gotta go with the better qb in this one-
    green bay on money line (to risky with points) should get -135 at worst    laying big,,,,,---
    good luck all

    "they have ALMOST won 10 in a row" Brilliant analysis there!! lol

     
     
    vue21849
    vue21849
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2008
    Posts: 5051
    Posted: Jan. 26, 2011 - 6:15 PM ET #100

       My first reaction when the line was posted was that it's inflated. And at Super Bowl time, it usually is to accommodate less sophisiticated bettors.I feel the contest will be very close, till near the end. Both teams' playing styles are  a carbon copy of each other. Weeks ago, I saw the Packers potential as a possible SB team. And up till last weekend, I was gung ho, about Green Bay's chances to win it all. However, I ALWAYS bet with my head and not my heart! I'm a rabid Bears fan, but I bet against them. Sometimes, you have to make hard choices. Like when I chose the Jets over NE.  I'm seeing the Pack as the new darlings of the media, and the betting public. I feel the number could even rise to 3 pts in the public frenzy to bet on "a good thing"! After much analysis, I'm going with:

    PITTSBURGH  + 2.5

    Reply

       My first reaction when the line was posted was that it's inflated. And at Super Bowl time, it usually is to accommodate less sophisiticated bettors.I feel the contest will be very close, till near the end. Both teams' playing styles are  a carbon copy of each other. Weeks ago, I saw the Packers potential as a possible SB team. And up till last weekend, I was gung ho, about Green Bay's chances to win it all. However, I ALWAYS bet with my head and not my heart! I'm a rabid Bears fan, but I bet against them. Sometimes, you have to make hard choices. Like when I chose the Jets over NE.  I'm seeing the Pack as the new darlings of the media, and the betting public. I feel the number could even rise to 3 pts in the public frenzy to bet on "a good thing"! After much analysis, I'm going with:

    PITTSBURGH  + 2.5

    All Forums | Pro Football
    «First Previous 456 ... 121314 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • Tuesday 11/03/2026 1,021
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 289,741
    • All About streak Survivor! 6,123
    • I'm embarrassed for Trump supporters 62,967
    • 🏀😎🥳 NCAA hoops bets hitting over 63% each year for past few seasons!...BUT will this continue? 🤔 ...or regress?? 🤒🤕😧 192,906
    • Florida Man Election Day 2,943
    • PART DEUX 149
    • NCAA WEEK # 10 *** 151 *** 2,930
    • Trump's legacy? 35,092
    • ***Macwesties * Tue. Nov. 03, 2026 * NCAAF * Week #10 * NCAAF College Football Plays*** 3,129

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Privacy Choices Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo
    Covers Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.