• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • NFL Prediction Prices
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
        • Back
        • UFC
        • Odds
        • Picks
        • News & Analysis
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
      • Politics
        • Back
        • Politics
        • Politics Home
        • Presidential Election Odds
        • Midterm Election Odds
        • House Midterm Odds
        • Senate Midterm Odds
        • Texas Midterm Odds
        • Michigan Midterm Odds
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • UFC
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Kalshi Referral Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • Polymarket Referral Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • Betr Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
      • Gemini Predictions Promo Code
    • U.S. Midterm Election
      U.S. Midterm Election
      • Midterm Election Odds Tracker
      • House Control Odds
      • Senate Control Odds
      • How to Trade Midterm Elections
      • Trump Midterm Odds
      • Texas Senate Prediction
      • Best Political Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | Pro Football

    Pittsburgh at Green Bay (02/06/2011)

    «First Previous 234 ... 121314 Next Last»
    TNTTOMMY
    FleshGordun
    wackycracker
    jonfon
    Texan396
    ...
    Participants:
    Search
    Views: 47210
    Posts: 342
    «First Previous 234 ... 121314 Next Last»
     
    TNTTOMMY
    TNTTOMMY
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2008
    Posts: 118
    Posted: Jan. 24, 2011 - 2:36 PM ET #26

    [Quote: Originally Posted by freedomteam] Vue is the man!  Picked every game in the playoffs.

    Would love to have his knowledge.

    Thanks.

    Agreed!

    Reply

    [Quote: Originally Posted by freedomteam] Vue is the man!  Picked every game in the playoffs.

    Would love to have his knowledge.

    Thanks.

    Agreed!

     
    FleshGordun
    FleshGordun
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2009
    Posts: 915
    Posted: Jan. 24, 2011 - 2:47 PM ET #27

    12/20/09 PIT 37 GB 36

    Rogers 383 yds. 3 TD 0 INT

    Rothlesberger 503 yrd's 3 TD 0 INT

    Reply

    12/20/09 PIT 37 GB 36

    Rogers 383 yds. 3 TD 0 INT

    Rothlesberger 503 yrd's 3 TD 0 INT

     
    wackycracker
    wackycracker
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2010
    Posts: 483
    Posted: Jan. 24, 2011 - 3:15 PM ET #28

    minus 2.5 and 45.5 o/u--hmmm,I see these lines bouncing around like an overinflated basketball--"Said the big fish to the little fish ---don't bite the hook til the bait get's better"--one of my wackyisms
    Reply
    minus 2.5 and 45.5 o/u--hmmm,I see these lines bouncing around like an overinflated basketball--"Said the big fish to the little fish ---don't bite the hook til the bait get's better"--one of my wackyisms
     
    jonfon
    jonfon
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2008
    Posts: 176
    Posted: Jan. 24, 2011 - 3:45 PM ET #29

    Quote Originally Posted by Irisheyez:

    Man.....hard to go against Pitt here.....very hard to do that......Bears had a chance to tie that game late with a third string qB.......as a matter of fact, I submit that if Hannie would have come in and played the third quarter, the Bears would have had even a better chance to win that game.  If the Packers struggle to score 14 offensive points in that game after an opening 7 point drive.....what the heck is Pitt gonna do to the 6th seed, 6 lose Pack.......Looks like the wrong team is favored here.  But, that is just a gut reaction without any real thought or digging. 


    ok...let's put it out there right now and be done with such NONSENSE..........

    IN THE NEXT 2 WEEKS, anyone who brings up the Seedings (2 vs. 6)  has absolutely no credibility.

    they mean NOTHING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    don't waste our time please...thanks.

    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by Irisheyez:

    Man.....hard to go against Pitt here.....very hard to do that......Bears had a chance to tie that game late with a third string qB.......as a matter of fact, I submit that if Hannie would have come in and played the third quarter, the Bears would have had even a better chance to win that game.  If the Packers struggle to score 14 offensive points in that game after an opening 7 point drive.....what the heck is Pitt gonna do to the 6th seed, 6 lose Pack.......Looks like the wrong team is favored here.  But, that is just a gut reaction without any real thought or digging. 


    ok...let's put it out there right now and be done with such NONSENSE..........

    IN THE NEXT 2 WEEKS, anyone who brings up the Seedings (2 vs. 6)  has absolutely no credibility.

    they mean NOTHING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    don't waste our time please...thanks.

     
    Texan396
    Texan396
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2007
    Posts: 950
    Posted: Jan. 24, 2011 - 3:56 PM ET #30

    Under 1st half

    Over 2nd Half

    Watch the spread and try to get a better number on the Cheeseheads closer to game time.The Pitt money should move it by then.

    Reply

    Under 1st half

    Over 2nd Half

    Watch the spread and try to get a better number on the Cheeseheads closer to game time.The Pitt money should move it by then.

     
    forkball
    forkball
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2009
    Posts: 566
    Posted: Jan. 24, 2011 - 3:56 PM ET #31

    Pack looked great against Atlanta. . .

    But not so great against Philly and a hobbling Vick who was one pass away from beating Green Bay.  Rodgers was mediocre. . .

    And again in Chicago, the Bears were on the thirty yard line in position to tie the game late with their third string q.b.

    Rodger q.b. rating. . .73.  Very mediocre.

    Pittsburgh took care of a better Ravens team with a come from behind victory and then downed the Jets in the first half only throwing 5 yes 5 times in the second half for the conservative win.

    For a team that had to win the last game of the regular season to get in the playoffs and has looked mediocre in its last 3 out of 4 games, how in the world is Green Bay favored?

     

     

    Reply

    Pack looked great against Atlanta. . .

    But not so great against Philly and a hobbling Vick who was one pass away from beating Green Bay.  Rodgers was mediocre. . .

    And again in Chicago, the Bears were on the thirty yard line in position to tie the game late with their third string q.b.

    Rodger q.b. rating. . .73.  Very mediocre.

    Pittsburgh took care of a better Ravens team with a come from behind victory and then downed the Jets in the first half only throwing 5 yes 5 times in the second half for the conservative win.

    For a team that had to win the last game of the regular season to get in the playoffs and has looked mediocre in its last 3 out of 4 games, how in the world is Green Bay favored?

     

     

     
    TheQuadYeah
    TheQuadYeah
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2010
    Posts: 1827
    Posted: Jan. 24, 2011 - 4:23 PM ET #32

    Quote Originally Posted by freedomteam:

    Vue is the man!  Picked every game in the playoffs.

    Would love to have his knowledge.

    Thanks.

     

    Me too, hopefully for your sake and mine he likes the Packers -     -2.5?!?! How are the Pack the underdogs? They almost didn't even make the playoffs - Vegas fix is in full effect people - get ready.......

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by freedomteam:

    Vue is the man!  Picked every game in the playoffs.

    Would love to have his knowledge.

    Thanks.

     

    Me too, hopefully for your sake and mine he likes the Packers -     -2.5?!?! How are the Pack the underdogs? They almost didn't even make the playoffs - Vegas fix is in full effect people - get ready.......

     
    FleshGordun
    FleshGordun
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2009
    Posts: 915
    Posted: Jan. 24, 2011 - 4:32 PM ET #33

    Public perception. Both teams take the foot off the gas in the 2nd half GB forgiven against back up QB's in CHI, PIT not they look like the weaker team giving up points to Sanchez & co. and not scoring. Both teams did the same thing protect the lead, dont make any mistakes on offense, let the defense keep everything in front of them make them earn every yard and point. I'm thinking GB fav. helps even the sides.  Both teams match up very well on paper, with PIT SB experienced players makes the difference, early lean PIT.
    Reply
    Public perception. Both teams take the foot off the gas in the 2nd half GB forgiven against back up QB's in CHI, PIT not they look like the weaker team giving up points to Sanchez & co. and not scoring. Both teams did the same thing protect the lead, dont make any mistakes on offense, let the defense keep everything in front of them make them earn every yard and point. I'm thinking GB fav. helps even the sides.  Both teams match up very well on paper, with PIT SB experienced players makes the difference, early lean PIT.
     
    bigdaddy87
    bigdaddy87
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2010
    Posts: 53
    Posted: Jan. 24, 2011 - 4:43 PM ET #34

    Green Bay is tooooo Soft for Pittsburg, did you see what they did to the best defense in the NFL.. ate them for LUNCH AND SPIT THEM OUT.. If you seen my write up last week, I had PITT.. I HAVE PITT AGAIN.. dont fall for this favored crap.. they R the dog... NO DOUBT IN MY MIND... that Green bay gets beat.. and they get beat badly... ROOF ROOF ROOF... 

    Take your bestfriends wifes sister to bed with this bet
    Buy on bad news sell on good
    Reply
    Green Bay is tooooo Soft for Pittsburg, did you see what they did to the best defense in the NFL.. ate them for LUNCH AND SPIT THEM OUT.. If you seen my write up last week, I had PITT.. I HAVE PITT AGAIN.. dont fall for this favored crap.. they R the dog... NO DOUBT IN MY MIND... that Green bay gets beat.. and they get beat badly... ROOF ROOF ROOF... 

    Take your bestfriends wifes sister to bed with this bet
     
    d33jay86
    d33jay86
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2008
    Posts: 262
    Posted: Jan. 24, 2011 - 5:00 PM ET #35

    Quote Originally Posted by LRpisano:



    Green Bay also went scoreless in the 2nd half of the Bears game, except for that pick 6 by the Green Bay DL guy, other than that their offense was a non factor (For scoring). I like Pittsburgh in this game.

     EXCUSES, EXCUSES, EXCUSES. should of, would of, could of but didnt. pitts didnt score shit in the second half! so what chu gotta say bout that? ur facts r non relevant, u sound like a HOMER!!!
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by LRpisano:



    Green Bay also went scoreless in the 2nd half of the Bears game, except for that pick 6 by the Green Bay DL guy, other than that their offense was a non factor (For scoring). I like Pittsburgh in this game.

     EXCUSES, EXCUSES, EXCUSES. should of, would of, could of but didnt. pitts didnt score shit in the second half! so what chu gotta say bout that? ur facts r non relevant, u sound like a HOMER!!!
     
    xbaggypants
    xbaggypants
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2010
    Posts: 14200
    Posted: Jan. 24, 2011 - 5:01 PM ET #36

    PACKERS
    Reply
    PACKERS
     
    outkastd4eva
    outkastd4eva
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2009
    Posts: 236
    Posted: Jan. 24, 2011 - 5:03 PM ET #37

    Both teams came out good in the 1st halves in the conf championships... Any thoughts on 1st half bet? Pack -1 and total 22.5. I like the over. Also liking teaser with Steelers +8.5 and over 39.5. And I knew Cutler would blow, that game was like taking candy from a baby! GB should've won that game by 14+ if Rodgers didn't throw that pick to Urlacher.

    I am from the 'Burgh and I can honestly understand why the line is Pack -2.5 b/c they are really on fire right now, but still very beatable. I will post again soon. But for now...

    GO STEELERS!
    Reply
    Both teams came out good in the 1st halves in the conf championships... Any thoughts on 1st half bet? Pack -1 and total 22.5. I like the over. Also liking teaser with Steelers +8.5 and over 39.5. And I knew Cutler would blow, that game was like taking candy from a baby! GB should've won that game by 14+ if Rodgers didn't throw that pick to Urlacher.

    I am from the 'Burgh and I can honestly understand why the line is Pack -2.5 b/c they are really on fire right now, but still very beatable. I will post again soon. But for now...

    GO STEELERS!
     
    d33jay86
    d33jay86
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2008
    Posts: 262
    Posted: Jan. 24, 2011 - 5:06 PM ET #38

    Quote Originally Posted by bigdaddy87:

    Green Bay is tooooo Soft for Pittsburg, did you see what they did to the best defense in the NFL.. ate them for LUNCH AND SPIT THEM OUT.. If you seen my write up last week, I had PITT.. I HAVE PITT AGAIN.. dont fall for this favored crap.. they R the dog... NO DOUBT IN MY MIND... that Green bay gets beat.. and they get beat badly... ROOF ROOF ROOF... 

    Take your bestfriends wifes sister to bed with this bet

    now we know that u dont watch the NFL. PITTS is the number 1 defense. second, DID U SEE WHAT SANCHEZ DID TO THEM IN THE 2nd HALF? IMAGINE WHAT AARON could do! i think your still madd because they WHOOPED UP ON YOUR CUBS! ahaha. i GUESS IT WASNT AS EASY AS U THOUGHT! I GUESS CUTLER was tOO SCARED OF THAT SOFT GB DEFENSE!! ahaha. your a JOKE!
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by bigdaddy87:

    Green Bay is tooooo Soft for Pittsburg, did you see what they did to the best defense in the NFL.. ate them for LUNCH AND SPIT THEM OUT.. If you seen my write up last week, I had PITT.. I HAVE PITT AGAIN.. dont fall for this favored crap.. they R the dog... NO DOUBT IN MY MIND... that Green bay gets beat.. and they get beat badly... ROOF ROOF ROOF... 

    Take your bestfriends wifes sister to bed with this bet

    now we know that u dont watch the NFL. PITTS is the number 1 defense. second, DID U SEE WHAT SANCHEZ DID TO THEM IN THE 2nd HALF? IMAGINE WHAT AARON could do! i think your still madd because they WHOOPED UP ON YOUR CUBS! ahaha. i GUESS IT WASNT AS EASY AS U THOUGHT! I GUESS CUTLER was tOO SCARED OF THAT SOFT GB DEFENSE!! ahaha. your a JOKE!
     
    stalker
    stalker
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2008
    Posts: 467
    Posted: Jan. 24, 2011 - 5:09 PM ET #39

    Quote Originally Posted by Biscuiteater1:

    Good point,but the Steelers know that and he was still able to do it.

    It's weird that you say the Steelers knew that and still couldn't stop it because didn't the same thing happen in the packers game? They get up to a nice 2 touchdown lead midway through the 3rd and an undrafted 3rd string QB comes in and completes 13-20 for 153 yards and almost brings them back when GB knew they weren't going to run the ball. 

     

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by Biscuiteater1:

    Good point,but the Steelers know that and he was still able to do it.

    It's weird that you say the Steelers knew that and still couldn't stop it because didn't the same thing happen in the packers game? They get up to a nice 2 touchdown lead midway through the 3rd and an undrafted 3rd string QB comes in and completes 13-20 for 153 yards and almost brings them back when GB knew they weren't going to run the ball. 

     

     
    baconbits
    baconbits
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2010
    Posts: 120
    Posted: Jan. 24, 2011 - 5:15 PM ET #40

    Im only watching the game for the commercials, outcome has already been determined by the big shots in Vegas in their fancy offices, Green Bay,,,,,,,,,,, LOCK,,,,,,,,,,,, yeah I said it, LOCK! I could give you 1000 reasons to take the Pack & 999 to take Pitt,,,,,,,,,,, the 1 variable, 6 seed laying CHALK, Enjoy the game!
    Reply
    Im only watching the game for the commercials, outcome has already been determined by the big shots in Vegas in their fancy offices, Green Bay,,,,,,,,,,, LOCK,,,,,,,,,,,, yeah I said it, LOCK! I could give you 1000 reasons to take the Pack & 999 to take Pitt,,,,,,,,,,, the 1 variable, 6 seed laying CHALK, Enjoy the game!
     
    stalker
    stalker
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2008
    Posts: 467
    Posted: Jan. 24, 2011 - 5:22 PM ET #41

    Quote Originally Posted by FleshGordun:

    Stalker gets it. Both winners build a lead get painfully conservative and put the game on two excellent defenses that can make the other team burn clock. PIT has the experience in SB's IMO this si a huge factor, but they have some injuries, and Polumolu still not 100%. Still PIT edge at saftey GB edge at corners. lineabckers edge PIT, D line even. Offense run game even, passing even, O-line GB. Special teams after further review.

    Agree with most of that. Offense run game I think is in Pitt's favor. Mendenhall is a two-time 1,000 yard rusher while GB brings in a guy in Starks that was a relatively unkown until the Philly game. Passing game has gotta be in GB's favor. They've been relying on Rodgers all year cause they have no running game and he's gotten them here. The Steelers can win if Ben has a bad or even a so-so game (look at the '05 Superbowl and even the Jets game as examples) but GB needs Rodgers to play well if they're going to win. If he's off they're screwed. I don't think either O-Line is good. Pitt has already lost 3 guys throughout the year and those guys weren't even that good to begin with. Pouncey will play in the game (he had the same injury on the other ankle in college and played the next game) and he's the only reliable one. Bulaga and Clifton have given up a lot of sacks this year. Harrison and/or Woodley could have big games.

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by FleshGordun:

    Stalker gets it. Both winners build a lead get painfully conservative and put the game on two excellent defenses that can make the other team burn clock. PIT has the experience in SB's IMO this si a huge factor, but they have some injuries, and Polumolu still not 100%. Still PIT edge at saftey GB edge at corners. lineabckers edge PIT, D line even. Offense run game even, passing even, O-line GB. Special teams after further review.

    Agree with most of that. Offense run game I think is in Pitt's favor. Mendenhall is a two-time 1,000 yard rusher while GB brings in a guy in Starks that was a relatively unkown until the Philly game. Passing game has gotta be in GB's favor. They've been relying on Rodgers all year cause they have no running game and he's gotten them here. The Steelers can win if Ben has a bad or even a so-so game (look at the '05 Superbowl and even the Jets game as examples) but GB needs Rodgers to play well if they're going to win. If he's off they're screwed. I don't think either O-Line is good. Pitt has already lost 3 guys throughout the year and those guys weren't even that good to begin with. Pouncey will play in the game (he had the same injury on the other ankle in college and played the next game) and he's the only reliable one. Bulaga and Clifton have given up a lot of sacks this year. Harrison and/or Woodley could have big games.

     
    bigdaddy87
    bigdaddy87
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2010
    Posts: 53
    Posted: Jan. 24, 2011 - 5:40 PM ET #42

    Quote Originally Posted by d33jay86:


    now we know that u dont watch the NFL. PITTS is the number 1 defense. second, DID U SEE WHAT SANCHEZ DID TO THEM IN THE 2nd HALF? IMAGINE WHAT AARON could do! i think your still madd because they WHOOPED UP ON YOUR CUBS! ahaha. i GUESS IT WASNT AS EASY AS U THOUGHT! I GUESS CUTLER was tOO SCARED OF THAT SOFT GB DEFENSE!! ahaha. your a JOKE!



    You miserable piece of crap.. THE BEARS WON THAT GAME... PITT will beat the living bejesus out of a 6th seed.. MY GAWD.. they lost to detroit this year.. they will get what they having coming to them this week.. same as you, if you talk dumb again.. 
    Buy on bad news sell on good
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by d33jay86:


    now we know that u dont watch the NFL. PITTS is the number 1 defense. second, DID U SEE WHAT SANCHEZ DID TO THEM IN THE 2nd HALF? IMAGINE WHAT AARON could do! i think your still madd because they WHOOPED UP ON YOUR CUBS! ahaha. i GUESS IT WASNT AS EASY AS U THOUGHT! I GUESS CUTLER was tOO SCARED OF THAT SOFT GB DEFENSE!! ahaha. your a JOKE!



    You miserable piece of crap.. THE BEARS WON THAT GAME... PITT will beat the living bejesus out of a 6th seed.. MY GAWD.. they lost to detroit this year.. they will get what they having coming to them this week.. same as you, if you talk dumb again.. 
     
    bigdaddyhpd
    bigdaddyhpd
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2003
    Posts: 8330
    Posted: Jan. 24, 2011 - 6:36 PM ET #43

    First of all I would like to give BIG props to the Steelers/Packers and their fans for making it to the BIG game

    I feel that the Green Bay Packers coaching staff should deserve some credit for their game planning during the playoffs. I think Rodgers was at his best when he was going by what was scripted to start the games. I guess that's why GB was so terrific in the first half of games during the playoffs. Seems as though the second half of games where Rodgers took control of the offense were not as dynamic. I also feel that the GB defense is a bit under the radar and should get a lot of credit for getting the Packers this far. Starks seems to be stepping up as the starter at tailback but not real sure how he will fair against this tough Steelers run defense.

    The Steelers already been to this show a few times and should be able to game plan really well without being distracted. They are very tough on both sides of the ball. If they get their running game going as they did against the Jets they will be looking at another Lombardi trophy.

    Story book ending would be...Green Bay wins Super Bowl and Favre is quickly forgotten.

    Probably best prop bet is that the commentators mention Favre's name over 10 times during the Super Bowl

    Anyway should be a great game and I'm not sure which way I'm going as of yet...maybe Packers at the half

    Reply

    First of all I would like to give BIG props to the Steelers/Packers and their fans for making it to the BIG game

    I feel that the Green Bay Packers coaching staff should deserve some credit for their game planning during the playoffs. I think Rodgers was at his best when he was going by what was scripted to start the games. I guess that's why GB was so terrific in the first half of games during the playoffs. Seems as though the second half of games where Rodgers took control of the offense were not as dynamic. I also feel that the GB defense is a bit under the radar and should get a lot of credit for getting the Packers this far. Starks seems to be stepping up as the starter at tailback but not real sure how he will fair against this tough Steelers run defense.

    The Steelers already been to this show a few times and should be able to game plan really well without being distracted. They are very tough on both sides of the ball. If they get their running game going as they did against the Jets they will be looking at another Lombardi trophy.

    Story book ending would be...Green Bay wins Super Bowl and Favre is quickly forgotten.

    Probably best prop bet is that the commentators mention Favre's name over 10 times during the Super Bowl

    Anyway should be a great game and I'm not sure which way I'm going as of yet...maybe Packers at the half

     
    bustn2night
    bustn2night
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2006
    Posts: 1142
    Posted: Jan. 24, 2011 - 6:52 PM ET #44

    Quote Originally Posted by coversROTHSTEIN:

     

    IF you were watching the game, you SHOULD know that once GB knew Cutler was out, they began running a generic offense. The second half was the most basic offense I've seen out of GB all year. They wanted to save their playbook for the Superbowl. If you have ever seen TODD COLLINS play, you would have done the same thing. Packers knew their D would win the game and wanted to limit the amount of exposure of their playbook...

     

    *Vegas is begging for Pitt money right here.  On every TV show today, everyone is all over the Steelers. Yet, GB is favored as a 6 seed.

    *Pitt OLINE is banged up. If you watched the Jets game, you should have noticed how many stupid blitzes the Jets ran. They would line up with one DT and everyone on one side of the line. Not too hard for an OLINE to pick up.  Packers come from all over the place. Packers will have a field day on this OLINE.

    *Power vs Speed.  However, GB also has power. So Steelers will play power football on offense while the Packers have the 2nd best D in the NFL. On O, the Packers speed will shred Pitts horrendous secondary. Pack will come out 4 and 5 wide and force Pitt to take their strength (LBS) off the field. Unless they want Harrison and CO. trying to cover Jones, Nelson, Jennings, and Driver.

     

     

     

    You're on crack!      Think you could hate on a great Steelers team anymore? Please put your pennies on the 6 seed team.

    Sorry that Pittsburgh destroyed the hard knocks Jets.

    AFC rules NFC for years now. Steelers 31 - 27.

    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by coversROTHSTEIN:

     

    IF you were watching the game, you SHOULD know that once GB knew Cutler was out, they began running a generic offense. The second half was the most basic offense I've seen out of GB all year. They wanted to save their playbook for the Superbowl. If you have ever seen TODD COLLINS play, you would have done the same thing. Packers knew their D would win the game and wanted to limit the amount of exposure of their playbook...

     

    *Vegas is begging for Pitt money right here.  On every TV show today, everyone is all over the Steelers. Yet, GB is favored as a 6 seed.

    *Pitt OLINE is banged up. If you watched the Jets game, you should have noticed how many stupid blitzes the Jets ran. They would line up with one DT and everyone on one side of the line. Not too hard for an OLINE to pick up.  Packers come from all over the place. Packers will have a field day on this OLINE.

    *Power vs Speed.  However, GB also has power. So Steelers will play power football on offense while the Packers have the 2nd best D in the NFL. On O, the Packers speed will shred Pitts horrendous secondary. Pack will come out 4 and 5 wide and force Pitt to take their strength (LBS) off the field. Unless they want Harrison and CO. trying to cover Jones, Nelson, Jennings, and Driver.

     

     

     

    You're on crack!      Think you could hate on a great Steelers team anymore? Please put your pennies on the 6 seed team.

    Sorry that Pittsburgh destroyed the hard knocks Jets.

    AFC rules NFC for years now. Steelers 31 - 27.

     
    Sandman23
    Sandman23
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2008
    Posts: 657
    Posted: Jan. 24, 2011 - 7:57 PM ET #45

    Lets end this year with the largest wager of the year

    Pittsburgh +115
    Reply
    Lets end this year with the largest wager of the year

    Pittsburgh +115
     
    Lar1212
    Lar1212
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2009
    Posts: 12908
    Posted: Jan. 24, 2011 - 7:57 PM ET #46

    I don't like to brag, but I went 4-0 yesterday and +12.0 units...

    Early leans:

    UNDER 45.0 (strong)

    PIT +2.5

    Reply

    I don't like to brag, but I went 4-0 yesterday and +12.0 units...

    Early leans:

    UNDER 45.0 (strong)

    PIT +2.5

     
    babygus17
    babygus17
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2010
    Posts: 332
    Posted: Jan. 24, 2011 - 8:34 PM ET #47

    LINE IS A HEAD SCRATCHER..... FEEL IT SHOULD BE FLIP FLOPPED, BUT GOTTA GO WITH MY BOYS. THE KARMA OF BENS VIP BATHROOM IN GA WILL CATCH UP TO HIM. RAJI AND CLAY WILL BE IN BENS GRILL ALL DAY FORCING TURNOVERS. LOMBARDI COMES HOME!
    Reply
    LINE IS A HEAD SCRATCHER..... FEEL IT SHOULD BE FLIP FLOPPED, BUT GOTTA GO WITH MY BOYS. THE KARMA OF BENS VIP BATHROOM IN GA WILL CATCH UP TO HIM. RAJI AND CLAY WILL BE IN BENS GRILL ALL DAY FORCING TURNOVERS. LOMBARDI COMES HOME!
     
    wannatesdr
    wannatesdr
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2010
    Posts: 542
    Posted: Jan. 24, 2011 - 8:36 PM ET #48

    GOOD LUCK ALL
    Reply
    GOOD LUCK ALL
     
    echelon1
    echelon1
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2010
    Posts: 338
    Posted: Jan. 24, 2011 - 9:04 PM ET #49

    GB pass rush will get to Ben much more than Jets were able...more pressures and sacks.  Especially with Pitt Oline banged up even more now.  I too am confused by the line.  Could've sworn it would be Pitt -2.5.  Was looking forward to GB moneyline and getting a better payout.  Either way taking the Pack.  GB can limit the Pitt offense.  Also think GB offense will have good success on this strong Pitt defense by Pack's strength passing will take advantage of Pitt's only semi-weakness.  See it GB 27-24 with late Pitt TD.  Would love to take the over, but just too dicey with two solid defenses.  Jets game woulda been evem lower scoring without fumble TD.  Nowhere near this high total.  So just taking Packers. 
    Reply
    GB pass rush will get to Ben much more than Jets were able...more pressures and sacks.  Especially with Pitt Oline banged up even more now.  I too am confused by the line.  Could've sworn it would be Pitt -2.5.  Was looking forward to GB moneyline and getting a better payout.  Either way taking the Pack.  GB can limit the Pitt offense.  Also think GB offense will have good success on this strong Pitt defense by Pack's strength passing will take advantage of Pitt's only semi-weakness.  See it GB 27-24 with late Pitt TD.  Would love to take the over, but just too dicey with two solid defenses.  Jets game woulda been evem lower scoring without fumble TD.  Nowhere near this high total.  So just taking Packers. 
     
     
    Radiators
    Radiators
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2007
    Posts: 2937
    Posted: Jan. 24, 2011 - 9:37 PM ET #50

    PACKERS
    Reply
    PACKERS
    All Forums | Pro Football
    «First Previous 234 ... 121314 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • Tuesday 11/03/2026 1,017
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 289,741
    • All About streak Survivor! 6,120
    • I'm embarrassed for Trump supporters 62,964
    • 🏀😎🥳 NCAA hoops bets hitting over 63% each year for past few seasons!...BUT will this continue? 🤔 ...or regress?? 🤒🤕😧 192,892
    • Florida Man Election Day 2,932
    • PART DEUX 143
    • NCAA WEEK # 10 *** 151 *** 2,897
    • Trump's legacy? 35,092
    • ***Macwesties * Tue. Nov. 03, 2026 * NCAAF * Week #10 * NCAAF College Football Plays*** 3,089

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Privacy Choices Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo
    Covers Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.