Posted:
#26
SD will play like a 11-1 team on national TV.
GAME 24-3 SD
Oakland at San Diego (12/04/2008)
Neither team is a big scorer and they both suck!
Posted:
#29
Chargers ML -450 is the only play for me.
From what I've seen lately, I wouldn't lay 10pts with the Chargers if they were playing San Diego State. However, there's no way they'll lose their 4th game in a row to a team slightly more pathetic than they are. Not in San Diego at least. I'll put up a lot to win a little in this situation.
Posted:
#33
Quote Originally Posted by johnnyjammer:
I dont know about the under only because if Mcfadden is effective in the run they will score..had only like 25 yards last weekend...so idk......I might just wait till half time and take a shot at what looks decent......I can tell you guys this...I took the over on the second half of last nights toilet bowl game between the texans and jags....everybody thought I was nuts....you have to consider the overall over/under and realize most of the time the oddsmakes are in range of that number and if they are way under than mean at halftime regardless of what is going on in the first half there is still 30 mins to get to that approximation...and of course the game being fixed as the wwe lol gl with your bets!! 
hahaha wow... u got lucky duder... love how you say these things... they were trying to run the clock out and ended up just running into the endzone a lot
Posted:
#37
all i know is one thing...SD should not be laying 10 pts to any team in existence right now. They are in total disarray and Norv Turner is one of the worst and least emotional coaches out there. Might as well put a tree trunk with a headset up there. All being said if current trend continues, Oakland will follow their horrible home loss with a STRAIGHT UP WIN. But to be safe, +10 looks solid IMO. LT clearly not the same as last year, the defense is soul-less w/o roid head merriman, and all it takes is one big run by a run-oriented team like raiders to reallt put pressure on SD covering 10 points. Think of it like this: If raiders score (gasp) a TD, Sd has to score 3 just to cover. Whats the more logical choice here? Im on oakland first half give me a TD and they cover +7 if you can find in 5 dimes
Posted:
#42
as everyone says..this is the time of year the bookies are cashing in for the off season....early lean on chargers and the under but all these national tv venues have been going way over the total. I will still take the Chargers as they break out of their funk. Oakland is all over the place but SD def is horrible .... 35 to 17, just covering the total.
over 41.5
Hot Forum Topics
