Posted:
#26
pats 31-17 watch out for the new england defence this year
New England at Tennessee (09/09/2012)
Posted:
#29
Quote Originally Posted by jmac1204:
Every year I talk about taking NE BIG in week 1. The lines always look soft and fishy, but every year in recent memory other than the year Brady went down, they've covered. I guess the question is will their O-Line be as bad as it's looked. They shouldn't have a problem at C, since they had no problems with the 4 they used last year, with Mankins and Solder playing 4 quarters, and with the fact that the TN D-Line is suspect at best, this is the year I drive to Vegas and lay 5k on them at -5(hopefully).
Every year I talk about taking NE BIG in week 1. The lines always look soft and fishy, but every year in recent memory other than the year Brady went down, they've covered. I guess the question is will their O-Line be as bad as it's looked. They shouldn't have a problem at C, since they had no problems with the 4 they used last year, with Mankins and Solder playing 4 quarters, and with the fact that the TN D-Line is suspect at best, this is the year I drive to Vegas and lay 5k on them at -5(hopefully).
Dont do it dude, I reviewed their opening history and they are 3/4 against the spread. I decided not to bet this game. IT seems like vegas keeps dropping the line to lure more suckers in.
Posted:
#37
someone please explain this line to me. i know the titans are home but for real? 4.5 now? this should be a 12 point spread. the patriots are suppose to win the super bowl this year or at least make it to the super bowl.. tennessee is a strggle team a new quarterback basically.. they are a 7-9, 8-8 team.. i dont get it.. i took the titans thoguh cause this a trap game.. vegas begging you to pick the patriots and everyone is. cant wait to see how this one plays out
Posted:
#40
Quote Originally Posted by babygus17:
fishiest line of week 1, we are witnesses to reverse line movement at its finest hour. pats did look like crap in preseason and O line did have its issues
fishiest line of week 1, we are witnesses to reverse line movement at its finest hour. pats did look like crap in preseason and O line did have its issues
and why does this line movement affect YOUR pick soo much ??? NE is CLEARLY the more dominant team by far, stop worrying about vegas and worry about the stats and facts... and that is Brady and the PATS OWN and tomorrow will be no different.
Pats win 35-17
Posted:
#41
[Quote: Originally Posted by RaMpAgE101]
and why does this line movement affect YOUR pick soo much ??? NE is CLEARLY the more dominant team by far, stop worrying about vegas and worry about the stats and facts... and that is Brady and the PATS OWN and tomorrow will be no different.
Pats win 35-17
and why does this line movement affect YOUR pick soo much ??? NE is CLEARLY the more dominant team by far, stop worrying about vegas and worry about the stats and facts... and that is Brady and the PATS OWN and tomorrow will be no different.
Pats win 35-17
1. PUBLIC TEAM= TONS OF ACTION ON THEIR SIDE.
2. WHEN DO WE SEE PATS WITH LOW LINES?
Posted:
#42
Quote Originally Posted by mellowman7883:
Dont do it dude, I reviewed their opening history and they are 3/4 against the spread. I decided not to bet this game. IT seems like vegas keeps dropping the line to lure more suckers in.
Ok I changed my mind, I'm staying away. I'm sure I'll hate myself when the Pats roll but oh well.
these 3 picks of mine,screams 
....happy nfl sunday guys! don't u just love football season? 
good luck! let's make some 
Posted:
#45
Quote Originally Posted by mellowman7883:
Dont do it dude, I reviewed their opening history and they are 3/4 against the spread. I decided not to bet this game. IT seems like vegas keeps dropping the line to lure more suckers in.
...or to lure more "trap" conspirators in...GL with that Titans ticket, you're gonna need it...Pats win by at LEAST a TD
Posted:
#48
All I have to say is do your research on Jake Locker's history against teams that showed some defense. I am an expert in the PAC and have watched Locker become very, very small in games where he was pressured. I believe he had some sub-100 yard games last year even.
JMHO
Tex aka Tony Bucca
Posted:
#49
All I have to say is do your research on Jake Locker's history against teams that showed some defense. I am an expert in the PAC and have watched Locker become very, very small in games where he was pressured. I believe he had some sub-100 yard games last year even.
JMHO
Tex aka Tony Bucca
Hot Forum Topics
