New England at Seattle (02/01/2015)
First and foremost ppl kill me thinking as soon as the Pats are in the super bowl they are sure winners. If you look at the last 2 super bowls "Tom Brady" has played in bc that is what makes ppl lean towards the pats is him. They have played a defensive minded team from the NFC being the Giants and this Seattle team is far more cohesive and talented defensively from the DL to Secondary. Yes Seattle played horrific on Sunday but guess what? They CAME BACK AND REFUSE TO LOSE. Yes GB let them come back blah, blah, but in OT it was new ball game and they couldnt stop Seattle when they needed the big stop. Bad games do happen but to come back on one of the biggest stages to overcome adversity in the worst way and win, tells me everything about that squad. Now lets look at last year's SB, everyone raved how Manning was going to pick Seattle D apart and yes many of you will be bias and say NO I KNEW SEATTLE WOULD WIN bc you think of Peyton in his current deflated form but many of you did believe he was going to beat Seattle last year and he got embarrassed. This is the thing for you ppl who just gamble and dont know football. You collapse the pocket on Aaron Rodgers when he's healthy and he keeps the play alive with his feet. You collapse the pocket on Peyton or Brady they either get sacked or they throw the ball in the dirt. Many times the pocket was collapse on GB yesterday and A-Rod kept the play alive with his one leg. Watch the first half of the Ravens game, Tom hates and despises pressure so bad that it makes him yell at the ref and say they are breathing on me throw the damn flag. Seattle knows if they can contain Blount this game can get out of hand. Chancellor matches up great against Gronk and not to mention their LB's can run with him. The only person who has a potential chance to do some good is Edelman. Watch the same recipe as the broncos, press the WRs at the line and bring pressure and make Tom beat you over the top and last time I check about 80% of Tom throws are throws are 15 yards or less. Do your homework and watch film ppl. The pats 4 losses this season are against aggressive suffocating blitzing defenses (Miami, Buffalo, GB, and KC). Yes the Pats destroyed the Colts but this is the same Colts D that let a no name Jonas Gray run for over 200 yds on them so I'm not in ah like the Pats are unstoppable. You give this Seattle D 2 weeks to prepare for an explosive offense and last year's SB proves what they can do. But at the end of the day that's why they call it gambling because you can pick who you want. Seattle wins back to back Super Bowl and let me jump on this line since its at a PK it line for 2 dimes. WISH YOU ALL GOOD LUCK
First and foremost ppl kill me thinking as soon as the Pats are in the super bowl they are sure winners. If you look at the last 2 super bowls "Tom Brady" has played in bc that is what makes ppl lean towards the pats is him. They have played a defensive minded team from the NFC being the Giants and this Seattle team is far more cohesive and talented defensively from the DL to Secondary. Yes Seattle played horrific on Sunday but guess what? They CAME BACK AND REFUSE TO LOSE. Yes GB let them come back blah, blah, but in OT it was new ball game and they couldnt stop Seattle when they needed the big stop. Bad games do happen but to come back on one of the biggest stages to overcome adversity in the worst way and win, tells me everything about that squad. Now lets look at last year's SB, everyone raved how Manning was going to pick Seattle D apart and yes many of you will be bias and say NO I KNEW SEATTLE WOULD WIN bc you think of Peyton in his current deflated form but many of you did believe he was going to beat Seattle last year and he got embarrassed. This is the thing for you ppl who just gamble and dont know football. You collapse the pocket on Aaron Rodgers when he's healthy and he keeps the play alive with his feet. You collapse the pocket on Peyton or Brady they either get sacked or they throw the ball in the dirt. Many times the pocket was collapse on GB yesterday and A-Rod kept the play alive with his one leg. Watch the first half of the Ravens game, Tom hates and despises pressure so bad that it makes him yell at the ref and say they are breathing on me throw the damn flag. Seattle knows if they can contain Blount this game can get out of hand. Chancellor matches up great against Gronk and not to mention their LB's can run with him. The only person who has a potential chance to do some good is Edelman. Watch the same recipe as the broncos, press the WRs at the line and bring pressure and make Tom beat you over the top and last time I check about 80% of Tom throws are throws are 15 yards or less. Do your homework and watch film ppl. The pats 4 losses this season are against aggressive suffocating blitzing defenses (Miami, Buffalo, GB, and KC). Yes the Pats destroyed the Colts but this is the same Colts D that let a no name Jonas Gray run for over 200 yds on them so I'm not in ah like the Pats are unstoppable. You give this Seattle D 2 weeks to prepare for an explosive offense and last year's SB proves what they can do. But at the end of the day that's why they call it gambling because you can pick who you want. Seattle wins back to back Super Bowl and let me jump on this line since its at a PK it line for 2 dimes. WISH YOU ALL GOOD LUCK
Anyone who seriously bets a side on this Superbowl is a bone head in my opinion. Other than a few prop bets, the only thing that I would bet is over in the 2nd half when desperation kicks in.
Anyone who seriously bets a side on this Superbowl is a bone head in my opinion. Other than a few prop bets, the only thing that I would bet is over in the 2nd half when desperation kicks in.
Anyone who seriously bets a side on this Superbowl is a bone head in my opinion. Other than a few prop bets, the only thing that I would bet is over in the 2nd half when desperation kicks in.
I'll drink to that
no....it's called FOOTBALL LOGIC....either u know the game or you don't. This is the MAIN game I would bet on. I look at the superbowl as a reward for faithful fans like most of us that actually watch the games week in and week out. If u have watched both of these most of the season u should have a good idea of what to expect. I thought both of these teams could be in the superbowl before the season started and now here we are. Also, I kind of look at it as disrespectful to call people who "dare" to bet on a superbowl as a BONEHEAD? really? wtf are u doing on a gambling site anyway if everyone else but urself is a bonehead? that's like walking into a strip club and saying..."wow...look at these perverts!..." So would that make u if ur in the same place and same time?
I've called the correct spread on every New England superbowl ever except for the 96 SB against GB. That's why Logically it's hard for me to imagine Brady losing THREE superbowls in a row. I look at this as a take a 2nd mortg out on ur home type of game. SERIOUSLY
Anyone who seriously bets a side on this Superbowl is a bone head in my opinion. Other than a few prop bets, the only thing that I would bet is over in the 2nd half when desperation kicks in.
I'll drink to that
no....it's called FOOTBALL LOGIC....either u know the game or you don't. This is the MAIN game I would bet on. I look at the superbowl as a reward for faithful fans like most of us that actually watch the games week in and week out. If u have watched both of these most of the season u should have a good idea of what to expect. I thought both of these teams could be in the superbowl before the season started and now here we are. Also, I kind of look at it as disrespectful to call people who "dare" to bet on a superbowl as a BONEHEAD? really? wtf are u doing on a gambling site anyway if everyone else but urself is a bonehead? that's like walking into a strip club and saying..."wow...look at these perverts!..." So would that make u if ur in the same place and same time?
I've called the correct spread on every New England superbowl ever except for the 96 SB against GB. That's why Logically it's hard for me to imagine Brady losing THREE superbowls in a row. I look at this as a take a 2nd mortg out on ur home type of game. SERIOUSLY
why is that,Piggy?
why is that,Piggy?
If it comes down to the running game, Seattle has the edge, they WILL control the clock and sore. Seems like a no brainier. They just need to detain Brady and cover their top receiver Gronk on every play. Seattle will win in a close one. Tease Seattle to +8 and take over at 42 1/2.
I think this is the play boys.
If it comes down to the running game, Seattle has the edge, they WILL control the clock and sore. Seems like a no brainier. They just need to detain Brady and cover their top receiver Gronk on every play. Seattle will win in a close one. Tease Seattle to +8 and take over at 42 1/2.
I think this is the play boys.
![]()
It's always amusing at this time of year, that all the "newbie cappers" come out of the woodwork to give their wisdom on this game. Now I ask you- where were these clowns all season long? So let's analyze this game. Originally, the game opened with the Seahawks as 3 point favorites. As of late (many places), Seattle is now a 1 point dog. In my opinion , the sharps appear to be trying to "middle" the game. The Hawks are the one with the superior "D", especially against the run. The problem remains -can the hawks, stall and pressure Brady enough, from long protracted drives, as he "dinks and dunks" down field with numerous attempts to connect with Gronk? Maybe -maybe not. See the Pats scoring some points. However, between the more mobile Wilson, and the inability (all game long!) to contain Marshal Lynch, will be the Patriots undoing. Call it what you like - but the game boils down to defense, ball control, and a more consistent ground game.
SEATTLE PICK 'EM
![]()
It's always amusing at this time of year, that all the "newbie cappers" come out of the woodwork to give their wisdom on this game. Now I ask you- where were these clowns all season long? So let's analyze this game. Originally, the game opened with the Seahawks as 3 point favorites. As of late (many places), Seattle is now a 1 point dog. In my opinion , the sharps appear to be trying to "middle" the game. The Hawks are the one with the superior "D", especially against the run. The problem remains -can the hawks, stall and pressure Brady enough, from long protracted drives, as he "dinks and dunks" down field with numerous attempts to connect with Gronk? Maybe -maybe not. See the Pats scoring some points. However, between the more mobile Wilson, and the inability (all game long!) to contain Marshal Lynch, will be the Patriots undoing. Call it what you like - but the game boils down to defense, ball control, and a more consistent ground game.
SEATTLE PICK 'EM
Idk about the best QB in the NFL...but certainly in ths game,& Seattle D is gnna make him look evn better...they had a hard enuff time stopping GB from marching down that field,regardless of all them drives ending in FGs...that was a soft coach playing it "safe"....don't really see that coming from pats next wk...I'm sure they'll b goin for it on 4th too... Lunch can get 200 & still doesn't mean they out score much less WIN..
Idk about the best QB in the NFL...but certainly in ths game,& Seattle D is gnna make him look evn better...they had a hard enuff time stopping GB from marching down that field,regardless of all them drives ending in FGs...that was a soft coach playing it "safe"....don't really see that coming from pats next wk...I'm sure they'll b goin for it on 4th too... Lunch can get 200 & still doesn't mean they out score much less WIN..
Pretty much you said everything I have said for the past 6 days... Green Bay matched up well with Seattle... if not for 20 miracle plays/or Rodgers being hurt, this would be a Packers/Pats Super Bowl... but it isnt... and NE just doesnt match up with this team.... Seattle controls this thing 30-21
Pretty much you said everything I have said for the past 6 days... Green Bay matched up well with Seattle... if not for 20 miracle plays/or Rodgers being hurt, this would be a Packers/Pats Super Bowl... but it isnt... and NE just doesnt match up with this team.... Seattle controls this thing 30-21
![]()
It's always amusing at this time of year, that all the "newbie cappers" come out of the woodwork to give their wisdom on this game. Now I ask you- where were these clowns all season long? So let's analyze this game. Originally, the game opened with the Seahawks as 3 point favorites. As of late (many places), Seattle is now a 1 point dog. In my opinion , the sharps appear to be trying to "middle" the game. The Hawks are the one with the superior "D", especially against the run. The problem remains -can the hawks, stall and pressure Brady enough, from long protracted drives, as he "dinks and dunks" down field with numerous attempts to connect with Gronk? Maybe -maybe not. See the Pats scoring some points. However, between the more mobile Wilson, and the inability (all game long!) to contain Marshal Lynch, will be the Patriots undoing. Call it what you like - but the game boils down to defense, ball control, and a more consistent ground game.
SEATTLE PICK 'EM
![]()
It's always amusing at this time of year, that all the "newbie cappers" come out of the woodwork to give their wisdom on this game. Now I ask you- where were these clowns all season long? So let's analyze this game. Originally, the game opened with the Seahawks as 3 point favorites. As of late (many places), Seattle is now a 1 point dog. In my opinion , the sharps appear to be trying to "middle" the game. The Hawks are the one with the superior "D", especially against the run. The problem remains -can the hawks, stall and pressure Brady enough, from long protracted drives, as he "dinks and dunks" down field with numerous attempts to connect with Gronk? Maybe -maybe not. See the Pats scoring some points. However, between the more mobile Wilson, and the inability (all game long!) to contain Marshal Lynch, will be the Patriots undoing. Call it what you like - but the game boils down to defense, ball control, and a more consistent ground game.
SEATTLE PICK 'EM
Defense wins championships , but Brady is a SUPERIOR level qb. I hate New England.....but logically It's hard for me to Fathom Brady losing THREE superbowls in a row. I actually predicted his two supperbowl loses.
I'm predicting a spread. New England wins by 4 in an epic superbowl. Seattle (Russel Wilson) just played like trash against GB and is very lucky they are in this game.
Defense wins championships , but Brady is a SUPERIOR level qb. I hate New England.....but logically It's hard for me to Fathom Brady losing THREE superbowls in a row. I actually predicted his two supperbowl loses.
I'm predicting a spread. New England wins by 4 in an epic superbowl. Seattle (Russel Wilson) just played like trash against GB and is very lucky they are in this game.
no....it's called FOOTBALL LOGIC....either u know the game or you don't. This is the MAIN game I would bet on. I look at the superbowl as a reward for faithful fans like most of us that actually watch the games week in and week out. If u have watched both of these most of the season u should have a good idea of what to expect. I thought both of these teams could be in the superbowl before the season started and now here we are. Also, I kind of look at it as disrespectful to call people who "dare" to bet on a superbowl as a BONEHEAD? really? wtf are u doing on a gambling site anyway if everyone else but urself is a bonehead? that's like walking into a strip club and saying..."wow...look at these perverts!..." So would that make u if ur in the same place and same time?
I've called the correct spread on every New England superbowl ever except for the 96 SB against GB. That's why Logically it's hard for me to imagine Brady losing THREE superbowls in a row. I look at this as a take a 2nd mortg out on ur home type of game. SERIOUSLY
no....it's called FOOTBALL LOGIC....either u know the game or you don't. This is the MAIN game I would bet on. I look at the superbowl as a reward for faithful fans like most of us that actually watch the games week in and week out. If u have watched both of these most of the season u should have a good idea of what to expect. I thought both of these teams could be in the superbowl before the season started and now here we are. Also, I kind of look at it as disrespectful to call people who "dare" to bet on a superbowl as a BONEHEAD? really? wtf are u doing on a gambling site anyway if everyone else but urself is a bonehead? that's like walking into a strip club and saying..."wow...look at these perverts!..." So would that make u if ur in the same place and same time?
I've called the correct spread on every New England superbowl ever except for the 96 SB against GB. That's why Logically it's hard for me to imagine Brady losing THREE superbowls in a row. I look at this as a take a 2nd mortg out on ur home type of game. SERIOUSLY
What??You better go back and do your work Pal,New England will beat this team,they matchup extremely well vs The Hawks.The Pats will be sooooo focus on this game,and believe me thier defense will be excellent in this one game.Seattle should not even be here,if Green Bays p--sy coach had play to win and not to lose, went for it in those one inch line deep in the red zone instead of fu--ing Fg,Seattle would at home watching this game.Seattle got lucky.New England will play to win and not settle for FG.Green Bay dominated the Hawks in Seattle,and then folded like a bunch of bitc-es.There in not one bitc- on the Pats side of the ball.
What??You better go back and do your work Pal,New England will beat this team,they matchup extremely well vs The Hawks.The Pats will be sooooo focus on this game,and believe me thier defense will be excellent in this one game.Seattle should not even be here,if Green Bays p--sy coach had play to win and not to lose, went for it in those one inch line deep in the red zone instead of fu--ing Fg,Seattle would at home watching this game.Seattle got lucky.New England will play to win and not settle for FG.Green Bay dominated the Hawks in Seattle,and then folded like a bunch of bitc-es.There in not one bitc- on the Pats side of the ball.
Hot Forum Topics
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
