New England at Seattle (02/01/2015)
First and foremost ppl kill me thinking as soon as the Pats are in the super bowl they are sure winners. If you look at the last 2 super bowls "Tom Brady" has played in bc that is what makes ppl lean towards the pats is him. They have played a defensive minded team from the NFC being the Giants and this Seattle team is far more cohesive and talented defensively from the DL to Secondary. Yes Seattle played horrific on Sunday but guess what? They CAME BACK AND REFUSE TO LOSE. Yes GB let them come back blah, blah, but in OT it was new ball game and they couldnt stop Seattle when they needed the big stop. Bad games do happen but to come back on one of the biggest stages to overcome adversity in the worst way and win, tells me everything about that squad. Now lets look at last year's SB, everyone raved how Manning was going to pick Seattle D apart and yes many of you will be bias and say NO I KNEW SEATTLE WOULD WIN bc you think of Peyton in his current deflated form but many of you did believe he was going to beat Seattle last year and he got embarrassed. This is the thing for you ppl who just gamble and dont know football. You collapse the pocket on Aaron Rodgers when he's healthy and he keeps the play alive with his feet. You collapse the pocket on Peyton or Brady they either get sacked or they throw the ball in the dirt. Many times the pocket was collapse on GB yesterday and A-Rod kept the play alive with his one leg. Watch the first half of the Ravens game, Tom hates and despises pressure so bad that it makes him yell at the ref and say they are breathing on me throw the damn flag. Seattle knows if they can contain Blount this game can get out of hand. Chancellor matches up great against Gronk and not to mention their LB's can run with him. The only person who has a potential chance to do some good is Edelman. Watch the same recipe as the broncos, press the WRs at the line and bring pressure and make Tom beat you over the top and last time I check about 80% of Tom throws are throws are 15 yards or less. Do your homework and watch film ppl. The pats 4 losses this season are against aggressive suffocating blitzing defenses (Miami, Buffalo, GB, and KC). Yes the Pats destroyed the Colts but this is the same Colts D that let a no name Jonas Gray run for over 200 yds on them so I'm not in ah like the Pats are unstoppable. You give this Seattle D 2 weeks to prepare for an explosive offense and last year's SB proves what they can do. But at the end of the day that's why they call it gambling because you can pick who you want. Seattle wins back to back Super Bowl and let me jump on this line since its at a PK it line for 2 dimes. WISH YOU ALL GOOD LUCK
Seriously, how do you expect anyone to read this? Find the frigging return key.
First and foremost ppl kill me thinking as soon as the Pats are in the super bowl they are sure winners. If you look at the last 2 super bowls "Tom Brady" has played in bc that is what makes ppl lean towards the pats is him. They have played a defensive minded team from the NFC being the Giants and this Seattle team is far more cohesive and talented defensively from the DL to Secondary. Yes Seattle played horrific on Sunday but guess what? They CAME BACK AND REFUSE TO LOSE. Yes GB let them come back blah, blah, but in OT it was new ball game and they couldnt stop Seattle when they needed the big stop. Bad games do happen but to come back on one of the biggest stages to overcome adversity in the worst way and win, tells me everything about that squad. Now lets look at last year's SB, everyone raved how Manning was going to pick Seattle D apart and yes many of you will be bias and say NO I KNEW SEATTLE WOULD WIN bc you think of Peyton in his current deflated form but many of you did believe he was going to beat Seattle last year and he got embarrassed. This is the thing for you ppl who just gamble and dont know football. You collapse the pocket on Aaron Rodgers when he's healthy and he keeps the play alive with his feet. You collapse the pocket on Peyton or Brady they either get sacked or they throw the ball in the dirt. Many times the pocket was collapse on GB yesterday and A-Rod kept the play alive with his one leg. Watch the first half of the Ravens game, Tom hates and despises pressure so bad that it makes him yell at the ref and say they are breathing on me throw the damn flag. Seattle knows if they can contain Blount this game can get out of hand. Chancellor matches up great against Gronk and not to mention their LB's can run with him. The only person who has a potential chance to do some good is Edelman. Watch the same recipe as the broncos, press the WRs at the line and bring pressure and make Tom beat you over the top and last time I check about 80% of Tom throws are throws are 15 yards or less. Do your homework and watch film ppl. The pats 4 losses this season are against aggressive suffocating blitzing defenses (Miami, Buffalo, GB, and KC). Yes the Pats destroyed the Colts but this is the same Colts D that let a no name Jonas Gray run for over 200 yds on them so I'm not in ah like the Pats are unstoppable. You give this Seattle D 2 weeks to prepare for an explosive offense and last year's SB proves what they can do. But at the end of the day that's why they call it gambling because you can pick who you want. Seattle wins back to back Super Bowl and let me jump on this line since its at a PK it line for 2 dimes. WISH YOU ALL GOOD LUCK
Seriously, how do you expect anyone to read this? Find the frigging return key.
Seriously, how do you expect anyone to read this? Find the frigging return key.
Seriously, how do you expect anyone to read this? Find the frigging return key.
I don't know who in the hell is going to cover. You don't either. This ought to be a hell of a game, damn near a pick-em.
I like Belichick to plan on throwing the ball all game and minimizing the run game. Don't look at the Indianapolis game, look at the Baltimore game. In that game New England ran a dead minimum amount of plays and Brady chucked it all day long. IF this happens and I am betting it will the following bets look pretty good.
over 47.5
Blount under 62.5 yards.
Belichick doesn't have a go to guy for rushing all game. He is notorious for benching a guy like Blount for fumbling or who in the hell knows why....He's Belichick
I don't know who in the hell is going to cover. You don't either. This ought to be a hell of a game, damn near a pick-em.
I like Belichick to plan on throwing the ball all game and minimizing the run game. Don't look at the Indianapolis game, look at the Baltimore game. In that game New England ran a dead minimum amount of plays and Brady chucked it all day long. IF this happens and I am betting it will the following bets look pretty good.
over 47.5
Blount under 62.5 yards.
Belichick doesn't have a go to guy for rushing all game. He is notorious for benching a guy like Blount for fumbling or who in the hell knows why....He's Belichick
Sorry I haven't posted on this forum before but as God as my witness I have been killing it on the last 7 SB's (Seattle ML, Ravens +pts, Giants + pts & under X2 vs Pats, Packers ML, Saints ML, Cards + points) BUT THIS ONE IS TUFF!!! Not confident at all... Maybe time to fade me???!!!??? My initial thought was NE & Under if you want to fade me.
I really do think it will be a close game (24-23 or 20-17 kind of game) that the Pats (who I hate) will barely win (with the help from BOTH of their Tight Ends). Expect both teams to run quite a bit.
Since I like the Under 47.5 I may just bet that and then tease the team with points (As of right now Seattle +8) to Under 54.5. Then get a little action on Pats -1 and Under 48 parlayed.
Sorry I haven't posted on this forum before but as God as my witness I have been killing it on the last 7 SB's (Seattle ML, Ravens +pts, Giants + pts & under X2 vs Pats, Packers ML, Saints ML, Cards + points) BUT THIS ONE IS TUFF!!! Not confident at all... Maybe time to fade me???!!!??? My initial thought was NE & Under if you want to fade me.
I really do think it will be a close game (24-23 or 20-17 kind of game) that the Pats (who I hate) will barely win (with the help from BOTH of their Tight Ends). Expect both teams to run quite a bit.
Since I like the Under 47.5 I may just bet that and then tease the team with points (As of right now Seattle +8) to Under 54.5. Then get a little action on Pats -1 and Under 48 parlayed.
Seattle played perhaps their worst game of the year 2 weeks ago and were still able to sneak away with the victory over a solid GB bunch.. a bunch that defeated the Pats mind you..
Brady and Co had trouble with Baltimore and that defense isn't anywhere near the caliber of this Seahawks unit. Tom Terrific isn't so when he's getting pressure from the front 4, which WILL happen. They won't be able to run the ball, so will have to rely on him dropping back 40+ times and that plays right into Seattle's hands.
Worried a little about Seattle's mediocre offense against the stout Pats defense, but i think Danger Wilson and Marshawn make enough plays to get it done in battle.
Seattle - 26
New England - 20
Seattle +1
Under 47.5
Seattle played perhaps their worst game of the year 2 weeks ago and were still able to sneak away with the victory over a solid GB bunch.. a bunch that defeated the Pats mind you..
Brady and Co had trouble with Baltimore and that defense isn't anywhere near the caliber of this Seahawks unit. Tom Terrific isn't so when he's getting pressure from the front 4, which WILL happen. They won't be able to run the ball, so will have to rely on him dropping back 40+ times and that plays right into Seattle's hands.
Worried a little about Seattle's mediocre offense against the stout Pats defense, but i think Danger Wilson and Marshawn make enough plays to get it done in battle.
Seattle - 26
New England - 20
Seattle +1
Under 47.5
| 1/20/15 11:05am | Pending | 2/2/15 6:30pm NFL Football 101 New England Patriots +42½ -82500* vs Seattle Seahawks |
| 1/20/15 11:05am | Pending | 2/2/15 6:30pm NFL Football 101 New England Patriots +42½ -82500* vs Seattle Seahawks |
uh huh...soft...like the guy who threw 4 picks isn't the same guy wth same amount of sacks...& then u wanna talk abt Brady don't like 2b touched...apparently u do,but that's ur own personal business miss daisy...they couldn't evn get to Rodgers,c'mon now...1 & done...simple as that for Seattle...
uh huh...soft...like the guy who threw 4 picks isn't the same guy wth same amount of sacks...& then u wanna talk abt Brady don't like 2b touched...apparently u do,but that's ur own personal business miss daisy...they couldn't evn get to Rodgers,c'mon now...1 & done...simple as that for Seattle...
I like the under in this game. I see this game playing out like the two previous NE-NYG Super Bowls. I am also leaning towards Seattle because Brady struggles so much against a defense that pressures him. This is not Indy.... More likely a 24-20 game. 2 units on the under now and probably Seattle as well straight or teased with the under.
I like the under in this game. I see this game playing out like the two previous NE-NYG Super Bowls. I am also leaning towards Seattle because Brady struggles so much against a defense that pressures him. This is not Indy.... More likely a 24-20 game. 2 units on the under now and probably Seattle as well straight or teased with the under.
intpicks is 10-2 last 12 Super Bowls. They just posted their picks for for side, O/U and 10 prop bets. Just go to int picks dot com
intpicks is 10-2 last 12 Super Bowls. They just posted their picks for for side, O/U and 10 prop bets. Just go to int picks dot com
Hot Forum Topics
-
🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵
449,019
-
PART DEUX
248
-
The Three-Day Money Train
4,104
-
Friday 09/18/2026
759
-
🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets
258,459
-
Trump's legacy?
25,444
-
NCAA FOOTBALL. 151
21,380
-
Week 3 Money
6,244
-
NCAA WEEK 3 ***Click here for GREATNESS***
7,076
-
We have picked a terrible time to have the stupidest president ever
29,073
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
