New england at chicago (12/12/2010)

parcell215

Prospect

Joined: Nov, 2010

Posts: 55

Posted: Dec. 11, 2010 - 1:57 PM ET #51

Quote Originally Posted by CJONES1068:

hope brady can throw with 6 inches of snow....35 mph winds and -20 windchills!.....UBDER 41 IS THE PLAY

Brady will be fine...win by 2 field goals

Rockdog

Banned

Joined: Jul, 2008

Posts: 5485

Posted: Dec. 11, 2010 - 3:52 PM ET #52

That asshole Cutler is good for at least 2 picks and will cost the Bears dearly.

CJONES1068

Rookie

Joined: Oct, 2003

Posts: 558

Posted: Dec. 11, 2010 - 4:06 PM ET #53

Quote Originally Posted by parcell215:

Brady will be fine...win by 2 field goals

there wont be any field goals even attempted....hell they may be going for 2 poinys after a touchdown instead of kicking the pat

joedaddy76

Prospect

Joined: Sep, 2007

Posts: 361

Posted: Dec. 11, 2010 - 5:34 PM ET #54

Quote Originally Posted by lookingtowin:

Home to New England, at Minnesota, home to the Jets, and at Green Bay. A 9-7 record may not even get Chicago in the Playoffs. Time for Cutler to pull his choke act.

jokers like u make me laugh.....u will be grippin ur ticket so hard come sunday.....u really think Chicago is gonna blow their season by losing 4 in a row to end it?.....ur underestimating a team that clearly has the better defense in this matchup.....their defensive line will get after Brady and their secondary will not give Brady many throwing options throughout the day.....especially in 30mph winds both teams will have to rely more on their running attack and that will favor Chicago in this one.....save ur hard earned dollars, bro

BEARS ALL DAY

circa

Rookie

Joined: Feb, 2008

Posts: 750

Posted: Dec. 11, 2010 - 6:38 PM ET #55

the only way bears win the last 4 is if the other teams QB's are injured, get lucky and/or refs make bad calls.... oh wait that's how they have 9 games.

remember only 2 wins against teams with winning records and have played one of the easiest schedules 30/32.

GB wins the div. and bears may get a wild card spot. In any case, Bears will get embarrassed, since the teams won't suck

circa

Rookie

Joined: Feb, 2008

Posts: 750

Posted: Dec. 11, 2010 - 6:39 PM ET #56

RUDEDOG747

Prospect

Joined: Oct, 2008

Posts: 150

Posted: Dec. 11, 2010 - 6:55 PM ET #57

new england pass deff is 2nd worst in the league giveing up 276.8 yds per game. the bears have won 7 of their last 8 december home games. and i will turn you all on to something. the pats offense has scored over 30 pts the last 4 weeks in a row, hell the last 2 weeks they have scored over 40.bradey is in for a bad day. cuttler is sarting to grow up;; bears-28 pats-17; going big on this one;;; feed the dog;;;;;

rock40237

Rookie

Joined: Dec, 2007

Posts: 567

Posted: Dec. 11, 2010 - 9:28 PM ET #58

Quote Originally Posted by circa:

oh wait that's how they have 9 games.

Yeah, has nothing to do with them only allowing 9 passing TD's all season to this point or having the number 2 rush defense in the league. Also has nothing to do with Cutler having 10 TD's to 3 ints in the last 5 games, with a completion percentage that got higher each week in that span. Just luck haha

lumpsluck

Prospect

Joined: Sep, 2008

Posts: 240

Posted: Dec. 11, 2010 - 10:41 PM ET #59

wow! this is better than jerry springer. i got picked on for being upset over the indy ats loss thur. but thanked them for allowing me to give them something to complain about.

lumpsluck

Prospect

Joined: Sep, 2008

Posts: 240

Posted: Dec. 11, 2010 - 10:42 PM ET #60

or continue i should say

Ber

Prospect

Joined: Oct, 2009

Posts: 348

Posted: Dec. 11, 2010 - 10:49 PM ET #61

I have had the worst season EVER!!! I had the colts -2.5 and what happens... titans show up and play a decent game. (colts defense blows ass!) After that game i'm not so sure about this pats -1. Vegas definetly knows what they're doing.

Ber

Prospect

Joined: Oct, 2009

Posts: 348

Posted: Dec. 11, 2010 - 10:54 PM ET #62

[Quote: Originally Posted by lumpsluck]

wow! this is better than jerry springer. i got picked on for being upset over the indy ats loss thur. but thanked them for allowing me to give them something to complain about.

here goes nothing. i bet the bears +3 and the over 37.5. small wagers. i am a packer fan and if my heart allowed me i would take the pats. bears are getting no respect they do just enough to win it seems. dont have any rock solid stats or trends to back up this call but bears 24 - patriots 20. goodluck and let the bashing begin! I'm also a packer fan and all I know is the packers blew it big time in their loss to chicago. I don't know what the bears are gonna do but I can tell you one thing... The Bears WILL NOT beat the Packers in last game of the season. Packers will win that division.

lordzud

Veteran

Joined: Jun, 2010

Posts: 2349

Posted: Dec. 11, 2010 - 11:57 PM ET #63

I live in Chicago and am taking the Patriots-3. Right now they are predicting snow with gusts up to 50 mph. That's right I said 50. Now I know Chicago weather and that means nobody knows wtf is going to happen. Check the weather reports right before game time to confirrm meanwhile STAY AWAY FROM THAT LOVELY OVER BET IT IS A TRAP. Brady won't be fazed by a snow storm, but nobody is passing the ball with winds over 30. That stadium is right on the lake and when the winds howl there they really howl.

jonfon

Prospect

Joined: Dec, 2008

Posts: 176

Posted: Dec. 12, 2010 - 12:22 AM ET #64

it is arguable whether or not Brady is the best qb ever.......

what is not arguable is that he is the best bad weather qb EVER!!!

Pats -3

wonbadappl

Prospect

Joined: Dec, 2005

Posts: 131

Posted: Dec. 12, 2010 - 12:42 AM ET #65

Bad weather favors the offense......Pats have a better offense!

captianlock

Prospect

Joined: Sep, 2010

Posts: 22

Posted: Dec. 12, 2010 - 1:51 AM ET #66

Quote Originally Posted by ArtSchlicter:

Wow, this is one of, if not THE, most idiotic statements I've ever read on this board. There is no such thing as a 18 point favorite in the NFL, unless MAYBE you match the best team, at home, vs the worst team on the road with a bunch of key injuries. There was absolutely NO WAY any team close to 9-3 was getting 14-18 points at home against ANYBODY, New England or otherwise. Only a COMPLETE IDIOT would suggest something like this happened MULTIPLE TIMES with the Patriots. No one on this board can disagree with that.

sounds like your an idiot.....New England layed above 20pts against Phil and NYJ in 07

the1andonly12

Veteran

Joined: Sep, 2009

Posts: 3172

Posted: Dec. 12, 2010 - 1:59 AM ET #67

If the wind is any where near 35 to 50 mph I"ll take the under.Nobody, even Brady is going to throw it longer than 15 yds.Who ever has the better running game will win.

UNDER UNDER UNDER

GLTA

jaywm

Prospect

Joined: Mar, 2010

Posts: 57

Posted: Dec. 12, 2010 - 5:13 AM ET #68

looking to win ur a fuckin person how dumb of u to talk shit nd think a -34 pats line will happen get real pats are my team they wont cover bye 34 bears d is way better than jets, pats cover easy at least 10

StevenGA1011

Captain

Joined: Jan, 2009

Posts: 6405

Posted: Dec. 12, 2010 - 6:13 AM ET #69

After what I've seen for the last month no way I can go against NE right now until they falter or IF I should type -- Patriots -3 &

VER 37.5

shygorilla8082

Rookie

Joined: Jan, 2009

Posts: 857

Posted: Dec. 12, 2010 - 6:17 AM ET #70

Marc Lawrence's pick is Chicago +3.

lookingtowin

Captain

Joined: Dec, 2005

Posts: 5594

Posted: Dec. 12, 2010 - 8:12 AM ET #71

Quote Originally Posted by holtnt:

YOU were right Big Man… Calm down…

Oh by the way… I like your play...

lookingtowin

Captain

Joined: Dec, 2005

Posts: 5594

Posted: Dec. 12, 2010 - 8:20 AM ET #72

Quote Originally Posted by joedaddy76:

BEARS ALL DAY

The only joke will be when NE kicks Chicagos ass today. The Bears just barely beat my Detroit Lions twice this year and if it were not for two late blown calls by the refs we would have won both. So don't tell me how good a defence Chicago has we almost beat you with a third string QB last week. Now the Bears are facing a real team with one of the best QBs in the league. I don't know what the hell you are smoking but i wouldn't mind some. One last thing if you think Chicago is going to win that strong if you have a paypal account i will take NE for $200.00 if you would like to place a small friendly wage. No pts because you said Chicago no problem, Put up or shut up.

ICEman83

All-Star

Joined: Aug, 2007

Posts: 12474

Posted: Dec. 12, 2010 - 8:31 AM ET #73

over.............

lookingtowin

Captain

Joined: Dec, 2005

Posts: 5594

Posted: Dec. 12, 2010 - 8:33 AM ET #74

Quote Originally Posted by jaywm:

looking to win ur a fuckin person how dumb of u to talk shit nd think a -34 pats line will happen get real pats are my team they wont cover bye 34 bears d is way better than jets, pats cover easy at least 10

I have no idea what you are talking about i think that Pats may win this by maybe 10 or more depending on the weather.

lumpsluck

Prospect

Joined: Sep, 2008

Posts: 240

Posted: Dec. 12, 2010 - 8:41 AM ET #75

Quote Originally Posted by Ber:

Quote Originally Posted by lumpsluck:

wow! this is better than jerry springer. i got picked on for being upset over the indy ats loss thur. but thanked them for allowing me to give them something to complain about.

Amen brother packerbacker! we can only control the games we have not the other bear games. they have it alittle rougher than we so we should be in great shape to win the division. go pack!

All Forums | Pro Football

New England at Chicago (12/12/2010)

Hot Forum Topics