All Forums | Pro Football

New England at Chicago (12/12/2010)

...
Participants:
Search
Views: 11503
Posts: 107
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2002
Posts: 61
Posted: #1

Away:  New England [7-4-1 ATS]
Home:  Chicago [6-5-1 ATS]

Game Time: 4:15 PM
Stadium: Soldier Field

Recent Meetings:
N/A

Team Leaders:

New England:
Passing: Tom Brady (3029)
Rushing: BenJarvus Green-Ellis (699)
Receiving: Wes Welker (672)

Chicago:
Passing: Jay Cutler (2545)
Rushing: Matt Forte (748)
Receiving: Johnny Knox (774)

More:
Live Odds
In-Depth Matchup Information
Consensus Betting Information

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 3457
Posted: #2
This is where the Bears bus starts losing riders.  NE, Minny, the Jets and GB in a revenge game that could wrap up the division for the Pack!!!  Yeah, no more Carolinas, Seattles, Detroits, Miamis or Buffalos fellas........the next month is big boy football and Jay Cutler won't "pass" the test against these upcoming defenses.  Whatever the line.....I'll take Brady of Cutler and Bill of Luvy all day long!!!!!!!!!  I'll cover 7-10 before I have to think about it.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 567
Posted: #3
Quote Originally Posted by Irisheyez:

!  Yeah, no more Carolinas, Seattles, Detroits, Miamis or Buffalos fellas

Whyd you leave off the Eagles, @Dolphins and Packers wins? They've beaten good teams they just get NO love because they dont win big... like the Patriots use to do pre Moss.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 567
Posted: #4
Call me a crazy, call me a homer or whatever but this line looks like a Bears line to me. Bears ML
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 5654
Posted: #5

Quote Originally Posted by Irisheyez:

This is where the Bears bus starts losing riders.  NE, Minny, the Jets and GB in a revenge game that could wrap up the division for the Pack!!!  Yeah, no more Carolinas, Seattles, Detroits, Miamis or Buffalos fellas........the next month is big boy football and Jay Cutler won't "pass" the test against these upcoming defenses.  Whatever the line.....I'll take Brady of Cutler and Bill of Luvy all day long!!!!!!!!!  I'll cover 7-10 before I have to think about it.

With ya Irish now they play a real football team.

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 5654
Posted: #6
No number out yet.  Its to bad NE won 45-3 last night i think we might have seen a -3.5 if it had been a close game now  probably going to be anywhere from
-7.5 to -9.5.  I think i will jump on the early line if its low enough because i think it will go up fast.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 66
Posted: #7
Two trends if you're leaning towards the Bears:

Bears are 4-0 ATS vs. a team with a winning record & the Patriots are 0-3-1 ATS in their last 4 games when playing on Sunday following a Monday night game.


 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 349
Posted: #8
Quote Originally Posted by lookingtowin:

No number out yet.  Its to bad NE won 45-3 last night i think we might have seen a -3.5 if it had been a close game now  probably going to be anywhere from
-7.5 to -9.5.  I think i will jump on the early line if its low enough because i think it will go up fast.

 

A 9-3 team getting 9.5 points at home

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 5654
Posted: #9
Quote Originally Posted by Flava83:

 

A 9-3 team getting 9.5 points at home

I can remember a few years ago 9-3 teams getting 14-18 pts at home against New England.  Not saying this is the same New England team but if its 3 or less and i never ever use this word but i am in REAL LARGE they will destroy Chicago the same way they did the Jets and the books will wish they had made it -9.5.

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 5654
Posted: #10
By the way if anyone is capping this that it is a tough spot for New England coming off a short week or a tough Monday night game for them (i don't even think they worked up a sweat last night) i think you are thinking the wrong way.   Four games left there is no look ahead, or tough spot or whatever other cliche you want to use.  New England will destory the Bears just like they did the Jets last night, they want the division and home field advantage and the only way the get it is keep on winning.  Bears this one is going to hurt.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 1654
Posted: #11
Quote Originally Posted by lookingtowin:

No number out yet.  Its to bad NE won 45-3 last night i think we might have seen a -3.5 if it had been a close game now  probably going to be anywhere from
-7.5 to -9.5.  I think i will jump on the early line if its low enough because i think it will go up fast.

Wow. All I can say is wow.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 1654
Posted: #12
Quote Originally Posted by lookingtowin:

I can remember a few years ago 9-3 teams getting 14-18 pts at home against New England. 

Your memory is horseshit cause it didnt happen

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 8
Posted: #13
Quote Originally Posted by lookingtowin:

I can remember a few years ago 9-3 teams getting 14-18 pts at home against New England. 

Wow, this is one of, if not THE, most idiotic statements I've ever read on this board.  There is no such thing as a 18 point favorite in the NFL, unless MAYBE you match the best team, at home, vs the worst team on the road with a bunch of key injuries.  There was absolutely NO WAY any team close to 9-3 was getting 14-18 points at home against ANYBODY, New England or otherwise.  Only a COMPLETE IDIOT would suggest something like this happened MULTIPLE TIMES with the Patriots.  No one on this board can disagree with that.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 47
Posted: #14
I remember NE giving 14 pts to a hometeam 3 yrs ago but pretty sure it wasn't a 9-3 game think it was miami....
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 1654
Posted: #15

Here you go...

No 9-3 teams were 14+ dogs at home. Or on the road for that matter

NEW ENGLAND (FT)
(SUR: 18-1 PSR: 10-9 O-U: 12-7)
S.09   NY Jets           W    -6'  38-14  o41
S.16*  SD                W    -3'  38-14  o46
S.23   BUFF.             W    -16' 38-7   o41
O.01*  Cincinnati        W    -7'  34-13  u53'
O.07   CLEVE.            W    -16  34-17  o48'
O.14   Dallas            W    -5'  48-27  o53
O.21   Miami             W    -16  49-28  o51
O.28   WASH.             W    -15' 52-7   o47'
N.04   Indy              L    -5   24-20  u56'
N.11   Bye
N.18*  Buffalo           W    -15' 56-10  o46'
N.25*  PHILA.            L    -24  31-28  o51
D.03*  Baltimore         L    -19' 27-24  o48
D.09   PITT.             W    -10' 34-13  u47'
D.16   NY JETS           L    -21  20-10  u42'
D.23   MIAMI             L    -22  28-7   u45
D.29*  NY Giants         L    -13  38-35  o46'
J.12*  J'VILLE           L    -13' 31-20  o50
J.20   SAN DIEGO         L    -13' 21-12  u47
F.03   NY Giants         L    -12' 14-17  u54'
(Super Bowl XLII at Glendale, Az)
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 1654
Posted: #16
Sorry that format is messed up.
 
vs BUF -16
vs CLE -16
@MIA -16
vs WAS -15
@BUF -15
vs PHL -24
@ BAL -19
vs NYJ -21
vs MIA -22
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 5654
Posted: #17
Quote Originally Posted by daysbtwin:

Here you go...

No 9-3 teams were 14+ dogs at home. Or on the road for that matter

NEW ENGLAND (FT)
(SUR: 18-1 PSR: 10-9 O-U: 12-7)
S.09   NY Jets           W    -6'  38-14  o41
S.16*  SD                W    -3'  38-14  o46
S.23   BUFF.             W    -16' 38-7   o41
O.01*  Cincinnati        W    -7'  34-13  u53'
O.07   CLEVE.            W    -16  34-17  o48'
O.14   Dallas            W    -5'  48-27  o53
O.21   Miami             W    -16  49-28  o51
O.28   WASH.             W    -15' 52-7   o47'
N.04   Indy              L    -5   24-20  u56'
N.11   Bye
N.18*  Buffalo           W    -15' 56-10  o46'
N.25*  PHILA.            L    -24  31-28  o51
D.03*  Baltimore         L    -19' 27-24  o48
D.09   PITT.             W    -10' 34-13  u47'
D.16   NY JETS           L    -21  20-10  u42'
D.23   MIAMI             L    -22  28-7   u45
D.29*  NY Giants         L    -13  38-35  o46'
J.12*  J'VILLE           L    -13' 31-20  o50
J.20   SAN DIEGO         L    -13' 21-12  u47
F.03   NY Giants         L    -12' 14-17  u54'
(Super Bowl XLII at Glendale, Az)

Who gives a royal fuck.  This site is getting worse and worse all the time you use to be able to make a post without 50 fucking bashers coming on here.   I don't give a shit -1 or -34 i have placed my bet at -2.5 for $300.00 and i will win that bet.  So take all your hard fucking work of looking up those stats and shove them up your ass.

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 5654
Posted: #18
And to all the other bashers out there you can take your bashing and suck this large thing between my legs.  I am more interested on here to here who you wise fucking idiots are betting on as far as sides or totals not to fucking wasting all your breath giving me useless statements because i posted a high number.  I shouldn't get this pissed because you are all probably high schoolers with your lap tops and have never made a bet in your lives.  Fuck ya all.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 5654
Posted: #19
One last thing i made $1750. last week how did you guys make out with your $5.00 bets,
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 349
Posted: #20
If you were big time, youd let it ride on the Pats
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 66
Posted: #21
Wow, lots of emotions on this one. Take the emotion out of it.

Why can't we all just get along?

The Pats are obviously favored but my advice here would be to let people pour money on the Patriots and let the line move up to- 4.5 or   -5 and jump on the Bears at home. 

The Patriots are great (I hate myself for typing these words) but the beatdown of the Jets is not a sign of how the rest of the season will go down. Right now I get 2.5 back if the Bears win outright and if the line goes up to 2.9 I might just put down a medium sized bet. 

Any matchup analysis?
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 5051
Posted: #22

Quote Originally Posted by lookingtowin:

By the way if anyone is capping this that it is a tough spot for New England coming off a short week or a tough Monday night game for them (i don't even think they worked up a sweat last night) i think you are thinking the wrong way.   Four games left there is no look ahead, or tough spot or whatever other cliche you want to use.  New England will destory the Bears just like they did the Jets last night, they want the division and home field advantage and the only way the get it is keep on winning.  Bears this one is going to hurt.

'ENUFF SAID!!

NEW ENGLAND  - 3  (HUGE!)

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 2093
Posted: #23

I will homer it up. Dare you to stop me son!!!!! Pats for the large!!!!

  • Monday Night Magic: Teams coming off a win of 17+ points on MNF are 37-22 ATS the following week.
    • If you’re not large, you’re small - the DOC
     
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2009
    Posts: 1654
    Posted: #24
    Quote Originally Posted by lookingtowin:

    Who gives a royal fuck.  This site is getting worse and worse all the time you use to be able to make a post without 50 fucking bashers coming on here.   I don't give a shit -1 or -34 i have placed my bet at -2.5 for $300.00 and i will win that bet.  So take all your hard fucking work of looking up those stats and shove them up your ass.

    This site is getting worse because of know-nothings like you. Sorry that I look at facts and dont spout a bunch of bullshit from my noise hole. Its obvious that you have no fucking idea how to set a line. Good luck with your bet

     
     
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2003
    Posts: 558
    Posted: #25

    hope brady can throw with 6 inches of snow....35 mph winds   and -20 windchills!.....UBDER 41 IS THE PLAY

    All Forums | Pro Football
    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Privacy Choices Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo
    Covers Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.