Posted:
#51
Minny
Minnesota at Green Bay (10/02/2014)
Posted:
#55
Packers -8 
no Teddy, no cover! but even with Teddy in the lineup, I think his performance wouldn't live up to his first. Vikes would be better bet if it was played in Minny but it is in Lambeau.. in the rain.. with Christian Ponder...
I think Packers will try to get the run going with breakout game due for Lacy. it'll be hard to kick field goals in wet conditions. I picked the Over prematurely and forgot to check the weather but I like the Under in this one..but it could go over capitalized on sloppy turnovers. Switching back to the Favorite and Under.
Packers - 24 Vikings -14
my Thursday Night record is 7-1 on sides & totals. keep it going PACK!!! 
Sip on that plus money honey!
Posted:
#57
Quote Originally Posted by Lakeshow411:
Quote Originally Posted by steve103061:
you think the line would have moved from 9.5 to 7.5 if bridgewater was questionable? - I think not
Bridgewater currently listed as "probable" butt da total dumping could be due to da 70% chance of rain...
Bridgewater is 100% NOT probable. Do you people make things up to work in your favor? Vikings staff has reported that Teddy KGB is a game time decision and that they will make the decision 90 minutes prior to game time. Good try though.
Posted:
#58
Quote Originally Posted by sjon412:
I'M IN THAT ONE TOUCHDOWN RANGE FOR THE O/U sjon. If you think it will be a factor then yes take a touchdown away and my total goes fron 54 to 47. Then under it is. If you don't think it will be a problem stick with the over.
ColonelJim, do you still stick with your total knowing its a 100% chance of thunderstorms? Would like your opinion. I'm torn on the O/U which usually means stay away but I'm a sucker for parlays
Posted:
#59
Both Rodgers and McCarthy have stated that the run game will be featured tonite in interviews this week because of the expected "rain". As I see it Rodgers and McCarthy both fear the scheme Zimmer has for containing Rodgers and the rain excuse is a perfect reason for relying on the run over the pass tonite therefore having an already built in excuse if the run doesnt work and they lose. Expect to hear "not in our gameplan because of the rain" should the run game not work as an excuse for why they didnt pass .more and that is if the packlose which is a big if.
Posted:
#60
Quote Originally Posted by OC_sharp949:
Damn.....
Damn.....
I was going to play Minn but now I see Vue is on them. Cannot go with Minn now. If Vue got paid for picking losers he would be a millionaire. Instead like I always say
FADE THE VUE make yourself a millionaire!!!
GB LARGE AND NASTY
Are you on drugs? You're going to make millions by fading me, and I'm only 0 - 3 - 1 for the season. Hell- son- cut me some slack-there's over 200 games in the season! If you were going to play the Vikings, and you go the opposite way because I happen to be playing them, then you would be FADING YOURSELF! Learn how to handicap the games,instead of the cappers on here.
Posted:
#61
Let's look at this in a subjective manner, Rodgers on Prime Time Television
is usually a winner and with Vue putting his dollars on Minnesota, I would say 99.9% of the time you should bet opposite of this longtime winner lol
. With this being said, I understand the probable rain and Teddy Bridgewater not playing but I dont think people understand how bad Green Bay Defense is. Asiata is the REAL DEAL!!!! TAKE MINNY PLUS 9!!!!! 
is usually a winner and with Vue putting his dollars on Minnesota, I would say 99.9% of the time you should bet opposite of this longtime winner lol. With this being said, I understand the probable rain and Teddy Bridgewater not playing but I dont think people understand how bad Green Bay Defense is. Asiata is the REAL DEAL!!!! TAKE MINNY PLUS 9!!!!!
Posted:
#63
I don't know, sports fans - Cassel's out Bridgewater "Questionable" who's the third guy? I don't even know....
Packers at home in a divisional "statement". Vue, I always thought you were the voice of reason, but I haven't been with you all year so far... And I just don't see it tonight either....
- Good Luck Buddy, but
Pack -7.5
Good Luck All!!!!
Posted:
#64
Purple pigmentation may be getting' best of me ....
Teaches me rights drinkin' Ol Colonels Purple Norse Brandy .
@ *
* 
.
. Regardless how bad and doomed Vikes have been and appear to be, Norsemen tend to show resilient fight via such division match ups .
IMO 9.5 is way off. Figure this game to be decided by 7
Problem : Pack have Blow away firepower .
Rodgers will air it out tonight, Vikes not.
Hare should beat turtle.
?
? 
Norsemen convincingly handled Matty Ice's Falcoons
via Mc Kinnon n ' Asiata running' wild on Falcs D.
BTW
Pack are dead last , allowing 175 yards rush per game.
REGARDLESS WHO QB' s for VIKES , Bet on it,
Vikes are runnin' all night long.
Cheese Field comes sloppy , Russian TurnOver Roulette
Kicks in and gettin' 7.5 ?
Naturally, if Vikes cover , we will know it's only because
Vue was due and if it doesn't ....
Well, Vue remains Vue.
Dont believe in Billy Goats , Bambino Curse or
Voodoo Vue pics.
This beer's for you Vue, your 9.5 Wager is a winner.
PACKERS 29 VIKES 23
BOLA
Do I feel strongly about this play as SD over Seattle, Colts over Titans, CowBlows over Saints ?
H E L L N O
Cheers Mon Colonel ! Like yourself, just sippin' n' enjoy ' n what should be a hard fought , short week bruiser , slugo fest rivalry game.
@#* pick percentage 
Posted:
#71
Quote Originally Posted by TheQuadYeah:
I don't know, sports fans - Cassel's out Bridgewater "Questionable" who's the third guy? I don't even know....
Packers at home in a divisional "statement". Vue, I always thought you were the voice of reason, but I haven't been with you all year so far... And I just don't see it tonight either....
- Good Luck Buddy, but
Pack -7.5
Good Luck All!!!!
" Voice of reason" ?
Uh .....Did you say something' Quad ?
One of us is damn sure going death.
Posted:
#73
I usually just stick to posting on SEC football games but this stat jumped out at me so figured I'd share..
Green Bay last in the league in rushing defense.. in 4 games they are being out rushed by an average of 103 yards per game... Minn with a 2-2 record has out rushed their opponent twice (by 118 and 113) and in those 2 games (an underdog in both) have won outright by at least 13. So based on that (flawed I'm sure) theory, minn out rushes GB by 100+ and wins outright
Posted:
#74
Quote Originally Posted by Digitalkarma:
Packers -8
no Teddy, no cover! but even with Teddy in the lineup, I think his performance wouldn't live up to his first. Vikes would be better bet if it was played in Minny but it is in Lambeau.. in the rain.. with Christian Ponder...
I think Packers will try to get the run going with breakout game due for Lacy. it'll be hard to kick field goals in wet conditions. I picked the Over prematurely and forgot to check the weather but I like the Under in this one..but it could go over capitalized on sloppy turnovers. Switching back to the Favorite and Under.
Packers - 24 Vikings -14
my Thursday Night record is 7-1 on sides & totals. keep it going PACK!!!
Well Said. I see a similar score but will be headed with the UNDER instead. Good Luck To All!!
Cheers!!
Posted:
#75
Quote Originally Posted by RAM69:
Let's look at this in a subjective manner, Rodgers on Prime Time Television is usually a winner and with Vue putting his dollars on Minnesota, I would say 99.9% of the time you should bet opposite of this longtime winner lol. With this being said, I understand the probable rain and Teddy Bridgewater not playing but I dont think people understand how bad Green Bay Defense is. Asiata is the REAL DEAL!!!! TAKE MINNY PLUS 9!!!!!
Let's look at this in a subjective manner, Rodgers on Prime Time Television
is usually a winner and with Vue putting his dollars on Minnesota, I would say 99.9% of the time you should bet opposite of this longtime winner lol. With this being said, I understand the probable rain and Teddy Bridgewater not playing but I dont think people understand how bad Green Bay Defense is. Asiata is the REAL DEAL!!!! TAKE MINNY PLUS 9!!!!! wassup with all you guys against this guy Vue? Am I missing something here?
Hot Forum Topics
Established in 1995,Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Covers is verified safe by:
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.