Posted:
#51
RAVENS
Denver at Baltimore (11/01/2009)
Posted:
#52
Quote Originally Posted by pizoniballer31:
You mean those are your recent loser picks bro.Okay here's the deal.If you want to make money on the books.Rule 1)don't pay anyone for picks. 2)study the games 3)no parlays 4)listen to eveyone but decide for your self 5)know when to go against the squates 6)play second half's
Look no one's perfect but if you lose a game make sure it's your bad not someone else's
GLTA
Do you have a system? Or do you play it by ear? Thanks...
Posted:
#54
@MIN L 31-33
CIN L 14-17
@NE L 21-27
CLE W 34-3
@SD W 31-26
KC W 38-24
Balt has lost to basically to three decent teams they went up against. And they had no business getting that close in the Minn game. Only decent team they beat was SD when they were in their funk, and even in that game it took a last second stop to win and cover.
@SD W 34-23
NE W 20-17 x
DAL W 17-10
@OAK W 23-3
CLE W 27-6
@CIN W 12-7
On the other hand, Den did beat NE, DAL, and SD. I won't count the Cinn win (miracle play), but kept the Cinn O from scoring. Say what you will, but it looks like Den is not getting enough respect. A 3.5 point spread, I think Den covers this one in a low scoring game.
The only downside to Den is that they haven't traveled this far east this season...
CIN L 14-17
@NE L 21-27
CLE W 34-3
@SD W 31-26
KC W 38-24
Balt has lost to basically to three decent teams they went up against. And they had no business getting that close in the Minn game. Only decent team they beat was SD when they were in their funk, and even in that game it took a last second stop to win and cover.
@SD W 34-23
NE W 20-17 x
DAL W 17-10
@OAK W 23-3
CLE W 27-6
@CIN W 12-7
On the other hand, Den did beat NE, DAL, and SD. I won't count the Cinn win (miracle play), but kept the Cinn O from scoring. Say what you will, but it looks like Den is not getting enough respect. A 3.5 point spread, I think Den covers this one in a low scoring game.
The only downside to Den is that they haven't traveled this far east this season...
Posted:
#56
line is up to 4 now....
Funny how more people are on Denver, and the line keeps moving in Their Favor???
My original lean was Baltimore....an iffy one at that. If it was a pick 'em....I think Baltimore wins....
Both are off BYE's, and I think Denver covers. Denver is healthy, and has stayed healthy....Also, Same situation 2 weeks ago with SD....Denver was underdog, and they win outright.
But that line movement scares me....
Anyone help with this explination???
Posted:
#58
I lost taking NE and SD when I was thinking Den was overrated and were due to lose.. I was wrong on both and now I feel myself thinking the same thing. Theres no way they can keep winning and this week on the Road against a Balt team that should have a much better record than 3-3. But they do keep winning and covering spreads, not sure how.
So, this time I will jump on their bandwagon especially since they are getting 4 pts with my local. I see a close game either way. Den gets first loss but still covers.
DEN +4.
Bal 23 - Den 21
GLA!!
Posted:
#61
DEN +3.5: Again, the wrong team is favored. The public is remembering the vaunted Raven defense of past, but this year they’ve been allowing over 300 yds per game and over 21 points per game. The Broncos, on the other hand are holding opponents to 11 pts per game, I’ll side with Orton the Denver D. Score Broncos 24-Ravens 14 (3 units)
Posted:
#68
[Quote: Originally Posted by coltsalltheway] ok only this time they won't cover because they might win by 2 1 or 3 and the line is -3.5 baltimore
Okay you lose again child. Let me tell you something. don't go into discussions disrespecting like you did to me unless you are certain. By the way today I hit Miami and SF. So like you said before "I hope you guys are fading Bobseger all his picks are losers". You're WRONG. Go away boy.
Hot Forum Topics
