Chicago at Philadelphia (11/07/2011)
Posted:
#101
That said I do agree with BreakaBookie, Hester is at least something you need to account for.. again - sorry if I wasnt clear Comer, Im not a big stats guy, I used to be but now I go more with a gut the last 12 years or so.
That said I do agree with BreakaBookie, Hester is at least something you need to account for.. again - sorry if I wasnt clear Comer, Im not a big stats guy, I used to be but now I go more with a gut the last 12 years or so.
Posted:
#102
just bought the line up to 10.5 and locked in the ML...
GL TO ALL!
my gut says hester.... picked up him and started him in Fantasy lol I have a gut feeling about him....
I could be wrong
GL TO ALL!
my gut says hester.... picked up him and started him in Fantasy lol I have a gut feeling about him....
I could be wrong
just bought the line up to 10.5 and locked in the ML...
GL TO ALL!
my gut says hester.... picked up him and started him in Fantasy lol I have a gut feeling about him....
I could be wrong
GL TO ALL!
my gut says hester.... picked up him and started him in Fantasy lol I have a gut feeling about him....
I could be wrong
Posted:
#104
I brought it up because someone above mentioned he has a few td's on monday night, to me that is irrelevant. Maybe they were all short punts, maybe the teams weer bad at covering, maybe the weather was bad, who knows..to me making a play based on what happened in the past is not a good approach..if we are talking college hoop and clemson at carolina, where they havent won in over 50 years or whatever, now that's one thing...but if hester's past performance on monday is your only basis for a play then I suggest re-evaluating...that's just me.
I brought it up because someone above mentioned he has a few td's on monday night, to me that is irrelevant. Maybe they were all short punts, maybe the teams weer bad at covering, maybe the weather was bad, who knows..to me making a play based on what happened in the past is not a good approach..if we are talking college hoop and clemson at carolina, where they havent won in over 50 years or whatever, now that's one thing...but if hester's past performance on monday is your only basis for a play then I suggest re-evaluating...that's just me.
Posted:
#105
good points Breaka..good luck all tonight..my week starts on tuesdays like the rest of us old timers - you all need to learn why Monday night football was even created - but I'm all for positive vibes
good points Breaka..good luck all tonight..my week starts on tuesdays like the rest of us old timers - you all need to learn why Monday night football was even created - but I'm all for positive vibes
Posted:
#107
Hilarious....my Sportsbook has these 2 prop's for tonight's game:
1. Will the Philadelphia Eagles run 7 or more plays without Michael Vick in the offense?
Yes - 165
No + 130
2. Will stoppage of play occur due to injury of Michael Vick ?
Yes - 230
No + 175
Yes and Yes !!!!
Hilarious....my Sportsbook has these 2 prop's for tonight's game:
1. Will the Philadelphia Eagles run 7 or more plays without Michael Vick in the offense?
Yes - 165
No + 130
2. Will stoppage of play occur due to injury of Michael Vick ?
Yes - 230
No + 175
Yes and Yes !!!!
Posted:
#110
Maybe Im an idiot but what does Vick's dog fighting past have to do with whether or not they cover the chalk tonight? Does that mean he will suddenly make better decisions? Or not throw a pick at the wrong time? Or are you saying that he will because of his past? I can understand the good Dr asking me why I brought up Hester, because it may involve my decision...but bringing this stuff up? I don;t get it. Is this a PETA site? Am I in the wrong forum?
I despise what he did but shouldn't we separate that from capping? I mean really guys..take it somewhere else if you wanna go there..print up some t-shirts and go on The View or whatever..this is about helping us all cash units tonight.
And i do think he is way, way overrated. Has been since he came out of Tech. Never has won anything and never will...the best Philly QB I ever saw was Jaworski, I go back to about '59 or '60, and I remember Jurgensen there, who was a great passer..I barely remember Van Brocklin,..but before all the "Jaws" nonsense on ESPN and him being the guy "breaking down film" - that guy could play. Tough as nails and accurate under pressure. Having Carmichael sure helped.
I despise what he did but shouldn't we separate that from capping? I mean really guys..take it somewhere else if you wanna go there..print up some t-shirts and go on The View or whatever..this is about helping us all cash units tonight.
And i do think he is way, way overrated. Has been since he came out of Tech. Never has won anything and never will...the best Philly QB I ever saw was Jaworski, I go back to about '59 or '60, and I remember Jurgensen there, who was a great passer..I barely remember Van Brocklin,..but before all the "Jaws" nonsense on ESPN and him being the guy "breaking down film" - that guy could play. Tough as nails and accurate under pressure. Having Carmichael sure helped.
Maybe Im an idiot but what does Vick's dog fighting past have to do with whether or not they cover the chalk tonight? Does that mean he will suddenly make better decisions? Or not throw a pick at the wrong time? Or are you saying that he will because of his past? I can understand the good Dr asking me why I brought up Hester, because it may involve my decision...but bringing this stuff up? I don;t get it. Is this a PETA site? Am I in the wrong forum?
I despise what he did but shouldn't we separate that from capping? I mean really guys..take it somewhere else if you wanna go there..print up some t-shirts and go on The View or whatever..this is about helping us all cash units tonight.
And i do think he is way, way overrated. Has been since he came out of Tech. Never has won anything and never will...the best Philly QB I ever saw was Jaworski, I go back to about '59 or '60, and I remember Jurgensen there, who was a great passer..I barely remember Van Brocklin,..but before all the "Jaws" nonsense on ESPN and him being the guy "breaking down film" - that guy could play. Tough as nails and accurate under pressure. Having Carmichael sure helped.
I despise what he did but shouldn't we separate that from capping? I mean really guys..take it somewhere else if you wanna go there..print up some t-shirts and go on The View or whatever..this is about helping us all cash units tonight.
And i do think he is way, way overrated. Has been since he came out of Tech. Never has won anything and never will...the best Philly QB I ever saw was Jaworski, I go back to about '59 or '60, and I remember Jurgensen there, who was a great passer..I barely remember Van Brocklin,..but before all the "Jaws" nonsense on ESPN and him being the guy "breaking down film" - that guy could play. Tough as nails and accurate under pressure. Having Carmichael sure helped.
Posted:
#111
yeah Hester is a minor point and by no means sways a decision....
the way I cap is based on matchups.... my play is dominately based mostly on bears run/screen game
then the cover 2 scheme vs. Vick...
then some trends and stats.... sprinkle a little hester on top lolol....
throw a little public all over the Eagles because they won off a bye like they always do with Andy Reid against the Cowboys who they matchup well against....
and you have Da Bears +10.5, and the ML lol GL TO ALL!
I didn't play the over but I'll root on it for you
the way I cap is based on matchups.... my play is dominately based mostly on bears run/screen game
then the cover 2 scheme vs. Vick...
then some trends and stats.... sprinkle a little hester on top lolol....
throw a little public all over the Eagles because they won off a bye like they always do with Andy Reid against the Cowboys who they matchup well against....
and you have Da Bears +10.5, and the ML lol GL TO ALL!
I didn't play the over but I'll root on it for you
yeah Hester is a minor point and by no means sways a decision....
the way I cap is based on matchups.... my play is dominately based mostly on bears run/screen game
then the cover 2 scheme vs. Vick...
then some trends and stats.... sprinkle a little hester on top lolol....
throw a little public all over the Eagles because they won off a bye like they always do with Andy Reid against the Cowboys who they matchup well against....
and you have Da Bears +10.5, and the ML lol GL TO ALL!
I didn't play the over but I'll root on it for you
the way I cap is based on matchups.... my play is dominately based mostly on bears run/screen game
then the cover 2 scheme vs. Vick...
then some trends and stats.... sprinkle a little hester on top lolol....
throw a little public all over the Eagles because they won off a bye like they always do with Andy Reid against the Cowboys who they matchup well against....
and you have Da Bears +10.5, and the ML lol GL TO ALL!
I didn't play the over but I'll root on it for you
Posted:
#117
Quote Originally Posted by BombaBookie:
LOL- I am with you Breaka, I placed a ML beers wager too, what a pay out,,,damn
When it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck.........
IT'S A MOTHERFUCKIN DUCK!
Good Luck!
Quote Originally Posted by BombaBookie:
LOL- I am with you Breaka, I placed a ML beers wager too, what a pay out,,,damn
When it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck.........
IT'S A MOTHERFUCKIN DUCK!
Good Luck!
Posted:
#119
Breaka you and I have a similar approach..im also rooting for you as i did a little play on the Bears +8 as well..i think the screen game is a key point here...one on one down field with Phillly;s secondary is dicey but they can eat up yards with the screen game..and I (like you) was looking at what Cutler did against Detroit...
so lets have a good night..DrComer I think you had the Over too so lets cash on that..i like the questions and solid dialogue ..good luck all
so lets have a good night..DrComer I think you had the Over too so lets cash on that..i like the questions and solid dialogue ..good luck all
Breaka you and I have a similar approach..im also rooting for you as i did a little play on the Bears +8 as well..i think the screen game is a key point here...one on one down field with Phillly;s secondary is dicey but they can eat up yards with the screen game..and I (like you) was looking at what Cutler did against Detroit...
so lets have a good night..DrComer I think you had the Over too so lets cash on that..i like the questions and solid dialogue ..good luck all
so lets have a good night..DrComer I think you had the Over too so lets cash on that..i like the questions and solid dialogue ..good luck all
Hot Forum Topics
- 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 463,178
- Monday 11/02/2026 710
- BEARS/SEATTLE live in game COMMENTS welcome 779
- NFL LOCKED IN! 112,281
- PART DEUX 168
- Streak Survivor Winner List 21,862
- Florida Man - Monday Night 4,910
- *EdgeHunter MNF Bears VS. Seahawks! 12-2 Run — Trust the Research, Let the Plays Speak!* 2,924
- 11/2 2,214
- Week 10 Money 1,793
Warning - External Link
Report User
Thank you for reporting
This content is abusive or harmful
This post is spam
An error has occurred
This post is spam
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
Delete Post
Are you sure you would like to remove this post?
Remove Thread
Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?
Scan Results
Login/Register
Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
