Posted:
#76
all of this is coming from NEGATIVE RSI RATINGS???
hmmmmm
Chicago at Philadelphia (11/07/2011)
Posted:
#77
Quote Originally Posted by ceversole:
all of this is coming from NEGATIVE RSI RATINGS???
hmmmmm
And that coming from someone who just joined September '11.
Or, more likely, someone who just opened a new account because the were embarrassed from their negative RSI.
Anytime you want a head to head challenge just let me know.
Posted:
#78
Quote Originally Posted by NNMsports:
Oh how painful it was watching the Eagles play the Bears last postseason. The bears looked like they were the great wall of china on defense. Eagles may win, but definately not cover the 9 point spread.
Oh how painful it was watching the Eagles play the Bears last postseason. The bears looked like they were the great wall of china on defense. Eagles may win, but definately not cover the 9 point spread.
Bears +9
eagles didnt play bears last postseason
Posted:
#79
I don't care about what hester did in the past, nor do I care what the iggles ATS is in the past - it means nothing. Tonight is a new year with new players and a new situation.
Looking to end a good week on a high note - O 47, no side play. I see the Bears getting 17, eagles 28, and i see it more likely they go over that than under, and i see the over as more likely than the bears covering. People talk about how bad Cutler is, and rightly so, but he is capable of decent ball once in awhile. He has gotten to a conference title game, headache aside, and that is something Schaub and Ryan and many other little darlings can't say. The overrated guy on that team is Urlacher. Ever since I saw Bettis run right over him like a man against a child in a big game in December of 2005, I knew he was all ESPN hype. GLA
Looking to end a good week on a high note - O 47, no side play. I see the Bears getting 17, eagles 28, and i see it more likely they go over that than under, and i see the over as more likely than the bears covering. People talk about how bad Cutler is, and rightly so, but he is capable of decent ball once in awhile. He has gotten to a conference title game, headache aside, and that is something Schaub and Ryan and many other little darlings can't say. The overrated guy on that team is Urlacher. Ever since I saw Bettis run right over him like a man against a child in a big game in December of 2005, I knew he was all ESPN hype. GLA
and San diego minus a half point. Easiest bet all week.
Posted:
#81
Quote Originally Posted by CappingVet:
I don't care about what hester did in the past, nor do I care what the iggles ATS is in the past - it means nothing. Tonight is a new year with new players and a new situation.
Looking to end a good week on a high note - O 47, no side play. I see the Bears getting 17, eagles 28, and i see it more likely they go over that than under, and i see the over as more likely than the bears covering. People talk about how bad Cutler is, and rightly so, but he is capable of decent ball once in awhile. He has gotten to a conference title game, headache aside, and that is something Schaub and Ryan and many other little darlings can't say. The overrated guy on that team is Urlacher. Ever since I saw Bettis run right over him like a man against a child in a big game in December of 2005, I knew he was all ESPN hype. GLA
I don't care about what hester did in the past, nor do I care what the iggles ATS is in the past - it means nothing. Tonight is a new year with new players and a new situation.
Looking to end a good week on a high note - O 47, no side play. I see the Bears getting 17, eagles 28, and i see it more likely they go over that than under, and i see the over as more likely than the bears covering. People talk about how bad Cutler is, and rightly so, but he is capable of decent ball once in awhile. He has gotten to a conference title game, headache aside, and that is something Schaub and Ryan and many other little darlings can't say. The overrated guy on that team is Urlacher. Ever since I saw Bettis run right over him like a man against a child in a big game in December of 2005, I knew he was all ESPN hype. GLA
You don't care about what Hester did in the past???
Then why did you bring it up???
I was commenting on your quoted stats.
Posted:
#83
Originally Posted by joewashington]
The Eagles weakness during the earlier games was covering the backs out of the backfield. So, when comparing the Bears games with the Cowboys' game, seems like the game could be close, especially when you factor in the kicking game...Robbie Gold is much better than our new kicker, and everyone is upset that they got rid o Akers, who is having another great season in San Fran.
Coaching? Not impressed by Reid or Smith....
If the Bears score an early touchdown, that's a 16-point hole.
I don't know how Vegas and the books work and how they try to lure betters to one side or another. I always thought (excuse my naivete) they tried to balance the betting to capture the vig....
Some guy made a post the other day saying, "I always go with the better team." I liked that...WHO WOULD YOU SAY IS THE BETTER TEAM TONIGHT....
When the line (-9) doesn't make sense......start investigating the motive.......Vegas put the line at -9 for a reason.....Eagles can't stop the run.....Bears can run.....Eagles coming off big-game high from beating Cowboys....Can they maintain that high 2 weeks in a row? Enough to cover a hefty 9 points?
Joe, you make a couple of good points. Last week was a do or die situation for Philly. Sunday Night Game, Bye Week, and rival cowboys (at least a rivalry in philly eyes).
The big question about last week's game was why Dallas didn't run Demarco Murry more. Made no sense. The Bears WILL run Forte.
Romo isn't the great quarterback we were led to believe. Cutler can zip the ball, but how well the Bears' O-Line plays is the unknown.
The Eagles weakness during the earlier games was covering the backs out of the backfield. So, when comparing the Bears games with the Cowboys' game, seems like the game could be close, especially when you factor in the kicking game...Robbie Gold is much better than our new kicker, and everyone is upset that they got rid o Akers, who is having another great season in San Fran.
Coaching? Not impressed by Reid or Smith....
If the Bears score an early touchdown, that's a 16-point hole.
I don't know how Vegas and the books work and how they try to lure betters to one side or another. I always thought (excuse my naivete) they tried to balance the betting to capture the vig....
Some guy made a post the other day saying, "I always go with the better team." I liked that...WHO WOULD YOU SAY IS THE BETTER TEAM TONIGHT....
Posted:
#84
Quote Originally Posted by CappingVet:
I don't care about what hester did in the past, nor do I care what the iggles ATS is in the past - it means nothing. Tonight is a new year with new players and a new situation.
Looking to end a good week on a high note - O 47, no side play. I see the Bears getting 17, eagles 28, and i see it more likely they go over that than under, and i see the over as more likely than the bears covering. People talk about how bad Cutler is, and rightly so, but he is capable of decent ball once in awhile. He has gotten to a conference title game, headache aside, and that is something Schaub and Ryan and many other little darlings can't say. The overrated guy on that team is Urlacher. Ever since I saw Bettis run right over him like a man against a child in a big game in December of 2005, I knew he was all ESPN hype. GLA
I don't care about what hester did in the past, nor do I care what the iggles ATS is in the past - it means nothing. Tonight is a new year with new players and a new situation.
Looking to end a good week on a high note - O 47, no side play. I see the Bears getting 17, eagles 28, and i see it more likely they go over that than under, and i see the over as more likely than the bears covering. People talk about how bad Cutler is, and rightly so, but he is capable of decent ball once in awhile. He has gotten to a conference title game, headache aside, and that is something Schaub and Ryan and many other little darlings can't say. The overrated guy on that team is Urlacher. Ever since I saw Bettis run right over him like a man against a child in a big game in December of 2005, I knew he was all ESPN hype. GLA
I agree with you 100%... (the bolded part lol)
most of the games ATS were in Chicago.... you really have to throw those out because this game is in Philly and they havn't played there since 07.....
I do think Hester is a factor you have to account for..... the guy has big games in primetime....
Philly's defense is awful.... they may be able to beat a passing team like the Cowboys with their allstar corners but against the run they are terrible... I don't know what the stats say im judging by what I've seen....
As for Cutler.... I was impressed by the game he had against the Lions.... that Detroit front was walking all over da bears oline and Cutler took a beating but had a great night.... his numbers did no justice to how well he played but he was 28 for 38 249 1 td no INTS and he had NO TIME at all....
Bears oline is terrible but Philly front 7 is nothing like Det's..... I'm expecting to see a great run/screen game from CHI....
and Vick vs. the cover 2 is not impressive.... look it up....
Da Bears ML (small play)
Da Bears (medium play)
Over, might pull the trigger before kickoff we'll see....
let's start this week off with a bang!
GL TO ALL!
Posted:
#86
Michael Vick is the most overrated QB, if not player, in the NFL. He has won absolutely nothing. In fact, his entire career has been injury after injury. Unbelievable hype around this guy...he's really not that good. Throws too many interceptions, makes poor running choices at the wrong time and most importantly, he consistently gets hurt.
Look for Vick to by helped off the field once again tonight. Hype hype hype job once again !
Chicago upsets Philly tonight
Chicago +9 LARGE
Chicago + 350
Posted:
#92
Quote Originally Posted by Sandman23:
Michael Vick is the most overrated QB, if not player, in the NFL. He has won absolutely nothing. In fact, his entire career has been injury after injury. Unbelievable hype around this guy...he's really not that good. Throws too many interceptions, makes poor running choices at the wrong time and most importantly, he consistently gets hurt.
Michael Vick is the most overrated QB, if not player, in the NFL. He has won absolutely nothing. In fact, his entire career has been injury after injury. Unbelievable hype around this guy...he's really not that good. Throws too many interceptions, makes poor running choices at the wrong time and most importantly, he consistently gets hurt.
Look for Vick to by helped off the field once again tonight. Hype hype hype job once again !
Chicago upsets Philly tonight
Chicago +9 LARGE
Chicago + 350
HATER!!!
Posted:
#93
Quote Originally Posted by au4040:
Bears defense still stout, only allowing over 18 points ONCE so far this year... and that was to my man Cam Newton who threw for 374 yards and a TD... and then rushed for another 35 yards and 2 touchdowns.
Bears defense still stout, only allowing over 18 points ONCE so far this year... and that was to my man Cam Newton who threw for 374 yards and a TD... and then rushed for another 35 yards and 2 touchdowns.
Seriously, where the fuck did you get that stat from? Did you even bother looking it up yourself or you just like pulling stats out of your ass?
Week 2 - Saints scored 30 on them
Week 3 - Packers put 27 on them
Week 4 - Panthers 29
Week 5 - Lions 24
Week 7 - Bucs (yes, Trashy Freeman) put 18
Posted:
#95
People talk a lot about Vick and his dog-fighting incident. IF you are going to bet on emotions, you are not going to win. Get over people hurting animals. If you freaking eat meat, you are an animal killer. SO WHAT? STFU!! Now.... This line is too fishy.. Can someone explain why Philly is the favorite here? and by 9 at that? Took Tenn and lost.. Taking CHICAGO here.. Chicago defense will keep it close.. Hopefully Forte can help the passing plays..
Posted:
#97
Quote Originally Posted by BettingTheHouze:
People talk a lot about Vick and his dog-fighting incident. IF you are going to bet on emotions, you are not going to win. Get over people hurting animals. If you freaking eat meat, you are an animal killer. SO WHAT? STFU!! Now.... This line is too fishy.. Can someone explain why Philly is the favorite here? and by 9 at that? Took Tenn and lost.. Taking CHICAGO here.. Chicago defense will keep it close.. Hopefully Forte can help the passing plays..
People talk a lot about Vick and his dog-fighting incident. IF you are going to bet on emotions, you are not going to win. Get over people hurting animals. If you freaking eat meat, you are an animal killer. SO WHAT? STFU!! Now.... This line is too fishy.. Can someone explain why Philly is the favorite here? and by 9 at that? Took Tenn and lost.. Taking CHICAGO here.. Chicago defense will keep it close.. Hopefully Forte can help the passing plays..
Chicago will keep it close, GL
But you ask why is Philly the fav???
C'mon man
Posted:
#99
Not sure what you mean Drcomer - I didnt quote any stats - all i said was who cares what happened in the past, it means nothing about tonight, and I posted my over play, which apparently you like also? Not trying to be argumentative, just didn't see what you mean. because I never post stats.
Hot Forum Topics
