Posted:
#26
Over 51 easy. Doesn't matter how banged up GB offense is Rogers will pick a part the Bears secondary. Lacy will run all over the Bears. MCcown and Forta will score enough for the cover.
Chicago at Green Bay (11/04/2013)
Posted:
#27
I love the under tonight....
GB is banged up on offense and gave the rock to lacy 29 times last week.
cutler is out and McGowan is playing QB so you know they are gonna pound the rock but GB has top 5 ranked run defense.
add a little rain to the mix and this game should be way under the total..... Way under. I think its a gift....
I'm staying away from the side due to the reasons I just posted. I like GB but could easily se Hester on Monday Night Football giving da bears a backdoor cover....
GL TO ALL!!!
Posted:
#28
Quote Originally Posted by TheQuadYeah:
O.K., O.K., I'm getting in early with this game because it's been bothering me for a couple of weeks now. This is an open letter to the Chicago Bears organization. First off, firing Lovie Smith (a defensive minded guy) was a HUGE mistake. Next, hiring Trestman, a West Coast style (and Canadian Football) offensive guru? Mistake #2..... Cuntler? Mistake #3, and "T.O." and "Ochocinco" style diva Brandon Marshall? Mistake #4.....
Why, you ask?
Because the Bears are not a high powered offensive team. Never have been, never will be. It's always been ground-and-pound, "Monsters Of The Midway", let the defense manage the clock, take FG's if we have to, manage the game, and then, maybe, throw a couple of passes to mix it up a bit.
What the Bears need is a game manager - look, you made it all the way to the Superbowl with Rex Grossman for God's sake!!! Just take a look at what the Ravens are doing, because you're both set up kind of the same way. They have 2 Superbowl wins since moving here in 1996 - and who were the QB's? Trent Dilfer and Joe Flacco. Not exactly "gunslingers" now, are they.....
Now, having said all of this, is Josh McCown the answer? I don't know, but I'll tell you this - he won't be throwing 5 FRIGGIN' PICKS EVERY GAME!!!!
Lastly, let's say McCown is the "Game Manager" your team desperately needs, and he rattles off the next 4 games which might be tough because it's Packers, Lions, Ravens, and Rams. Or even if he goes 3-1. Now Cuntler's coming back from his "Vaginal Cramps" - do you pull McCown????
I guess only time will tell.....
Now, to this game - Bears rested, had time to get McCown "indoctrinated", Packers offense beat up, Monday Night Primetime division rival......
Bears M/L - - you heard it here first.........
Good Luck All!!!
....That's the dumbest post I have read all season. Your idea that the Bears need to follow the Ravens model who won with Dilfer is totally flawed as the Rvens had one of the best defense of all time and the Bears defense sucks behind.
Posted:
#29
I know that the over of 51 is looking good but in the last 10 meetings between these two teams only once have they scored over 51 points. When both teams have had the total line at 50 or over they have not covered this year. I understand the injuries on both sides are going to play a key factor but I have a feeling this is going to be lower scoring game than the experts think. Also the Bears have a bye week to prepare. I like the under.
Posted:
#30
Quote Originally Posted by Sammy_Ace:
I think this line is an overreaction to the Cutler being out. McCown came in last week under a baptism by fire situation and handled himself quite well. Given the Bears' familiarity with the Packers offense, I think they will be able to hold their own and do a much better job of containing Aaron Rodgers explosive passing attack than Minnesota did last week. Especially without the services of Jones, Finely, and Cobb.
I think this line is an overreaction to the Cutler being out. McCown came in last week under a baptism by fire situation and handled himself quite well. Given the Bears' familiarity with the Packers offense, I think they will be able to hold their own and do a much better job of containing Aaron Rodgers explosive passing attack than Minnesota did last week. Especially without the services of Jones, Finely, and Cobb.
I also think the Bears will not put the game on McCown's shoulders, play good defense, and emphasize turnover-free ground & pound football with Forte leading the charge. Speaking of ground and pound, the Packers will definitely try to exploit the missing Lance Briggs, so look for them to give a heavy dose to their workhorse Eddie Lacey.
With all that being said, I love the Bears and the UNDER. Pack total from last week was 75 points and the Bears total from the Washington game was a whopping 86 points!!! Now we have a total set at just 49.5. I think the previous high scoring games provide us with value, as we have 2 teams here that will be running the ball a lot!!
My final:
Bears 20
Pack 24
good luck
CHUPAKABRA APPROVES OF THIS MESSAGE
Posted:
#32
Quote Originally Posted by TryMyLuck27:
Most games GB played with Chicago are winning double digits with Cutler or without doesnt matter. Roger are beast on Monday night. GB at home final score 17-30 GB good luck all !!!!
Most games GB played with Chicago are winning double digits with Cutler or without doesnt matter. Roger are beast on Monday night. GB at home final score 17-30 GB good luck all !!!!
A beast? Did you know that he's 9-2 against the bears lifetime and those 2 losses came on MNF.. History repeats itself and I like the bears...
Posted:
#33
I think we are just handing those friggin books money betting the 10.5 spread on this game. Two bets for action junkies. Green Bay ML. You might not like risking 50 to make 10 but it'll be a winner better than 5 times to one. McCown is an unknown factor, no sense in betting on or against him. What is known is Rogers and Lacy and company are going to roll through this old, slow, and injury devastated Bears defense so I'm betting on the over in the Green Bay point total.
Posted:
#35
Quote Originally Posted by JohnnyMarr:
....That's the dumbest post I have read all season. Your idea that the Bears need to follow the Ravens model who won with Dilfer is totally flawed as the Rvens had one of the best defense of all time and the Bears defense sucks behind.
....That's the dumbest post I have read all season. Your idea that the Bears need to follow the Ravens model who won with Dilfer is totally flawed as the Rvens had one of the best defense of all time and the Bears defense sucks behind.
Once again, point missed. Why don't you go read post #22 and get back to me.....
Tonight, Bears -10.5 and under 51.....
Good Luck All!!!!
Posted:
#36
At 5 dimes I made this bet. Over under for Packers is 30.5 at -105. Meh. But being a good book they give me a ton of options. I bet the over for the Packers at 34.5 and those 4 points give me a +199. Alright! 2 to 1 payout if the Packers score 5 TD's on the Bears. I'm a Chicago resident, I know my Bears. They have no pass rush, their linebackers are replacement level and their pass defenders are banged up and getting on in years. If you give Rogers time, he'll kill you. I wonder what the over under is on Lacy for yards rushing. He is going to get a lot of carries and he won't be stopped by this hapless bunch.
Posted:
#37
some of you people are really insane.bet the mL on packers laying 50$ to win 10$ your better off betting a horse you get back a lot more.anyway like the under I would think the o/u would have been 54 or around there.after last weeks scoring.just like the browns line at -1 fishy only 50 pts.lot of running watched the pack play the Vikings and rogers waits till 1 second to hike the ball and does not throw a lot if incomplete passes plus lacy averages 24 carries and green bay is 3rd in league in time of possession.that = under to me big .
Posted:
#40
Quote Originally Posted by rose123:
some of you people are really insane.bet the mL on packers laying 50$ to win 10$ your better off betting a horse you get back a lot more.anyway like the under I would think the o/u would have been 54 or around there.after last weeks scoring.just like the browns line at -1 fishy only 50 pts.lot of running watched the pack play the Vikings and rogers waits till 1 second to hike the ball and does not throw a lot if incomplete passes plus lacy averages 24 carries and green bay is 3rd in league in time of possession.that = under to me big .
Yeah, I'm nuts to bet money line most of the time, but it's all I like tonight. Packers are not losing up in Green Bay, not against this bunch. Last time Bears lost Cutler they went on a looong losing streak, and that is when their defense was really good. Now they are really bad. Got a hunch Rogers is going to put up plus 40 on my Bears tonight. The addition of Lacy to Green Bay is huge.
Posted:
#41
Quote Originally Posted by TryMyLuck27:
Most games GB played with Chicago are winning double digits with Cutler or without doesnt matter. Roger are beast on Monday night. GB at home final score 17-30 GB good luck all !!!!
Most games GB played with Chicago are winning double digits with Cutler or without doesnt matter. Roger are beast on Monday night. GB at home final score 17-30 GB good luck all !!!!
You know it's so easy to check these things on Covers. Just go to the matchup for these teams and if you can count you'll see that the Pack has one exactly 3 games out of 10 by double digits.
GB or CHI ????? 
OVER or UNDER ?????
Posted:
#47
Backup 
Statement
StatementOne can easily imagine J. Mc Cown as Sacrificial Backup QB
in tuff ,heated spotlight divisional battle.
However, been there done that , J Mc knows Bears system in out + benefits off Bye prep for Top spot showdown .
Packs Soft white underbelly plays to Forte's strength n' for Bears to have upset chance, appears evident they MUST rely on special teams n' ground oriented attack.
Worst case scenario : Bears in comeback mode = J Mc ( Per career form) tossin' Killer INTS.
Appears Push may be worst case scenario @ + 10.
Too many Pts in what I had figured 7.5 as True Line.
Never liked Cutler , never liked his whimperin' style n' perhaps I'm wrong believin' Bears will rally behind Josh Mc. who imo has more spine than JC.
As posted, On real Nice Ca$h $treak, however tonite
Money 
Mngment
Mngment kicks in :
Short WTF play on
Bears + 10
BOLA
Posted:
#48
Cut & Dried: Culter tried:
Jay wants another multi-million dollar contract after this year.
That's why his buddy Brandon spilled the beans that Jay will only miss one game
by only avoiding Green Bay & multi-interceptions, because his "injury"
is in fact not serious. Injury had to look like it's a serious month-long recovery
type of injury otherwise he would yet again be seen as not being tough -
he was riding a bike on the sideline instead of taking the field against Green Bay.
A year ago in Green Bay Jay managed to throw a TD but also got intercepted 4 times
- although Jay's career record shows that every year he does throw over 50% interceptions
versus his TD's, Green Bay makes fun of playing "Cuntler": Jay has never thrown more TDs
than he has thrown interceptions against Green Bay - and Jay knows that he never will.
So anyone can understand Jay once again faking an injury, even though he will miss out on
one of his very large weekly paychecks in order to
1.) skirt the issue of his never having won against Green Bay (excepting that one and only time,
Rogers 2nd game in Chicago in 2010, when Hester and 2 field goals resulted in a 20-17 win),
and,
2.) in order to secure millionsof dollars, if not a few more, in his upcoming contract negotiations.
By contrast, Michael Jordan never ducked-out, bujust kept losing to Detroit until he could beat them;
however Field General Jay's no dummy, rather he's a very wealthy and very clever quitter,
for he knows exactly when and which games to just quit on - particularly those where he was supposed
to be the solution but has never delivered against Chicago's long-standing rival Green Bay.
Cutler TD/Int, Rating vs. GB:
2012: 1/4, 28.2 (Loser)
2011: 2/2, 78.9 (Loser); 1/1, 78.5 (Loser)
2010: 1/1, 82.5 (Winner); 0/2, 43.5 (Loser); 0/1, 31.8 (Loser)
2009: 1/4, 43.2 (Loser); 2/2, 74.9 (Loser)
Totals: Won 1 & Lost 8
with 8 Touchdowns & 17 Interceptions (= horribly more than twice as many Int's as TD's)
Most games this week were close. It's easier for a division rival to cover 10.5 pts, especially if
Jay Cutler is sitting this one out - so there's no way to intercept Cutler 4 times as is the norm for him
- easier by far than it is for a winless Tampa Bay to be up 3 TDs on Seattle at home.
Jay wants another multi-million dollar contract after this year.
That's why his buddy Brandon spilled the beans that Jay will only miss one game
by only avoiding Green Bay & multi-interceptions, because his "injury"
is in fact not serious. Injury had to look like it's a serious month-long recovery
type of injury otherwise he would yet again be seen as not being tough -
he was riding a bike on the sideline instead of taking the field against Green Bay.
A year ago in Green Bay Jay managed to throw a TD but also got intercepted 4 times
- although Jay's career record shows that every year he does throw over 50% interceptions
versus his TD's, Green Bay makes fun of playing "Cuntler": Jay has never thrown more TDs
than he has thrown interceptions against Green Bay - and Jay knows that he never will.
So anyone can understand Jay once again faking an injury, even though he will miss out on
one of his very large weekly paychecks in order to
1.) skirt the issue of his never having won against Green Bay (excepting that one and only time,
Rogers 2nd game in Chicago in 2010, when Hester and 2 field goals resulted in a 20-17 win),
and,
2.) in order to secure millionsof dollars, if not a few more, in his upcoming contract negotiations.
By contrast, Michael Jordan never ducked-out, bujust kept losing to Detroit until he could beat them;
however Field General Jay's no dummy, rather he's a very wealthy and very clever quitter,
for he knows exactly when and which games to just quit on - particularly those where he was supposed
to be the solution but has never delivered against Chicago's long-standing rival Green Bay.
Cutler TD/Int, Rating vs. GB:
2012: 1/4, 28.2 (Loser)
2011: 2/2, 78.9 (Loser); 1/1, 78.5 (Loser)
2010: 1/1, 82.5 (Winner); 0/2, 43.5 (Loser); 0/1, 31.8 (Loser)
2009: 1/4, 43.2 (Loser); 2/2, 74.9 (Loser)
Totals: Won 1 & Lost 8
with 8 Touchdowns & 17 Interceptions (= horribly more than twice as many Int's as TD's)
Most games this week were close. It's easier for a division rival to cover 10.5 pts, especially if
Jay Cutler is sitting this one out - so there's no way to intercept Cutler 4 times as is the norm for him
- easier by far than it is for a winless Tampa Bay to be up 3 TDs on Seattle at home.
Hot Forum Topics
