Posted:
#51
Zimmerman is auctioning the gun used to kill Saint Trayvon artin
Posted:
#52
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:
Quote Originally Posted by Ktrain:
What about you Slim? Are you ok with profiting off the death of others?
Sure it happens every day .....,profiting from death is everywhere.e.g. casket makers, funeral homes, all profit from death each day. So do cemeteries,,makers of headstones, gravestones and grave markers ..et al....it is happening everywhere ..just look around ..What about you Slim? Are you ok with profiting off the death of others?
I could excuse your post if it was in a vacuum by itself. Given the context of the thread though, it seems pretty ignorant.
Let's go with your examples though and put them into the context of this thread. The very thread you started.
Would you be ok if the funeral director was directly involved with the death of a person, and then not only advertised the funeral, while charging admission, but also celebrated the death of that person on a website?
If you're cool with people profiting off of deaths They're directly involved in, just say so.
Maybe you can Bowl can come up with some business that celebrates the deaths of people? You could donate some of the proceeds to fighting the Black Lives Matter movement and keeping Hillary out of office (Hell I'll even give you a pat on the back for fighting that cause).
Posted:
#53
Ktrain,this was your question :What about you Slim? Are you ok with profiting off the death of others?
Easy to comprehend ..I answered the ''Q'' you asked
The problem is not in my inability to comprehend,,it's plainly in your inability to frame the question correctly..
By the way,, I see you are starting to unravel and call names ..most liberals do when they get dithered..
Easy to comprehend ..I answered the ''Q'' you asked
The problem is not in my inability to comprehend,,it's plainly in your inability to frame the question correctly..
By the way,, I see you are starting to unravel and call names ..most liberals do when they get dithered..
Posted:
#54
Quote Originally Posted by SportsFan9698:
I say there is a HUGE difference between a legal right and the right thing to do. I heard him say in some interview this is the last act to "put this ordeal behind him". What nonsense. It was behind him until he decided to enter back into the news cycle by profiting from the infamous gun.
I use the term gun loosely... it is a Kel Tec... the lowest of low end pistols a few dollars can buy.
We are in rare accord on this issue.
Just because you can do something does not mean you should. A guy could legally smear feces all over his face right before a job interview. That would be ill-advised unless he is trying to become a rodeo clown.
However, it is certainly preferable to sell the gun than to use it in the commision of a crime.
Posted:
#56
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:
Ktrain,this was your question :What about you Slim? Are you ok with profiting off the death of others?Easy to comprehend ..I answered the ''Q'' you asked The problem is not in my inability to comprehend,,it's plainly in your inability to frame the question correctly..By the way,, I see you are starting to unravel and call names ..most liberals do when they get dithered..
Ktrain,this was your question :What about you Slim? Are you ok with profiting off the death of others?Easy to comprehend ..I answered the ''Q'' you asked The problem is not in my inability to comprehend,,it's plainly in your inability to frame the question correctly..By the way,, I see you are starting to unravel and call names ..most liberals do when they get dithered..
You're correct, I wasn't specific enough. I gave you way too much credit thinking you are intelligent enough to answer that question without acting like child. My fault for that. I'll try not not to give your intelligence that much credit in the future (handshake).
It was wrong of me to think you could answer that question within the context of the thread, especially since you started the thread. My fault for that one.
I didn't call you any names. I didn't call you a Nazi. You just choose to interpret it that way. Considering you started the thread, your responses to questions directed at you have been ignorant.
The irony is that you whine about name calling yet refer to me as a liberal in the same post. Now you could say that you're just associating me with group, except that you have thrown the term "liberal" around the forum in a derogatory manner for years.
Like I previously stated though, I must be the worst liberal ever. Pro second amendment and anti minimum wage increase. I don't support HRC or Bernie and I never voted for BHO. Guess I shouldn't hold my breathe on the DNC invite huh? But you just keep claiming everyone's a liberal because they don't agree with every little thing you say. I'm sure that gets you far in life.
Do you condone George Zimmerman, or anyone else, profiting off the death of another human being, where they directly contributed to the death of that person?
I apologize if that's too vague or not specific enough. I realize things are getting more difficult for you at this advanced age.
Posted:
#61
Quote Originally Posted by Ktrain:
Did you really just compare TM to victims of the Holocaust who were murdered? Looks like you need to go take a deep breath and gather your composure.
The Nazi's profited off the justifiable homicide of the Jewish people. They were allowed to kill without criminal guilt in Germany. Are you ok with that?
Pretty simple question. Yes or no?
Perhaps you should take a deep breath, gather your composure, and then answer.
Did you really just compare TM to victims of the Holocaust who were murdered? Looks like you need to go take a deep breath and gather your composure.
The Nazi's profited off the justifiable homicide of the Jewish people. They were allowed to kill without criminal guilt in Germany. Are you ok with that?
Pretty simple question. Yes or no?
Perhaps you should take a deep breath, gather your composure, and then answer.
WTF Ktrain?
So nobody in the Nazi party was ever punished for war crimes or murdering the person?
I hope you aren't trying to say that because it took time to topple the regime that it was condoned.
If dl36 was an honest man he'd say you've gone over the deep end.
Posted:
#63
Quote Originally Posted by Ktrain:
Sure it happens every day .....,profiting from death is everywhere.e.g. casket makers, funeral homes, all profit from death each day. So do cemeteries,,makers of headstones, gravestones and grave markers ..et al....it is happening everywhere ..just look around ..
I could excuse your post if it was in a vacuum by itself. Given the context of the thread though, it seems pretty ignorant.
Let's go with your examples though and put them into the context of this thread. The very thread you started.
Would you be ok if the funeral director was directly involved with the death of a person, and then not only advertised the funeral, while charging admission, but also celebrated the death of that person on a website?
If you're cool with people profiting off of deaths They're directly involved in, just say so.
Maybe you can Bowl can come up with some business that celebrates the deaths of people? You could donate some of the proceeds to fighting the Black Lives Matter movement and keeping Hillary out of office (Hell I'll even give you a pat on the back for fighting that cause).
Sure it happens every day .....,profiting from death is everywhere.e.g. casket makers, funeral homes, all profit from death each day. So do cemeteries,,makers of headstones, gravestones and grave markers ..et al....it is happening everywhere ..just look around ..
I could excuse your post if it was in a vacuum by itself. Given the context of the thread though, it seems pretty ignorant.
Let's go with your examples though and put them into the context of this thread. The very thread you started.
Would you be ok if the funeral director was directly involved with the death of a person, and then not only advertised the funeral, while charging admission, but also celebrated the death of that person on a website?
If you're cool with people profiting off of deaths They're directly involved in, just say so.
Maybe you can Bowl can come up with some business that celebrates the deaths of people? You could donate some of the proceeds to fighting the Black Lives Matter movement and keeping Hillary out of office (Hell I'll even give you a pat on the back for fighting that cause).
That line of thinking is very intellectually dishonest. Thats like saying if you're for abortions then you don't mind babies getting killed.
Posted:
#64
Bowl,
That's interesting that you bring up abortions because this whole topic got me thinking about my stance on abortion.
I've always been pro choice, I still am. But I'm definitely not in favor of a baby being aborted in the final week or even trimester.
I have to say, I'm. It quite sure when the cutoff should be.
I'm not quite sure I can accurately define when life begins.
I've also being trying to think of any scenario where it would be morally ok for a person to profit off the death of another person, where the first person played a direct role in the death of the second person. I can't think of any.
That's interesting that you bring up abortions because this whole topic got me thinking about my stance on abortion.
I've always been pro choice, I still am. But I'm definitely not in favor of a baby being aborted in the final week or even trimester.
I have to say, I'm. It quite sure when the cutoff should be.
I'm not quite sure I can accurately define when life begins.
I've also being trying to think of any scenario where it would be morally ok for a person to profit off the death of another person, where the first person played a direct role in the death of the second person. I can't think of any.
Posted:
#67
Slim,
An obsession is possible. Although I don't believe I've mentioned it in any other thread. I could be wrong about that.
Either way, it's still no where near your obsession with liberals. You literally call everyone who doesn't agree with you on a topic a liberal.
What's really scary is that I've actually agreed with you on a few things in the past....and you still call me a liberal!
it's getting scary Slim. I fear for your mental health.
I wish you the best Slim. (Handshake)
An obsession is possible. Although I don't believe I've mentioned it in any other thread. I could be wrong about that.
Either way, it's still no where near your obsession with liberals. You literally call everyone who doesn't agree with you on a topic a liberal.
What's really scary is that I've actually agreed with you on a few things in the past....and you still call me a liberal!
it's getting scary Slim. I fear for your mental health.
I wish you the best Slim. (Handshake)
Posted:
#68
Quote Originally Posted by Ktrain:
I didn't call you any names. I didn't call you a Nazi. You just choose to interpret it that way. Considering you started the thread, your responses to questions directed at you have been ignorant. .
I didn't call you any names. I didn't call you a Nazi. You just choose to interpret it that way. Considering you started the thread, your responses to questions directed at you have been ignorant. .
"Gramps" twice ..that's ageism..You get so distressed you forget what you even said..and then lie like Obama ..
Posted:
#69
Slim,
I'll give you that one if it helps you to sleep better. You want to talk about reaching though.....
You're way more sensitive than I thought. Good luck with that.
I thought there was a decent chance you were a grandpa though. Especially with the skippy comment. Seem like something a grandpa or an old man would say.
I'm sorry I hurt your feelings Slim. I'll let you have your safe space now.
I'll give you that one if it helps you to sleep better. You want to talk about reaching though.....
You're way more sensitive than I thought. Good luck with that.
I thought there was a decent chance you were a grandpa though. Especially with the skippy comment. Seem like something a grandpa or an old man would say.
I'm sorry I hurt your feelings Slim. I'll let you have your safe space now.
Posted:
#70
Quote Originally Posted by Ktrain:
You're correct, I wasn't specific enough. I gave you way too much credit thinking you are intelligent enough to answer that question without acting like child. My fault for that. I'll try not not to give your intelligence that much credit in the future (handshake).
It was wrong of me to think you could answer that question within the context of the thread, especially since you started the thread. My fault for that one.
I didn't call you any names. I didn't call you a Nazi. You just choose to interpret it that way. Considering you started the thread, your responses to questions directed at you have been ignorant.
The irony is that you whine about name calling yet refer to me as a liberal in the same post. Now you could say that you're just associating me with group, except that you have thrown the term "liberal" around the forum in a derogatory manner for years.
Like I previously stated though, I must be the worst liberal ever. Pro second amendment and anti minimum wage increase. I don't support HRC or Bernie and I never voted for BHO. Guess I shouldn't hold my breathe on the DNC invite huh? But you just keep claiming everyone's a liberal because they don't agree with every little thing you say. I'm sure that gets you far in life.
Do you condone George Zimmerman, or anyone else, profiting off the death of another human being, where they directly contributed to the death of that person?
I apologize if that's too vague or not specific enough. I realize things are getting more difficult for you at this advanced age.
You're correct, I wasn't specific enough. I gave you way too much credit thinking you are intelligent enough to answer that question without acting like child. My fault for that. I'll try not not to give your intelligence that much credit in the future (handshake).
It was wrong of me to think you could answer that question within the context of the thread, especially since you started the thread. My fault for that one.
I didn't call you any names. I didn't call you a Nazi. You just choose to interpret it that way. Considering you started the thread, your responses to questions directed at you have been ignorant.
The irony is that you whine about name calling yet refer to me as a liberal in the same post. Now you could say that you're just associating me with group, except that you have thrown the term "liberal" around the forum in a derogatory manner for years.
Like I previously stated though, I must be the worst liberal ever. Pro second amendment and anti minimum wage increase. I don't support HRC or Bernie and I never voted for BHO. Guess I shouldn't hold my breathe on the DNC invite huh? But you just keep claiming everyone's a liberal because they don't agree with every little thing you say. I'm sure that gets you far in life.
Do you condone George Zimmerman, or anyone else, profiting off the death of another human being, where they directly contributed to the death of that person?
I apologize if that's too vague or not specific enough. I realize things are getting more difficult for you at this advanced age.
The funny thing is they all like to claim they are conservatives. Well, conservatives have principles and to me, they are just anti-Democrat/other side.
Posted:
#71
Ktrain ,an abortionist profits off the death of another human being.
.and on Zimmerman selling his gun I find it ..like I said on page #1 an insensitive thing to do ..but it's his to sell ..and I really doubt if anyone actually buys it ..if some one does I don't think it will be for very much.. ....
.and on Zimmerman selling his gun I find it ..like I said on page #1 an insensitive thing to do ..but it's his to sell ..and I really doubt if anyone actually buys it ..if some one does I don't think it will be for very much.. ....
Posted:
#72
Quote Originally Posted by Ktrain:
Slim,
I'll give you that one if it helps you to sleep better. You want to talk about reaching though.....
You're way more sensitive than I thought. Good luck with that.
I thought there was a decent chance you were a grandpa though. Especially with the skippy comment. Seem like something a grandpa or an old man would say.
I'm sorry I hurt your feelings Slim. I'll let you have your safe space now.
Slim,
I'll give you that one if it helps you to sleep better. You want to talk about reaching though.....
You're way more sensitive than I thought. Good luck with that.
I thought there was a decent chance you were a grandpa though. Especially with the skippy comment. Seem like something a grandpa or an old man would say.
I'm sorry I hurt your feelings Slim. I'll let you have your safe space now.
That's cute ...you made me lol
Skippy back on the other side of 8 mile was someone left handed ..(handshake)
Posted:
#73
Quote Originally Posted by Ktrain:
Bowl,
That's interesting that you bring up abortions because this whole topic got me thinking about my stance on abortion.
I've always been pro choice, I still am. But I'm definitely not in favor of a baby being aborted in the final week or even trimester.
I have to say, I'm. It quite sure when the cutoff should be.
I'm not quite sure I can accurately define when life begins.
I've also being trying to think of any scenario where it would be morally ok for a person to profit off the death of another person, where the first person played a direct role in the death of the second person. I can't think of any.
Bowl,
That's interesting that you bring up abortions because this whole topic got me thinking about my stance on abortion.
I've always been pro choice, I still am. But I'm definitely not in favor of a baby being aborted in the final week or even trimester.
I have to say, I'm. It quite sure when the cutoff should be.
I'm not quite sure I can accurately define when life begins.
I've also being trying to think of any scenario where it would be morally ok for a person to profit off the death of another person, where the first person played a direct role in the death of the second person. I can't think of any.
You missed my point.
Even though you are FOR abortions, I am not going to accuse you of wanting to see babies die...because that would be intellectually dishonest.
You saying that I condone Nazis profiting off of the murders of Jewish people is every bit as intellectualy dishonest because I see every one of those as murders. The only people that see those killings as justifiable are Nazis themselves.
Posted:
#74
Bowl,
I'm pro choice. Not pro abortion. I believe abortion should be avoided as much as possible. But there are instances, such as the mothers health, were I can see why an abortion would be necessary. I also don't think women who are victims of rape, and be one prego oats a result of that rape, should be forced to carry the child to term. It should be at the mothers discretion. Back to the thread though.
I thought I just asked you if you condoned the Nazi's profiting off the deaths of the Jewish people? Did I actually say that you did? If so, I apologize for the accusation. I sincerely do. I thought I just asked.
I bring it up because the Germans were using justifiable homicide at the time. Same as Zimmerman.
I don't think Zimmerman's homicide was justifiable but the law in Florida does. I don't think the Nazi's homicides were justifiable either, but the law in Germany at the time did.
I'm just want to know why you're ok with one profiting and not the other? Both were justifiable homicides under the law at the time the acts were committed. Yet you defend the actions of one and not the other.
I'm pro choice. Not pro abortion. I believe abortion should be avoided as much as possible. But there are instances, such as the mothers health, were I can see why an abortion would be necessary. I also don't think women who are victims of rape, and be one prego oats a result of that rape, should be forced to carry the child to term. It should be at the mothers discretion. Back to the thread though.
I thought I just asked you if you condoned the Nazi's profiting off the deaths of the Jewish people? Did I actually say that you did? If so, I apologize for the accusation. I sincerely do. I thought I just asked.
I bring it up because the Germans were using justifiable homicide at the time. Same as Zimmerman.
I don't think Zimmerman's homicide was justifiable but the law in Florida does. I don't think the Nazi's homicides were justifiable either, but the law in Germany at the time did.
I'm just want to know why you're ok with one profiting and not the other? Both were justifiable homicides under the law at the time the acts were committed. Yet you defend the actions of one and not the other.
Hot Forum Topics
Established in 1995,Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Covers is verified safe by:
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.