All Forums | Politics

Zimmerman is auctioning the gun used to kill Saint Trayvon artin

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 4246
Posts: 166
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 5625
Posted: #26
Dam internet, I'll have a response later.

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2004
Posts: 10738
Posted: #27
Quote Originally Posted by bowlslit:

Dam internet, I'll have a response later.

Don't bother , what you just  posted is one of your more intelligent contributions.

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 34856
Posted: #28
Quote Originally Posted by darkhorse12:

Sorry slim, but GZ ruined his own life by needlessly putting himself in a position that he didn't have to.



You sound like you're don't like  “white Hispanics” ...

Be that what it may,, could you try to answer question ? Is the gun  Zimmermans property to sell or not..if not why ?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2005
Posts: 1399
Posted: #29
George Zimmerman was nothing more than a chicken garbage wannabe cop and has done nothing in the years since to change this impression.  Although legally innocent don't feel sorry for him in the least.   Feel bad for the Martin family and these actions by the pond scum just make it worse
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 5625
Posted: #30
Quote Originally Posted by darkhorse12:

Don't bother , what you just  posted is one of your more intelligent contributions.


darkdonkey12. Don't get me started on you. I could go on and on about how you think you can post an old link to argue about the viability of Obamacare. The link you posted was from before Obamacare took hold. That wasn't just an anomaly. That is your regular.

Ktrain you have to be very careful when you pass judgement on someone based purely on emotion. 

Far too often these days people take fights too far. Hell, there was a girl that died in a fight in Maryland or something just a week or so ago.

When I was in school you were considered weak if you needed help kicking someones arse. What has happened that makes it ok to have an advantage of 2+ in a fight. There used to be people that would stand by to make sure the fight was evenly matched back in my day.

Back to Zimmerman, you guys who only feel sorry for Trayvon are messed up because you judge based on emotion and not wisdom and common sense.

I hope none of you guys ever get positions of power because that is a slippery slope.

My personal opinion of Zimmerman based on the sound of his voice is that he was scared of confrontation altogether...perhaps thats why he felt the need to carry the gun. When he said "He's coming to check me out" he had fear in his voice.

Rachel Jenteel testified that Trayvon had made it home based on her phone call with him. At some point, he decided he was going to confront Zimmerman and common sense would tell you that he was the one who was more upset or angry or pissed off. 

I truly believe that Zimmerman was simply trying to help by keeping eyes on the last known location of TM and not following him to confront him.

Would love to see someone make a rational argument that contradicts that theory.

Bottom line is people that make decision out of emotion are idiots.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2004
Posts: 10738
Posted: #31

Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:



You sound like you're don't like  “white Hispanics” ...

Be that what it may,, could you try to answer question ? Is the gun  Zimmermans property to sell or not..if not why ?

Sure it's his to sell. As for my comment ,it was to correct your misconception why his life was ruined.

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2004
Posts: 10738
Posted: #32
Quote Originally Posted by bowlslit:


darkdonkey12. Don't get me started on you. I could go on and on about how you think you can post an old link to argue about the viability of Obamacare. The link you posted was from before Obamacare took hold. That wasn't just an anomaly. That is your regular.

Ktrain you have to be very careful when you pass judgement on someone based purely on emotion. 

Far too often these days people take fights too far. Hell, there was a girl that died in a fight in Maryland or something just a week or so ago.

When I was in school you were considered weak if you needed help kicking someones arse. What has happened that makes it ok to have an advantage of 2+ in a fight. There used to be people that would stand by to make sure the fight was evenly matched back in my day.

Back to Zimmerman, you guys who only feel sorry for Trayvon are messed up because you judge based on emotion and not wisdom and common sense.

I hope none of you guys ever get positions of power because that is a slippery slope.

My personal opinion of Zimmerman based on the sound of his voice is that he was scared of confrontation altogether...perhaps thats why he felt the need to carry the gun. When he said "He's coming to check me out" he had fear in his voice.

Rachel Jenteel testified that Trayvon had made it home based on her phone call with him. At some point, he decided he was going to confront Zimmerman and common sense would tell you that he was the one who was more upset or angry or pissed off. 

I truly believe that Zimmerman was simply trying to help by keeping eyes on the last known location of TM and not following him to confront him.

Would love to see someone make a rational argument that contradicts that theory.

Bottom line is people that make decision out of emotion are idiots.

Ah, name calling, republican 101 .  Sticks and stones........... 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 5625
Posted: #33
Quote Originally Posted by darkhorse12:

Ah, name calling, republican 101 .  Sticks and stones........... 


Is that all you got? That was a long post. Any counter arguments to the post? My guess is no.

Perhaps you can provide another link from 1999 to prove your points.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 6580
Posted: #34
Quote Originally Posted by bowlslit:


darkdonkey12. Don't get me started on you. I could go on and on about how you think you can post an old link to argue about the viability of Obamacare. The link you posted was from before Obamacare took hold. That wasn't just an anomaly. That is your regular.

Ktrain you have to be very careful when you pass judgement on someone based purely on emotion. 

Far too often these days people take fights too far. Hell, there was a girl that died in a fight in Maryland or something just a week or so ago.

When I was in school you were considered weak if you needed help kicking someones arse. What has happened that makes it ok to have an advantage of 2+ in a fight. There used to be people that would stand by to make sure the fight was evenly matched back in my day.

Back to Zimmerman, you guys who only feel sorry for Trayvon are messed up because you judge based on emotion and not wisdom and common sense.

I hope none of you guys ever get positions of power because that is a slippery slope.

My personal opinion of Zimmerman based on the sound of his voice is that he was scared of confrontation altogether...perhaps thats why he felt the need to carry the gun. When he said "He's coming to check me out" he had fear in his voice.

Rachel Jenteel testified that Trayvon had made it home based on her phone call with him. At some point, he decided he was going to confront Zimmerman and common sense would tell you that he was the one who was more upset or angry or pissed off. 

I truly believe that Zimmerman was simply trying to help by keeping eyes on the last known location of TM and not following him to confront him.

Would love to see someone make a rational argument that contradicts that theory.

Bottom line is people that make decision out of emotion are idiots.

You keep reverting back to the actual incident. I'm not referring to that. I'm referring to the act of marketing the weapon in an effort to profit of the death of another human being.

For arguments sake, let's say I agree with you on what happened that lead to Martin's death (I don't in reality but that's besides the point). 

I would still consider the act of Zimmerman attempting to sell the weapon for profit to be morally wrong and a terrible idea. 

Does he have the right to sell it? Absolutely. 

Is it a good idea to market the weapon as he has done? Absolutely not. 

You might be ok with a person profiting off of killing another person, even if the law deemed it justifiable. I'm not ok with that. 

He has has success in selling art work calling out the justice system. I have no problem with this because it isn't directly involved with glorifying the death of another human being. Why can't he go back to making more art as a means of earning income? 

So I ask you Bowl, are you ok with Zimmerman profiting off of the death of Trayvon Martin? 

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2004
Posts: 10738
Posted: #35
Quote Originally Posted by bowlslit:


Is that all you got? That was a long post. Any counter arguments to the post? My guess is no.

Perhaps you can provide another link from 1999 to prove your points.

You mean you really want me to make you look dumber than I already have?

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2004
Posts: 10738
Posted: #36
Quote Originally Posted by bowlslit:


Is that all you got? That was a long post. Any counter arguments to the post? My guess is no.

Perhaps you can provide another link from 1999 to prove your points.

Regarding your post, You really sound emotional about GZ and the trial.

 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 5625
Posted: #37
Ktrain I refuse to judge him based on emotion. I haven't walked a day in his shoes. I don't know (I can imagine) what it must be like for him on a daily basis.

What if he can't pay his bills with the art revenue? Do you wan't him getting welfare the rest of his life?

Darkdonkey12 bring it on clown. I could be half asleep and still come out clean. Undefeated vs you and your lap donkey as we speak.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 5625
Posted: #38
Quote Originally Posted by darkhorse12:

Regarding your post, You really sound emotional about GZ and the trial.

 


Oh no! That's the type of comment DL36 would make. Do me a favor, roll over in that king size bed and slap him for me will you?
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2004
Posts: 10738
Posted: #39
Quote Originally Posted by bowlslit:

Ktrain I refuse to judge him based on emotion. I haven't walked a day in his shoes. I don't know (I can imagine) what it must be like for him on a daily basis.

What if he can't pay his bills with the art revenue? Do you wan't him getting welfare the rest of his life?

Darkdonkey12 bring it on clown. I could be half asleep and still come out clean. Undefeated vs you and your lap donkey as we speak.

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 6580
Posted: #40
Quote Originally Posted by bowlslit:

Ktrain I refuse to judge him based on emotion. I haven't walked a day in his shoes. I don't know (I can imagine) what it must be like for him on a daily basis.

What if he can't pay his bills with the art revenue? Do you wan't him getting welfare the rest of his life?

Darkdonkey12 bring it on clown. I could be half asleep and still come out clean. Undefeated vs you and your lap donkey as we speak.

It's a pretty cut and dry question Bowl. Yes or no, do you condone Zimmerman profiting off the death of Martin? 

I read a few reports that said Zimmerman made around $100k for a piece of art he created. I don't know how accurate it is but I didn't find anything refuting it (full disclosure: I didn't spend a ton of time researching this). Seems like this would be a fairly lucrative career if he pursued it more. 

So I ask you again Bowl, are you ok with Zimmerman profiting off the death of Martin? Pretty simple question. You can say "yes" if you really do believe it's ok. I just want to know where you stand on it. 


 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 5625
Posted: #41
Quote Originally Posted by Ktrain:


It's a pretty cut and dry question Bowl. Yes or no, do you condone Zimmerman profiting off the death of Martin? 

I read a few reports that said Zimmerman made around $100k for a piece of art he created. I don't know how accurate it is but I didn't find anything refuting it (full disclosure: I didn't spend a ton of time researching this). Seems like this would be a fairly lucrative career if he pursued it more. 

So I ask you again Bowl, are you ok with Zimmerman profiting off the death of Martin? Pretty simple question. You can say "yes" if you really do believe it's ok. I just want to know where you stand on it. 


 

If I believed Zimmerman murdered TM then I would have a problem with it. 

Since it was justifiable homicide then I do not have a problem with it.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 6580
Posted: #42
Quote Originally Posted by bowlslit:


If I believed Zimmerman murdered TM then I would have a problem with it. 

Since it was justifiable homicide then I do not have a problem with it.

I appreciate you finally giving a straight forward answer. 

I think it's terrible that you're ok with someone profiting off the death of another person. It's very disappointing to hear you take this stance. 

Does Zimmerman's activities after the Martin incident have any affect on your stance? I'm referring to the charges of domestic violence and road rage incident. You could also take a look at his twitter activity too. Unless it's all lies and a fake twitter account, he doesn't exactly seem to be struggling as some have suggested in here. 

Out of curiosity, are you ok with the Nazi's profiting off the killing of the Jewish people? They were just following orders after all. 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 5625
Posted: #43
Quote Originally Posted by Ktrain:


I appreciate you finally giving a straight forward answer. 

I think it's terrible that you're ok with someone profiting off the death of another person. It's very disappointing to hear you take this stance. 

Does Zimmerman's activities after the Martin incident have any affect on your stance? I'm referring to the charges of domestic violence and road rage incident. You could also take a look at his twitter activity too. Unless it's all lies and a fake twitter account, he doesn't exactly seem to be struggling as some have suggested in here. 

Out of curiosity, are you ok with the Nazi's profiting off the killing of the Jewish people? They were just following orders after all. 

Did you really just compare TM to victims of the Holocaust who were murdered? 

Looks like you need to go take a deep breath and gather your composure.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 34856
Posted: #44
Quote Originally Posted by bowlslit:


Did you really just compare TM to victims of the Holocaust who were murdered? 

Looks like you need to go take a deep breath and gather your composure.



That's what it sounds like to me..he also pulled that Nazzi crap on me earlier..comparing me to them....


 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2003
Posts: 27850
Posted: #45
Well if the shoe fits...

I am guessing you thought he was in trouble enough to need a bail out, Yeah I thought he needed a bail out also. 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 34856
Posted: #46
                                    /\

Sounds like someone is up-set, because his MYPIllow order is late..
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 6580
Posted: #47
Quote Originally Posted by bowlslit:

Quote Originally Posted by Ktrain:

I appreciate you finally giving a straight forward answer. I think it's terrible that you're ok with someone profiting off the death of another person. It's very disappointing to hear you take this stance. Does Zimmerman's activities after the Martin incident have any affect on your stance? I'm referring to the charges of domestic violence and road rage incident. You could also take a look at his twitter activity too. Unless it's all lies and a fake twitter account, he doesn't exactly seem to be struggling as some have suggested in here. Out of curiosity, are you ok with the Nazi's profiting off the killing of the Jewish people? They were just following orders after all. 
Did you really just compare TM to victims of the Holocaust who were murdered? Looks like you need to go take a deep breath and gather your composure.



The Nazi's profited off the justifiable homicide of the Jewish people. They were allowed to kill without criminal guilt in Germany. Are you ok with that?

Pretty simple question. Yes or no?

Perhaps you should take a deep breath, gather your composure, and then answer.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 6580
Posted: #48
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:

Quote Originally Posted by bowlslit:

Did you really just compare TM to victims of the Holocaust who were murdered? Looks like you need to go take a deep breath and gather your composure.
That's what it sounds like to me..he also pulled that Nazzi crap on me earlier..comparing me to them....

I said the Nazi's could have used a guy like you. I didn't say you are a Nazi.

Your reading comprehension is slipping Gramps. That's twice you've failed to comprehend what I've said in this thread.

What about you Slim? Are you ok with profiting off the death of others?
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 34856
Posted: #49
Quote Originally Posted by Ktrain

I said the Nazi's could have used a guy like you. I didn't say you are a Nazi.

[/Quote:



Weasel words ....


 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 34856
Posted: #50
Quote Originally Posted by Ktrain:



What about you Slim? Are you ok with profiting off the death of others?


Sure it happens every day .....,profiting from death is everywhere.
e.g. casket makers, funeral homes, all profit from death each day. So do cemeteries,,makers of headstones, gravestones and grave markers ..et al....it is happening everywhere ..just look around ..
All Forums | Politics
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2025 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.