Posted:
#26
Dam internet, I'll have a response later.
Zimmerman is auctioning the gun used to kill Saint Trayvon artin
Posted:
#28
Quote Originally Posted by darkhorse12:
Sorry slim, but GZ ruined his own life by needlessly putting himself in a position that he didn't have to.
You sound like you're don't like “white Hispanics” ...
Be that what it may,, could you try to answer question ? Is the gun Zimmermans property to sell or not..if not why ?
Posted:
#30
Quote Originally Posted by darkhorse12:
Don't bother , what you just posted is one of your more intelligent contributions.
darkdonkey12. Don't get me started on you. I could go on and on about how you think you can post an old link to argue about the viability of Obamacare. The link you posted was from before Obamacare took hold. That wasn't just an anomaly. That is your regular.
Ktrain you have to be very careful when you pass judgement on someone based purely on emotion.
Far too often these days people take fights too far. Hell, there was a girl that died in a fight in Maryland or something just a week or so ago.
When I was in school you were considered weak if you needed help kicking someones arse. What has happened that makes it ok to have an advantage of 2+ in a fight. There used to be people that would stand by to make sure the fight was evenly matched back in my day.
Back to Zimmerman, you guys who only feel sorry for Trayvon are messed up because you judge based on emotion and not wisdom and common sense.
I hope none of you guys ever get positions of power because that is a slippery slope.
My personal opinion of Zimmerman based on the sound of his voice is that he was scared of confrontation altogether...perhaps thats why he felt the need to carry the gun. When he said "He's coming to check me out" he had fear in his voice.
Rachel Jenteel testified that Trayvon had made it home based on her phone call with him. At some point, he decided he was going to confront Zimmerman and common sense would tell you that he was the one who was more upset or angry or pissed off.
I truly believe that Zimmerman was simply trying to help by keeping eyes on the last known location of TM and not following him to confront him.
Would love to see someone make a rational argument that contradicts that theory.
Bottom line is people that make decision out of emotion are idiots.
Posted:
#31
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:
You sound like you're don't like “white Hispanics” ...
Be that what it may,, could you try to answer question ? Is the gun Zimmermans property to sell or not..if not why ?
You sound like you're don't like “white Hispanics” ...
Be that what it may,, could you try to answer question ? Is the gun Zimmermans property to sell or not..if not why ?
Sure it's his to sell. As for my comment ,it was to correct your misconception why his life was ruined.
Posted:
#32
Quote Originally Posted by bowlslit:
darkdonkey12. Don't get me started on you. I could go on and on about how you think you can post an old link to argue about the viability of Obamacare. The link you posted was from before Obamacare took hold. That wasn't just an anomaly. That is your regular.
Ktrain you have to be very careful when you pass judgement on someone based purely on emotion.
Far too often these days people take fights too far. Hell, there was a girl that died in a fight in Maryland or something just a week or so ago.
When I was in school you were considered weak if you needed help kicking someones arse. What has happened that makes it ok to have an advantage of 2+ in a fight. There used to be people that would stand by to make sure the fight was evenly matched back in my day.
Back to Zimmerman, you guys who only feel sorry for Trayvon are messed up because you judge based on emotion and not wisdom and common sense.
I hope none of you guys ever get positions of power because that is a slippery slope.
My personal opinion of Zimmerman based on the sound of his voice is that he was scared of confrontation altogether...perhaps thats why he felt the need to carry the gun. When he said "He's coming to check me out" he had fear in his voice.
Rachel Jenteel testified that Trayvon had made it home based on her phone call with him. At some point, he decided he was going to confront Zimmerman and common sense would tell you that he was the one who was more upset or angry or pissed off.
I truly believe that Zimmerman was simply trying to help by keeping eyes on the last known location of TM and not following him to confront him.
Would love to see someone make a rational argument that contradicts that theory.
Bottom line is people that make decision out of emotion are idiots.
Ah, name calling, republican 101 . Sticks and stones...........
Posted:
#34
Quote Originally Posted by bowlslit:
darkdonkey12. Don't get me started on you. I could go on and on about how you think you can post an old link to argue about the viability of Obamacare. The link you posted was from before Obamacare took hold. That wasn't just an anomaly. That is your regular.
Ktrain you have to be very careful when you pass judgement on someone based purely on emotion.
Far too often these days people take fights too far. Hell, there was a girl that died in a fight in Maryland or something just a week or so ago.
When I was in school you were considered weak if you needed help kicking someones arse. What has happened that makes it ok to have an advantage of 2+ in a fight. There used to be people that would stand by to make sure the fight was evenly matched back in my day.
Back to Zimmerman, you guys who only feel sorry for Trayvon are messed up because you judge based on emotion and not wisdom and common sense.
I hope none of you guys ever get positions of power because that is a slippery slope.
My personal opinion of Zimmerman based on the sound of his voice is that he was scared of confrontation altogether...perhaps thats why he felt the need to carry the gun. When he said "He's coming to check me out" he had fear in his voice.
Rachel Jenteel testified that Trayvon had made it home based on her phone call with him. At some point, he decided he was going to confront Zimmerman and common sense would tell you that he was the one who was more upset or angry or pissed off.
I truly believe that Zimmerman was simply trying to help by keeping eyes on the last known location of TM and not following him to confront him.
Would love to see someone make a rational argument that contradicts that theory.
Bottom line is people that make decision out of emotion are idiots.
You keep reverting back to the actual incident. I'm not referring to that. I'm referring to the act of marketing the weapon in an effort to profit of the death of another human being.
For arguments sake, let's say I agree with you on what happened that lead to Martin's death (I don't in reality but that's besides the point).
I would still consider the act of Zimmerman attempting to sell the weapon for profit to be morally wrong and a terrible idea.
Does he have the right to sell it? Absolutely.
Is it a good idea to market the weapon as he has done? Absolutely not.
You might be ok with a person profiting off of killing another person, even if the law deemed it justifiable. I'm not ok with that.
He has has success in selling art work calling out the justice system. I have no problem with this because it isn't directly involved with glorifying the death of another human being. Why can't he go back to making more art as a means of earning income?
So I ask you Bowl, are you ok with Zimmerman profiting off of the death of Trayvon Martin?
Posted:
#37
Ktrain I refuse to judge him based on emotion. I haven't walked a day in his shoes. I don't know (I can imagine) what it must be like for him on a daily basis.
What if he can't pay his bills with the art revenue? Do you wan't him getting welfare the rest of his life?
Darkdonkey12 bring it on clown. I could be half asleep and still come out clean. Undefeated vs you and your lap donkey as we speak.
Posted:
#39
Quote Originally Posted by bowlslit:
Ktrain I refuse to judge him based on emotion. I haven't walked a day in his shoes. I don't know (I can imagine) what it must be like for him on a daily basis.
Ktrain I refuse to judge him based on emotion. I haven't walked a day in his shoes. I don't know (I can imagine) what it must be like for him on a daily basis.
What if he can't pay his bills with the art revenue? Do you wan't him getting welfare the rest of his life?
Darkdonkey12 bring it on clown. I could be half asleep and still come out clean. Undefeated vs you and your lap donkey as we speak.
Posted:
#40
Quote Originally Posted by bowlslit:
Ktrain I refuse to judge him based on emotion. I haven't walked a day in his shoes. I don't know (I can imagine) what it must be like for him on a daily basis.
Ktrain I refuse to judge him based on emotion. I haven't walked a day in his shoes. I don't know (I can imagine) what it must be like for him on a daily basis.
What if he can't pay his bills with the art revenue? Do you wan't him getting welfare the rest of his life?
Darkdonkey12 bring it on clown. I could be half asleep and still come out clean. Undefeated vs you and your lap donkey as we speak.
It's a pretty cut and dry question Bowl. Yes or no, do you condone Zimmerman profiting off the death of Martin?
I read a few reports that said Zimmerman made around $100k for a piece of art he created. I don't know how accurate it is but I didn't find anything refuting it (full disclosure: I didn't spend a ton of time researching this). Seems like this would be a fairly lucrative career if he pursued it more.
So I ask you again Bowl, are you ok with Zimmerman profiting off the death of Martin? Pretty simple question. You can say "yes" if you really do believe it's ok. I just want to know where you stand on it.
Posted:
#41
Quote Originally Posted by Ktrain:
It's a pretty cut and dry question Bowl. Yes or no, do you condone Zimmerman profiting off the death of Martin?
I read a few reports that said Zimmerman made around $100k for a piece of art he created. I don't know how accurate it is but I didn't find anything refuting it (full disclosure: I didn't spend a ton of time researching this). Seems like this would be a fairly lucrative career if he pursued it more.
So I ask you again Bowl, are you ok with Zimmerman profiting off the death of Martin? Pretty simple question. You can say "yes" if you really do believe it's ok. I just want to know where you stand on it.
If I believed Zimmerman murdered TM then I would have a problem with it.
Since it was justifiable homicide then I do not have a problem with it.
Posted:
#42
Quote Originally Posted by bowlslit:
If I believed Zimmerman murdered TM then I would have a problem with it.
Since it was justifiable homicide then I do not have a problem with it.
I appreciate you finally giving a straight forward answer.
I think it's terrible that you're ok with someone profiting off the death of another person. It's very disappointing to hear you take this stance.
Does Zimmerman's activities after the Martin incident have any affect on your stance? I'm referring to the charges of domestic violence and road rage incident. You could also take a look at his twitter activity too. Unless it's all lies and a fake twitter account, he doesn't exactly seem to be struggling as some have suggested in here.
Out of curiosity, are you ok with the Nazi's profiting off the killing of the Jewish people? They were just following orders after all.
Posted:
#43
Quote Originally Posted by Ktrain:
I appreciate you finally giving a straight forward answer.
I think it's terrible that you're ok with someone profiting off the death of another person. It's very disappointing to hear you take this stance.
Does Zimmerman's activities after the Martin incident have any affect on your stance? I'm referring to the charges of domestic violence and road rage incident. You could also take a look at his twitter activity too. Unless it's all lies and a fake twitter account, he doesn't exactly seem to be struggling as some have suggested in here.
Out of curiosity, are you ok with the Nazi's profiting off the killing of the Jewish people? They were just following orders after all.
Did you really just compare TM to victims of the Holocaust who were murdered?
Looks like you need to go take a deep breath and gather your composure.
Posted:
#44
Quote Originally Posted by bowlslit:
Did you really just compare TM to victims of the Holocaust who were murdered?
Looks like you need to go take a deep breath and gather your composure.
That's what it sounds like to me..he also pulled that Nazzi crap on me earlier..comparing me to them....
Posted:
#47
Quote Originally Posted by bowlslit:
Quote Originally Posted by Ktrain:
I appreciate you finally giving a straight forward answer. I think it's terrible that you're ok with someone profiting off the death of another person. It's very disappointing to hear you take this stance. Does Zimmerman's activities after the Martin incident have any affect on your stance? I'm referring to the charges of domestic violence and road rage incident. You could also take a look at his twitter activity too. Unless it's all lies and a fake twitter account, he doesn't exactly seem to be struggling as some have suggested in here. Out of curiosity, are you ok with the Nazi's profiting off the killing of the Jewish people? They were just following orders after all.
Did you really just compare TM to victims of the Holocaust who were murdered? Looks like you need to go take a deep breath and gather your composure.I appreciate you finally giving a straight forward answer. I think it's terrible that you're ok with someone profiting off the death of another person. It's very disappointing to hear you take this stance. Does Zimmerman's activities after the Martin incident have any affect on your stance? I'm referring to the charges of domestic violence and road rage incident. You could also take a look at his twitter activity too. Unless it's all lies and a fake twitter account, he doesn't exactly seem to be struggling as some have suggested in here. Out of curiosity, are you ok with the Nazi's profiting off the killing of the Jewish people? They were just following orders after all.
The Nazi's profited off the justifiable homicide of the Jewish people. They were allowed to kill without criminal guilt in Germany. Are you ok with that?
Pretty simple question. Yes or no?
Perhaps you should take a deep breath, gather your composure, and then answer.
Posted:
#48
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:
Quote Originally Posted by bowlslit:
Did you really just compare TM to victims of the Holocaust who were murdered? Looks like you need to go take a deep breath and gather your composure.
That's what it sounds like to me..he also pulled that Nazzi crap on me earlier..comparing me to them....Did you really just compare TM to victims of the Holocaust who were murdered? Looks like you need to go take a deep breath and gather your composure.
I said the Nazi's could have used a guy like you. I didn't say you are a Nazi.
Your reading comprehension is slipping Gramps. That's twice you've failed to comprehend what I've said in this thread.
What about you Slim? Are you ok with profiting off the death of others?
Posted:
#50
Quote Originally Posted by Ktrain:
What about you Slim? Are you ok with profiting off the death of others?
What about you Slim? Are you ok with profiting off the death of others?
Sure it happens every day .....,profiting from death is everywhere.
e.g. casket makers, funeral homes, all profit from death each day. So do cemeteries,,makers of headstones, gravestones and grave markers ..et al....it is happening everywhere ..just look around ..
Hot Forum Topics
Established in 1995,Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Covers is verified safe by:
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.