• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • NFL Prediction Prices
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
      • Politics
        • Back
        • Politics
        • Politics Home
        • Presidential Election Odds
        • Midterm Election Odds
        • House Midterm Odds
        • Senate Midterm Odds
        • Texas Midterm Odds
        • Michigan Midterm Odds
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Kalshi Referral Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • Polymarket Referral Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • Betr Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
      • Gemini Predictions Promo Code
    • NFL Week 7
      NFL Week 7
      • NFL Odds
      • NFL Picks
      • Patriots-Bears Picks
      • NFL ATS Picks
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | Politics

    trump's economy failing; worse than Obama's last 3

    «First Previous 121314 ... 293031 Next Last»
    DeezyAZ81
    fubah2
    chadebennett
    Midnight1
    Participants:
    Search
    Views: 2758
    Posts: 755
    «First Previous 121314 ... 293031 Next Last»
     
    DeezyAZ81
    DeezyAZ81
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2005
    Posts: 8713
    Posted: Jul. 16, 2020 - 7:13 PM ET #276

    Quote Originally Posted by gambleholic63:

    Quote Originally Posted by gambleholic63: Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by gambleholic63: To further my point, I wonder how many $4,000 per month health insurance premium checks you had to write in the years immediately following the passage of the ACA? Many of my friends and their families were faced with the harsh reality that they either pony up the 4K a month or suffer the consequences of an illness bankrupting their future.  So...how many monthly 4k checks did you have to write?  To my eyes, it seems so much easier to support destructive economic policies when you are on the receiving end.  So....how many monthly checks?  I'm waiting. I have a family of 4 and never had to dole out 4k a month during Obama's time, so I have no idea what kind of coverage they required or their health backgrounds. Sounds like they must have had some serious health concerns. So, some of your friends had to pay high costs, so you hate the ACA?? Nice argument. Didn't impact you in any way? Love the friends argument. Talk about weak. Deezy. This is where your mind is disconnected from what was happening in the real world. Obviously, we all have different families and friends and we all live in different financial and economic circles. I can assure you, as I am sure Rush can chime in on, that people were getting hosed by the ACA. I'm surprised you are oblivious to the fact, but this is where you and I have a tremendous disconnect.  Rush...please chime in with some of the experiences you witnessed so Deezy can wake up and smell the coffee. And you are wrong to assume it didn't affect me. I owned my own business for 30 years prior to my retirement this year. My rates doubled in the very first year of the ACA. So yes, it did affect me.  That's the problem with you low wage earners. You want EVERYTHING subsidized but are delusional as to where the money actually comes from.

    Funny how you said zero about it impacting you personally until I asked you. Yeah I mean us low wage earners... Of course.. You are so wise, rich, and above all of us on this forum... I want everything free you are so correct...an_praise

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by gambleholic63:

    Quote Originally Posted by gambleholic63: Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by gambleholic63: To further my point, I wonder how many $4,000 per month health insurance premium checks you had to write in the years immediately following the passage of the ACA? Many of my friends and their families were faced with the harsh reality that they either pony up the 4K a month or suffer the consequences of an illness bankrupting their future.  So...how many monthly 4k checks did you have to write?  To my eyes, it seems so much easier to support destructive economic policies when you are on the receiving end.  So....how many monthly checks?  I'm waiting. I have a family of 4 and never had to dole out 4k a month during Obama's time, so I have no idea what kind of coverage they required or their health backgrounds. Sounds like they must have had some serious health concerns. So, some of your friends had to pay high costs, so you hate the ACA?? Nice argument. Didn't impact you in any way? Love the friends argument. Talk about weak. Deezy. This is where your mind is disconnected from what was happening in the real world. Obviously, we all have different families and friends and we all live in different financial and economic circles. I can assure you, as I am sure Rush can chime in on, that people were getting hosed by the ACA. I'm surprised you are oblivious to the fact, but this is where you and I have a tremendous disconnect.  Rush...please chime in with some of the experiences you witnessed so Deezy can wake up and smell the coffee. And you are wrong to assume it didn't affect me. I owned my own business for 30 years prior to my retirement this year. My rates doubled in the very first year of the ACA. So yes, it did affect me.  That's the problem with you low wage earners. You want EVERYTHING subsidized but are delusional as to where the money actually comes from.

    Funny how you said zero about it impacting you personally until I asked you. Yeah I mean us low wage earners... Of course.. You are so wise, rich, and above all of us on this forum... I want everything free you are so correct...an_praise

     
    fubah2
    fubah2
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2012
    Posts: 54115
    Posted: Jul. 16, 2020 - 7:19 PM ET #277

    February 28, 2020
    A new poll released Thursday found that Obamacare is at its most popular
    it's ever been among the American public since it was signed into law by
    President Obama almost a decade ago.

    Navigator Research poll found that 54% of Americans expressed favorable
    views of the program. Around 31% of the public said they had unfavorable
    views and 9% responded they didn't know.

    The net favorability — or the gap between favorable and unfavorable views
    — stood at +23, a 22-point increase since the group last asked the question
    in June 2019.
    The results stood at 46% favorable vs. 45% unfavorable then.


    The national survey was conducted online and relied on answers from 1,000
    registered voters and 200 additional interviews with political independents
    who didn't lean one way or the other.

    Another poll released last Friday from the Kaiser Family Foundation,
    a nonpartisan health research organization, mirrored those results.
    Its ongoing survey tracking public attitudes toward the Affordable Care Act
    found 55% of Americans supported it, a record high. Around 37% opposed it.

    Source: https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/poll-obamacare-new-most-popular-aca-obama-trump-healthcare-favorable-2020-2-1028949597#

     

    Reply

    February 28, 2020
    A new poll released Thursday found that Obamacare is at its most popular
    it's ever been among the American public since it was signed into law by
    President Obama almost a decade ago.

    Navigator Research poll found that 54% of Americans expressed favorable
    views of the program. Around 31% of the public said they had unfavorable
    views and 9% responded they didn't know.

    The net favorability — or the gap between favorable and unfavorable views
    — stood at +23, a 22-point increase since the group last asked the question
    in June 2019.
    The results stood at 46% favorable vs. 45% unfavorable then.


    The national survey was conducted online and relied on answers from 1,000
    registered voters and 200 additional interviews with political independents
    who didn't lean one way or the other.

    Another poll released last Friday from the Kaiser Family Foundation,
    a nonpartisan health research organization, mirrored those results.
    Its ongoing survey tracking public attitudes toward the Affordable Care Act
    found 55% of Americans supported it, a record high. Around 37% opposed it.

    Source: https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/poll-obamacare-new-most-popular-aca-obama-trump-healthcare-favorable-2020-2-1028949597#

     

     
    DeezyAZ81
    DeezyAZ81
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2005
    Posts: 8713
    Posted: Jul. 16, 2020 - 7:22 PM ET #278

    Quote Originally Posted by gambleholic63:

    Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by gambleholic63: To further my point, I wonder how many $4,000 per month health insurance premium checks you had to write in the years immediately following the passage of the ACA? Many of my friends and their families were faced with the harsh reality that they either pony up the 4K a month or suffer the consequences of an illness bankrupting their future.  So...how many monthly 4k checks did you have to write?  To my eyes, it seems so much easier to support destructive economic policies when you are on the receiving end.  So....how many monthly checks?  I'm waiting. I have a family of 4 and never had to dole out 4k a month during Obama's time, so I have no idea what kind of coverage they required or their health backgrounds. Sounds like they must have had some serious health concerns. So, some of your friends had to pay high costs, so you hate the ACA?? Nice argument. Didn't impact you in any way? Love the friends argument. Talk about weak. Deezy. This is where your mind is disconnected from what was happening in the real world. Obviously, we all have different families and friends and we all live in different financial and economic circles. I can assure you, as I am sure Rush can chime in on, that people were getting hosed by the ACA. I'm surprised you are oblivious to the fact, but this is where you and I have a tremendous disconnect.  Rush...please chime in with some of the experiences you witnessed so Deezy can wake up and smell the coffee.

    Of course...not all federal and state policies impact everyone the same. Isn't that kind of how all public policies work? Duhhh. But there are tens of millions of low-income, and low-middle income workers that now are guaranteed healthcare coverage, who did not possess access to basic healthcare before. If I have to pay a little more for my private family healthcare plan (I am self-employed also, I assume you are) for the greater good and healthcare equality, and can afford to (which I can), then what does that hurt? In my case, enrolling in a plan through Obamacare for my family costs around 1200 per month, but guess what you do not have to choose to enroll in it. I do not know of any family paying 4k per month for healthcare under ACA, it is not even possible in my state. If they suffer from terrible health, they would be denied by a private insurer anyway. We do seem to be disconnected on the policy based on views on equality and access clearly. 

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by gambleholic63:

    Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by gambleholic63: To further my point, I wonder how many $4,000 per month health insurance premium checks you had to write in the years immediately following the passage of the ACA? Many of my friends and their families were faced with the harsh reality that they either pony up the 4K a month or suffer the consequences of an illness bankrupting their future.  So...how many monthly 4k checks did you have to write?  To my eyes, it seems so much easier to support destructive economic policies when you are on the receiving end.  So....how many monthly checks?  I'm waiting. I have a family of 4 and never had to dole out 4k a month during Obama's time, so I have no idea what kind of coverage they required or their health backgrounds. Sounds like they must have had some serious health concerns. So, some of your friends had to pay high costs, so you hate the ACA?? Nice argument. Didn't impact you in any way? Love the friends argument. Talk about weak. Deezy. This is where your mind is disconnected from what was happening in the real world. Obviously, we all have different families and friends and we all live in different financial and economic circles. I can assure you, as I am sure Rush can chime in on, that people were getting hosed by the ACA. I'm surprised you are oblivious to the fact, but this is where you and I have a tremendous disconnect.  Rush...please chime in with some of the experiences you witnessed so Deezy can wake up and smell the coffee.

    Of course...not all federal and state policies impact everyone the same. Isn't that kind of how all public policies work? Duhhh. But there are tens of millions of low-income, and low-middle income workers that now are guaranteed healthcare coverage, who did not possess access to basic healthcare before. If I have to pay a little more for my private family healthcare plan (I am self-employed also, I assume you are) for the greater good and healthcare equality, and can afford to (which I can), then what does that hurt? In my case, enrolling in a plan through Obamacare for my family costs around 1200 per month, but guess what you do not have to choose to enroll in it. I do not know of any family paying 4k per month for healthcare under ACA, it is not even possible in my state. If they suffer from terrible health, they would be denied by a private insurer anyway. We do seem to be disconnected on the policy based on views on equality and access clearly. 

     
    fubah2
    fubah2
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2012
    Posts: 54115
    Posted: Jul. 16, 2020 - 7:26 PM ET #279

    Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:

    Quote Originally Posted by Rush51:

    Quote Originally Posted by Rush51:

    ... And Deezy.... What about the Business tax cut ???   That was a BIG Deal.

     

     

    https://www.npr.org/2019/12/20/789540931/2-years-later-trump-tax-cuts-have-failed-to-deliver-on-gops-promises

     

    Interesting read on corporate tax cuts. "Corporate tax revenues fell 31% in the first year after the cut was passed. Overall tax revenues have declined as a share of the economy in each of the two years since the tax cut took effect."

    The federal deficit this year was $984 billion — an extraordinary figure at a time when the country is not mired in recession or widespread war.

    The tax cut also failed to produce a permanent boost in economic growth, despite promises from Republican supporters. 

    In fact, the economy grew 2.9% last year — exactly the same as in 2015.

    The tax cut, along with increased government spending, did give a short-term lift to the economy and businesses temporarily boosted investment. But the rocket fuel burned off quickly. Business investment declined in the last two quarters.

    This article is from December 2019. Pre-Pandemic as well. 

    You sure the business tax cuts were beneficial? Clearly you have not read up on them. 

     

    Well stated again!  an_clap

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:

    Quote Originally Posted by Rush51:

    Quote Originally Posted by Rush51:

    ... And Deezy.... What about the Business tax cut ???   That was a BIG Deal.

     

     

    https://www.npr.org/2019/12/20/789540931/2-years-later-trump-tax-cuts-have-failed-to-deliver-on-gops-promises

     

    Interesting read on corporate tax cuts. "Corporate tax revenues fell 31% in the first year after the cut was passed. Overall tax revenues have declined as a share of the economy in each of the two years since the tax cut took effect."

    The federal deficit this year was $984 billion — an extraordinary figure at a time when the country is not mired in recession or widespread war.

    The tax cut also failed to produce a permanent boost in economic growth, despite promises from Republican supporters. 

    In fact, the economy grew 2.9% last year — exactly the same as in 2015.

    The tax cut, along with increased government spending, did give a short-term lift to the economy and businesses temporarily boosted investment. But the rocket fuel burned off quickly. Business investment declined in the last two quarters.

    This article is from December 2019. Pre-Pandemic as well. 

    You sure the business tax cuts were beneficial? Clearly you have not read up on them. 

     

    Well stated again!  an_clap

     
    DeezyAZ81
    DeezyAZ81
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2005
    Posts: 8713
    Posted: Jul. 16, 2020 - 7:29 PM ET #280

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

    Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by Rush51: Quote Originally Posted by Rush51: ... And Deezy.... What about the Business tax cut ???   That was a BIG Deal.     https://www.npr.org/2019/12/20/789540931/2-years-later-trump-tax-cuts-have-failed-to-deliver-on-gops-promises   Interesting read on corporate tax cuts. "Corporate tax revenues fell 31% in the first year after the cut was passed. Overall tax revenues have declined as a share of the economy in each of the two years since the tax cut took effect." The federal deficit this year was $984 billion — an extraordinary figure at a time when the country is not mired in recession or widespread war. The tax cut also failed to produce a permanent boost in economic growth, despite promises from Republican supporters.  In fact, the economy grew 2.9% last year — exactly the same as in 2015. The tax cut, along with increased government spending, did give a short-term lift to the economy and businesses temporarily boosted investment. But the rocket fuel burned off quickly. Business investment declined in the last two quarters. This article is from December 2019. Pre-Pandemic as well.  You sure the business tax cuts were beneficial? Clearly you have not read up on them.    Well stated again!

    The public information is there if people actually choose to acknowledge it. 

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

    Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by Rush51: Quote Originally Posted by Rush51: ... And Deezy.... What about the Business tax cut ???   That was a BIG Deal.     https://www.npr.org/2019/12/20/789540931/2-years-later-trump-tax-cuts-have-failed-to-deliver-on-gops-promises   Interesting read on corporate tax cuts. "Corporate tax revenues fell 31% in the first year after the cut was passed. Overall tax revenues have declined as a share of the economy in each of the two years since the tax cut took effect." The federal deficit this year was $984 billion — an extraordinary figure at a time when the country is not mired in recession or widespread war. The tax cut also failed to produce a permanent boost in economic growth, despite promises from Republican supporters.  In fact, the economy grew 2.9% last year — exactly the same as in 2015. The tax cut, along with increased government spending, did give a short-term lift to the economy and businesses temporarily boosted investment. But the rocket fuel burned off quickly. Business investment declined in the last two quarters. This article is from December 2019. Pre-Pandemic as well.  You sure the business tax cuts were beneficial? Clearly you have not read up on them.    Well stated again!

    The public information is there if people actually choose to acknowledge it. 

     
    fubah2
    fubah2
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2012
    Posts: 54115
    Posted: Jul. 16, 2020 - 7:36 PM ET #281

    Source: https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2019/12/04/jobs-creation-trump-goal-has-fallen-short/4249422002/#:~:text=Manufacturers%20have%20created%20about%20440%2C000%20jobs%20during%20Trump%E2%80%99s,Trump%E2%80%99s%20trade%20war%20with%20China%20have%20curtailed%20production.

    Zandi estimates the Trump-led tax cuts and spending increases have added 485,000 jobs while his trade war has cost 320,000. That appears to be a modest 165,000 net gain for the economy. But Zandi says Trump’s tough stance on immigration likely has reduced employment by 220,000 by keeping out immigrants who would have spent money and helped grow the labor force.

    While such differences may not move the needle in the 2020 election, Trump faces risks in manufacturing strongholds like Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania that helped deliver victory for him in 2016 and have been hurt by the trade war. Since April, the unemployment rate has climbed from 2.8% to 3.3% in Wisconsin and from 3.8% to 4.2% in Pennsylvania.

    “A softer job market will become a political headwind to the president’s re-election bid if it continues into next summer,” Zandi says.

    Reply

    Source: https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2019/12/04/jobs-creation-trump-goal-has-fallen-short/4249422002/#:~:text=Manufacturers%20have%20created%20about%20440%2C000%20jobs%20during%20Trump%E2%80%99s,Trump%E2%80%99s%20trade%20war%20with%20China%20have%20curtailed%20production.

    Zandi estimates the Trump-led tax cuts and spending increases have added 485,000 jobs while his trade war has cost 320,000. That appears to be a modest 165,000 net gain for the economy. But Zandi says Trump’s tough stance on immigration likely has reduced employment by 220,000 by keeping out immigrants who would have spent money and helped grow the labor force.

    While such differences may not move the needle in the 2020 election, Trump faces risks in manufacturing strongholds like Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania that helped deliver victory for him in 2016 and have been hurt by the trade war. Since April, the unemployment rate has climbed from 2.8% to 3.3% in Wisconsin and from 3.8% to 4.2% in Pennsylvania.

    “A softer job market will become a political headwind to the president’s re-election bid if it continues into next summer,” Zandi says.

     
    fubah2
    fubah2
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2012
    Posts: 54115
    Posted: Jul. 16, 2020 - 7:40 PM ET #282

    Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:

      The public information is there if people actually choose to acknowledge it.

    Of course.  But therein lies the problem.  adolf-lovers aren't very smart, but they can smell bad news coming....so they they either go to their playbook and use: "Liar, Liar, pants on Fire"  ....or.... their frequent "go to" play, and cover their ears while screaming "nanner, nanner, I can't hear you, "

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:

      The public information is there if people actually choose to acknowledge it.

    Of course.  But therein lies the problem.  adolf-lovers aren't very smart, but they can smell bad news coming....so they they either go to their playbook and use: "Liar, Liar, pants on Fire"  ....or.... their frequent "go to" play, and cover their ears while screaming "nanner, nanner, I can't hear you, "

     
    chadebennett
    chadebennett
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2011
    Posts: 614
    Posted: Jul. 16, 2020 - 7:46 PM ET #283

    Obama’s last eight years have brought the lowest labor participation rates since the 1970s, with 95 million Americans out of the labor force. The so-called recovery has been the weakest one since the 1940s. We have the lowest home ownership rate in 51 years – despite mortgage rates artificially kept at record lows. Over 11 million more Americans are on food stamps since he became president and more than 43 million Americans now live in poverty. One of every six men between 18 and 34 are either in prison or out of work.

    Reply

    Obama’s last eight years have brought the lowest labor participation rates since the 1970s, with 95 million Americans out of the labor force. The so-called recovery has been the weakest one since the 1940s. We have the lowest home ownership rate in 51 years – despite mortgage rates artificially kept at record lows. Over 11 million more Americans are on food stamps since he became president and more than 43 million Americans now live in poverty. One of every six men between 18 and 34 are either in prison or out of work.

     
    chadebennett
    chadebennett
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2011
    Posts: 614
    Posted: Jul. 16, 2020 - 7:47 PM ET #284

    Then, of course, there's President Obama's assault on the business community through his burdensome regulations. Consider this: The estimated cost of regulations under Obama is a staggering $873 billion. That includes a shocking $344 billion cost in Environmental Protection Agency regulations alone. All told, the number of new regulations that been finalized under President Obama checks in at almost 3,000.

    Reply

    Then, of course, there's President Obama's assault on the business community through his burdensome regulations. Consider this: The estimated cost of regulations under Obama is a staggering $873 billion. That includes a shocking $344 billion cost in Environmental Protection Agency regulations alone. All told, the number of new regulations that been finalized under President Obama checks in at almost 3,000.

     
    chadebennett
    chadebennett
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2011
    Posts: 614
    Posted: Jul. 16, 2020 - 7:48 PM ET #285

    When it comes to jobs, President Obama is always bragging about how many he's created, but facts are stubborn things. In the past eight years, America has lost more than 300,000 manufacturing jobs and, although the president doesn’t mention it, America had a global trade deficit of over $732 billion last year.

    Reply

    When it comes to jobs, President Obama is always bragging about how many he's created, but facts are stubborn things. In the past eight years, America has lost more than 300,000 manufacturing jobs and, although the president doesn’t mention it, America had a global trade deficit of over $732 billion last year.

     
    fubah2
    fubah2
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2012
    Posts: 54115
    Posted: Jul. 16, 2020 - 7:49 PM ET #286

    Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:

    Quote Originally Posted by Rush51:

     

    Quote Originally Posted by Rush51:

    Deezy......Am I to believe your "Pew Research Center" source or the "Wall Street Journal ??"  You are not building a very good case for your argument.     The facts are irrefutable..  but continue to plug your ears, cover your mouth, and cover your eyes (insert emoji here. Lol)

     

    Hilarious. But we should all just believe you???? an_roll_laughBecause you are such an unbiased source. My argument isn't the weak one here, when yours appears to be "Fake News" an_roll_laughDo not believe what you are seeing and hearing folks....I am the chosen one....only listen to me.

    No point in arguing with someone as clueless as yourself. 

    They make statements.  They don't support them with verifiable facts.

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:

    Quote Originally Posted by Rush51:

     

    Quote Originally Posted by Rush51:

    Deezy......Am I to believe your "Pew Research Center" source or the "Wall Street Journal ??"  You are not building a very good case for your argument.     The facts are irrefutable..  but continue to plug your ears, cover your mouth, and cover your eyes (insert emoji here. Lol)

     

    Hilarious. But we should all just believe you???? an_roll_laughBecause you are such an unbiased source. My argument isn't the weak one here, when yours appears to be "Fake News" an_roll_laughDo not believe what you are seeing and hearing folks....I am the chosen one....only listen to me.

    No point in arguing with someone as clueless as yourself. 

    They make statements.  They don't support them with verifiable facts.

     
    fubah2
    fubah2
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2012
    Posts: 54115
    Posted: Jul. 16, 2020 - 7:50 PM ET #287

    ECONOMIST/YouGov survey


    1500 (1242 RV) 3.3% MOE, July 12 - 14, 2020
    Source: https://docs.cdn.yougov.com/hpupr0zhkl/econTabReport.pdf

    *NOTE:
    Before adolf-lovers here wet their collective panties as usual,
    to eliminate poll bias, I show the responses from "MODERATES"
    (ie, niether Liberals, nor Conservatives)
    MODERATES decide elections!


    Q: Is the USA better off now than four years ago?
    MODERATES say:
    21% ...better now
    56% ...better off 4 years ago under Obama!!!

     


    Q: Are YOU personally better off now than you were four years ago?
    MODERATES say:
    34% ...better now
    41% ...better off 4 years ago under Obama!

     

    more key results to come in other thread...

     

    Reply

    ECONOMIST/YouGov survey


    1500 (1242 RV) 3.3% MOE, July 12 - 14, 2020
    Source: https://docs.cdn.yougov.com/hpupr0zhkl/econTabReport.pdf

    *NOTE:
    Before adolf-lovers here wet their collective panties as usual,
    to eliminate poll bias, I show the responses from "MODERATES"
    (ie, niether Liberals, nor Conservatives)
    MODERATES decide elections!


    Q: Is the USA better off now than four years ago?
    MODERATES say:
    21% ...better now
    56% ...better off 4 years ago under Obama!!!

     


    Q: Are YOU personally better off now than you were four years ago?
    MODERATES say:
    34% ...better now
    41% ...better off 4 years ago under Obama!

     

    more key results to come in other thread...

     

     
    chadebennett
    chadebennett
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2011
    Posts: 614
    Posted: Jul. 16, 2020 - 7:50 PM ET #288

    Yet another drag on the American economy is ObamaCare, his signature legislation and crowning achievement. Remember when Obama repeatedly told you that under his plan you could keep your doctor, you keep your plan and that that it would drive down overall health costs to the point the average family would save $2,500 a year? And how ObamaCare would actually reduce the deficit?

    Reply

    Yet another drag on the American economy is ObamaCare, his signature legislation and crowning achievement. Remember when Obama repeatedly told you that under his plan you could keep your doctor, you keep your plan and that that it would drive down overall health costs to the point the average family would save $2,500 a year? And how ObamaCare would actually reduce the deficit?

     
    Midnight1
    Midnight1
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2007
    Posts: 25585
    Posted: Jul. 16, 2020 - 7:51 PM ET #289

    If you are asking Rush to chime in, you have already lost the discussion gamble. an_beatup

    Many of us in here have owned our own business & if you are now bitching about your medical cost, you should never have retired. Like others I have no problem paying a little more for my fellow Americans. 

    Reply

    If you are asking Rush to chime in, you have already lost the discussion gamble. an_beatup

    Many of us in here have owned our own business & if you are now bitching about your medical cost, you should never have retired. Like others I have no problem paying a little more for my fellow Americans. 

     
    chadebennett
    chadebennett
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2011
    Posts: 614
    Posted: Jul. 16, 2020 - 7:51 PM ET #290

    As for the average American family saving $2,500 a year on health care, the exact opposite has happened. According to the Kaiser Family Foundation, the increase in health care costs for employer-sponsored benefits since 2008 is now $5,462. That is a 43 percent increase.

    Reply

    As for the average American family saving $2,500 a year on health care, the exact opposite has happened. According to the Kaiser Family Foundation, the increase in health care costs for employer-sponsored benefits since 2008 is now $5,462. That is a 43 percent increase.

     
    fubah2
    fubah2
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2012
    Posts: 54115
    Posted: Jul. 16, 2020 - 7:53 PM ET #291

    Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:

    Quote Originally Posted by Rush51:

     

    Yes, and yes. I am not talking stock ownership bro. I should not have to get literal with you. You understand what I am saying. Most Americans do not regularly engage in stock trading. Read the NPR article I just posted excerpts of on the business tax cuts. It has not been a huge benefit for the economy, sorry. Men lie, women lie...numbers don't.

    Less than 50% of Americans have any money in stocks (or bonds)

     

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:

    Quote Originally Posted by Rush51:

     

    Yes, and yes. I am not talking stock ownership bro. I should not have to get literal with you. You understand what I am saying. Most Americans do not regularly engage in stock trading. Read the NPR article I just posted excerpts of on the business tax cuts. It has not been a huge benefit for the economy, sorry. Men lie, women lie...numbers don't.

    Less than 50% of Americans have any money in stocks (or bonds)

     

     
    DeezyAZ81
    DeezyAZ81
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2005
    Posts: 8713
    Posted: Jul. 16, 2020 - 7:56 PM ET #292

    Quote Originally Posted by chadebennett:

    As for the average American family saving $2,500 a year on health care, the exact opposite has happened. According to the Kaiser Family Foundation, the increase in health care costs for employer-sponsored benefits since 2008 is now $5,462. That is a 43 percent increase.

    Hey Kayleigh McEnany, Stop posting! 

    Of course healthcare costs are higher now than in 2008. They were on an upward trend long before Obamacare. Every year they rose before the ACA, and after. Not surprising, cost of living, real estate costs, wages are also higher than in 2008. Are you going to tell us the sky is blue next? 

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by chadebennett:

    As for the average American family saving $2,500 a year on health care, the exact opposite has happened. According to the Kaiser Family Foundation, the increase in health care costs for employer-sponsored benefits since 2008 is now $5,462. That is a 43 percent increase.

    Hey Kayleigh McEnany, Stop posting! 

    Of course healthcare costs are higher now than in 2008. They were on an upward trend long before Obamacare. Every year they rose before the ACA, and after. Not surprising, cost of living, real estate costs, wages are also higher than in 2008. Are you going to tell us the sky is blue next? 

     
    fubah2
    fubah2
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2012
    Posts: 54115
    Posted: Jul. 16, 2020 - 7:56 PM ET #293

    Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:

    Quote Originally Posted by Rush51:

     

    You should believe the Wall Street Journal considering YOU were praising it 2 days ago and it is a conservative source....

    Funny, that  LOL

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:

    Quote Originally Posted by Rush51:

     

    You should believe the Wall Street Journal considering YOU were praising it 2 days ago and it is a conservative source....

    Funny, that  LOL

     
    fubah2
    fubah2
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2012
    Posts: 54115
    Posted: Jul. 16, 2020 - 8:00 PM ET #294

    Quote Originally Posted by Rush51:

    I don't have anything intelligent to respond with !  I am defeated !

    surprised  well that's different

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by Rush51:

    I don't have anything intelligent to respond with !  I am defeated !

    surprised  well that's different

     
    DeezyAZ81
    DeezyAZ81
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2005
    Posts: 8713
    Posted: Jul. 16, 2020 - 8:04 PM ET #295

    Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1:

    If you are asking Rush to chime in, you have already lost the discussion gamble.  Many of us in here have owned our own business & if you are now bitching about your medical cost, you should never have retired. Like others I have no problem paying a little more for my fellow Americans.

    Exactly, the guy claims to be so wealthy and rich, and yet is complaining about the costs of healthcare insurance, which proves that he is neither. The truly rich and wealthy do not complain about healthcare insurance costs or taxes. an_roll_laugh

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1:

    If you are asking Rush to chime in, you have already lost the discussion gamble.  Many of us in here have owned our own business & if you are now bitching about your medical cost, you should never have retired. Like others I have no problem paying a little more for my fellow Americans.

    Exactly, the guy claims to be so wealthy and rich, and yet is complaining about the costs of healthcare insurance, which proves that he is neither. The truly rich and wealthy do not complain about healthcare insurance costs or taxes. an_roll_laugh

     
    fubah2
    fubah2
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2012
    Posts: 54115
    Posted: Jul. 16, 2020 - 8:05 PM ET #296

    Quote Originally Posted by Snorkel:

    1)Renegotiated NAFTA-

     

    umm, you know this was just signed very recently, right?  (Canada did not attend because of the trump-virus)

    So what does a spring 2020 new NAFTA deal have to do with the last 3 years of trump compared with the last 3 years of Obama???

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by Snorkel:

    1)Renegotiated NAFTA-

     

    umm, you know this was just signed very recently, right?  (Canada did not attend because of the trump-virus)

    So what does a spring 2020 new NAFTA deal have to do with the last 3 years of trump compared with the last 3 years of Obama???

     
    fubah2
    fubah2
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2012
    Posts: 54115
    Posted: Jul. 16, 2020 - 8:10 PM ET #297

    Quote Originally Posted by Snorkel:

     

    3)Funded a depleted military

    What depleted?? We have 19 aircraft carrier fleets. The most any opponent has is 2.

    But according to you, the military was depleted.  At an exorbitant cost running up the deficit and National Debt even more - which can't pay back!   Great!  All hail the self-procalimed "king of debt"

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by Snorkel:

     

    3)Funded a depleted military

    What depleted?? We have 19 aircraft carrier fleets. The most any opponent has is 2.

    But according to you, the military was depleted.  At an exorbitant cost running up the deficit and National Debt even more - which can't pay back!   Great!  All hail the self-procalimed "king of debt"

     
    chadebennett
    chadebennett
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2011
    Posts: 614
    Posted: Jul. 16, 2020 - 8:16 PM ET #298

    Obama Employment Failure and GDP Growth: 

    • 8 years of disappointment.
    • 95 million citizens could not find jobs.
    • Labor force participation rate lowest point since 1977.
    • During the Obama years, 13 million more people were added to Medicaid.
    • 11 million more people were forced onto food stamps since Obama took office.
    • The percentage of 18-34 year olds living with parents or family hit a 70-year high.
    • The Social Security Disability rolls increased by 5 million under Obama
    • Failed Growth: Obama is the first president not to achieve a single year of 3% GDP growth
    Reply

    Obama Employment Failure and GDP Growth: 

    • 8 years of disappointment.
    • 95 million citizens could not find jobs.
    • Labor force participation rate lowest point since 1977.
    • During the Obama years, 13 million more people were added to Medicaid.
    • 11 million more people were forced onto food stamps since Obama took office.
    • The percentage of 18-34 year olds living with parents or family hit a 70-year high.
    • The Social Security Disability rolls increased by 5 million under Obama
    • Failed Growth: Obama is the first president not to achieve a single year of 3% GDP growth
     
    fubah2
    fubah2
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2012
    Posts: 54115
    Posted: Jul. 16, 2020 - 8:21 PM ET #299

    Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:

    Depleted military??? Funny Obama and Trump's spending on military on an annual basis is extremely similar. $600 billion to around $700 billion. So is his budget more, yes.
     

    Factor in inflation and they are even closer....but only a moron would think -- given our HISTORIC NATIONAL DEBT and HISTORIC ANNUAL INTEREST PAYMENTS on that DEBT -- that we should be spending EVEN MORE money on what already is something like 20 fold the most powerful military on the planet.  

    But hey, adolf-lovers, don't let common sense get in the way of spending our future on another credit card like Bush did.  We NEED to borrow many more TRILLIONS because afterall, those ISIS dudes have rifles....and bullets!!! Yikes!

     

     https://theconversation.com/trumps-planned-military-buildup-is-based-on-faulty-claims-not-good-strategy-73883   

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:

    Depleted military??? Funny Obama and Trump's spending on military on an annual basis is extremely similar. $600 billion to around $700 billion. So is his budget more, yes.
     

    Factor in inflation and they are even closer....but only a moron would think -- given our HISTORIC NATIONAL DEBT and HISTORIC ANNUAL INTEREST PAYMENTS on that DEBT -- that we should be spending EVEN MORE money on what already is something like 20 fold the most powerful military on the planet.  

    But hey, adolf-lovers, don't let common sense get in the way of spending our future on another credit card like Bush did.  We NEED to borrow many more TRILLIONS because afterall, those ISIS dudes have rifles....and bullets!!! Yikes!

     

     https://theconversation.com/trumps-planned-military-buildup-is-based-on-faulty-claims-not-good-strategy-73883   

     
     
    fubah2
    fubah2
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2012
    Posts: 54115
    Posted: Jul. 16, 2020 - 8:24 PM ET #300

    Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:

    Quote Originally Posted by Snorkel:  Thanks for proving my point about character!

     

    Pretty ironic stressing character in posts defending Trump. you care about character in a free message board but not from your President??? Interesting. He is never an immoral, smart a$&”, who insults anyone that disagrees with him! Too funny.

    Very ironic.  But they don't understand that.

    Instead they go to play #3 of the trump-lover playbook (insert image of 3 chimps): 

    "See nothing, hear nothing, say nothing"

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:

    Quote Originally Posted by Snorkel:  Thanks for proving my point about character!

     

    Pretty ironic stressing character in posts defending Trump. you care about character in a free message board but not from your President??? Interesting. He is never an immoral, smart a$&”, who insults anyone that disagrees with him! Too funny.

    Very ironic.  But they don't understand that.

    Instead they go to play #3 of the trump-lover playbook (insert image of 3 chimps): 

    "See nothing, hear nothing, say nothing"

    All Forums | Politics
    «First Previous 121314 ... 293031 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • Claiming Prizes 57,811
    • Wednesday 10/21/2026 970
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 279,682
    • I'm embarrassed for Trump supporters 61,607
    • PART DEUX 153
    • Public Indicator Calculations 2026 23,323
    • NFL THREAD * 151 * 26,139
    • Lies, Inaccuracies & Stupidity 33,176
    • NCAA WEEK 7 *** Railroad to Paradise *** 14,665
    • I Thought Trump Campaigned on Lowering Prices!?!? 32,434

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Privacy Choices Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo
    Covers Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.