Posted:
#26
To acclaim mother Jones as credible is almost as stupid as assuming Stu was white.
Typical liberal making assertions and accusations with no evidence.
Trump would NEVER demand loyalty, even though he's on tape doing just that
Posted:
#27
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:
I'm black and from Oakland you f#cking idiot. You really are the biggest dipsh!t on covers. You're the one who does not know of what you speak. Trying so hard to be down for a cause yet not realizing you have your head up your own behind. And the reason you don't realize it is because you think your garbage smells like roses you smug person.
Ah yes, my shi* smells like roses when I create threads that address the rollback of civil rights by Jeff Sessions. Yes, that makes PERFECT SENSE.
Oh, you're 'black and from Oakland' (LOL) but you speak of 'whiny liberals' and 'rioting and occupying' in terms that a white preppy Yale student who never saw a black person beyond a magazine cover would. And the way the raging bigots here would.
So tell me how, being black and living in Oakland, you are a conservative, because what you just typed is EXACTLY what they type to defame your race, here and elsewhere on a continual basis.
Tell us Mr. "Black and I'm from Oakland" but let me complain about those 'rioters' and 'whiny liberals.'
Who's your father Mr. "I'm black and I'm from Oakland"? Sheriff David Clarke? Lol.
Do you have any idea of the company you are making in this forum? Do you have any idea what the members here have typed. The words to shi* on the black race like they were pieces of shi*? Do you?
You do not. You've been here for 8 fu**ing months. You have no idea of the shi* you are rubbing shoulders with. Read some of the what people type here to get an idea.
Why don't think about that before you answer...
Posted:
#28
Quote Originally Posted by Mark_The_Narc:
To acclaim mother Jones as credible is almost as stupid as assuming Stu was white.
To acclaim mother Jones as credible is almost as stupid as assuming Stu was white.
Typical liberal making assertions and accusations with no evidence.
Go back to playing blackjack Marc.
You've just stamped 'idiot' on your forehead.
And Mother Jones isn't credible well, despite all evidence, because, Scal said it was. And I, Marc, don't believe that.
But because Stu being 'black' IS favorable in this conversation for Marc, that IS TRUE, with no evidence, because Stu said so! And I DO believe that.
Let's just randomly pick and choose what we like as true, and therefore it is true, because that's the way the world works!
Posted:
#30
Quote Originally Posted by Mark_The_Narc:
Scal,
Scal,
Honest question for you. What made you decide to post stating he was white?
Well look at 99.9% of the rest of the bigots in those forum who shi* on blacks who I've embarrassed for 10 years.
His stereotypical references are just like theirs.
Hope that makes sense.
Posted:
#34
A couple of recent real gems from Clara Jeffery, editor of Mother Jones. Nothing partisan here, keep moving along.
In April, 2017, after the 2017 Shayrat missile strike, with the launch of 59 Tomahawk (missile) cruise missiles in response to the Khan Shaykhun chemical attack, Jeffrey wrote on Twitter, "That the missiles are callled tomahawks must enrage a lot of Native Americans", allegedly accusing the naming due to cultural appropriation. The comment was met with mockery by some users on Twitter with many pointing out that the U.S. military has a history of naming after Native Americans. Further, the U.S. military gets permission from Native American tribes before naming after them per the Department of the Army’s Pamphlet 70-3, paragraph 1-11-4-g.
On June 9th 2017, following the United Kingdom general election, 2017, Jeffery wrote a post on Twitter in which she misinterpreted an article referring to the United Kingdom's First-past-the-post voting system as the first time a system entitled 'past the post' had been put in place, despite that system existing in the United States of America, and Jeffery editing a publication whose entire focus is on U.S. politics.
Posted:
#35
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
Well look at 99.9% of the rest of the bigots in those forum who shi* on blacks who I've embarrassed for 10 years.
His stereotypical references are just like theirs.
Hope that makes sense.
Let's get one thing straight. The only person you embarrass on this site is yourself and everyone knows it. Now get into facts.
The only point I made was that whiny liberals (like you) who complain about Trump being in office when they didn't even vote (did you vote?) are the reason he is in office. Not Trump supporters. Hillary Clinton had extremely low voter turn out. That's a fact. I had even had conversations with people, many of them caucasian women, many of them registered absentee in swing states, who refused to vote for Clinton because they were staunch Bernie Sanders supporters. Absentee! All they had to do was walk down to the mail box. If you are a liberal caucasian female candidate and you can't even mobilize all of the liberal caucasian female voters, supporters of your opponent can't be blamed for you not winning. That is a fact.
Now to the protest and riots comment. I know somebody like you, a white guy that likes to talk a big game, probably hasn't experienced a lot of riots but let me give you more facts, being that Oakland has had it's fair share in recent years. The national media likes to portray this image of black people rising up and rebelling. What they don't show you is some of the biggest contributers to said riots aren't even black and could give a damn about the issues. They are serial anarchist, most of them white, who come from other cities(sometimes other states) looking for a reason to destroy sh!t. And as an Oakland native I can tell you that my city has had and has enough issues of it's own without having some white dude come in from hundreds of miles away to destroy it. Or some newly moved white dude that's gentrifying my city and has no qualms about destroying it. They didn't live here when there were no stores so they have no problem destroying a mom&pops that may even be black owned. And in the name of my rights? F#ck off because at the end of the day they don't blame the Scalabrine's of the world, they blame the stumptownstu's. That's a fact.
Scal, you think you know but at the end of the day you're the same as them. You're like the white guy that walks up to a black guy and says sh!t like, "I feel your pain, bro." not realizing that we're looking at you like, "darn off, guy. You don't feel my pain. You wanna help me then treat me like a person and not a cause. I am not a f#cking humpback whale." And for the record I voted for Clinton even though I felt like she sucked simply because I thought Trump was inexperienced and undereducated. And a far right-wing puppet. I'm not a democrat nor republican. I take issues individually. I'm liberal on some, conservative on others but realistic on all. And atleast I voted. I bet a guy like you who talks a bunch of sh!t in a covers forum probably did not vote. I bet you're exactly the type of person I was talking about. You whine in a chat forum but you're not about action. Having some skittles and an Arizona as your covers avatar does not f#cking impress me.
R.I.P. #94 MARSHAWN KNEELAND - DC4L
Posted:
#37
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:
Let's get one thing straight. The only person you embarrass on this site is yourself and everyone knows it. Now get into facts.
The only point I made was that whiny liberals (like you) who complain about Trump being in office when they didn't even vote (did you vote?) are the reason he is in office. Not Trump supporters. Hillary Clinton had extremely low voter turn out. That's a fact. I had even had conversations with people, many of them caucasian women, many of them registered absentee in swing states, who refused to vote for Clinton because they were staunch Bernie Sanders supporters. Absentee! All they had to do was walk down to the mail box. If you are a liberal caucasian female candidate and you can't even mobilize all of the liberal caucasian female voters, supporters of your opponent can't be blamed for you not winning. That is a fact.
Now to the protest and riots comment. I know somebody like you, a white guy that likes to talk a big game, probably hasn't experienced a lot of riots but let me give you more facts, being that Oakland has had it's fair share in recent years. The national media likes to portray this image of black people rising up and rebelling. What they don't show you is some of the biggest contributers to said riots aren't even black and could give a damn about the issues. They are serial anarchist, most of them white, who come from other cities(sometimes other states) looking for a reason to destroy sh!t. And as an Oakland native I can tell you that my city has had and has enough issues of it's own without having some white dude come in from hundreds of miles away to destroy it. Or some newly moved white dude that's gentrifying my city and has no qualms about destroying it. They didn't live here when there were no stores so they have no problem destroying a mom&pops that may even be black owned. And in the name of my rights? F#ck off because at the end of the day they don't blame the Scalabrine's of the world, they blame the stumptownstu's. That's a fact.
Scal, you think you know but at the end of the day you're the same as them. You're like the white guy that walks up to a black guy and says sh!t like, "I feel your pain, bro." not realizing that we're looking at you like, "darn off, guy. You don't feel my pain. You wanna help me then treat me like a person and not a cause. I am not a f#cking humpback whale." And for the record I voted for Clinton even though I felt like she sucked simply because I thought Trump was inexperienced and undereducated. And a far right-wing puppet. I'm not a democrat nor republican. I take issues individually. I'm liberal on some, conservative on others but realistic on all. And atleast I voted. I bet a guy like you who talks a bunch of sh!t in a covers forum probably did not vote. I bet you're exactly the type of person I was talking about. You whine in a chat forum but you're not about action. Having some skittles and an Arizona as your covers avatar does not f#cking impress me.
I think we just witnessed a murder. Anyone gonna volunteer to write a eulogy for scal?
Posted:
#38
Let's start with the "embarrass myself" claim....
I write the most detailed write-ups this site has ever seen. They are among the most commented on. Among the most viewed. I'm one of the last capping dinosaurs of this site still going strong as everyone has left. I'm still here, giving out free caps.
On top of that YOU are an active participant IN MY THREADS.
So you like to make company, on a regular basis, with someone who embarrasses themselves on this site?
I mean, I just read the FIRST SENTENCE and I am wary of moving on because it might get even more dense, as you just insulted...yourself. 
(Oh by the way, you're already in the good graces of the bigots here. Be proud of that as someone who is black. Again, it's good company particularly when those very same people could give a shi* about your race.)
You are a fuc*ing fool.
Posted:
#39
First sentence. You embarrassed yourself.
Second sentence: Again you embarrass yourself.
You state "The only point I made was that whiny liberals (like you) who complain about Trump being in office when they didn't even vote (did you vote?) are the reason he is in office."
No. I did not vote. I come from a state that is DEEP BLUE. My vote would have been another vote in the total tally that did NOTHING for Hillary because once the State goes blue, it's meaningless.
Whether you agree with this is meaningless (and of course you'll disagree with it). If I live in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Florida, Ohio, Wisconsin, Not only would I have voted, I would have worked on behalf of Bernie first and Hillary second after the primaries to garner even more votes in swing states.
Instead, you seem to think a symbolic gesture when a vote in one of the most diverse states in the Union matters. It doesn't. It's going blue. You won't accept that or this answer and I don't expect someone who has already INSULTED themselves in the first sentence to.
Shall I go on? I can. It will get worse you know.
Posted:
#40
had even had conversations with people, many of them caucasian women, many of them registered absentee in swing states, who refused to vote for Clinton because they were staunch Bernie Sanders supporters. Absentee! All they had to do was walk down to the mail box. If you are a liberal caucasian female candidate and you can't even mobilize all of the liberal caucasian female voters, supporters of your opponent can't be blamed for you not winning. That is a fact.
Now the conversation has shifted to liberal caucasian female voters in swing states...Lol.
Ok. Thanks for that 'fact' and their mobilization methods...
How would you like me address this...
Posted:
#41
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
Let's start with the "embarrass myself" claim....
Let's start with the "embarrass myself" claim....
I write the most detailed write-ups this site has ever seen. They are among the most commented on. Among the most viewed. I'm one of the last capping dinosaurs of this site still going strong as everyone has left. I'm still here, giving out free caps.
On top of that YOU are an active participant IN MY THREADS.
So you like to make company, on a regular basis, with someone who embarrasses themselves on this site?
I mean, I just read the FIRST SENTENCE and I am wary of moving on because it might get even more dense, as you just insulted...yourself.
(Oh by the way, you're already in the good graces of the bigots here. Be proud of that as someone who is black. Again, it's good company particularly when those very same people could give a shi* about your race.)
You are a fuc*ing fool.
Did you break your arm patting yourself on the back? "My post are the most commented on...the most viewed...blah, blah, blah." That doesn't mean that you're popular. Or respected. It just means that you're polarizing. And in that aspect you're essentially the Trump of covers. Everyone has an opinion about you but just as many of them are negative as are positive. People wait for you to fall flat on your face so they tune in. That, again, is a fact. And while yes, you do have the "longest write-ups" you're just a mediocre capper who has probably been subpar lately so you've been doubling down on the political stuff. You really are the Trump of covers. A self-aggrandizing blow-hard.
R.I.P. #94 MARSHAWN KNEELAND - DC4L
Posted:
#42
Now to the protest and riots comment. I know somebody like you, a white guy that likes to talk a big game, probably hasn't experienced a lot of riots but let me give you more facts, being that Oakland has had it's fair share in recent years
Talk a big game? What exactly does that mean. What game am I talking?
The people who are talking, particularly the ones in this forum who you are cozying up to at the moment, are responsible for the continued defamation of the black race (and this happens on a daily basis all over this forum and elsewhere) which leads to, oh I don't know, police shootings of unarmed black men (and children) without punishment.
If you do not think this is the case, then where is the punishment for those officers? The absence of punishment comes from, in part, the zeitgeist that surrounds the black culture and how it's defamed DIALY. It's largely regarded as expendable from, get this, YOUR very attitude. YOU are more harmful to your own race than a bigot is simply by how you portray the issues of which you speak because you will be given more credibility by the bigot (because you are black). Hence BWS already siding with you. And he's not one to cozy up to either.
And being black allows you NO privilege to speak of things in the black community the way you do, or enable you to give a hand wave to my criticism of you, or even address me as you do. In fact, it's far worse that your are black.
From this point, you are an observer with an opinion (a highly misinformed one), black or white.
And quite dense (and deleterious to your race to boot).
Feeling good yet?
Posted:
#43
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:
Did you break your arm patting yourself on the back? "My post are the most commented on...the most viewed...blah, blah, blah." That doesn't mean that you're popular. Or respected. It just means that you're polarizing. And in that aspect you're essentially the Trump of covers. Everyone has an opinion about you but just as many of them are negative as are positive. People wait for you to fall flat on your face so they tune in. That, again, is a fact. And while yes, you do have the "longest write-ups" you're just a mediocre capper who has probably been subpar lately so you've been doubling down on the political stuff. You really are the Trump of covers. A self-aggrandizing blow-hard.
Ah Stu. How you shi* on yourself and your credibility.
Let me ask you: What would make someone a credible capper on Covers.
Someone with ZERO views. Someone with NO COMMENTS. Someone who DOESN'T inspire debate. SOMEONE who writes NOTHING????
The antithesis of what you speak is moronic.
"You're not a good capper! You only have the longest and most-detailed write-ups. Yes everyone participates but that doesn't mean anything. Yes everyone views your thread but that doesn't mean anything. Hey, there are people that HATE you so that means something! You're Trump!"
Think about what you are typing.
Look at what you just wrote.
It's asinine. And I feel you are wasting a lot of my time at this point.
Just as many are negative...they are negative HERE because I've shi* on the very posters you are making friends with as BIGOTS and you don't even know it!"
You get here in October of 2016 and you think that you can speak to someone who has been capping here for a decade.
CHECK YOURSELF KID!!!
Posted:
#44
hey are serial anarchist, most of them white, who come from other cities(sometimes other states) looking for a reason to destroy sh!t. And as an Oakland native I can tell you that my city has had and has enough issues of it's own without having some white dude come in from hundreds of miles away to destroy it. Or some newly moved white dude that's gentrifying my city and has no qualms about destroying it. They didn't live here when there were no stores so they have no problem destroying a mom&pops that may even be black owned. And in the name of my rights? F#ck off because at the end of the day they don't blame the Scalabrine's of the world, they blame the stumptownstu's. That's a fact.
Ah, ok. No white serial anarchists are responsible for uprisings in black communities when people like Michael Brown, Tamir Rice and Trayvon Martin get shot. Or when Eric Garner gets choked to death (Oh just to let you know the people who you are coming up to blame his death on him being 400 pounds, ya know, because well, he's fat and sweaty and fat sweaty people die easier than just people who are generally out of shape).
Yes, the black community themselves didn't start that. White serial anarchists did and they just want to 'destroy garbage".
And let's bring in the gentrifying issue because well, we feel like it.
At this point Stu, you are in over your head.
And speaking of heads, head over to the sports forums and stay there.
This conversation is not good for you. And the way you are conducting yourself here does you far more harm than good.
Posted:
#46
Scal, there's a reason so many people ridicule you. It's because you're ridiculous. And you like to give a lot of opinions and act as if they are cardinal but i'm just simply stating facts. That Clinton did not win the election because of low turn out in swing states is a fact. That the protesters/rioters who often vandalize my city are often caucasians who really don't give a damn about the issues meanwhile black people bear the brunt of the blame is a fact. That a white guy from Pennsylvania is trying to tell me about being black in America is what's really asinine is a fact. That you are the exact type of person I am speaking of. One who talks a bunch yet can't even be bothered with the simplest act of voting because "you live in a deep blue state so it doesn't matter." is a fact. What about local stuff? That stuff doesn't matter either? I live if the biggest blue state and I still vote. Even if my presidential vote is just "symbolic". Everyone should vote. Especially groups who have had to fight for it. News flash, Scal. You're white. You haven't had to fight for anything. So it means nothing for you to take something like voting for granted. To tout Clinton winning the popular vote by 3 million doesn't say as much. 8 million? That would be a conversation starter. Maybe then you could see change in the voting system you see as so flawed. And lastly, you like to say i'm embarrassing myself which shows you don't even know the definition of the word. I don't care what these people think so by definition I can't be embarrassed on this site. You obviously do care. That's why you have these long write-ups under the auspices of "helping". That's why you brag about comment numbers and views. Who cares? Only you, which is sad. Especially since, again, half of those views are from people who don't like you and half of those comments are talking sh!t. And you care. As I said before, that isn't being popular. That's being polarizing. And that was my comparison to Trump. And it is also a fact. At the end of the day this is your thread and you are entitled to your opinions in it. And since you care so much about being heard on covers and I care so little i'll just leave it alone and not give you the attention you so obviously covet. I look forward to football season when we can talk about sports instead of politics because I don't dislike you like some of these guys. And I don't cheer when you fail and disappear when you succeed like a lot of them do.
p.s. Just because this profile is new doesn't mean i'm new to covers. Another assumption. Seems to be a theme with you. You know what they say about assumptions, as cliché as it is.
R.I.P. #94 MARSHAWN KNEELAND - DC4L
Posted:
#47
Stu, again. The ONLY people that attempt to ridicule me are the ones I've called out for nearly a DECADE based on their bigotry, and one which you embolden by continuing the trend (and as someone who is black, it is even MORE shameful to side with such people, which you are doing by DEFAULT, by echoing their sentiments).
Now again, I can pick apart virtually everything you say and shoot it down.
First you asked me if I voted in a poor attempt to deride me. I said no.And what was my reason? Because a deep blue state individual voter doesn't matter. Then I said I would have been enormously pro-active in a swing state (where it matters).
Your FIRST response to this is the following:
That Clinton did not win the election because of low turn out in swing states is a fact.
Now I ask you, where the fu** did I disagree with that or say that wasn't a fact. Further, what the hell does that have to do with me not voting in a deep blue state. And when did I say I was from Pennsylvania? How is Pennsylvania deep blue?
And no one is telling you about 'being black'. That is such a ridiculous overgeneralization. I can speak about the black community, white community, Jewish/Muslim community, as any race.
Get off your pedestal where you think you can tell me what I can and cannot say. I tell you to shut the fu** up because you embolden bigots here. That's it. But it's your choice to keeping yapping, which you obviously are choosing to do.
What I am telling you, is that your words on here hurt your credibility and you are embarrassing yourself white or black, but particularly as a black male you are hurting yourself even more because the bigots here ALREADY LOVE YOU. And that's a dangerous place to be (and of course, not a single bigot here thinks themselves a bigot, as NO BIGOT EVER would. So this is normal behavior.)
Just like like they love David Clarke. Or Ben Carson. They like you already.
Because when a black male supports anything they say, they automatically believe it to be true (even if it's a SINGLE black male saying it). These threads are prevalent here proving it.
So keep talking...And whether you are black or white in NJ, the state was going blue so 'caring' about voting has little to do with being white in NJ ...or black.
But I probably have your head spinning right now...So I'll stop. Because you leave me breathless. And helpless...to help you.
Which you need a ton of...because if you keep typing and don't read what you type, you are lighting a dynamite stick fuse here.
Posted:
#48
As I'm supposed to know you are an alias....
"Another assumption" he saysMy god.....wow.
My god.....wow. So you're an alias. Big deal.
Is this Ktrain? I once got in an argument with him when a cop pretty much made a Hispanic kids head explode when he tackled him on concrete.
On that day, Ktrain said the cop had a right to shoot a 4 year old if the 4 year old pointed a gun at him (as though there was no other option).
I'll never forget him typing that. One of the most depraved things typed here. Maybe you're KTrain. Maybe not...Who cares really? You've said your piece. And it hurts you and others.
Posted:
#50
How to spot a race baiter a mile away..................
Consistently putting down one race for their faults while justifying the actions of another race they are trying to protect. Deep blue state??? If producing racists like yourself is the result of a deep blue state please let us know which one so we can avoid vacationing there.
I am certainly thankful that the community I live in doesn't put up with racism and bigotry BS. On the rare occasion it does it gets slapped down quickly and it's ALWAYS outsiders. Living in a University town helps as there is usually lots of diversity like our University. What a miserable life one must have to constantly spew a message of white guilt. I would feel the same way if every time someone commented on blacks it was negative. Everything out of your yapper is white hatred.
On a side note, you know you are a moderate when you disagree with Scal and Sabanesque. I have successfully been able to do this on multiple occasions. Far left and far right is a miserable way to go through life. These people are always more angry than the sane.
Hot Forum Topics
