Posted:
#1
If you're wise you'll add Kamala +150 to every parlay bet you're considering today.
Trump parlay buster
easy easy easy win, even if she takes an L they will find some ballots somewhere and win late... 
+150
Posted:
#3
Not sure the exact stat but i think it was something like out of the last 8 elections when the odds makers have a favorite it has come thru 7 out of the 8 elections. The odds makers are more accurate then all the dumb polls. Personally i think Trump wins BUT i dont trust this election. The dems seem like they will do whatever it takes to win.
Posted:
#11
In the highly contested state of Pennsylvania, Heritage data goes back 30 years and covers 32 elections with over 100 million votes cast and found only 39 cases of voter fraud. The percentage of fraudulent votes in Arizona over the last 25 years of elections was a minuscule .0000845%, and no election outcome in the U.S. has ever been altered by ballot fraud.
Not enough to make a difference unless your an orange presidential candidate who wants to claim possible mass voter fraud before election in case he loses. Again.
Posted:
#12
Quote Originally Posted by typeone:
easy easy easy win, even if she takes an L they will find some ballots somewhere and win late... harris +119 +150
easy easy easy win, even if she takes an L they will find some ballots somewhere and win late... harris +119 +150
Bullseye.
Vote Trump, Bet Kamala. No matter what odds you find. They will ensure a Kamala "win".
Trump beat the crazy white lady the first time around. They're not gonna let him beat the crazy "black" lady the second time around. Our nation is screwed!
Posted:
#18
Quote Originally Posted by 7out:
In the highly contested state of Pennsylvania, Heritage data goes back 30 years and covers 32 elections with over 100 million votes cast and found only 39 cases of voter fraud. The percentage of fraudulent votes in Arizona over the last 25 years of elections was a minuscule .0000845%, and no election outcome in the U.S. has ever been altered by ballot fraud. Not enough to make a difference unless your an orange presidential candidate who wants to claim possible mass voter fraud before election in case he loses. Again.
In the highly contested state of Pennsylvania, Heritage data goes back 30 years and covers 32 elections with over 100 million votes cast and found only 39 cases of voter fraud. The percentage of fraudulent votes in Arizona over the last 25 years of elections was a minuscule .0000845%, and no election outcome in the U.S. has ever been altered by ballot fraud. Not enough to make a difference unless your an orange presidential candidate who wants to claim possible mass voter fraud before election in case he loses. Again.
Thanks for showing us some kind of data on your believe. Instead of being an idiot and keep repeating the Orangeman divide the country lies and deception like a clueless dumbass disciple
A broken Rolex is right twice A-day hahaha
Posted:
#22
Quote Originally Posted by 7out:
In the highly contested state of Pennsylvania, Heritage data goes back 30 years and covers 32 elections with over 100 million votes cast and found only 39 cases of voter fraud. The percentage of fraudulent votes in Arizona over the last 25 years of elections was a minuscule .0000845%, and no election outcome in the U.S. has ever been altered by ballot fraud. Not enough to make a difference unless your an orange presidential candidate who wants to claim possible mass voter fraud before election in case he loses. Again.
In the highly contested state of Pennsylvania, Heritage data goes back 30 years and covers 32 elections with over 100 million votes cast and found only 39 cases of voter fraud. The percentage of fraudulent votes in Arizona over the last 25 years of elections was a minuscule .0000845%, and no election outcome in the U.S. has ever been altered by ballot fraud. Not enough to make a difference unless your an orange presidential candidate who wants to claim possible mass voter fraud before election in case he loses. Again.
Lolajahaha
Hot Forum Topics
