On Sunday, 21 August Hillary wears a heavy coat at an outdoor fundraiser in Nantucket, Mass while the temp is at 75. She also takes a jet ride a whole 20 miles, She refused an SUV and helicopter ride. You can not make this stuff up. This should be a fun blog for everybody to write in.Election day around the corner.
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
On Sunday, 21 August Hillary wears a heavy coat at an outdoor fundraiser in Nantucket, Mass while the temp is at 75. She also takes a jet ride a whole 20 miles, She refused an SUV and helicopter ride. You can not make this stuff up. This should be a fun blog for everybody to write in.Election day around the corner.
Which is the strategy that will lose him the election. He will look angry, emotional and vile. This image to America will march Hillary right into the White House.
You don't gain votes looking all negative and upset. Trump is playing to his dwindling emotional and negative voting base at this point. It seems every day that this is about personal gain and narcissism and not actually wanting to win and make America great. If not he wouldn't be employing such poor strategy.
Which is the strategy that will lose him the election. He will look angry, emotional and vile. This image to America will march Hillary right into the White House.
You don't gain votes looking all negative and upset. Trump is playing to his dwindling emotional and negative voting base at this point. It seems every day that this is about personal gain and narcissism and not actually wanting to win and make America great. If not he wouldn't be employing such poor strategy.
I don't see a problem here.... older women often have poor blood circulation and need to be kept warm..and they wear warm clothing even in warmer weather ..poor circulation will make you feel cold ...
Poor circulation can lead to numerous health conditions or worsen those you already have with age,,Poor foot circulation is sometimes caused by obesity, lack of exercise, or poor food choices.
If, she is having a problem with standing up and falls or needs help on occasions from falling,,, it's all apart of old age ,,she will probably be OK and only needs to increase her yoga positions for constipation..............
I don't see a problem here.... older women often have poor blood circulation and need to be kept warm..and they wear warm clothing even in warmer weather ..poor circulation will make you feel cold ...
Poor circulation can lead to numerous health conditions or worsen those you already have with age,,Poor foot circulation is sometimes caused by obesity, lack of exercise, or poor food choices.
If, she is having a problem with standing up and falls or needs help on occasions from falling,,, it's all apart of old age ,,she will probably be OK and only needs to increase her yoga positions for constipation..............
Reshuffling the deck chairs on the titanic does not stop the ship that is filling with hundreds of gallons of water a minute and dropping like a rock to the bottom of the ocean.
So what identifiable difference or change has bannon made in trumps campaign? And how does this identifiable difference or change that actually has had a real effect of the presidential race?
Please let me know if you're just talking wait and see and we are just making guesses and opinion pronosticating what may or may never happen.
Can you tell me what what identifiable difference or change bannon has made in trump's campaign and that has had an actual
Effect on the race?
Reshuffling the deck chairs on the titanic does not stop the ship that is filling with hundreds of gallons of water a minute and dropping like a rock to the bottom of the ocean.
So what identifiable difference or change has bannon made in trumps campaign? And how does this identifiable difference or change that actually has had a real effect of the presidential race?
Please let me know if you're just talking wait and see and we are just making guesses and opinion pronosticating what may or may never happen.
Can you tell me what what identifiable difference or change bannon has made in trump's campaign and that has had an actual
Sorry I didn't even read his post trying to distract from our conversation. It is always difficult when people try to either answer questions for other people or engage in antics to detract from the discussion.
I get what he did in the past, but you fail to identify anything thing he has done. Considering he has had absolutely no effect or change on trumps campaign, he seems like in reality a complete non-factor.
So let's give him the benefit of the doubt on him getting settled in and having a positive change. What exactly will he do to make a positive change? Has he stated that he is going to change even one thing on trump's campaign or is it just rearranging the deck chairs on the titantic and saying it going to make a difference?
Can you identify exactly what changes he will make or changes he has proposed because he thinks Trump's campaign is wrong?
Like if we go beyond reality into hypothetical fantasy land and assuming he has a positive effect, can you or has he identified what trump's campaign is doing wrong and how he is going to fix it?
Sorry I didn't even read his post trying to distract from our conversation. It is always difficult when people try to either answer questions for other people or engage in antics to detract from the discussion.
I get what he did in the past, but you fail to identify anything thing he has done. Considering he has had absolutely no effect or change on trumps campaign, he seems like in reality a complete non-factor.
So let's give him the benefit of the doubt on him getting settled in and having a positive change. What exactly will he do to make a positive change? Has he stated that he is going to change even one thing on trump's campaign or is it just rearranging the deck chairs on the titantic and saying it going to make a difference?
Can you identify exactly what changes he will make or changes he has proposed because he thinks Trump's campaign is wrong?
Like if we go beyond reality into hypothetical fantasy land and assuming he has a positive effect, can you or has he identified what trump's campaign is doing wrong and how he is going to fix it?
Meanwhile Hillary has a team of 150 lawyers to help her stay out of trouble with hiding implicating emails and taking in donations for pay for play, "hidden" sometimes in $250,000 speeches which her lawyers advise her to hide--SICK and despicable to need that many lawyers if you are an honest trustworthy person for the office of Presidency. She has a team of 250+ campaign advisors and managers and umpteen mid managers who will handle a budget of one billion dollars. Ever wonder or care where that comes from? Perverse!
Wow. What a "great" campaign. We're all "impressed."
She is a SAD and hard product to sell despite. She is old, bietchy, haggard, NEVER at ease , and she is CORRUPT!
"Great" campaign. "Stronger together" is a sixth grader slogan.
Meanwhile Hillary has a team of 150 lawyers to help her stay out of trouble with hiding implicating emails and taking in donations for pay for play, "hidden" sometimes in $250,000 speeches which her lawyers advise her to hide--SICK and despicable to need that many lawyers if you are an honest trustworthy person for the office of Presidency. She has a team of 250+ campaign advisors and managers and umpteen mid managers who will handle a budget of one billion dollars. Ever wonder or care where that comes from? Perverse!
Wow. What a "great" campaign. We're all "impressed."
She is a SAD and hard product to sell despite. She is old, bietchy, haggard, NEVER at ease , and she is CORRUPT!
"Great" campaign. "Stronger together" is a sixth grader slogan.
What a sad state the country is in that a major party anoints her as the heir apparent... Corrupt, old, damaged goods, unqualified, dishonest, can't standup, a retread but she does do the funky chicken well. WTF has she done in her political career to deserve to be POTUS?
The Dude....
What a sad state the country is in that a major party anoints her as the heir apparent... Corrupt, old, damaged goods, unqualified, dishonest, can't standup, a retread but she does do the funky chicken well. WTF has she done in her political career to deserve to be POTUS?
Emails newly discovered (nothing can be hidden or scrubbed if it goes to outer space first--duh)shows that Huma Abedin (whose mother edits an Americsn pro Muslim opinion paper that says the US caused 09/11) was the go between and point person for setting up meetings between Clonton and Islamic heads of state. The Prince of Bahrain could not get a meeting with Clinton--declined offers. After he donated $32,000,000 (pocket change to help Haiti--a country Clonton helped destroy with regime destabilization and collecting money after the earthquake and trickling down only 10%), the Prince finally got his private audience.
She knew Islamic heads of state had serious cash from oil money and Huma had to be trusted and had to speak Arabic.
"Clinton Corruption Fatigue"?
I will give you a daily doseage.
Emails newly discovered (nothing can be hidden or scrubbed if it goes to outer space first--duh)shows that Huma Abedin (whose mother edits an Americsn pro Muslim opinion paper that says the US caused 09/11) was the go between and point person for setting up meetings between Clonton and Islamic heads of state. The Prince of Bahrain could not get a meeting with Clinton--declined offers. After he donated $32,000,000 (pocket change to help Haiti--a country Clonton helped destroy with regime destabilization and collecting money after the earthquake and trickling down only 10%), the Prince finally got his private audience.
She knew Islamic heads of state had serious cash from oil money and Huma had to be trusted and had to speak Arabic.
I think that this last desprate attempt at a smear campaign trying to insinuate Hillary having a health issue is a poor choice of strategy that will only March Hillary right into the whitehouse.
This did not work with Obama and the whole birther desperation and only made the GOP and what ever else they said look completely crazy even when they did have good points. Making allegations about hillary's health seems short sighted and tit-for-tat as a defensive of trumps lack of transparency about his finances.
But this defensiveness around trumps tax records is huge problem because without an image of financial success there is nothing trump has to stand on other than his hot air rhetoric.
We have seen trump supporters waiving the white flag for quite sometime now attacking Hillary rather than backing their own candidate. Because if they had something to showcase and promote concerning trump they would, but instead we see the intense waving of the white flag knowing that the more we learn about trump, the less people will vote of him.
But gangjng up and piling it on is all there is left in the absence of a coherent strategy to trump winning. And when Hillary wins the presidency they will have no one to blame but themselves and their Failed strategy. Hillary is so bad that all the GOP needed to do was run any electable candidate and roll to victory. But the party appears to be in complete shambles, dominated by this type of insanity. Republicans really deserve better
I think that this last desprate attempt at a smear campaign trying to insinuate Hillary having a health issue is a poor choice of strategy that will only March Hillary right into the whitehouse.
This did not work with Obama and the whole birther desperation and only made the GOP and what ever else they said look completely crazy even when they did have good points. Making allegations about hillary's health seems short sighted and tit-for-tat as a defensive of trumps lack of transparency about his finances.
But this defensiveness around trumps tax records is huge problem because without an image of financial success there is nothing trump has to stand on other than his hot air rhetoric.
We have seen trump supporters waiving the white flag for quite sometime now attacking Hillary rather than backing their own candidate. Because if they had something to showcase and promote concerning trump they would, but instead we see the intense waving of the white flag knowing that the more we learn about trump, the less people will vote of him.
But gangjng up and piling it on is all there is left in the absence of a coherent strategy to trump winning. And when Hillary wins the presidency they will have no one to blame but themselves and their Failed strategy. Hillary is so bad that all the GOP needed to do was run any electable candidate and roll to victory. But the party appears to be in complete shambles, dominated by this type of insanity. Republicans really deserve better
What a sad state the country is in that a major party anoints her as the heir apparent... Corrupt, old, damaged goods, unqualified, dishonest, can't standup, a retread but she does do the funky chicken well. WTF has she done in her political career to deserve to be POTUS?
I was thinking you were talking about the GOP when you were talking sad state.
Both candidates are corrupt and dishonest but even those terms are so emotional and black and white. Both candidates are old, older than our current president. Using this ageism tactic of sick and old as a means of discrediting Hillary seems like only a fool would buy it hook line and sinker.
You say Hillary is unqualified but the reality is that Obama was less qualified than she was when he started and that was thrown around but trump is actually less qualified than either of them. I remember many in the Democratic Party that felt that Hillary should have been the Candidate and not Obama because she was far more experienced in 2008.
Trump is perhaps the least qualified candidate ever. If you can name a few less qualified than trump let me know. If not it sounds silly to even bring this up as a means of garnering trump support. It's like trump and his supporters are trying to lose. Like why would you even bring up a concept like qualification and experience with the least experienced and qualified presidential candidate we have ever seen from a major party.
It's political suicide. I swear at this point trump is trying to lose and his followers are marching right off the cliff with him
Quote Originally Posted by Killer_B:
The Dude....
What a sad state the country is in that a major party anoints her as the heir apparent... Corrupt, old, damaged goods, unqualified, dishonest, can't standup, a retread but she does do the funky chicken well. WTF has she done in her political career to deserve to be POTUS?
I was thinking you were talking about the GOP when you were talking sad state.
Both candidates are corrupt and dishonest but even those terms are so emotional and black and white. Both candidates are old, older than our current president. Using this ageism tactic of sick and old as a means of discrediting Hillary seems like only a fool would buy it hook line and sinker.
You say Hillary is unqualified but the reality is that Obama was less qualified than she was when he started and that was thrown around but trump is actually less qualified than either of them. I remember many in the Democratic Party that felt that Hillary should have been the Candidate and not Obama because she was far more experienced in 2008.
Trump is perhaps the least qualified candidate ever. If you can name a few less qualified than trump let me know. If not it sounds silly to even bring this up as a means of garnering trump support. It's like trump and his supporters are trying to lose. Like why would you even bring up a concept like qualification and experience with the least experienced and qualified presidential candidate we have ever seen from a major party.
It's political suicide. I swear at this point trump is trying to lose and his followers are marching right off the cliff with him
Sorry I didn't even read his post trying to distract from our conversation. It is always difficult when people try to either answer questions for other people or engage in antics to detract from the discussion.
I get what he did in the past, but you fail to identify anything thing he has done. Considering he has had absolutely no effect or change on trumps campaign, he seems like in reality a complete non-factor.
So let's give him the benefit of the doubt on him getting settled in and having a positive change. What exactly will he do to make a positive change? Has he stated that he is going to change even one thing on trump's campaign or is it just rearranging the deck chairs on the titantic and saying it going to make a difference?
Can you identify exactly what changes he will make or changes he has proposed because he thinks Trump's campaign is wrong?
Like if we go beyond reality into hypothetical fantasy land and assuming he has a positive effect, can you or has he identified what trump's campaign is doing wrong and how he is going to fix it?
Why don't the two of you read this and give your opinon or add facts on the topic of bannon and the Actual effect he has had or will have rather than saying meanwhile and attempting to then sidetrack the civil discussion with your nonsense?
Please friends, join us in the civil disucssion about Bannon
Quote Originally Posted by dl36:
Sorry I didn't even read his post trying to distract from our conversation. It is always difficult when people try to either answer questions for other people or engage in antics to detract from the discussion.
I get what he did in the past, but you fail to identify anything thing he has done. Considering he has had absolutely no effect or change on trumps campaign, he seems like in reality a complete non-factor.
So let's give him the benefit of the doubt on him getting settled in and having a positive change. What exactly will he do to make a positive change? Has he stated that he is going to change even one thing on trump's campaign or is it just rearranging the deck chairs on the titantic and saying it going to make a difference?
Can you identify exactly what changes he will make or changes he has proposed because he thinks Trump's campaign is wrong?
Like if we go beyond reality into hypothetical fantasy land and assuming he has a positive effect, can you or has he identified what trump's campaign is doing wrong and how he is going to fix it?
Why don't the two of you read this and give your opinon or add facts on the topic of bannon and the Actual effect he has had or will have rather than saying meanwhile and attempting to then sidetrack the civil discussion with your nonsense?
Please friends, join us in the civil disucssion about Bannon
"Great" campaign. "Stronger together" is a sixth grader slogan.
Throughout her campaign, Hillary Clinton shifted through a variety of
third grade slogans, never sticking to one for long. A few examples of her campaign
slogans were:
Big Challenges, Real Solutions:Time to Pick a President Renew the Promise of America I'm In to Win Working for Change, Working for You The Strength and Experience to Make Change Happen Turn Up the Heat, Turn America Around Offering a New Beginning Ready for Change, Ready to Lead
What a scatterbrain her and her group are....they had to take down this one real quick "The Strength and Experience to Make Change Happen" because Obama told her he already make the change happen ....lol
Quote Originally Posted by Relax_Dude:
"Great" campaign. "Stronger together" is a sixth grader slogan.
Throughout her campaign, Hillary Clinton shifted through a variety of
third grade slogans, never sticking to one for long. A few examples of her campaign
slogans were:
Big Challenges, Real Solutions:Time to Pick a President Renew the Promise of America I'm In to Win Working for Change, Working for You The Strength and Experience to Make Change Happen Turn Up the Heat, Turn America Around Offering a New Beginning Ready for Change, Ready to Lead
What a scatterbrain her and her group are....they had to take down this one real quick "The Strength and Experience to Make Change Happen" because Obama told her he already make the change happen ....lol
But this defensiveness around trumps tax records is huge problem because without an image of financial success there is nothing trump has to stand on other than his hot air rhetoric.
" ... without an image of financial success ..."
Are you suggesting that Trump is not financially successful?
You need to change your source of news and simply apply common sense.
Wow
In your same post that I just quoted, you went on to say ... " We have seen trump supporters waiving the white flag for quite sometime now attacking Hillary rather than backing their own candidate. Because if they had something to showcase and promote concerning trump they would"
Isn't the EXACT SAME THING also true of HRC's supporters?
No candidate in the history of politics has been more widely attacked by the media, and much of the population, than Trump has. It's not even close. (much of it for good reason)
All that HRC, and her brigade of liberal media do is attack Trump. That's all they can do, because the truth about her career is the stuff that books will be written about one day, and they won't be flattering.
Thus, any comment saying "all they can do is attack Hillary" becomes positively absurd.
Neither candidate has enough positives to report to offset the avalanche of negatives that they both have in their past and present. I am stating the obvious, which should be recognized by anyone with a shred of objectivity.
DL, political affiliations, such as "non partisan independent" are only labels.
A persons true beliefs usually come to the forefront while engaged in discussion
bigreds daddy
Quote Originally Posted by dl36:
But this defensiveness around trumps tax records is huge problem because without an image of financial success there is nothing trump has to stand on other than his hot air rhetoric.
" ... without an image of financial success ..."
Are you suggesting that Trump is not financially successful?
You need to change your source of news and simply apply common sense.
Wow
In your same post that I just quoted, you went on to say ... " We have seen trump supporters waiving the white flag for quite sometime now attacking Hillary rather than backing their own candidate. Because if they had something to showcase and promote concerning trump they would"
Isn't the EXACT SAME THING also true of HRC's supporters?
No candidate in the history of politics has been more widely attacked by the media, and much of the population, than Trump has. It's not even close. (much of it for good reason)
All that HRC, and her brigade of liberal media do is attack Trump. That's all they can do, because the truth about her career is the stuff that books will be written about one day, and they won't be flattering.
Thus, any comment saying "all they can do is attack Hillary" becomes positively absurd.
Neither candidate has enough positives to report to offset the avalanche of negatives that they both have in their past and present. I am stating the obvious, which should be recognized by anyone with a shred of objectivity.
DL, political affiliations, such as "non partisan independent" are only labels.
A persons true beliefs usually come to the forefront while engaged in discussion
But this defensiveness around trumps tax records is huge problem because without an image of financial success there is nothing trump has to stand on other than his hot air rhetoric.
" ... without an image of financial success ..."Are you suggesting that Trump is not financially successful?You need to change your source of news and simply apply common sense.Wow In your same post that I just quoted, you went on to say ... " We have seen trump supporters waiving the white flag for quite sometime now attacking Hillary rather than backing their own candidate. Because if they had something to showcase and promote concerning trump they would"Isn't the EXACT SAME THING also true of HRC's supporters?No candidate in the history of politics has been more widely attacked by the media, and much of the population, than Trump has. It's not even close. (much of it for good reason)All that HRC, and her brigade of liberal media do is attack Trump. That's all they can do, because the truth about her career is the stuff that books will be written about one day, and they won't be flattering.Thus, any comment saying "all they can do is attack Hillary" becomes positively absurd.Neither candidate has enough positives to report to offset the avalanche of negatives that they both have in their past and present. I am stating the obvious, which should be recognized by anyone with a shred of objectivity.DL, political affiliations, such as "non partisan independent" are only labels.A persons true beliefs usually come to the forefront while engaged in discussion
Well said. This is Wall Street Journal, Christian Science Monitor, One Smerica News type of dialogue. Thank you. DL may never read this, nor read it care. He is clearly on some sort of personal agenda/vendetta whose main attack is to group a Trump supporter" into a label as "emotional" (are Hillary supporters unemotional about her?) and irrational / unthinking. This is a typical charge every election cycle and pointless, except it gets him into constant battle mode as a "non-partisan independent" troll.
Quote Originally Posted by Hugh_Jorgan:
Quote Originally Posted by dl36:
But this defensiveness around trumps tax records is huge problem because without an image of financial success there is nothing trump has to stand on other than his hot air rhetoric.
" ... without an image of financial success ..."Are you suggesting that Trump is not financially successful?You need to change your source of news and simply apply common sense.Wow In your same post that I just quoted, you went on to say ... " We have seen trump supporters waiving the white flag for quite sometime now attacking Hillary rather than backing their own candidate. Because if they had something to showcase and promote concerning trump they would"Isn't the EXACT SAME THING also true of HRC's supporters?No candidate in the history of politics has been more widely attacked by the media, and much of the population, than Trump has. It's not even close. (much of it for good reason)All that HRC, and her brigade of liberal media do is attack Trump. That's all they can do, because the truth about her career is the stuff that books will be written about one day, and they won't be flattering.Thus, any comment saying "all they can do is attack Hillary" becomes positively absurd.Neither candidate has enough positives to report to offset the avalanche of negatives that they both have in their past and present. I am stating the obvious, which should be recognized by anyone with a shred of objectivity.DL, political affiliations, such as "non partisan independent" are only labels.A persons true beliefs usually come to the forefront while engaged in discussion
Well said. This is Wall Street Journal, Christian Science Monitor, One Smerica News type of dialogue. Thank you. DL may never read this, nor read it care. He is clearly on some sort of personal agenda/vendetta whose main attack is to group a Trump supporter" into a label as "emotional" (are Hillary supporters unemotional about her?) and irrational / unthinking. This is a typical charge every election cycle and pointless, except it gets him into constant battle mode as a "non-partisan independent" troll.
One of the questions Ms Clinton must answer in written form, based on the new batch of emails:, within 30 days:"Why was Huma Abedin your assistant while Sec of State, allowed to serve as an assistant for the Clinton Foundation? (Obvious conflict of interest)
One of the questions Ms Clinton must answer in written form, based on the new batch of emails:, within 30 days:"Why was Huma Abedin your assistant while Sec of State, allowed to serve as an assistant for the Clinton Foundation? (Obvious conflict of interest)
Virginia governor Mccaulife working overtime to get 300,000 felons the right to vote. He has voting officials signing them up one by one. Mccaulife is a long time Clinton close friend. So victims of these felons ? Fck em. This is about winning a swing state, and victims are probably pro law enforcement --so fck em again.
Virginia governor Mccaulife working overtime to get 300,000 felons the right to vote. He has voting officials signing them up one by one. Mccaulife is a long time Clinton close friend. So victims of these felons ? Fck em. This is about winning a swing state, and victims are probably pro law enforcement --so fck em again.
Virginia governor Mccaulife working overtime to get 300,000 felons the right to vote. He has voting officials signing them up one by one. Mccaulife is a long time Clinton close friend. So victims of these felons ? Fck em. This is about winning a swing state, and victims are probably pro law enforcement --so fck em again.
300,000 felons will cancel out the law enforcement voters. Nice job libtards! Turn Virginia into a Detroit--your jewel in your crown. 300,000 is a lot--enough to carry a state where voting could be 1.9 to 1.7 million going one way or the other. This is sad.
Quote Originally Posted by Relax_Dude:
Virginia governor Mccaulife working overtime to get 300,000 felons the right to vote. He has voting officials signing them up one by one. Mccaulife is a long time Clinton close friend. So victims of these felons ? Fck em. This is about winning a swing state, and victims are probably pro law enforcement --so fck em again.
300,000 felons will cancel out the law enforcement voters. Nice job libtards! Turn Virginia into a Detroit--your jewel in your crown. 300,000 is a lot--enough to carry a state where voting could be 1.9 to 1.7 million going one way or the other. This is sad.
Hot Forum Topics
