Quote Originally Posted by Slimdaddy2004:
gales, I am not a tax lawyer, nor do I pretend to be. I believe he could give his children non-charitable gift up to like $50K or $100K to each child that cannot be taxed. If he was fiscally smart, which Mr. Buffett is, he could have been doing that every year since he was a millionaire or earlier. That is one way.
Slim, you seem like a nice guy, and you seem to be passionate about your beliefs. Not trying to be rude, but I just feel like you are slightly over your head in terms of this discussion. Others have already pointed out the glaring mistakes in this post, so I will refrain from re-hashing them, but some of your points in this and in other posts just don't really make a whole lot of sense.
Its not just you though. Today, its the in-thing for everyone to have an opinion on economics and taxes when they have no background in it, and no real basis for any of their opinions. It seems like everyone has an opinion and thinks they know exactly what they are talking about, when very few do.
I noticed a few pot shots you were taking at Koaj in the thread, and I think that is a poor choice on your part. I don't post much, but I read a lot of these threads, and Koaj is easily one of the more knowledgable, intelligent posters in this forum. I don't agree 100% with what he says, but he usually has very strong points, and lots of good information to back it up.
I'd also be careful putting Mr. Buffett on the pedestal you seem to be doing and attempting to use him as a rationale for agreeing with you. Yes, he is a very rich man, and has built quite a fortune. But he also gets quite a few breaks that you and I could not get (i.e. Goldman Sachs and GE sweetheart deals) and built the majority of his fortune during a time when the information he used to make his investments was not readily available to the majority of the investing public. Noone is saying he is not an intelligent man, or that he does not have an excellent track record, but I think it is a mistake to take his thoughts on economics as God's word.
Personally, I think there is a lot that Obama could potentially bring to the table for this country. Unfortunately, I just don't feel like his economic policies are a good example. No matter how much you tax the extremely wealthy, the extremely wealthy will always be wealthy. All he is doing is killing the middle class in a doomed attempt to help the poor. Saying noone making under $250K would see a tax increase was a great way to get elected. Just watch when that $250K suddenly becomes a more realistic $100K.
More taxes going into the most inefficient "corporation" in the country, means less disposable income, which means less spending, which means less business for companies, which means less money for payrolls, which means less jobs.
Very oversimplified explanation, but its one that is hard to argue with. We are already in an extremely poor economic climate. The last thing we need to be doing is raising taxes.