• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • NFL Prediction Prices
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
      • Politics
        • Back
        • Politics
        • Politics Home
        • Presidential Election Odds
        • Midterm Election Odds
        • House Midterm Odds
        • Senate Midterm Odds
        • Texas Midterm Odds
        • Michigan Midterm Odds
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Kalshi Referral Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • Polymarket Referral Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • Betr Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
      • Gemini Predictions Promo Code
    • NFL Week 7
      NFL Week 7
      • NFL Odds
      • NFL Picks
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | Politics

    MAGA.........

    «First Previous 1234
    SarasotaSlim
    shiek
    Raiders22
    wallstreetcappers
    sicknesscity
    ...
    Participants:
    Search
    Views: 1918
    Posts: 88
    «First Previous 1234
     
    SarasotaSlim
    SarasotaSlim
    Covers Rehab
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2007
    Posts: 35543
    Posted: Nov. 23, 2017 - 3:46 PM ET #76

    Quote Originally Posted by shiek:

    The most important metric in rating a leader is how and whether they accept responsibility when something goes wrong.    What is the clowns rating on that metric.  All he does is blame everyone else


    The alternative would have been someone with a shrilling and annoying voice... who blames everyone else for her mistakes and failures.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by shiek:

    The most important metric in rating a leader is how and whether they accept responsibility when something goes wrong.    What is the clowns rating on that metric.  All he does is blame everyone else


    The alternative would have been someone with a shrilling and annoying voice... who blames everyone else for her mistakes and failures.
     
    shiek
    shiek
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2005
    Posts: 1404
    Posted: Nov. 23, 2017 - 3:57 PM ET #77

    Hillary Clinton and jeb bush were 2 of the worst presidential candidates during my lifetime.  Hillary had zero chance of fixing the major problems of the day.  Trump has a slight chance but has not yet demonstrated the leadership skills necessary.  He's got a huge lift but I'll give him a chance.
    Reply
    Hillary Clinton and jeb bush were 2 of the worst presidential candidates during my lifetime.  Hillary had zero chance of fixing the major problems of the day.  Trump has a slight chance but has not yet demonstrated the leadership skills necessary.  He's got a huge lift but I'll give him a chance.
     
    Raiders22
    Raiders22
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 34802
    Posted: Nov. 23, 2017 - 4:05 PM ET #78

    Really? Amazing that is your best metric for measuring a leader. I don't feel that way at all. It may be important. But not the most important one. 
    And there is no way Hillary or Jeb were two of the worst candidates in your lifetime.  You may not have liked them or their leanings but very hard to deny their qualifications. 
    What leadership skills are you referring to exactly?  Which ones does he have and which does he not have?  
    Reply
    Really? Amazing that is your best metric for measuring a leader. I don't feel that way at all. It may be important. But not the most important one. 
    And there is no way Hillary or Jeb were two of the worst candidates in your lifetime.  You may not have liked them or their leanings but very hard to deny their qualifications. 
    What leadership skills are you referring to exactly?  Which ones does he have and which does he not have?  
     
    Raiders22
    Raiders22
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 34802
    Posted: Nov. 23, 2017 - 4:11 PM ET #79

    Slim.  Yes intangibles move. But our dilemma is always, after analyzing the data, how to extrapolate the amount and reason, etc.  
    The other big issue is when they don't actually manifest --- then things deteriorate very quickly. 
    But the big concern now is, if or when, the ceiling is lifted do we go with more spending or not?
    Reply
    Slim.  Yes intangibles move. But our dilemma is always, after analyzing the data, how to extrapolate the amount and reason, etc.  
    The other big issue is when they don't actually manifest --- then things deteriorate very quickly. 
    But the big concern now is, if or when, the ceiling is lifted do we go with more spending or not?
     
    shiek
    shiek
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2005
    Posts: 1404
    Posted: Nov. 23, 2017 - 5:00 PM ET #80

    Didn't say they weren't qualified.  To the contrary, 2 of the most qualified.   Both horrible candidates, however, because neither could even tell the American people why they were running and, more importantly, were absolutely clueless about the appeal of trump (which is why both lost).   Qualifications, have very little to do w running a competent natl race.   

    If you are going to criticize someone else's opinion on a metric then at least offer your own and in that light I guess u r going to agree w the op that trump is a good leader.
    Reply
    Didn't say they weren't qualified.  To the contrary, 2 of the most qualified.   Both horrible candidates, however, because neither could even tell the American people why they were running and, more importantly, were absolutely clueless about the appeal of trump (which is why both lost).   Qualifications, have very little to do w running a competent natl race.   

    If you are going to criticize someone else's opinion on a metric then at least offer your own and in that light I guess u r going to agree w the op that trump is a good leader.
     
    Raiders22
    Raiders22
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 34802
    Posted: Nov. 23, 2017 - 5:54 PM ET #81

    Not criticizing as much as surprised you would say that is all.  Worst certainly sounded like you didn't think they were that qualified.  Both were top tier in their parties for a reason. Lot of experience in politics. Both actually talked about the issues that they thought their folks wanted to hear about. Bush did well as a governor. Hillary was respected as a candidate as well. Just because they lost doesn't mean they were worst.  For sure you may not agree with their views on what they would do about the issues. 
    Not criticizing a metric?  What metric?  You didn't use one to criticize. It seemed to be your opinion was all. But seemed to based on your bias to me. 
    To me you have to be able to express your opinion and views and potential actions well enough to get people follow you.  I think they both built up a large following.  The issue to me with democrats is they don't have a good influx of young candidates yet. Republicans didn't relate well enough to disgruntled people that are upset with usual politics. 
    Diplomacy, ability to convince people that your way may be worth giving it a shot. And ability to multi-task and have well-trusted assistants to delegate to.  And many more such things. 
    I didn't mean to really be critical.  Just amazed you said it the way you did. 
    My questions for you would be what your metrics are?  What candidates of each party did you prefer based on your metrics?  Because a lot of people obviously felt those well two of the best candidates.  Or did you really just mean something altogether different?
    Reply
    Not criticizing as much as surprised you would say that is all.  Worst certainly sounded like you didn't think they were that qualified.  Both were top tier in their parties for a reason. Lot of experience in politics. Both actually talked about the issues that they thought their folks wanted to hear about. Bush did well as a governor. Hillary was respected as a candidate as well. Just because they lost doesn't mean they were worst.  For sure you may not agree with their views on what they would do about the issues. 
    Not criticizing a metric?  What metric?  You didn't use one to criticize. It seemed to be your opinion was all. But seemed to based on your bias to me. 
    To me you have to be able to express your opinion and views and potential actions well enough to get people follow you.  I think they both built up a large following.  The issue to me with democrats is they don't have a good influx of young candidates yet. Republicans didn't relate well enough to disgruntled people that are upset with usual politics. 
    Diplomacy, ability to convince people that your way may be worth giving it a shot. And ability to multi-task and have well-trusted assistants to delegate to.  And many more such things. 
    I didn't mean to really be critical.  Just amazed you said it the way you did. 
    My questions for you would be what your metrics are?  What candidates of each party did you prefer based on your metrics?  Because a lot of people obviously felt those well two of the best candidates.  Or did you really just mean something altogether different?
     
    shiek
    shiek
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2005
    Posts: 1404
    Posted: Nov. 23, 2017 - 7:50 PM ET #82

    I was merely challenging the ops apparent suggestion that trump was a good leader.   Said another way, from my perspective, you cannot be a good leader if you never accept responsibility for failures and instead blame others.   You apparently disagree.

    When I took issue w the ops characterization of trump as a leader then he noted that the alternative was worse.  Well saying that u picked the lesser of 2 evils in no way establishes that your guy is a good leader.  I was basically noting that I agreed w his assessment about Hillary by noting that she and the other main establishment guy were the 2 worst candidates I've ever seen.  You basically confirmed this in your comment that Repubs didn't relate enough to the disgruntled folks.  Washington is broken and both bush and Clinton were clueless about this, which was the election in a nutshell.


    Reply
    I was merely challenging the ops apparent suggestion that trump was a good leader.   Said another way, from my perspective, you cannot be a good leader if you never accept responsibility for failures and instead blame others.   You apparently disagree.

    When I took issue w the ops characterization of trump as a leader then he noted that the alternative was worse.  Well saying that u picked the lesser of 2 evils in no way establishes that your guy is a good leader.  I was basically noting that I agreed w his assessment about Hillary by noting that she and the other main establishment guy were the 2 worst candidates I've ever seen.  You basically confirmed this in your comment that Repubs didn't relate enough to the disgruntled folks.  Washington is broken and both bush and Clinton were clueless about this, which was the election in a nutshell.


     
    Raiders22
    Raiders22
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 34802
    Posted: Nov. 23, 2017 - 8:22 PM ET #83

    Gotcha. No problem with you saying it that way. I agree. 
    Reply
    Gotcha. No problem with you saying it that way. I agree. 
     
    wallstreetcappers
    wallstreetcappers
    Covers Linesmen
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2003
    Posts: 58436
    Posted: Nov. 23, 2017 - 8:56 PM ET #84

    Really SS?

    Oh my crap you are making me laugh..

    So Apple corps "intangibles" are the same as what you are claiming...oh and you forgot the goodwill part. Is goodwill like Trump saying Happy Thanksgiving to all the troops???

    Reply
    Really SS?

    Oh my crap you are making me laugh..

    So Apple corps "intangibles" are the same as what you are claiming...oh and you forgot the goodwill part. Is goodwill like Trump saying Happy Thanksgiving to all the troops???

     
    sicknesscity
    sicknesscity
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2012
    Posts: 2157
    Posted: Nov. 24, 2017 - 11:22 AM ET #85

    Okay, I guess it has to be said but Trump doesn't really lead.  Why would I even say that?  Easy.  He defers all military decisions to the brass in the military, which is very atypical for a commander-in-chief and he's not involved in any of the drafting of bills when it comes to Congress, which means this executive branch is possibly the most absent one in the history of the U.S. 

    What Trump actually does is tells others what he wants accomplished and takes credit when things go right, then blames everyone but himself when something goes wrong, absolving himself of any responsibility.  I'm hardly impressed by his leadership.
    Reply
    Okay, I guess it has to be said but Trump doesn't really lead.  Why would I even say that?  Easy.  He defers all military decisions to the brass in the military, which is very atypical for a commander-in-chief and he's not involved in any of the drafting of bills when it comes to Congress, which means this executive branch is possibly the most absent one in the history of the U.S. 

    What Trump actually does is tells others what he wants accomplished and takes credit when things go right, then blames everyone but himself when something goes wrong, absolving himself of any responsibility.  I'm hardly impressed by his leadership.
     
    sundance
    sundance
    MVP
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2002
    Posts: 16806
    Posted: Nov. 24, 2017 - 11:29 AM ET #86

    Thankfully at this point in time we are not trading a traitor like Bowe Bergdahl for 5 enemy warriors. I will call this major progress.
    Reply
    Thankfully at this point in time we are not trading a traitor like Bowe Bergdahl for 5 enemy warriors. I will call this major progress.
     
    Raiders22
    Raiders22
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 34802
    Posted: Nov. 24, 2017 - 6:37 PM ET #87


    Veteran
    QUOTE#85
    Posted: 11/24/2017 11:22:06 AM
    Okay, I guess it has to be said but Trump doesn't really lead.  Why would I even say that?  Easy.  He defers all military decisions to the brass in the military, which is very atypical for a commander-in-chief and he's not involved in any of the drafting of bills when it comes to Congress, which means this executive branch is possibly the most absent one in the history of the U.S.  

    What Trump actually does is tells others what he wants accomplished and takes credit when things go right, then blames everyone but himself when something goes wrong, absolving himself of any responsibility.  I'm hardly impressed by his leadership.

    What is wrong with deferring decisions to experts in their fields?  Unless there is a direction issue you want to change or deal with.  Maybe transgender or some strategy on troop deployment suggestions?  What did Obama or Bush do differently that you prefer?
    What exactly would you want him to do as far as drafting bills?  He has had numerous meeting with members of congress expressing his opinion on things. It is not like he can actually write the bills or really even be in the committee meetings.  What did Obama or Bush do differently that you prefer?  I don't see him as absent?  What do you mean?  He is in the news and quoted quite a bit as far as why he likes and prefers. 
    Telling others what you want accomplished is actually what leaders do --- they call that delegating.  What has he blamed others for that he wanted done and they didn't do?  Not sure what examples you mean here?
    But use just the last two presidents, Obama and Bush, and contrast and compare please.  I need clarity. Unless you are just anti-Trump and ranting?  Which I get.  Just wondered if there were things to back you up in this? 
    Reply

    Veteran
    QUOTE#85
    Posted: 11/24/2017 11:22:06 AM
    Okay, I guess it has to be said but Trump doesn't really lead.  Why would I even say that?  Easy.  He defers all military decisions to the brass in the military, which is very atypical for a commander-in-chief and he's not involved in any of the drafting of bills when it comes to Congress, which means this executive branch is possibly the most absent one in the history of the U.S.  

    What Trump actually does is tells others what he wants accomplished and takes credit when things go right, then blames everyone but himself when something goes wrong, absolving himself of any responsibility.  I'm hardly impressed by his leadership.

    What is wrong with deferring decisions to experts in their fields?  Unless there is a direction issue you want to change or deal with.  Maybe transgender or some strategy on troop deployment suggestions?  What did Obama or Bush do differently that you prefer?
    What exactly would you want him to do as far as drafting bills?  He has had numerous meeting with members of congress expressing his opinion on things. It is not like he can actually write the bills or really even be in the committee meetings.  What did Obama or Bush do differently that you prefer?  I don't see him as absent?  What do you mean?  He is in the news and quoted quite a bit as far as why he likes and prefers. 
    Telling others what you want accomplished is actually what leaders do --- they call that delegating.  What has he blamed others for that he wanted done and they didn't do?  Not sure what examples you mean here?
    But use just the last two presidents, Obama and Bush, and contrast and compare please.  I need clarity. Unless you are just anti-Trump and ranting?  Which I get.  Just wondered if there were things to back you up in this? 
     
     
    darkhorse12
    darkhorse12
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2004
    Posts: 10739
    Posted: Nov. 24, 2017 - 8:41 PM ET #88

    Quote Originally Posted by sundance:

    Thankfully at this point in time we are not trading a traitor like Bowe Bergdahl for 5 enemy warriors. I will call this major progress.

    He wasn't a "traitor" until after he was tried. Unless you don't believe in the constitution.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by sundance:

    Thankfully at this point in time we are not trading a traitor like Bowe Bergdahl for 5 enemy warriors. I will call this major progress.

    He wasn't a "traitor" until after he was tried. Unless you don't believe in the constitution.
    All Forums | Politics
    «First Previous 1234

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • Thursday 10/22/2026 935
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 279,953
    • Patriots vs Bears in-game live TNF 1,943
    • NFL LOCKED IN! 109,719
    • Patriots@Bears discussion 3,638
    • NFL THREAD * 151 * 27,058
    • Thursday”s POD 2,682
    • Public Indicator Calculations 2026 23,657
    • Week 8 Money 7,465
    • Republicans push back against the lunatic Trump and his team of liars. 23,327

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Privacy Choices Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo
    Covers Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.