MAGA.........
SS,
WSC, you asked me "What specifically related only to Trump and his actions can you attribute to what you claim?"
..and I told you........... President Trumps intangible leadership has produced tangible results...he is creating a culture and atmosphere that is conducive specifically to winning.
Now. if you don't want to believe that ..don't. Candidate Trump shocked the world when he beat Hillary Clinton for the presidency of the United States..Many people did not want to except it and like yourself still don't..but it is what it is..
President Trumps leadership instills confidence in Americans ..that's why small business owner confidence has surged under President Trump ..not for any specific policy changes from the President ,,but because they feel great optimism,, that their businesses will improve in the near future ..call it a sudden awakening of the business animal spirits. ( emotional and intangible dynamics)
They can see President Trump begin to lift at least some of the $1.9 trillion burden regulation imposes on the economy every year..
Now ,you have been asking a lot of questions from people in this thread ..so I know you are acking for someone to ask you why the Debt to GDP ratio has decreased by more than 1%,,if not for Trump being president..
So, I ask you why ? .... .
...and please save us your snarky comments,that you have been posting to members in this thread and calling President Trump every despicable name you can think of.....just post the answer to the question..we know you can do it.
SS,
WSC, you asked me "What specifically related only to Trump and his actions can you attribute to what you claim?"
..and I told you........... President Trumps intangible leadership has produced tangible results...he is creating a culture and atmosphere that is conducive specifically to winning.
Now. if you don't want to believe that ..don't. Candidate Trump shocked the world when he beat Hillary Clinton for the presidency of the United States..Many people did not want to except it and like yourself still don't..but it is what it is..
President Trumps leadership instills confidence in Americans ..that's why small business owner confidence has surged under President Trump ..not for any specific policy changes from the President ,,but because they feel great optimism,, that their businesses will improve in the near future ..call it a sudden awakening of the business animal spirits. ( emotional and intangible dynamics)
They can see President Trump begin to lift at least some of the $1.9 trillion burden regulation imposes on the economy every year..
Now ,you have been asking a lot of questions from people in this thread ..so I know you are acking for someone to ask you why the Debt to GDP ratio has decreased by more than 1%,,if not for Trump being president..
So, I ask you why ? .... .
...and please save us your snarky comments,that you have been posting to members in this thread and calling President Trump every despicable name you can think of.....just post the answer to the question..we know you can do it.
The US and global economies turn slowly, very slowly...funds spent this year will not flow through the economy for a solid 12-18 months and will not be visible in economic activity or tax receipts for another 6-12 months past that, and those numbers are optimistic! What you are claiming is without merit and absurd.
The US and global economies turn slowly, very slowly...funds spent this year will not flow through the economy for a solid 12-18 months and will not be visible in economic activity or tax receipts for another 6-12 months past that, and those numbers are optimistic! What you are claiming is without merit and absurd.
I asked you why " the Debt to GDP ratio has decreased by more than 1%" and 90 % of your answer is to tear down what I feel is the answer....and again slam President Trump.
The only reason you give for this decrease is because things move slow ..and it was some event or action that happened between May 2015 and the end of 2015... well we know it wasn't the Clean Power Plan (state cap & trade) President Obama enacted in 2015...or the Obama brokered nuclear peace agreement with Iran in of 2015,nor the negotiated Trans Pacific Partnership in October 2015...and it sure would not have been the Paris Climate Agreement announce in December of, 2015..
One thing we know for sure it wasn't because of the 2,353 federal regulators issued during 2015 ...some major ,,that would impose an annual costs of $100 million or more...
You want specifics,, but avoid being specific about what tangible actions happened 18 to 30 months ago that caused the debt to GDP ratio to decrease by more than 1%...
Do you want to try again to answer the Q ?
I asked you why " the Debt to GDP ratio has decreased by more than 1%" and 90 % of your answer is to tear down what I feel is the answer....and again slam President Trump.
The only reason you give for this decrease is because things move slow ..and it was some event or action that happened between May 2015 and the end of 2015... well we know it wasn't the Clean Power Plan (state cap & trade) President Obama enacted in 2015...or the Obama brokered nuclear peace agreement with Iran in of 2015,nor the negotiated Trans Pacific Partnership in October 2015...and it sure would not have been the Paris Climate Agreement announce in December of, 2015..
One thing we know for sure it wasn't because of the 2,353 federal regulators issued during 2015 ...some major ,,that would impose an annual costs of $100 million or more...
You want specifics,, but avoid being specific about what tangible actions happened 18 to 30 months ago that caused the debt to GDP ratio to decrease by more than 1%...
Do you want to try again to answer the Q ?
That Repub only first year, or any president first year GDP stat is a joke, it is factually impossible for any president to move the needle like that, it just cannot happen.
That Repub only first year, or any president first year GDP stat is a joke, it is factually impossible for any president to move the needle like that, it just cannot happen.
So how much do you think would need to be cut and how long would that cut take to filter through to impact GDP? To have a 1% impact in a less than 10 month period of a potential 15% impact, the cut required would probably need to be in the 20% range, maybe higher. Federal spending I am giving half of the total, maybe that number is a tad high, maybe not. So to move the total needle 1% when the impact is less than 20%, that would mean a 5X move AND add that you are talking an ten or less month period.
So how much do you think would need to be cut and how long would that cut take to filter through to impact GDP? To have a 1% impact in a less than 10 month period of a potential 15% impact, the cut required would probably need to be in the 20% range, maybe higher. Federal spending I am giving half of the total, maybe that number is a tad high, maybe not. So to move the total needle 1% when the impact is less than 20%, that would mean a 5X move AND add that you are talking an ten or less month period.
What I'm gleaning from your economic Mumbo Jumbo and shot gun answer is you do not have a specific answer to what tangible action caused the debt to GDP ratio to decrease by more than 1%...you just know it has nothing to do with President Trump.
Well ,maybe we should revisit this thread after the next quarter or six months down the road ..or better yet after 30 months into his presidency like you claim it takes to affect change..that would make it the around the second quarter of 2019....coming near the end of his first term....
What I'm gleaning from your economic Mumbo Jumbo and shot gun answer is you do not have a specific answer to what tangible action caused the debt to GDP ratio to decrease by more than 1%...you just know it has nothing to do with President Trump.
Well ,maybe we should revisit this thread after the next quarter or six months down the road ..or better yet after 30 months into his presidency like you claim it takes to affect change..that would make it the around the second quarter of 2019....coming near the end of his first term....
WSC,
What I'm gleaning from your economic Mumbo Jumbo and shot gun answer is you do not have a specific answer to what tangible action caused the debt to GDP ratio to decrease by more than 1%...you just know it has nothing to do with President Trump.
Well ,maybe we should revisit this thread after the next quarter or six months down the road ..or better yet after 30 months into his presidency like you claim it takes to affect change..that would make it the around the second quarter of 2019....coming near the end of his first term....
WSC,
What I'm gleaning from your economic Mumbo Jumbo and shot gun answer is you do not have a specific answer to what tangible action caused the debt to GDP ratio to decrease by more than 1%...you just know it has nothing to do with President Trump.
Well ,maybe we should revisit this thread after the next quarter or six months down the road ..or better yet after 30 months into his presidency like you claim it takes to affect change..that would make it the around the second quarter of 2019....coming near the end of his first term....
Now look who is getting cute. ..stooping so low as to discredit someones father....
..and you of all people should not be talking about someones parents..
Well one thing WSC,, at least I knew who mine were ..
......................
Now look who is getting cute. ..stooping so low as to discredit someones father....
..and you of all people should not be talking about someones parents..
Well one thing WSC,, at least I knew who mine were ..
......................
Manufacturing output rose 1.3 percent in October, and upward revisions to previous months reduced the decrease estimated for the third quarter to 1.2 percent at an annual rate.
Manufacturing PMI index for the United States increased to 60.1 in October of 2017 from 59.8 in September, beating market expectations of 58.5. It is a new high reading since August of 2005, as production, employment and inventories continued to rise and the outlook for business conditions remained positive. It is the 4th time in the whole series the number is above 60.
Manufacturing employment rose by 24,000 in October, with job gains in computer and electronic products (+5,000) and chemicals (+4,000). Employment in fabricated metals continued to trend up (+4,000). Manufacturing has added 156,000 jobs since a recent employment low in November 2016.
Manufacturing output rose 1.3 percent in October, and upward revisions to previous months reduced the decrease estimated for the third quarter to 1.2 percent at an annual rate.
Manufacturing PMI index for the United States increased to 60.1 in October of 2017 from 59.8 in September, beating market expectations of 58.5. It is a new high reading since August of 2005, as production, employment and inventories continued to rise and the outlook for business conditions remained positive. It is the 4th time in the whole series the number is above 60.
Manufacturing employment rose by 24,000 in October, with job gains in computer and electronic products (+5,000) and chemicals (+4,000). Employment in fabricated metals continued to trend up (+4,000). Manufacturing has added 156,000 jobs since a recent employment low in November 2016.
Because,, intangible assets add to a company's possible future worth and can be much more valuable than its tangible assets.....The value of intangible assets are not to be disregarded..
For example in the quarterly period ended April 1, 2017, Apple, Inc. recorded total goodwill and acquired intangible to be worth $8.09 billion and Net PP&E worth $27.16 billion.
To say something that is intangible can not effect something in the present is turning a blind eye to a valuable resource..An intangible
attribute in leadership can truly distinguish those who succeed at the top....that is why it's said that extraordinary leaders possess certain characteristics,, that fall between the lines of existing leadership models..
Because,, intangible assets add to a company's possible future worth and can be much more valuable than its tangible assets.....The value of intangible assets are not to be disregarded..
For example in the quarterly period ended April 1, 2017, Apple, Inc. recorded total goodwill and acquired intangible to be worth $8.09 billion and Net PP&E worth $27.16 billion.
To say something that is intangible can not effect something in the present is turning a blind eye to a valuable resource..An intangible
attribute in leadership can truly distinguish those who succeed at the top....that is why it's said that extraordinary leaders possess certain characteristics,, that fall between the lines of existing leadership models..
Hot Forum Topics
- Thursday 10/22/2026 935
- 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 279,953
- Patriots vs Bears in-game live TNF 1,944
- NFL LOCKED IN! 109,719
- Patriots@Bears discussion 3,638
- NFL THREAD * 151 * 27,058
- Thursday”s POD 2,686
- Public Indicator Calculations 2026 23,657
- Week 8 Money 7,474
- Republicans push back against the lunatic Trump and his team of liars. 23,327
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
