All Forums | Politics

I was wrong to criticize the Clinton's for Bill's affairs.

...
Participants:
Search
Views: 1832
Posts: 32
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 5625
Posted: #1
It's very clear the Bill's penis expeditions are the least of the problems we'll face if HRC is elected.

There is NOTHING that Donald could do or be accused of that would Trump this.

I bet most liberals don't even have the integrity to watch this and explain or agree with it's claims.

https://youtu.be/7LYRUOd_QoM


 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2004
Posts: 10739
Posted: #2
Quote Originally Posted by bowlslit:

It's very clear the Bill's penis expeditions are the least of the problems we'll face if HRC is elected.

There is NOTHING that Donald could do or be accused of that would Trump this.

I bet most liberals don't even have the integrity to watch this and explain or agree with it's claims.

https://youtu.be/7LYRUOd_QoM


Trump being accused of raping a 13 y o still TRUMPS that. Try again.

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 35351
Posted: #3
Quote Originally Posted by darkhorse12:

Trump being accused of raping a 13 y o still TRUMPS that. Try again.


Unless Bill did something sexually with a 12 year old boy.....   but that's something a Republican congressmen would more likely do.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 5625
Posted: #4
Oh look, the baum buddies post consecutively again.
 
Covers Linesmen
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2003
Posts: 58436
Posted: #5
Can you make a thread without the immature jabs???

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 35351
Posted: #6
Quote Originally Posted by bowlslit:

Oh look, the baum buddies post consecutively again.

Should we PM you before we decide to post to see if it's ok?  Would you like to see a rough draft of what I'm going to write next time?
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 5625
Posted: #7
Quote Originally Posted by BWS77:


Should we PM you before we decide to post to see if it's ok?  Would you like to see a rough draft of what I'm going to write next time?

Oh, I'm NOT trying to censor you or anyone I just find it funny that you two are never far apart these days. Not funny ha ha....funny creepy.


 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 35351
Posted: #8
Quote Originally Posted by bowlslit:


Oh, I'm NOT trying to censor you or anyone I just find it funny that you two are never far apart these days. Not funny ha ha....funny creepy.



Almost an hour apart....  not really anything to get your panties in a bunch over
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2004
Posts: 10739
Posted: #9

Quote Originally Posted by bowlslit:

Oh look, the baum buddies post consecutively again.

I don't know about darkhorse..... but I post when I can.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 1393
Posted: #10
Quote Originally Posted by darkhorse12:

Trump being accused of raping a 13 y o still TRUMPS that. Try again.


Being "accused" of something and actually being impeached, as well as losing your law license due to perjury are 2 very different things.

I'm no trump fan, he's a complete charlatan, but the comparisons being made to the Clintons (30 years of deceit and high level corruption) are laughable...these people have a lifetime of auditioning...enough is enough
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2004
Posts: 10739
Posted: #11
Quote Originally Posted by gmanusc2001:


Being "accused" of something and actually being impeached, as well as losing your law license due to perjury are 2 very different things.

I'm no trump fan, he's a complete charlatan, but the comparisons being made to the Clintons (30 years of deceit and high level corruption) are laughable...these people have a lifetime of auditioning...enough is enough

He wasn't impeached. He was acquitted . But aside from that the bottom line is one of those two will be your next president. Your choice , the corrupt one or the corrupt and crazy one.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 1393
Posted: #12
Quote Originally Posted by darkhorse12:

He wasn't impeached. He was acquitted . But aside from that the bottom line is one of those two will be your next president. Your choice , the corrupt one or the corrupt and crazy one.


....this is a prime example of the problem we are facing...there are simply too many uninformed automaton voters for the Democrat party (by design)
-
On December 19, 1998 the US House of Representatives passed 2 articles of impeachment, accusing slick Willy of lying under oath to a federal grand jury, and obstruction of justice, Bill Clinton became the 2nd president in us history to be impeached by Congress (this doesn't mean "removed from office")
-
"Impeachment" from public office, and "acquittal" in a court of law are apples and oranges.
-
Please do us all the courtesy of actually learning history, before u enter another voting booth.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2004
Posts: 10739
Posted: #13
Well if you want to split hairs There were THREE Presidents brought up on impeachment charges A Johnson, R Nixon and W J Clinton . Nixon resigned before the house could vote, but impeachment articles were drawn up for him.  And as far as acquittal goes you can be acquitted in the senate if a 2/3 vote isn't reached.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2004
Posts: 10739
Posted: #14

Quote Originally Posted by darkhorse12:

Well if you want to split hairs There were THREE Presidents brought up on impeachment charges A Johnson, R Nixon and W J Clinton . Nixon resigned before the house could vote, but impeachment articles were drawn up for him.  And as far as acquittal goes you can be acquitted in the senate if a 2/3 vote isn't reached.

Yes my mistake , Clinton was "impeached" and he was acquitted in the senate.

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2004
Posts: 10739
Posted: #15

The Senate, having tried William Jefferson Clinton, President of the United States, upon two articles of impeachment exhibited against him by the House of Representatives, and twothirds of the Senators present not having found him guilty of the charges contained therein: it is, therefore, ordered and adjudged that the said William Jefferson Clinton be, and he is hereby, acquitted of the charges in this said article.

The Chair directs judgment to be entered in accordance with the judgment of the Senate as follows: The Senate, having tried William Jefferson Clinton, President of the United States, upon two articles of impeachment exhibited against him by the House of Representatives, and twothirds of the Senators present not having found him guilty of the charges contained therein: it is, therefore, ordered and adjudged that the said William Jefferson Clinton be, and he is hereby, acquitted of the charges in this said article.

These excerts are from pp 1458 and 1459 of the congressional record of Clintons impeachment proceedings. Maybe you should heed your own advice.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 1393
Posted: #16
I notice u haven't addressed my other point of fact, Clinton's disbarment from practicing law in front of the Supreme Court ,after having his AR law license revoked......
I assume you'd like to twist the argument into a knot to somehow justify his potential 2nd occupancy of the white house.
-
My original point was simply this....anecdotal accusations are not synonymous with actual proven facts.
Do u deny the fact of Bill's admitted perjury before a grand jury?

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 5625
Posted: #17
Quote Originally Posted by darkhorse12:

Yes my mistake , Clinton was "impeached" and he was acquitted in the senate.


Wasn't your first mistake in this thread...You forgot to sign out in post#9 in this thread and sign into BWS77 name.

Did you think we would be too stupid to notice?
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 5625
Posted: #18
Hmmm Ken Star....we learned from the Vince Foster case was in the Clinton's pocket to begin with.

The trial in the United States Senate began right after the seating of the 106th Congress, in which the Republicans began with 55 senators. A two-thirds vote (67 senators) was required to remove Clinton from office. Fifty senators voted to remove Clinton on the obstruction of justice charge and 45 voted to remove him on the perjury charge; no Democrat voted guilty on either charge. Clinton was acquitted, becoming the second sitting United States President to be formally charged with a crime (impeached) and subsequently declared not guilty (acquitted)
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 35351
Posted: #19
Quote Originally Posted by bowlslit:


Wasn't your first mistake in this thread...You forgot to sign out in post#9 in this thread and sign into BWS77 name.

Did you think we would be too stupid to notice?

No, but you are too stupid to realize he's fukking with you.   
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2004
Posts: 10739
Posted: #20
Quote Originally Posted by BWS77:


No, but you are too stupid to realize he's fukking with you.   

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2004
Posts: 10739
Posted: #21
Quote Originally Posted by gmanusc2001:

I notice u haven't addressed my other point of fact, Clinton's disbarment from practicing law in front of the Supreme Court ,after having his AR law license revoked......
I assume you'd like to twist the argument into a knot to somehow justify his potential 2nd occupancy of the white house.
-
My original point was simply this....anecdotal accusations are not synonymous with actual proven facts.
Do u deny the fact of Bill's admitted perjury before a grand jury?

Do your apples taste like oranges?

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 5625
Posted: #22
Quote Originally Posted by bowlslit:

Hmmm Ken Star....we learned from the Vince Foster case was in the Clinton's pocket to begin with.

The trial in the United States Senate began right after the seating of the 106th Congress, in which the Republicans began with 55 senators. A two-thirds vote (67 senators) was required to remove Clinton from office. Fifty senators voted to remove Clinton on the obstruction of justice charge and 45 voted to remove him on the perjury charge; no Democrat voted guilty on either charge. Clinton was acquitted, becoming the second sitting United States President to be formally charged with a crime (impeached) and subsequently declared not guilty (acquitted)

Crooked Democrats...we all know fast willie lied numerous times about his cigar shoving hands. Democrats and a few Republicans, have no integrity.

It's not the affairs, it's the cover ups.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2005
Posts: 6840
Posted: #23
Quote Originally Posted by bowlslit:


Crooked Democrats...we all know fast willie lied numerous times about his cigar shoving hands. Democrats and a few Republicans, have no integrity.

It's not the affairs, it's the cover ups.

why are you so hung up on this point? it is very strange
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 5625
Posted: #24
Quote Originally Posted by mattbrot:


why are you so hung up on this point? it is very strange

Probably because it baffles me to no end how demalibs can be so passive about letting a politician like Hillary back in the WH when we know for fact that she and her husband don't respect the honor or the significance of position. She doesn't deserve to go down in history books as the first woman to be elected. 

She even mentioned in her speach that William and her had a conversation 40+ years ago about having the highest power in the world...not for the sake of helping people but merely for the ability to say they had it.

They raided the WH the last time they left...recklessly broke a vase that was irreplaceable....She wasn't mad at him for shoving a cigar up a young girls cooch...she was mad about him getting caught.

The reason I make a big deal about it is that I'm appalled that people in this forum don't even try to protect the sanctity of what should be an honorable place.

You show me un unfaithful spouse, and I'll show you someone that likely isn't making good decisions.
 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 35351
Posted: #25
Quote Originally Posted by mattbrot:


why are you so hung up on this point? it is very strange

And how about the billion cigars that haven't been shoved into a girl's vagina, but rather have been burned to death?

#cigarlivesmatter
All Forums | Politics
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gambling
Betting Sites
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
21+
Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
Help Privacy Privacy Choices Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
Covers is verified safe by:
Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo
Covers Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.