It's about time. The lib mantra has been "no one is above the law.........well, welcome to the law. ![]()
Similar case in Trump first term ended with charges dropped against a judge. Unlike other presidents, lawless dictator escalates war against courts to threaten US system of checks and balances in government.
Similar case in Trump first term ended with charges dropped against a judge. Unlike other presidents, lawless dictator escalates war against courts to threaten US system of checks and balances in government.
@thirdperson
What case was that ?
How similar was it ?
@thirdperson
What case was that ?
How similar was it ?
Milwaukee Circuit Court Judge Hannah Dugan..is probably the fugliest female Ive seen out side the midway at the circus..forget about her disagreement with the administration’s policies....just arrest her for not doing something about her looks.. ugh...
Milwaukee Circuit Court Judge Hannah Dugan..is probably the fugliest female Ive seen out side the midway at the circus..forget about her disagreement with the administration’s policies....just arrest her for not doing something about her looks.. ugh...
Stopping a court proceeding and sneaking an illegal immigrant and his attorney out the back door is not "a system of checks and balances"
Stopping a court proceeding and sneaking an illegal immigrant and his attorney out the back door is not "a system of checks and balances"
How about "THE REST OF THE STORY" or doesn't that fit your narative?
The Massachsetts judge that helped an illegal escape in 2018 had charges dropped during Biden Admin in 2022. So the State of Massachusetts through the Massachusetts Commission on Judicial Conduct, a state agency charged with investigating allegations of misconduct among those admitted to the bench has filed charges last year against the judge.
How about "THE REST OF THE STORY" or doesn't that fit your narative?
The Massachsetts judge that helped an illegal escape in 2018 had charges dropped during Biden Admin in 2022. So the State of Massachusetts through the Massachusetts Commission on Judicial Conduct, a state agency charged with investigating allegations of misconduct among those admitted to the bench has filed charges last year against the judge.
So here you have a hard leaning Left state, Massachusetts, filing it's own charges of misconduct for judge helping illegal immigrant escape and when Trump Admin does it.................![]()
![]()
From Politico; https://www.politico.com/news/2025/04/25/hannah-dugan-shelley-joseph-immigration-00311183
Unlike the case Friday, however, Joseph surrendered to authorities. And federal prosecutors eventually dropped the charges . Joseph was instead referred to the Massachusetts Commission on Judicial Conduct, a state agency charged with investigating allegations of misconduct among those admitted to the bench.
Late last year, the commission filed formal charges against Joseph with the state’s highest court, a surprisingly forceful step for a body that has only gone so far five other times since 2000 .
So here you have a hard leaning Left state, Massachusetts, filing it's own charges of misconduct for judge helping illegal immigrant escape and when Trump Admin does it.................![]()
![]()
From Politico; https://www.politico.com/news/2025/04/25/hannah-dugan-shelley-joseph-immigration-00311183
Unlike the case Friday, however, Joseph surrendered to authorities. And federal prosecutors eventually dropped the charges . Joseph was instead referred to the Massachusetts Commission on Judicial Conduct, a state agency charged with investigating allegations of misconduct among those admitted to the bench.
Late last year, the commission filed formal charges against Joseph with the state’s highest court, a surprisingly forceful step for a body that has only gone so far five other times since 2000 .
Pretty damn funny, when you have one of the most corrupt persons ever as the president. Guess you believe all those charges against trump wer all bogus and fake news. Magas live in a different reality, where they believe people like trump is above the law
Pretty damn funny, when you have one of the most corrupt persons ever as the president. Guess you believe all those charges against trump wer all bogus and fake news. Magas live in a different reality, where they believe people like trump is above the law
A president who weaponized the FBI and judicial system to get Trump on classified documents is found to have hundreds of classified docs himself taken illegally as he wasn't a president when he took them. Then he is found too forgetful and feeble to be ever convicted by a jury for his crimes, yet he's president.
A prosecutor who said "I will get Trump" and "no one is above the law!" is commiting the same crime she is prosecuting Trump for.
Hollywood would reject this movie script. Nobody's that STUPID!
lmfaooooooooooooo. ![]()
A president who weaponized the FBI and judicial system to get Trump on classified documents is found to have hundreds of classified docs himself taken illegally as he wasn't a president when he took them. Then he is found too forgetful and feeble to be ever convicted by a jury for his crimes, yet he's president.
A prosecutor who said "I will get Trump" and "no one is above the law!" is commiting the same crime she is prosecuting Trump for.
Hollywood would reject this movie script. Nobody's that STUPID!
lmfaooooooooooooo. ![]()
truly fucking gullible. pence and biden turned them in. Trump had top secret classified papers in his fucking bathroom. No fuckin hope for the brain washed. send him your paycheck this week![]()
truly fucking gullible. pence and biden turned them in. Trump had top secret classified papers in his fucking bathroom. No fuckin hope for the brain washed. send him your paycheck this week![]()
Biden read those classified docs to his book writer years before they were "turned in". He knew he had them for years. And Biden didn't turn any documents in, first they were found at the Penn Center (obviously many people knew or they would have covered it up) and then people other than Biden (his lawyers, no conflict there!) searched his residences and only after that did the FBI get an "invite" and they found more!
No hope for the sheep.
Biden read those classified docs to his book writer years before they were "turned in". He knew he had them for years. And Biden didn't turn any documents in, first they were found at the Penn Center (obviously many people knew or they would have covered it up) and then people other than Biden (his lawyers, no conflict there!) searched his residences and only after that did the FBI get an "invite" and they found more!
No hope for the sheep.
You guys told the world the border is open, biological males allowed to compete against women, Steele dossier was real, hunter laptop fake.. had 51 top Intel officials lie about laptop, paid off social media to censor,msm covering up biden's mentality... creating many people ,regardless of party affiliation to more skeptical of whst is being reported. And, gave putin the ok to invade Ukraine. All facts which is something the left have problems with.
You guys told the world the border is open, biological males allowed to compete against women, Steele dossier was real, hunter laptop fake.. had 51 top Intel officials lie about laptop, paid off social media to censor,msm covering up biden's mentality... creating many people ,regardless of party affiliation to more skeptical of whst is being reported. And, gave putin the ok to invade Ukraine. All facts which is something the left have problems with.
-Assisted and OK'd drug use on the street.
-Cashless bail for violent fenlonies.
-Encouraging and turning a blind eye to political vandalism.
-No way COVID came from a lab.
-Assisted and OK'd drug use on the street.
-Cashless bail for violent fenlonies.
-Encouraging and turning a blind eye to political vandalism.
-No way COVID came from a lab.
“I was thinking, I, a U.S. citizen, am visiting Japan. And what it means is that if I steal someone’s wallet in Japan, the Japanese authorities can arrest me and prosecute me.
It’s allegiance, meaning can they control you as a matter of law.
I can also rely on them if my wallet is stolen to, under Japanese law, go and prosecute the person who had stolen it.
So there’s this relationship, even though I’m just a temporary traveler, I’m just on vacation in Japan, I’m still locally owing allegiance in that sense.
Is that the right way to think about it? And if so, doesn’t that explain why both temporary residents and undocumented people would have that kind of allegiance just by virtue of being in the United States?”
![]()
I do not like to call anyone dumb because that is not something they can help; ignorance, they can and should change. But you would be hard pressed to find anyone that has ever served on the Supreme Court that has been dumber.
This is what you get when you have weak advisors giving a knucklehead advice on candidates to hire that followed a statement that so many took to be a DEI statement.
![]()
“I was thinking, I, a U.S. citizen, am visiting Japan. And what it means is that if I steal someone’s wallet in Japan, the Japanese authorities can arrest me and prosecute me.
It’s allegiance, meaning can they control you as a matter of law.
I can also rely on them if my wallet is stolen to, under Japanese law, go and prosecute the person who had stolen it.
So there’s this relationship, even though I’m just a temporary traveler, I’m just on vacation in Japan, I’m still locally owing allegiance in that sense.
Is that the right way to think about it? And if so, doesn’t that explain why both temporary residents and undocumented people would have that kind of allegiance just by virtue of being in the United States?”
![]()
I do not like to call anyone dumb because that is not something they can help; ignorance, they can and should change. But you would be hard pressed to find anyone that has ever served on the Supreme Court that has been dumber.
This is what you get when you have weak advisors giving a knucklehead advice on candidates to hire that followed a statement that so many took to be a DEI statement.
![]()
@Raiders22
It staggers the imagination.....boggles the mind. There's no way someone that openly said they can't define what a women is should've been confirmed to the SCOTUS. This is just another reminder of why. Also, making the Japan comparison is a major gaffe in itself because Japan doesn't allow "birthright citizenship" either.
@Raiders22
It staggers the imagination.....boggles the mind. There's no way someone that openly said they can't define what a women is should've been confirmed to the SCOTUS. This is just another reminder of why. Also, making the Japan comparison is a major gaffe in itself because Japan doesn't allow "birthright citizenship" either.
Part of the problem is that one should respect the laws of any nation they visit. If your intention is not to follow that nations laws, then what is it that you are really doing in that nation. Your analogy is spot on in the sense that any visitor that is visiting a nation should respect the laws of that nation regardless of whether that law is a law in your own nation. Most laws are common sense and travel to any nation in the world equally. The punishment may vary, but in your example, stealing is stealing and I am not certain that any nation thinks that is acceptable.
Now, to relate that here to America, some of these illegals come into the country to break the law. Coming to America illegally is breaking the law. Right off the bat they are not in good standing. As such, they should not receive benefits, aid or a pass because they are here illegally. If I were in a country and could not provide papers as to the reason for my visit or that I was there illegally, then I would expect to be punished to the extent of that nations laws. Illegals coming to America are not ignorant of our laws, they are intentionally subverting them because there is no harsh or criminal implications when caught. Deporting one so they can reattempt 50 more times to enter America again is not a viable system. Instead, America rewards them and says you should have due process for some odd reason. Why? This would be equivalent of telling the person in your example that they are allowed to roll back time one hour and rethink whether or not they want to steal. Absolutely absurd.
Until there are stiffer penalties of trying to go to America illegally, then this will never subside. You can try and control it as much as you want, but these other countries teach their people on how to come to America illegally and how to work our system financially. The entire system is just that, a system. They are taught the way of the process and told that even if you are caught and deported, we have methods that we can continue to try until we get you back in the country. And America, welcomes those illegals to jobs, financial aid, healthcare and protection in some areas of the country. And for what purpose?
Part of the problem is that one should respect the laws of any nation they visit. If your intention is not to follow that nations laws, then what is it that you are really doing in that nation. Your analogy is spot on in the sense that any visitor that is visiting a nation should respect the laws of that nation regardless of whether that law is a law in your own nation. Most laws are common sense and travel to any nation in the world equally. The punishment may vary, but in your example, stealing is stealing and I am not certain that any nation thinks that is acceptable.
Now, to relate that here to America, some of these illegals come into the country to break the law. Coming to America illegally is breaking the law. Right off the bat they are not in good standing. As such, they should not receive benefits, aid or a pass because they are here illegally. If I were in a country and could not provide papers as to the reason for my visit or that I was there illegally, then I would expect to be punished to the extent of that nations laws. Illegals coming to America are not ignorant of our laws, they are intentionally subverting them because there is no harsh or criminal implications when caught. Deporting one so they can reattempt 50 more times to enter America again is not a viable system. Instead, America rewards them and says you should have due process for some odd reason. Why? This would be equivalent of telling the person in your example that they are allowed to roll back time one hour and rethink whether or not they want to steal. Absolutely absurd.
Until there are stiffer penalties of trying to go to America illegally, then this will never subside. You can try and control it as much as you want, but these other countries teach their people on how to come to America illegally and how to work our system financially. The entire system is just that, a system. They are taught the way of the process and told that even if you are caught and deported, we have methods that we can continue to try until we get you back in the country. And America, welcomes those illegals to jobs, financial aid, healthcare and protection in some areas of the country. And for what purpose?
This is the kind of sheer stupidity that can have a useful side effect. When someone is so detached from basic reasoning, it forces everyone else on the Court to draw a bright line around what not to do and makes it harder for the other judges to drift in that direction. In that sense, having someone like Jackson on the Court can be helpful as long as she stays the only outlier. Double her up with another retard and we are all cooked.
This is the kind of sheer stupidity that can have a useful side effect. When someone is so detached from basic reasoning, it forces everyone else on the Court to draw a bright line around what not to do and makes it harder for the other judges to drift in that direction. In that sense, having someone like Jackson on the Court can be helpful as long as she stays the only outlier. Double her up with another retard and we are all cooked.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.