• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • NFL Prediction Prices
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
      • Politics
        • Back
        • Politics
        • Politics Home
        • Presidential Election Odds
        • Midterm Election Odds
        • House Midterm Odds
        • Senate Midterm Odds
        • Texas Midterm Odds
        • Michigan Midterm Odds
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Kalshi Referral Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • Polymarket Referral Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • Betr Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
      • Gemini Predictions Promo Code
    • NFL Week 7
      NFL Week 7
      • NFL Odds
      • NFL Picks
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | Politics

    3 days till th real election begins

    «First Previous 1234 Next Last»
    wallstreetcappers
    nature1970
    Hugh_Jorgan
    sundance
    165yds
    ...
    Participants:
    Search
    Views: 1568
    Posts: 90
    «First Previous 1234 Next Last»
     
    wallstreetcappers
    wallstreetcappers
    Covers Linesmen
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2003
    Posts: 58436
    Posted: Dec. 19, 2016 - 10:27 PM ET #51

    Great logic you two..

    If you do not include the largest voting state in the country then Trump wins easy..

    What kind of stupid logic is that? It goes against all of these so-called constitution ramblings you guys have from time to time.

    With the EC a vote is not equal from state to state, you cannot exclude California or Penn or Florida or Arizona...that logic is just plain stupid.

    I say cut loose the EC and let the votes flow into a national count, forget the state and district for a presidential election..then MY vote down here means something and a repub vote in Calif means something.

    This isnt difficult...but please spare the "If Calif didnt count" garbage, it is beneath both of you.
    Reply
    Great logic you two..

    If you do not include the largest voting state in the country then Trump wins easy..

    What kind of stupid logic is that? It goes against all of these so-called constitution ramblings you guys have from time to time.

    With the EC a vote is not equal from state to state, you cannot exclude California or Penn or Florida or Arizona...that logic is just plain stupid.

    I say cut loose the EC and let the votes flow into a national count, forget the state and district for a presidential election..then MY vote down here means something and a repub vote in Calif means something.

    This isnt difficult...but please spare the "If Calif didnt count" garbage, it is beneath both of you.
     
    nature1970
    nature1970
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2015
    Posts: 21593
    Posted: Dec. 19, 2016 - 10:37 PM ET #52

    Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:

    Great logic you two..

    If you do not include the largest voting state in the country then Trump wins easy..

    What kind of stupid logic is that? It goes against all of these so-called constitution ramblings you guys have from time to time.

    With the EC a vote is not equal from state to state, you cannot exclude California or Penn or Florida or Arizona...that logic is just plain stupid.

    I say cut loose the EC and let the votes flow into a national count, forget the state and district for a presidential election..then MY vote down here means something and a repub vote in Calif means something.

    This isnt difficult...but please spare the "If Calif didnt count" garbage, it is beneath both of you.

    amending the constitution is about the most difficult feats known to politicians,
    it isn't some okie dokie thing as executive action or repeal of an executive order.
    why would smaller states give up their piece of the election. California has the most electorates any way. 
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:

    Great logic you two..

    If you do not include the largest voting state in the country then Trump wins easy..

    What kind of stupid logic is that? It goes against all of these so-called constitution ramblings you guys have from time to time.

    With the EC a vote is not equal from state to state, you cannot exclude California or Penn or Florida or Arizona...that logic is just plain stupid.

    I say cut loose the EC and let the votes flow into a national count, forget the state and district for a presidential election..then MY vote down here means something and a repub vote in Calif means something.

    This isnt difficult...but please spare the "If Calif didnt count" garbage, it is beneath both of you.

    amending the constitution is about the most difficult feats known to politicians,
    it isn't some okie dokie thing as executive action or repeal of an executive order.
    why would smaller states give up their piece of the election. California has the most electorates any way. 
     
    nature1970
    nature1970
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2015
    Posts: 21593
    Posted: Dec. 19, 2016 - 11:04 PM ET #53

    might be the exact difference of Liberal vs Conservative though

    Conservatives will not relinquish a better position for nothing in return

    even if it is the right thing.

    Liberals would give their position away for the greater good.


    Reply
    might be the exact difference of Liberal vs Conservative though

    Conservatives will not relinquish a better position for nothing in return

    even if it is the right thing.

    Liberals would give their position away for the greater good.


     
    nature1970
    nature1970
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2015
    Posts: 21593
    Posted: Dec. 20, 2016 - 4:46 AM ET #54

    If you are not liberal when you are young you have no heart.
    if you are not conservative when you get older you have no brain.
    -Winston Churchill
    Reply
    If you are not liberal when you are young you have no heart.
    if you are not conservative when you get older you have no brain.
    -Winston Churchill
     
    Hugh_Jorgan
    Hugh_Jorgan
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2002
    Posts: 22961
    Posted: Dec. 20, 2016 - 7:49 AM ET #55

    Quote Originally Posted by Hugh_Jorgan:


    Wouldn't it be fair to say that if there were no EC, and Trump focused on winning the popular vote, that he would have campaigned differently?

    To make any argument that HRC won the popular vote is flawed simply because the objective is not to win the popular vote, but to win the EC.
    It's the equivalent of a gambler saying the team he bet on gained more yards than their opponent, yet his team still lost the game.

    Also, there's a lot of chatter about HRC's "significant" win in the popular vote.
    Another way to look at it is that she won the popular vote by about **4%.
    Trump won the EC vote by about **26%
    Trumps win is much more significant 


    ** I did not break out a calculator, so my %'s could be slightly off

    Checkmate 
    bigreds daddy
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by Hugh_Jorgan:


    Wouldn't it be fair to say that if there were no EC, and Trump focused on winning the popular vote, that he would have campaigned differently?

    To make any argument that HRC won the popular vote is flawed simply because the objective is not to win the popular vote, but to win the EC.
    It's the equivalent of a gambler saying the team he bet on gained more yards than their opponent, yet his team still lost the game.

    Also, there's a lot of chatter about HRC's "significant" win in the popular vote.
    Another way to look at it is that she won the popular vote by about **4%.
    Trump won the EC vote by about **26%
    Trumps win is much more significant 


    ** I did not break out a calculator, so my %'s could be slightly off

    Checkmate 
     
    wallstreetcappers
    wallstreetcappers
    Covers Linesmen
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2003
    Posts: 58436
    Posted: Dec. 20, 2016 - 1:10 PM ET #56

    Quote Originally Posted by Hugh_Jorgan:


    Checkmate 

    Because you say the word???


    You are funny, go throw angry tantrums when someone does not agree with you, make things personal..claim victory when people are not paying attention to you. How fun!

    You are wrong in the assumption that is why I did not reply to you directly..it made no sense, and was beneath you to even say what you did.

    It is as if you claim Trump was underfunded and not interested in California so he didnt try, but if he HAD wanted to of course he could have done so because he is Trump of course so obviously if he wanted to win the popular vote he could have.

    What a load of crap...you think Trump had ANY shot at California at any time? I dont care if he spent 50 million only in California, his mouth cost him 10 times that in negative publicity, he never stood a shot. So spare me the "if he had focused on the popular vote" schtick it makes no sense. He had many cards fall his way at the end, Clinton shot herself in the foot and he caught ALL the breaks he needed to win, that is what happened.

    Yeah Trump had this all planned out like a bettor does...he knew all along that every single swing he needed would come in, but then if this was so obvious then I guess all those books were pretty clueless and like to give money away.

    You crack me up...congrats on your checkmate win, you really impressed everyone. I think you belong on the Trump team, they need your intellect to guide the nation for the next four years.

    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by Hugh_Jorgan:


    Checkmate 

    Because you say the word???


    You are funny, go throw angry tantrums when someone does not agree with you, make things personal..claim victory when people are not paying attention to you. How fun!

    You are wrong in the assumption that is why I did not reply to you directly..it made no sense, and was beneath you to even say what you did.

    It is as if you claim Trump was underfunded and not interested in California so he didnt try, but if he HAD wanted to of course he could have done so because he is Trump of course so obviously if he wanted to win the popular vote he could have.

    What a load of crap...you think Trump had ANY shot at California at any time? I dont care if he spent 50 million only in California, his mouth cost him 10 times that in negative publicity, he never stood a shot. So spare me the "if he had focused on the popular vote" schtick it makes no sense. He had many cards fall his way at the end, Clinton shot herself in the foot and he caught ALL the breaks he needed to win, that is what happened.

    Yeah Trump had this all planned out like a bettor does...he knew all along that every single swing he needed would come in, but then if this was so obvious then I guess all those books were pretty clueless and like to give money away.

    You crack me up...congrats on your checkmate win, you really impressed everyone. I think you belong on the Trump team, they need your intellect to guide the nation for the next four years.

     
    sundance
    sundance
    MVP
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2002
    Posts: 16806
    Posted: Dec. 20, 2016 - 1:22 PM ET #57

    Great quote by Churchill nature. 100% true.
    Reply
    Great quote by Churchill nature. 100% true.
     
    Hugh_Jorgan
    Hugh_Jorgan
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2002
    Posts: 22961
    Posted: Dec. 20, 2016 - 9:30 PM ET #58

    Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:


    Because you say the word???


    You are funny, go throw angry tantrums when someone does not agree with you, make things personal..claim victory when people are not paying attention to you. How fun!

    You are wrong in the assumption that is why I did not reply to you directly..it made no sense, and was beneath you to even say what you did.

    It is as if you claim Trump was underfunded and not interested in California so he didnt try, but if he HAD wanted to of course he could have done so because he is Trump of course so obviously if he wanted to win the popular vote he could have.

    What a load of crap...you think Trump had ANY shot at California at any time? I dont care if he spent 50 million only in California, his mouth cost him 10 times that in negative publicity, he never stood a shot. So spare me the "if he had focused on the popular vote" schtick it makes no sense. He had many cards fall his way at the end, Clinton shot herself in the foot and he caught ALL the breaks he needed to win, that is what happened.

    Yeah Trump had this all planned out like a bettor does...he knew all along that every single swing he needed would come in, but then if this was so obvious then I guess all those books were pretty clueless and like to give money away.

    You crack me up...congrats on your checkmate win, you really impressed everyone. I think you belong on the Trump team, they need your intellect to guide the nation for the next four years.


    Interesting how you put so many words in my mouth .. words that I not only did not say, but words that I would not say because I believe them to be false.

    I wasn't talking about California, but since you brought it up I will offer my opinion as it relates to the point I so aptly made in post #48.

    If the end game is to win the EC vote, you campaign accordingly.
    If the end game is to win the popular vote, you campaign accordingly.
    The 2 campaigns are distinctly different.

    Trump knew he could not win California, so spent $0 there.
    This is called 'campaigning to win the Electoral College vote' 


    If the election was going to be determined by the popular vote, then I'm sure Trump would have campaigned in California, not to "win the state" as you sarcastically pointed out, but simply to gain some votes.
    I trust that this makes sense.

    I will not address the shots/insults that you aimed my way.
    I recognize that you are still frazzled by the election results, so I forgive you ... but I will say this ...
    While I respect your intelligence (said with sincerity) I do not respect your ability to trade insults with me (said with equal sincerity). You are simply out of your league when it comes to the useless talent of exchanging barbs. Let's hope I remain in a forgiving mood 

    Ed, may you and yours have a wonderful holiday season 
    bigreds daddy
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:


    Because you say the word???


    You are funny, go throw angry tantrums when someone does not agree with you, make things personal..claim victory when people are not paying attention to you. How fun!

    You are wrong in the assumption that is why I did not reply to you directly..it made no sense, and was beneath you to even say what you did.

    It is as if you claim Trump was underfunded and not interested in California so he didnt try, but if he HAD wanted to of course he could have done so because he is Trump of course so obviously if he wanted to win the popular vote he could have.

    What a load of crap...you think Trump had ANY shot at California at any time? I dont care if he spent 50 million only in California, his mouth cost him 10 times that in negative publicity, he never stood a shot. So spare me the "if he had focused on the popular vote" schtick it makes no sense. He had many cards fall his way at the end, Clinton shot herself in the foot and he caught ALL the breaks he needed to win, that is what happened.

    Yeah Trump had this all planned out like a bettor does...he knew all along that every single swing he needed would come in, but then if this was so obvious then I guess all those books were pretty clueless and like to give money away.

    You crack me up...congrats on your checkmate win, you really impressed everyone. I think you belong on the Trump team, they need your intellect to guide the nation for the next four years.


    Interesting how you put so many words in my mouth .. words that I not only did not say, but words that I would not say because I believe them to be false.

    I wasn't talking about California, but since you brought it up I will offer my opinion as it relates to the point I so aptly made in post #48.

    If the end game is to win the EC vote, you campaign accordingly.
    If the end game is to win the popular vote, you campaign accordingly.
    The 2 campaigns are distinctly different.

    Trump knew he could not win California, so spent $0 there.
    This is called 'campaigning to win the Electoral College vote' 


    If the election was going to be determined by the popular vote, then I'm sure Trump would have campaigned in California, not to "win the state" as you sarcastically pointed out, but simply to gain some votes.
    I trust that this makes sense.

    I will not address the shots/insults that you aimed my way.
    I recognize that you are still frazzled by the election results, so I forgive you ... but I will say this ...
    While I respect your intelligence (said with sincerity) I do not respect your ability to trade insults with me (said with equal sincerity). You are simply out of your league when it comes to the useless talent of exchanging barbs. Let's hope I remain in a forgiving mood 

    Ed, may you and yours have a wonderful holiday season 
     
    Hugh_Jorgan
    Hugh_Jorgan
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2002
    Posts: 22961
    Posted: Dec. 20, 2016 - 9:32 PM ET #59

    BTW ... no more "checkmate", now that I recognize it offended you.




    GAME ... SET ... MATCH!!! 

    bigreds daddy
    Reply
    BTW ... no more "checkmate", now that I recognize it offended you.




    GAME ... SET ... MATCH!!! 

     
    wallstreetcappers
    wallstreetcappers
    Covers Linesmen
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2003
    Posts: 58436
    Posted: Dec. 21, 2016 - 1:37 PM ET #60

    I know how you are, Ive seen plenty and I know that it is not at all the extent of your angst..that is easy to see.

    When someone goes off the deep end as you have several times in public it is easy to tell that there is much more not seen and I am quite sure that is a fact with regards to you.

    I think it is wise for you to stick to other message boards and the penalty box when hurling insults and crude comments as you have, that suits your weak personality and your inability to hold a heated or pointed debate without cracking.

    All these years you have never seen me act even remotely as crude and disgusting as you and many of your friends, that is in no way a sign of what my abilities are with regard to debating, what it shows is that some people are able to stay above such things irregardless of really vile and personal attacks, and others are just not capable.

    Just because someone isnt ruthless and disgusting doesnt mean they are not quite capable of what you are suggesting but in a respectful and civil way.
    Reply
    I know how you are, Ive seen plenty and I know that it is not at all the extent of your angst..that is easy to see.

    When someone goes off the deep end as you have several times in public it is easy to tell that there is much more not seen and I am quite sure that is a fact with regards to you.

    I think it is wise for you to stick to other message boards and the penalty box when hurling insults and crude comments as you have, that suits your weak personality and your inability to hold a heated or pointed debate without cracking.

    All these years you have never seen me act even remotely as crude and disgusting as you and many of your friends, that is in no way a sign of what my abilities are with regard to debating, what it shows is that some people are able to stay above such things irregardless of really vile and personal attacks, and others are just not capable.

    Just because someone isnt ruthless and disgusting doesnt mean they are not quite capable of what you are suggesting but in a respectful and civil way.
     
    Hugh_Jorgan
    Hugh_Jorgan
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2002
    Posts: 22961
    Posted: Dec. 21, 2016 - 6:28 PM ET #61

    Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:

    I know how you are, Ive seen plenty and I know that it is not at all the extent of your angst..that is easy to see.

    When someone goes off the deep end as you have several times in public it is easy to tell that there is much more not seen and I am quite sure that is a fact with regards to you.

    I think it is wise for you to stick to other message boards and the penalty box when hurling insults and crude comments as you have, that suits your weak personality and your inability to hold a heated or pointed debate without cracking.

    All these years you have never seen me act even remotely as crude and disgusting as you and many of your friends, that is in no way a sign of what my abilities are with regard to debating, what it shows is that some people are able to stay above such things irregardless of really vile and personal attacks, and others are just not capable.

    Just because someone isnt ruthless and disgusting doesnt mean they are not quite capable of what you are suggesting but in a respectful and civil way.

    Ed, did you just whine about me insulting others .... while you were insulting me? 

    Merry Christmas, Ed 
    bigreds daddy
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:

    I know how you are, Ive seen plenty and I know that it is not at all the extent of your angst..that is easy to see.

    When someone goes off the deep end as you have several times in public it is easy to tell that there is much more not seen and I am quite sure that is a fact with regards to you.

    I think it is wise for you to stick to other message boards and the penalty box when hurling insults and crude comments as you have, that suits your weak personality and your inability to hold a heated or pointed debate without cracking.

    All these years you have never seen me act even remotely as crude and disgusting as you and many of your friends, that is in no way a sign of what my abilities are with regard to debating, what it shows is that some people are able to stay above such things irregardless of really vile and personal attacks, and others are just not capable.

    Just because someone isnt ruthless and disgusting doesnt mean they are not quite capable of what you are suggesting but in a respectful and civil way.

    Ed, did you just whine about me insulting others .... while you were insulting me? 

    Merry Christmas, Ed 
     
    165yds
    165yds
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2007
    Posts: 18777
    Posted: Dec. 21, 2016 - 10:33 PM ET #62

    Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:

    Great logic you two..

    If you do not include the largest voting state in the country then Trump wins easy..

    What kind of stupid logic is that? It goes against all of these so-called constitution ramblings you guys have from time to time.

    With the EC a vote is not equal from state to state, you cannot exclude California or Penn or Florida or Arizona...that logic is just plain stupid.

    I say cut loose the EC and let the votes flow into a national count, forget the state and district for a presidential election..then MY vote down here means something and a repub vote in Calif means something.

    This isnt difficult...but please spare the "If Calif didnt count" garbage, it is beneath both of you.


    The small states are not going to vote for the popular vote and become fly over states.  Not worth talking about.  Your new President is taking over soon, get behind him because this is your country.  The better he does the better you do.  Stop the whining already, is this going to go on for eight more years from you?  
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:

    Great logic you two..

    If you do not include the largest voting state in the country then Trump wins easy..

    What kind of stupid logic is that? It goes against all of these so-called constitution ramblings you guys have from time to time.

    With the EC a vote is not equal from state to state, you cannot exclude California or Penn or Florida or Arizona...that logic is just plain stupid.

    I say cut loose the EC and let the votes flow into a national count, forget the state and district for a presidential election..then MY vote down here means something and a repub vote in Calif means something.

    This isnt difficult...but please spare the "If Calif didnt count" garbage, it is beneath both of you.


    The small states are not going to vote for the popular vote and become fly over states.  Not worth talking about.  Your new President is taking over soon, get behind him because this is your country.  The better he does the better you do.  Stop the whining already, is this going to go on for eight more years from you?  
     
    djbrow
    djbrow
    Covers Referee
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2004
    Posts: 15759
    Posted: Dec. 21, 2016 - 10:59 PM ET #63

    Quote Originally Posted by 165yds:

    The small states are not going to vote for the popular vote and become fly over states.  Not worth talking about.  Your new President is taking over soon, get behind him because this is your country.  The better he does the better you do.  Stop the whining already, is this going to go on for eight more years from you?  

    You mean how you and your fellow right wingers got behind Obama?
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by 165yds:

    The small states are not going to vote for the popular vote and become fly over states.  Not worth talking about.  Your new President is taking over soon, get behind him because this is your country.  The better he does the better you do.  Stop the whining already, is this going to go on for eight more years from you?  

    You mean how you and your fellow right wingers got behind Obama?
     
    wallstreetcappers
    wallstreetcappers
    Covers Linesmen
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2003
    Posts: 58436
    Posted: Dec. 22, 2016 - 6:25 PM ET #64

    Quote Originally Posted by Hugh_Jorgan:


    Ed, did you just whine about me insulting others .... while you were insulting me? 

    Merry Christmas, Ed 

    Oh super cute, you after all these years and so many personal jabs at me trying to play the victim role...

    If insulting you is pointing out your years of attacks and insults and how I have not and will not do that, I guess in your silly world it is an insult, but funny how you can dish it as you have and still try to act like you are being insulted. 

    Nothing I said was an insult, you have done every single thing I listed and many more, I dont care if you like being called out as it seems you started the whole thing as you always do.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by Hugh_Jorgan:


    Ed, did you just whine about me insulting others .... while you were insulting me? 

    Merry Christmas, Ed 

    Oh super cute, you after all these years and so many personal jabs at me trying to play the victim role...

    If insulting you is pointing out your years of attacks and insults and how I have not and will not do that, I guess in your silly world it is an insult, but funny how you can dish it as you have and still try to act like you are being insulted. 

    Nothing I said was an insult, you have done every single thing I listed and many more, I dont care if you like being called out as it seems you started the whole thing as you always do.
     
    nature1970
    nature1970
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2015
    Posts: 21593
    Posted: Dec. 22, 2016 - 6:38 PM ET #65

    okay wall street , Hillary won 48.2% Trump won 46% (source cbs news)

     neither have a majority merely a plurality so it goes to the house of representatives and republicans pick trump anyway.

    or do you believe a plurality is enough ?

    Reply

    okay wall street , Hillary won 48.2% Trump won 46% (source cbs news)

     neither have a majority merely a plurality so it goes to the house of representatives and republicans pick trump anyway.

    or do you believe a plurality is enough ?

     
    TILTOLOGIC
    TILTOLOGIC
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2007
    Posts: 5527
    Posted: Dec. 22, 2016 - 7:04 PM ET #66

    Electoral College will be here long after your screen goes black and are just dust in the ground. Fact

    Watching you all cry like little girls has been a wonderful thing. Thank you
    Reply
    Electoral College will be here long after your screen goes black and are just dust in the ground. Fact

    Watching you all cry like little girls has been a wonderful thing. Thank you
     
    TILTOLOGIC
    TILTOLOGIC
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2007
    Posts: 5527
    Posted: Dec. 22, 2016 - 7:06 PM ET #67

    Maybe all you little girls could move to a swing state and make a difference? or better yet get the crazies in NY and Cali to do it. 

    Doubtful i imagine. Crazies need other crazies nearby to keep from killing themselves.
    Reply
    Maybe all you little girls could move to a swing state and make a difference? or better yet get the crazies in NY and Cali to do it. 

    Doubtful i imagine. Crazies need other crazies nearby to keep from killing themselves.
     
    wallstreetcappers
    wallstreetcappers
    Covers Linesmen
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2003
    Posts: 58436
    Posted: Dec. 22, 2016 - 7:43 PM ET #68

    Classy...

    So are you saying you like the EC because you got the guy in you wanted or you think the whole system is in working order from an election perspective?

    Should a vote mean the same irregardless of where you live or not? To me that is the only issue.

    Anywhere in the country a vote should not be negated from another because you live in a state that is slighted strongly to either party, that is anti-freedom and any system that rewards vote negating should be improved.
    Reply
    Classy...

    So are you saying you like the EC because you got the guy in you wanted or you think the whole system is in working order from an election perspective?

    Should a vote mean the same irregardless of where you live or not? To me that is the only issue.

    Anywhere in the country a vote should not be negated from another because you live in a state that is slighted strongly to either party, that is anti-freedom and any system that rewards vote negating should be improved.
     
    nature1970
    nature1970
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2015
    Posts: 21593
    Posted: Dec. 22, 2016 - 7:48 PM ET #69

    https://www.nytimes.com/elections/results/arizona

    3% difference wall that was it in Arizona.

    but to the point Hillary has 48% of total vote trump has 46% of total vote.

    neither gets a majority in national election. so then what?


    Reply

    https://www.nytimes.com/elections/results/arizona

    3% difference wall that was it in Arizona.

    but to the point Hillary has 48% of total vote trump has 46% of total vote.

    neither gets a majority in national election. so then what?


     
    TILTOLOGIC
    TILTOLOGIC
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2007
    Posts: 5527
    Posted: Dec. 22, 2016 - 8:20 PM ET #70

    Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:

    Classy...

    So are you saying you like the EC because you got the guy in you wanted or you think the whole system is in working order from an election perspective?

    Should a vote mean the same irregardless of where you live or not? To me that is the only issue.

    Anywhere in the country a vote should not be negated from another because you live in a state that is slighted strongly to either party, that is anti-freedom and any system that rewards vote negating should be improved.

    I'm vehemently against mob rule.
    Which is exactly why we have the EC and not the will of an easily manipulated populace and thus prevent entrenched power. want   Which becomes so much easier to accomplish when you can make your whole platform handouts, illegal alien voters, and a media totally complicit.  Thats the road to total control. You want a dictator in the future of this country, you go ahead and get rid of the EC

    We live in a republic, it's not a true democracy and it never has been. 

    and now you want to change it because you can't stomach Donald Trump 

    take a deep breath and think a little bit. 
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:

    Classy...

    So are you saying you like the EC because you got the guy in you wanted or you think the whole system is in working order from an election perspective?

    Should a vote mean the same irregardless of where you live or not? To me that is the only issue.

    Anywhere in the country a vote should not be negated from another because you live in a state that is slighted strongly to either party, that is anti-freedom and any system that rewards vote negating should be improved.

    I'm vehemently against mob rule.
    Which is exactly why we have the EC and not the will of an easily manipulated populace and thus prevent entrenched power. want   Which becomes so much easier to accomplish when you can make your whole platform handouts, illegal alien voters, and a media totally complicit.  Thats the road to total control. You want a dictator in the future of this country, you go ahead and get rid of the EC

    We live in a republic, it's not a true democracy and it never has been. 

    and now you want to change it because you can't stomach Donald Trump 

    take a deep breath and think a little bit. 
     
    TILTOLOGIC
    TILTOLOGIC
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2007
    Posts: 5527
    Posted: Dec. 22, 2016 - 8:32 PM ET #71

    I don't understand why anyone would want a government voted on purely by its largesse, which is exactly what you would get. Why do you think Cali and NY are so blue all the time? These are states ran by an elite few and the rest are dirt poor who live off handouts. Why would anyone want a country like that?  

    It's insane. And its also why democracies of the past always died. 
    Founders wrote about exactly this. The irony is some would say the EC was there to  prevent a guy like Trump from winning. But that didn't happen because of the the total disaster named Hillary Clinton.  



    Reply
    I don't understand why anyone would want a government voted on purely by its largesse, which is exactly what you would get. Why do you think Cali and NY are so blue all the time? These are states ran by an elite few and the rest are dirt poor who live off handouts. Why would anyone want a country like that?  

    It's insane. And its also why democracies of the past always died. 
    Founders wrote about exactly this. The irony is some would say the EC was there to  prevent a guy like Trump from winning. But that didn't happen because of the the total disaster named Hillary Clinton.  



     
    TILTOLOGIC
    TILTOLOGIC
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2007
    Posts: 5527
    Posted: Dec. 22, 2016 - 8:45 PM ET #72

    You should direct your anger at the DNC for allowing itself to be rigged in favor of the worst candidate in modern history.  And more specifically, John Podesta and his minions who had a Billion dollar treasure chest, a popular incumbent POTUS, and an entire media syndicate fully in their corner. 

    AND STILL LOST


    Reply
    You should direct your anger at the DNC for allowing itself to be rigged in favor of the worst candidate in modern history.  And more specifically, John Podesta and his minions who had a Billion dollar treasure chest, a popular incumbent POTUS, and an entire media syndicate fully in their corner. 

    AND STILL LOST


     
    TILTOLOGIC
    TILTOLOGIC
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2007
    Posts: 5527
    Posted: Dec. 22, 2016 - 9:14 PM ET #73


    Look at this and tell me you still want to abolish the EC.
    Reply

    Look at this and tell me you still want to abolish the EC.
     
    TILTOLOGIC
    TILTOLOGIC
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2007
    Posts: 5527
    Posted: Dec. 22, 2016 - 9:21 PM ET #74

    I tried pasting an election result map by county.


    https://metrocosm.com/election-2016-map-3d/


    Let's just say its STARK.
    Reply
    I tried pasting an election result map by county.


    https://metrocosm.com/election-2016-map-3d/


    Let's just say its STARK.
     
     
    165yds
    165yds
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2007
    Posts: 18777
    Posted: Dec. 23, 2016 - 12:54 PM ET #75

    I can't believe you're still crying Wall over the EC. 

    A grown man doesn't act this way Wall.  


    Reply
    I can't believe you're still crying Wall over the EC. 

    A grown man doesn't act this way Wall.  


    All Forums | Politics
    «First Previous 1234 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • Thursday 10/22/2026 937
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 279,953
    • Patriots vs Bears in-game live TNF 1,955
    • NFL LOCKED IN! 109,720
    • Thursday”s POD 2,844
    • NFL THREAD * 151 * 27,065
    • Patriots@Bears discussion 3,642
    • Public Indicator Calculations 2026 23,667
    • Week 8 Money 7,628
    • Republicans push back against the lunatic Trump and his team of liars. 23,327

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Privacy Choices Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo
    Covers Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.