Posted:
#2001
82-82 
MAGAm Yisrael Chai
0
SCALABRINE vs. PACKERSBACKERS - Loser Leaves Covers for Eternity
Posted:
#2003
The peoples champ Pack 
presents thee with OT....another 5min of glorrious international hoops...one of my many talents here on covers, which only recently i have been helping out my fellow covers brothers and sisters by sharing my knowledge....i am a kind and loving champ...and i do it all for free.
presents thee with OT....another 5min of glorrious international hoops...one of my many talents here on covers, which only recently i have been helping out my fellow covers brothers and sisters by sharing my knowledge....i am a kind and loving champ...and i do it all for free.
MAGAm Yisrael Chai
0
Posted:
#2006
Post #1990-
Now, to all you trolls....
You are talking about the simplest of the simple here for the -120 bet is he not???
Can someone tell this POS why I wouldn’t ask him or Packers why a bet with both sides at -120 needs to be accepted?
As they go on and make fun of the bet, consequently making fun...of themselves...
Or should I let the POS figure it out, for himself....if he can...
Because I expect most of you trolls to stay quiet as not to embarrass him....
0
Posted:
#2007
Final score 90-84 Estudiantes...oh well, did you enjoy the ride? Did you feel the passion? Did you find yourself caught up in the action? Did you find yourself rooting for a team youve never heard of to pull off an epic comeback for the peoples champ Pack ? Did you feel the excitement of a successful and profitable ingame wagering opportunity? Did you wonder why the fuk this game held so much interest for the peoples champ? Did you feel the rush of a potential long shot hitting while making almost a sure profit along the way with the +13.5 gimme spread? Wonder how the peoples champ knew this was a super live play?
? Did you feel the excitement of a successful and profitable ingame wagering opportunity? Did you wonder why the fuk this game held so much interest for the peoples champ? Did you feel the rush of a potential long shot hitting while making almost a sure profit along the way with the +13.5 gimme spread? Wonder how the peoples champ knew this was a super live play?Regardless....i guarantee everyone here reading this one thing:
In Scals 11 years here, never once has he ever inspired people with ingame passion like this...never has he spotted an opportunity within a game like this where the payout was super juicy, with an almost guaranteed ATS ingame wager for sure profits...never has he truly engaged anyone here in 11 years showing us that hes a real sincere guy who loves betting sports.
The peoples champ sadly did not cash his +600ML but thats ok...we all come close sometimes but miss out, we win some we lose some...thats the nature of the beast....but i promise you all this...Scal will never talk to anyone here like an equal...but the peoples champ is a common man, just like everyone else here...humble, sincere, kind, generous, and knows far more about ingame wagering than most people on covers...its become the most profitable betting option nowadays if you know what youre doing and to more importantly know what to look for....this relatively meaningless basketball game held max value halfway thru the 1st q....Bayreuth was down 17-2 at home as a 3.5 home fav...spots like these always catches the peoples champ eyes...and usually after the 1st q, that when the correct time is to back the home team at severely inflated odds...many of you fine gents know what im talking about here...and to those that are not too familiar with ingame wagering, we can all learn together the tricks and secrets of the peoples champ...after February 4th 2018 
I kindly thank you all for allowing me to successfully hijack this thread for the past 45min or so...it was fun showing covers how an ingame thread/rally is properly conducted....
MAGAm Yisrael Chai
0
Posted:
#2009
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
Post #1990-
Post #1990-
Now, to all you trolls....
You are talking about the simplest of the simple here for the -120 bet is he not???
Can someone tell this POS why I wouldn’t ask him or Packers why a bet with both sides at -120 needs to be accepted?
As they go on and make fun of the bet, consequently making fun...of themselves...
Or should I let the POS figure it out, for himself....if he can...
Because I expect most of you trolls to stay quiet as not to embarrass him....
How ironic...the only troll left of any significance in this thread has become you...now thats the purest definition of a complete 180 degree turnaround 
MAGAm Yisrael Chai
0
Posted:
#2010
And they still don’t know why I didn’t ask about my -120 bet but it perfectly encapsulates what they are:
Lazy illiterate trolls who contribute nothing.
And Packers still pushes forward with idiocy even galvanized by my calling him out!
There is a reason I never responded to you both asking about -120 bets.
It’s right in the OP you dumbas*es. One of the only fu**ing rules there. Post NUMBER ONE. Directly addressed.
And this is what Covers is left with in Jorgan and Packers after all is said and done?
A troll who MC’s a lossing a +600 ML bet and is proud of it with nary a criticIsm for the losing play.
A troll who has a 10% hit rate on parlays again nary a word from the peanut gallery...
A troll who wins a 17 run baseball game and needs miracles in a 5 inning line that’s not even legal? All the while Scal takes the Stros at -103 and takes it down. With the best odds possible by far for 6 of 7 days?
Scal A capper who puts in ND -3 over Stanford and now that line is -6.5.
Scal A capper who puts in Purdue -1 over Indiana and now that is -2.5 even with one of the starting QB’s injured for the rest of the year.
Yes that Scal guy has no idea what he is doing! Lol!
And they mock a Morgan State pick not even knowing if it’s basketball or football. LOLOL.
These are the trolls that will remain on covers and they can’t even read an OP with the most basic set of rules, one speaking loud and clear to -120 on both sides.
This is what you POS in the Pbox support? Gimmee and HockeyTeeth And WMI and Lbcake And TideMan And WizardOfOdds And BWS And Stump.
That is who you make company with?
That is who you support?
These two can’t even TYPE at a moderate rate of speed for a comprehenisve writeup never mind conceptualize an angle.
This is why I have stayed out of this septic tank of a forum for YEARS.
I find even their avatars repulsive because the slovenly manchildren who sit behind them are embarrassments to the gender.
The posters here are total shi-stains.
No integrity, or brains or honor. Doing nothing for no one.
Bragging about golf games and filet mignon and using insults of a high school freshman about tuba players...reallly.
All the while Packers gives him a digital rimjob?
You fu**ing idiots.
Jester beget jesters.
Let the pigs lie in their shi*
It is a site to behold. Truly.
0
Posted:
#2011
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
And they still don’t know why I didn’t ask about my -120 bet but it perfectly encapsulates what they are:
Lazy illiterate trolls who contribute nothing.
And Packers still pushes forward with idiocy even galvanized by my calling him out!
There is a reason I never responded to you both asking about -120 bets.
It’s right in the OP you dumbas*es. One of the only fu**ing rules there. Post NUMBER ONE. Directly addressed.
And this is what Covers is left with in Jorgan and Packers after all is said and done?
A troll who MC’s a lossing a +600 ML bet and is proud of it with nary a criticIsm for the losing play.
A troll who has a 10% hit rate on parlays again nary a word from the peanut gallery...
A troll who wins a 17 run baseball game and needs miracles in a 5 inning line that’s not even legal? All the while Scal takes the Stros at -103 and takes it down. With the best odds possible by far for 6 of 7 days?
Scal A capper who puts in ND -3 over Stanford and now that line is -6.5.
Scal A capper who puts in Purdue -1 over Indiana and now that is -2.5 even with one of the starting QB’s injured for the rest of the year.
Yes that Scal guy has no idea what he is doing! Lol!
And they mock a Morgan State pick not even knowing if it’s basketball or football. LOLOL.
These are the trolls that will remain on covers and they can’t even read an OP with the most basic set of rules, one speaking loud and clear to -120 on both sides.
This is what you POS in the Pbox support? Gimmee and HockeyTeeth And WMI and Lbcake And TideMan And WizardOfOdds And BWS And Stump.
That is who you make company with?
That is who you support?
These two can’t even TYPE at a moderate rate of speed for a comprehenisve writeup never mind conceptualize an angle.
This is why I have stayed out of this septic tank of a forum for YEARS.
I find even their avatars repulsive because the slovenly manchildren who sit behind them are embarrassments to the gender.
The posters here are total shi-stains.
No integrity, or brains or honor. Doing nothing for no one.
Bragging about golf games and filet mignon and using insults of a high school freshman about tuba players...reallly.
All the while Packers gives him a digital rimjob?
You fu**ing idiots.
Jester beget jesters.
Let the pigs lie in their shi*
It is a site to behold. Truly.
I had to repost this just in case you go poof one day...when i have time im sure to dissect this one later...but at first glance it looks like just another weeping vagina monolgue repeating itself for the umpteenth time
MAGAm Yisrael Chai
0
Posted:
#2012
Fyi scalscunt...that +600 ML actually didnt lose a single penny...it made one full unit...thats the goal for any bettor...perhaps you simply dont understand because you maybe dont bet and just pretend you do...go review the entire log and you surely will learn something...all for free
MAGAm Yisrael Chai
0
so what ragland upgraded,poos big nose heard the kid is trepiditious in regards to getting hurt! o my o me
Posted:
#2016
Of course you didn’t read it Packers, it skewers you and the troll you give a rimjob to every single night.
And every post I skewer you and Hugh in it’s such an interesting coincidence that you don’t even read them??!?
It very succinctly informs you both of you didn’t read, comprehend or remember an OP which is less than a quarter of ONE page of a regular book.
Even as you read this you still don’t know how big a fool you both look about a -120 line.
“The people’s champ did not cash his +600 ML” but now later it made a unit. Of course it did. His words before changed to suit him after.
Who did you help with that “humble” narration of a bet 99% of Covers thought was what could have been a coc*fight in the Dominican Republic?
Anyone? Did a single soul tail him? Speak now! Tell me you failed any of that? ONE POSTER.
No one? Compare this to ONE regular thread of mine which evokes discussion inspires debate, tailers and faders, ya know LIFE. As opposed to you, talking to....yourself...He’ll I posted a thread just positing a question about the Jets and Browns and inspired more debate in a few hours than you have in your whole life online or in real life.
Ah yes, I’d be quite humble too if I were in a room with an internet connection as my only lifeline.
Get that tongue ready for the rimjob.
Hugh will be here soon.
0
Posted:
#2017
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
Of course you didn’t read it Packers, it skewers you and the troll you give a rimjob to every single night.
Debate requires both sides to actually listen to what each are saying.Of course you didn’t read it Packers, it skewers you and the troll you give a rimjob to every single night.
And every post I skewer you and Hugh in it’s such an interesting coincidence that you don’t even read them??!?
It very succinctly informs you both of you didn’t read, comprehend or remember an OP which is less than a quarter of ONE page of a regular book.
Even as you read this you still don’t know how big a fool you both look about a -120 line.
“The people’s champ did not cash his +600 ML” but now later it made a unit. Of course it did. His words before changed to suit him after.
Who did you help with that “humble” narration of a bet 99% of Covers thought was what could have been a coc*fight in the Dominican Republic?
Anyone? Did a single soul tail him? Speak now! Tell me you failed any of that? ONE POSTER.
No one? Compare this to ONE regular thread of mine which evokes discussion inspires debate, tailers and faders, ya know LIFE. As opposed to you, talking to....yourself...He’ll I posted a thread just positing a question about the Jets and Browns and inspired more debate in a few hours than you have in your whole life online or in real life.
Ah yes, I’d be quite humble too if I were in a room with an internet connection as my only lifeline.
Get that tongue ready for the rimjob.
Hugh will be here soon.
How many stars would you rank your 18th play?
Max Miller a great member of congress!
0
Posted:
#2018
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
Scal A capper who puts in ND -3 over Stanford and now that line is -6.5.
Scal A capper who puts in Purdue -1 over Indiana and now that is -2.5 even with one of the starting QB’s injured for the rest of the year.
Hopefully there will be no snow
Histrionic personality disorder. It's sad
0
Posted:
#2019
Scal A capper who puts in ND -3 over Stanford and now that line is -6.5.
Scal A capper who puts in Purdue -1 over Indiana and now that is -2.5 even with one of the starting QB’s injured for the rest of the year.
If they both lose who fukkin cares?
Max Miller a great member of congress!
0
Posted:
#2022
Quote Originally Posted by benhogan76:
Debate requires both sides to actually listen to what each are saying.
Debate requires both sides to actually listen to what each are saying.
How many stars would you rank your 18th play?
Oh I do listen, and if you say something fu**ing stupid (often), or regurgitate what I said, I'll tell you.
And too fu**ing bad if you are offended, because I don't have the time.
And I have rates about FIFTY winners with stars, so again, do you really take ONE loser with a star rating and harp on it. STILL? LOL. Grow up.
0
Posted:
#2023
Scal nobody likes the crying and excuses after every single loss. Once in awhile okay but every loss? You can make an excuse about anything and you always do. Never does anyone here from you I made a bad bet. It’s always someone else’s fault. You remind me of the Knicks in the mid 90’s who never committed a foul.
0
Posted:
#2024
Quote Originally Posted by benhogan76:
Scal A capper who puts in ND -3 over Stanford and now that line is -6.5.
Scal A capper who puts in Purdue -1 over Indiana and now that is -2.5 even with one of the starting QB’s injured for the rest of the year.
If they both lose who fukkin cares?
Well seasoned cappers care Ben.
You know what that is? Something you are not apparently.
How do I know? Because of your infantile response of "Well if they both lose, who cares!"
Do you know anything about getting the best line?
Would you take Notre Dame -3 now if offered to you today knowing the actual line was -6.5. You'd be pretty stupid to pass up 3.5 free points now wouldn't you.
What about Bama to win the title at -110, another line grab when earl that is now -160.
Would you leave $.50 juice on the table if offered Bama today.
See when you're paying an extra $.50 today, I'm collecting on far more.
Will these all win? I don't know. But over the long term I'm gonna be far more profitable than the dunce who says "Yeah well the bet can lose so WHO CARES!????"
0
Posted:
#2025
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
Well seasoned cappers care Ben.
You know what that is? Something you are not apparently.
How do I know? Because of your infantile response of "Well if they both lose, who cares!"
Do you know anything about getting the best line?
Would you take Notre Dame -3 now if offered to you today knowing the actual line was -6.5. You'd be pretty stupid to pass up 3.5 free points now wouldn't you.
What about Bama to win the title at -110, another line grab when earl that is now -160.
Would you leave $.50 juice on the table if offered Bama today.
See when you're paying an extra $.50 today, I'm collecting on far more.
Will these all win? I don't know. But over the long term I'm gonna be far more profitable than the dunce who says "Yeah well the bet can lose so WHO CARES!????"
Isn't this almost the EXACT ARGUEMENT you had AGAINST Hugh for a couple of his picks in this very contest?
0
Hot Forum Topics
