All Forums | Penalty Box

SCALABRINE vs. PACKERSBACKERS - Loser Leaves Covers for Eternity

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 73181
Posts: 3208
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 52975
Posted: #1476
For the record, the peoples champ Pack  believes betting on a look ahead line is pretty ....i wont say its against the rules or nature of this cap off, but to lock into a pick without knowing injury status of key players, or the ignore the ebb and flow of the season between now and then is as reckless a wager as betting against Wyoming on homecoming.
But i suppose it fits the perpetrators M.O...pick something well into the future to give plenty of time to hype up a play in order to attract max number of blind sheep as possible to the slaughterhouse.
MAGAm Yisrael Chai
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 52975
Posted: #1477
Quote Originally Posted by wmi799:

So a play that loses is okay since it had a 25,000 word write-up versus a couple TO THE POINT words that wins?

You'd rather lose money?

To each is own

He lives on his own planet called Delusionaisa
MAGAm Yisrael Chai
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2010
Posts: 33652
Posted: #1478
I'd rather win money. Write-ups are nice and I give Scal kudos for the work he puts in them. At the same time the play posted as some do with a few words mean as much. 
Histrionic personality disorder. It's sad
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #1479
Posted plays with a few words?

Hard to find those, especially ones that are meaningful.

It’s like trying to explain String Theory in a few sentences.

Again, my losing plays make you a winner in the long term because of the breadth of research that goes into the play.

And 90% are explainable:

1) Bob Davie abandoning the option for no reason.
2) Hoge getting crippled
3) Butch pulling Dormandy without notice
4) jets scoring on two completely busted plays to cover against the jags.

Meanwhile Hugh gets 2 3 run homers to cover a 5 inning line and then is told “great play”.

The choice is yoursz

Warren Buffet (me) May lose a tiny amount of money to start a year but go with the lucky stockbroker (Hugh/Packers) who happened to short Chipotle stock because of tainted burritos and Buffet will see them in the unemployment line the next year.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 52975
Posted: #1480
Scal likely the only person alive who didnt know Kevin Spacey was gaay until this week 
MAGAm Yisrael Chai
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #1481
Ok we’ll see if my lookahead lines pan out....

It’s called thinking outside the box.

Like it did with my Purdue Ohio Bet or my Purdue season win total bet both of hich hit easily.


While you are looking at the lines for the week, I’m looking for the lines 2 MONTHS from now. Typical squad vs. sharp thinking.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 52975
Posted: #1482
Come February 4th 2018, you will have all the time in the world to lookahead into infinity.

MAGAm Yisrael Chai
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 3675
Posted: #1483
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:

Posted plays with a few words?

Hard to find those, especially ones that are meaningful.

It’s like trying to explain String Theory in a few sentences.

Again, my losing plays make you a winner in the long term because of the breadth of research that goes into the play.

And 90% are explainable:

1) Bob Davie abandoning the option for no reason.
2) Hoge getting crippled
3) Butch pulling Dormandy without notice
4) jets scoring on two completely busted plays to cover against the jags.

Meanwhile Hugh gets 2 3 run homers to cover a 5 inning line and then is told “great play”.

The choice is yoursz

Warren Buffet (me) May lose a tiny amount of money to start a year but go with the lucky stockbroker (Hugh/Packers) who happened to short Chipotle stock because of tainted burritos and Buffet will see them in the unemployment line the next year.

Excuse me, im a little slow, how does this work.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #1484
We all knew Kevin Spacey was ga y Packers. The POINT was that you are IN THE CLOSET like Spacey tailing me to build your roll while you defame me here. I mean when a guy nails a $2,000 play backing a team on a 15 game losing streak and wins straight up, he’s damn good.

It’s analogous and not about his sexual preferences. Ok? Get it now? No? I know. Don’t bother.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #1485
Quote Originally Posted by HockeyTeeth:


Excuse me, im a little slow, how does this work.

I’ll explain. Take lessons from the guy who wins the $3,000 pt with 7-2 off suit and you’ll be a long term loser.

Take lessons from the guy who loses the $300 pot when he gets his aces cracked due to a 1 outer on the river and you’ll be a long term winner.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2004
Posts: 6768
Posted: #1486
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:

And that is why you will be leaving your site.

I can’t make the president leave his position.

And he is an incredibly deranged liar.

We all lie. But to lie over and over and over like the President does, like you do, has its consequences.

And I can control it here.

And that is why you’ll be leaving.

But what really interesting is that no one is fading my CSU pick...even at a better line

I wonder why...

 No need to bring Obama into his, even though the lying POS is finally out of the White House.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #1487
You don’t really have the audacity to call Obama a lying POS in comparison to this POS.

Because that would qualify you as perhaps the biggest imbecile in the history of man.

Just walk away. Please. It’s is the most embarrassing post in this thread. And that’s saying a lot.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2002
Posts: 22961
Posted: #1488
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:

 

 It’s is the most embarrassing post in this thread. And that’s saying a lot.

With all you've posted in this thread ... you and I can finally agree on something 
bigreds daddy
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2002
Posts: 22961
Posted: #1489
Cal ... to clarify, I was referencing that saying anything that you claim is "the most embarrassing" comment, would certainly be saying a lot based upon the sh!t you have already spewed in this thread.

I was not passing judgement on anything wizardofroz posted 
bigreds daddy
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #1490
To not pass judgment after reading it puts you in the same boat
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2002
Posts: 22961
Posted: #1491
Put me in any boat you like ... as long as it's not YOUR boat 
bigreds daddy
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 52975
Posted: #1492
Wow Scal has fallen off the deep end today 
MAGAm Yisrael Chai
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2014
Posts: 2042
Posted: #1493
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:

Condoning violence against women....and that punch was brutal by the way.

Wonderful content of character we have of this site do we not?

Chivalry is not dead.

Ladies sign up here for your next Tinder date. Hey he may laugh if you get socked in the mouth but whatevs....

That fukkin b1tch deserves everything she gets.  What lesson did she learn...............don't get in someone's space and not expect to get knocked out.  The fact that it was a women makes no difference.  It would have been sweet if it was a guy acting like that.

Actions have consequences.  The Snookster found that out the hard way.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2014
Posts: 2042
Posted: #1494
"Symbolism over substance"

Symbolism = long winded write-ups

Substance = winning

It's the mantra that all far left nut jobs live by.  No one should be surprised by his thought process.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 52975
Posted: #1495
Scal you really need to stop watching Don Lemon 
MAGAm Yisrael Chai
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #1496
Doubling down on violence against women.

See my policy is barring a gun being pointed at you or a knife coming at your chest is to never strike a woman in any way.

Your standard? If she gets in your personal space, you get knocked out (and I’m not misconstruing, read his post above)

Wow what a catch.

No wonder why most guys on her are single and will remain so.

Women are literally scared to death of them!
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #1497
Pssssssst. Packers: (liberals don’t actually watch CNN). I know you think we do. We don’t. Not with any seriousness. 

Carry on with your idiocy.....
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2012
Posts: 26914
Posted: #1498
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:

Posted plays with a few words?

Hard to find those, especially ones that are meaningful.

It’s like trying to explain String Theory in a few sentences.

Again, my losing plays make you a winner in the long term because of the breadth of research that goes into the play.

And 90% are explainable:

1) Bob Davie abandoning the option for no reason.
2) Hoge getting crippled
3) Butch pulling Dormandy without notice
4) jets scoring on two completely busted plays to cover against the jags.

Meanwhile Hugh gets 2 3 run homers to cover a 5 inning line and then is told “great play”.

The choice is yoursz

Warren Buffet (me) May lose a tiny amount of money to start a year but go with the lucky stockbroker (Hugh/Packers) who happened to short Chipotle stock because of tainted burritos and Buffet will see them in the unemployment line the next year.


string theory?  been watching Big Bang Theory on a loop Scal?
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #1499
Before last week’s game:

Arizona was +6.5 @ AZ state.

They are now -3.5 at @ AZ state a TEN point move.

We all know it’s Tate but a Rich Rod team getting a 10 pt move in it’s favir..

Pretty amazing! 
 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #1500
No I listen to lectures on it BigD.

And I’m convinced, as are many respected physicists, that we might be living in some kind of simulation.

Yes I believe that. Not sure what kind or how it was constructed but it CAN be true. 
All Forums | Penalty Box
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gambling
Betting Sites
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
21+
Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
Covers is verified safe by:
Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.