Posted:
#1276
Oh and btw...you still have about 90 minutes to bend that joint 
MAGAm Yisrael Chai
0
SCALABRINE vs. PACKERSBACKERS - Loser Leaves Covers for Eternity
Posted:
#1277
No I didn’t know it was their homecoming game.
It was only in my 2,000 word write up....that it was their homecoming game.
And who cares that Allen is said to go #1 in the draft.
Watch him play and you’ll see how high of a pick he should be.
Right now Tate out of Arizona should be drafted higher than him.
0
Posted:
#1281
Quote Originally Posted by lbcake:
I have to admit (no offence Hugh), that was quite the fortunate win, If Scal wasn't such a miserable flock, I'd throw a sympathy word or two his way.
I have to admit (no offence Hugh), that was quite the fortunate win, If Scal wasn't such a miserable flock, I'd throw a sympathy word or two his way.
FWIW...I do not want to see any of the participants to go, Scal included.
IF he could only be one-third douche, I probably could accept his choreographed arrogant behavior.
Man was that ever a kick to the balls. JUST UNREAL.
Well at least bialowas and Betty Crocker have exhibited a morsel of courage to say that was a bad beat. I call it perhaps the worst 5 inning loss ever given the stage.
Stump? No courage.
In the words of Meatloaf, two outta three ain’t bad.
0
Posted:
#1283
The site gets millions of unique visitors.
How can I post 10’s of thousands of those who DIDN’T Refute my thread.
And it’s not just those that opened. There wasn’t a SINGLE thread in the main forum on that game hence NO ONE had a counter.
I can’t POST silent observers NOT refuting my thread.
0
Posted:
#1285
Scal...listen up bud...the dildo/buttplug doesnt go in your ears...hear me loud and clear you sodomite tout wannabe:
There were plenty of respected cappers here who chose to go out of their way, and give you their honest opinion about reconsidering your Lobos pick....some even pleaded with you to not make that pick count towards this cap off.
So stop making up fake news again...even people who dont really like you suggested to get off the Lobos eventual trainwreck
MAGAm Yisrael Chai
0
Posted:
#1286
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:
Scal, i've been very busy with work and haven't been able to folllw the thread as closely. I hadn't realized you were referring to a F5 wager. That is the nature of today's baseball and the way runs are scored nowadays. Less manufactured runs, small ball. More uppercut swings and homers. And the 'stros are definitely built that way but with that said, I have no problem with you calling that a moose or backdoor. That is commonly how it happens though. The 5th inning has become increasingly significant as today's pitchers commonly start to lose their stuff around then. And Kersh has been consistently serving up homers since he came back. So you say backdoor, I say Houston, at home and getting a .5, is/was the correct bet. I also say you don't know d*ck about capping baseball based on the points you are trying to make so you insults are empty. Paper thin like everything you say.
The odds of scoring 3 runs with 2 outs and nobody on is 0.477%. Don’t be dumb Stump.
Scal, i've been very busy with work and haven't been able to folllw the thread as closely. I hadn't realized you were referring to a F5 wager. That is the nature of today's baseball and the way runs are scored nowadays. Less manufactured runs, small ball. More uppercut swings and homers. And the 'stros are definitely built that way but with that said, I have no problem with you calling that a moose or backdoor. That is commonly how it happens though. The 5th inning has become increasingly significant as today's pitchers commonly start to lose their stuff around then. And Kersh has been consistently serving up homers since he came back. So you say backdoor, I say Houston, at home and getting a .5, is/was the correct bet. I also say you don't know d*ck about capping baseball based on the points you are trying to make so you insults are empty. Paper thin like everything you say.
0
Posted:
#1291
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
I literally could have my eyeballs in line with the spikes of an Iron Maiden and wouldn’t bow to a single posting member on this site. So give it up Packers.
I literally could have my eyeballs in line with the spikes of an Iron Maiden and wouldn’t bow to a single posting member on this site. So give it up Packers.
In the words of Howie Manuel....NO DEAL
Its a shame your stubbornness failed you once again.
6-7
6-8
6-9
7-9
7-10
8-10
8-11
8-12
That is what you have to look forward to...then we throw one last party for you 
MAGAm Yisrael Chai
0
Posted:
#1293
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
And yet not a single poster out of 10’s of thousands took Wyoming and refuted my thread or had a legit reason to. I wonder why????
It’s called “Stone Cold Fear” when I post a play ...and you are on the other side....
Actually, my fake news posting friend, there were posters in your thread who both refuted your pick, and said they were on Wyoming.
Here is your thread ... please refer to posts #6, 24, 30, and 36
You put the fear into no one.
In the 10 years you've been on this site you've had 1 decent year and 1 good year, and that somehow allowed you to convince yourself that you know what the hell you are doing.
All of your supporters ... where are they?
You had posted a few times in the mains that you were "taking care of business in the PB" ... so why haven't any of your loyal followers come in here to defend you?
In case you haven't noticed, you have been getting verbally pummeled by almost everyone who posts in this thread.
Do you know why that is?
It's because you are an unlikeable, narcissistic, loud mouthed, know-it-all.
The good news is that you and Gandhi have a mutual internet enemy ... so you got that going for you 
bigreds daddy
0
Posted:
#1294
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
Excuse me. I’ve watched every Wyoming game this year. I know what I am doing. And I bet ON WYOMING THIS YEAR. I’m 1-1 winning WHILE PLAYING Them to cover against Hawaii, a game ironically they SHOULDN’T HAVE COVERED. I type in caps because I am so sick of repeating this!
Secondly, the rules were made for PACKERS. That is why they aren’t detailed.
While I detest him, I know he’ll play the games straight up and he has.
Hugh inserted himself into the competition. And I accepted. And the mistake was not amending the rules to be more aggressive. But I despise the POS so much I jumped at the chance.
And NO I WOULDNT DO WHAT HE IS DOING. Particularly with a lead where it is more than beneficial!
If you've "watched every Wyoming game this year" like you say, then you should know how good that kid QB is, and maybe not to bet against him?
Here's what I'm saying. You've got 4 months, every sport available, and only like 6 picks left. WHY THIS GAME? Why this? You should know as a degenerate - regardless of sport, standings, who's up, who's down, who's hurt, who's not, blah, blah, blah, a divisional rivalry/conference game and under 3 points is basically always a pick 'em with whoever has the ball last.
Ravens/Steelers, Dodgers/Giants, Bulls/Pistons, Packers/Vikings, Cowboys/Giants - - UCLA/USC, Florida/Georgia - - and yes, this game. There's not ANY OTHER GAME in ANY OTHER SPORT that has a little more advantage or angle to it than this one?
Maybe you want to leave on 2/4/18 and you're just putting on a front for this contest so you don't just disappear. It'll be "someone else's fault" "bad beats", etc., etc.....
If that's the case, that's pretty punk-A$$ - but, to each his own.....
Good Luck
0
Posted:
#1296
Raise your hand if you think Scal is in the fetal position during halftime, praying to the gambling gods to spare him yet another vicious backdoor cover by the quarterbackless Broncos...i for sure as heck know he punched another wall with his other hand when that running back did his best Kershaw impersonation with that pick in the endzone....that should have been 21-0 and game over...but that wouldnt be the easy way Scal does things around here...he requires and demands DRAMA 
...cant wait to see the 2nd half Scal 
...its coming...just like winter
...cant wait to see the 2nd half Scal ...its coming...just like winter
MAGAm Yisrael Chai
0
Posted:
#1297
Scal,
I wish you would at least consider bending the knee. I'd hate to see another long time Covers contributer go by the way side. I don't always agree with your picks and race baiting behavior, but this site is really starting to lack the colorful characters that once made this site great. It's nice to have a guy to disagree with in good fun. Bend the knee broham
0
Posted:
#1298
Let's see after the game MBialowas. I will no longer comment on the outcome of these games no matter how big a lead after the greatest 5 inning bad beat in the history of MLB (given the stage of the World Series, and that's not hyperbole).
If we were in a contest 25 years ago, he'd have the Bills down 35-3 to the Oilers against me. That's just what accompanies his picks.
I make picks and win the old fashioned way, I EARN it. (the Missouri bombing of Idaho by 42 being an example).
0
Posted:
#1299
Just to clarify, let's see means, let me see what I will say in general about this game.
NOT Let's see about a knee, which will NEVER happen.
And if anyone here thinks I'm not serious, thinks I will make a fake account, ask them the last time I posted in General Discussion which I said I'd never do again...
I WILL Go. But I can assure you......they will too if they lose.
0
Posted:
#1300
But Colorado State is a must win. Regardless or it's pretty much done. Just get back to .500 and reassess with better picks. They lose, it's pretty much done. I'll play out the string still but my hopes will be crushed. I don't expect them to lose or I wouldn't have risked my account on it.
0
Hot Forum Topics
