Posted:
#1076
Post 1079...
Wow, now youre going to make derogatory comments like that against all Russians?
How is that ok in your books?
MAGAm Yisrael Chai
0
SCALABRINE vs. PACKERSBACKERS - Loser Leaves Covers for Eternity
Posted:
#1081
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
Thanks Big.
Thanks Big. Scal that $$ was found money today,we pay at 5hundo either way and i was -487 to start the day...-38 nowwwwwwwwww
detroit tonite but not with himmmmm....owwww...5 dimes is groovy baby,i thank you and hugh both ,'cause i reasoned that if scal and hugh agree, GET DOWN, so aftwr yeaarrrsssss , i went to 5 dimes and got 100 free for bingo and reduced juice for life..whew doggg>>>lIons tonite for the $$$$,...Momma said so...
bigFnPOO
0
Posted:
#1084
Oh I saw it Big.
Missed extra point. I mean every facet of the game he gets break after break after break.
He'd have to sweat a 6 pt lead but now with 7 the Skins will have to score yet again for him to lose. It's really incredible.
HOW MANY BREAKS can ONE CAPPER GET!
Meanwhile, had you told anyone the Hawks would score 41, they would have taken them in a heartbeat laying 6. Today? Not today....Their defense played as bad as New Mexico. Of course it did.
0
Posted:
#1085
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
What an embarrassment of capping:
What an embarrassment of capping:
I'd literally be blushing at the window to cash a Cowboys ticket after this debacle.
Put me down for a loss in that game and let me keep my integrity, something Hugh will never have.
That's why I always said, it is better to LOSE with Scal on correctly capped plays, then play the junk that is in the forum. And the junk is all here, clear as day.
BWS knows a little bit. That is why I lay off on him with regard to picks. His writing style is equivalent to a 10 year old who doesn't know what a paragraph is but there seems to be some neurons firing somewhere. At least after knowing Penn State would coved. But that's about it. Go to the hockey forum and the guy treats wins like the Israelites treated leprosy.
At least BWS would play straight up. He'd never play two sides trying for a middle with no cash on the line. That is a fu**ing sham, especially when you go 0-3 on the day and that is your only win.
And then to play a no juice middle.
At least Packers, where, when I went to check the score for two low level Bolsheviks (it might have been a squash match for all I know), I was diverted to a Russian bride site and probably got a virus on my PC in the process, played it straight up.
But not Madoff.
This scumbag is playing a reduced juice 5 inning line. After getting called out for a 2 side bet. You'd think there would be honor, even amongst Sodomites.
May the gambling gods rain hellfire on him. Dump the ancient rock oil on his entire roll and set it aflame.
Let me partake in dancing around it with glee with you dear gambling gods.
Let him rot. May this 5 inning pick give him be the pick that ruins him.
I ask this of you dear gambling gods. Bring me Justice. Drop this justice like an anvil on the head of sawdust of Madoff.
I say any -110 pick. HUNDREDS to choose from. He takes a -125 line with a site discount. For shame for shame for shame......
Please Scal...this thread needs a post like this atleast once an hour...come up with another before the Steelers/Lion kickoff...this stuff you write is the best 
MAGAm Yisrael Chai
0
Posted:
#1091
Quote Originally Posted by mbialowas:
Scal, you gotta admit Houston was the right side. They were up pretty much all game
Scal, you gotta admit Houston was the right side. They were up pretty much all game
Yes it was of course. I tailed BB on this one! I liked his thread in the NFL forum.
Plus it was a racially based thread right up my alley.
My pick, my responsibility.
But if you want to tell him I tailed him at least say I like the OP despite the loss. But that of course is up to you.
I can't really do that at the moment!
But this pick hurt. 6-7 is putting me in a major hole. pretty much making my next two must wins or I will be leaving.
0
Posted:
#1094
Quote Originally Posted by GimmeMoneyNow:
Question:
If all parties hit their allotted 20 before 2/4/18 (which looks to be the case) is the loser/losers still allowed to stay on Covers and keep posting until that date? Or is it an instantaneous departure once the 20 is reached?
Thank you
We all stay until the Super Bowl.
Since no one did it I am clarifying it now.
0
Posted:
#1096
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
So in a game where th skins are going to go up 16-7
So in a game where th skins are going to go up 16-7
Here is Hugh Jorgan’s first rate capping:
Their past 4 series:
Washington lines up for a FG blocked and returned to the 3 TD Dallas.
Fumble in Wash territory - FG Dallas
Fumble in awash Terioty - FG Dallas
Literally gained 30 yards on all three series. 13 points
Very selective recap there, buddy.
How about pointing out that the Cowboys fumbled on their first play, gifting the Skins 3 points without even making a 1st down?
How about pointing out that the Cowboys kicker missed his first FG attempt?
How about pointing out that huge penalties called on the Cowboys which not only wiped out big plays, even a TD, but was the biggest reason that Washington was in the game?
Ya see, my whiny friend, anyone who watched that game recognized that Dallas was the better team.
Go back to your New Mexico/Wyoming thread and keep criticizing the guys who bet Wyoming as not having a clue ... Wyoming was winning 42-0 at the half!!!
bigreds daddy
0
Posted:
#1100
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
I say any -110 pick. HUNDREDS to choose from. He takes a -125 line with a site discount. For shame for shame for shame......
Actually, my delusional amigo, "reduced juice" is 5 cents, not 15 cents.
If you take a peek now you will see that the reduced juice line on the Astros +1/2, first 5 innings has been bet up to -125.
You bet Wyoming at -2, and by kickoff they were +2.
I bet Astros 1st 5 at -110, and then it goes to -125.
Who were you saying had the silent lurkers?
Who did you say moved lines?
That's right, your king, HUGH JORGAN!!!
bigreds daddy
0
Hot Forum Topics
