Posted:
#1051
I would trust Poo if need be, among a very select few others here, and they all know who they are 
MAGAm Yisrael Chai
0
SCALABRINE vs. PACKERSBACKERS - Loser Leaves Covers for Eternity
Posted:
#1053
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
Yes I DID state 20 units in the play. And I’ve said THAT 10,00 times too! and if your point is you want me to use UNITS, I’m WAY up.
your way up at Under 50% for year, well done.Yes I DID state 20 units in the play. And I’ve said THAT 10,00 times too! and if your point is you want me to use UNITS, I’m WAY up.
SO KEEP pushing the issue. You only make me look better!
Your meltdown last night says everything that needs to be said about you. You were wrong and said 4 of 5 star play when it was complete dud you make excuses and attack who ever might have been on winning side. Turnovers happen, move on.
Max Miller a great member of congress!
0
Posted:
#1054
Quote Originally Posted by benhogan76:
so if I bet a fav of -180 and lose it equals a win at EV as the same?
so if I bet a fav of -180 and lose it equals a win at EV as the same?
.... if i pick a fav of -180 and share with site, i say ... example here... " Colorad st. -240 m.l" ... they lose..."i say Jets +250 m.l" they win,(vsMiami) Now,i dont tell you how much to bet. but i was 1-1 with you. i hope this helps clarify things in my world.bigFnPOO
0
Posted:
#1055
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
No thanks Gimmee.
No thanks Gimmee.
You are proposing that I PM them with my picks and they’d deliver them honestly?
There is literally NO ONE on this ENTIRE SITE, that they’d propose that I’d even trust with ONE CENT of my roll.
Stop asking me to trust Sodomites!
Who said anything about money? I'm simply talking about picks for this contest if someone happens to get banned before 2/4/18.....
I also said you guys could find an impartial third party. Now, if there is absolutely NO ONE on this ENTIRE SITE you could trust to do that, what does that say about you? I guess that question was answered when you called everyone here "Sodomites".....
0
Posted:
#1057
Poo , would you say one pick was LARGE, other pick was just a pick? I could careless what anyone puts on any game and if you choose to bet more then you can handle it is on you not person who posted plays but feeling need to add 4 of 5 stars is him wanting to be able call back on it.
Max Miller a great member of congress!
0
Posted:
#1059
Quote Originally Posted by daphenom:
My 2 cents ... even if packers was to remain banned or somehow gets banned again his 9 wins count .
My 2 cents ... even if packers was to remain banned or somehow gets banned again his 9 wins count .
Scalabitchhhh trying to make up rules in middle of contest .
If Scalabitchhhhh fails to reach 9 wins .. he goes bye bye , go write novels for a living that’s all your good for .
Bingo bango...historical data suggests Scal is a 40% lifetime capper here in 11 years of plays...that means be is going to hit 8 correct darts out of 20...this competition was over the moment either Hugh or I hit 9.
MAGAm Yisrael Chai
0
Posted:
#1061
Quote Originally Posted by benhogan76:
Poo , would you say one pick was LARGE, other pick was just a pick? I could careless what anyone puts on any game and if you choose to bet more then you can handle it is on you not person who posted plays but feeling need to add 4 of 5 stars is him wanting to be able call back on it.
Poo , would you say one pick was LARGE, other pick was just a pick? I could careless what anyone puts on any game and if you choose to bet more then you can handle it is on you not person who posted plays but feeling need to add 4 of 5 stars is him wanting to be able call back on it.
No a pick is a pick is a pick, no 1 2 3 4 5 50 star plays,,,thats balderdash...that is called "plunging" on Lex. ave...a plunger bets 100, next game 200 then 300 the guys a crook so he got $$, then he go 750, then he bet 2k, then 5k..then he go busto,, = a Plunger, I will say Jets +250, colts +12, GB -240... i cannot keep my own books if it wasnt for books excellent bkkping systems... you keep your books,i keep mine. I give you, not tout,or expect compensation... after a month of seeing/hearing me make my picks..youknow whether im a winner or a loser, dont let the bad enunciation and harsh tone bs you, im ok sports bettor or my ppl and gf woulda quit on me..i handle a huge load son,, i tell you saints -440 today with the over 42.5 in colts gm and then cap it off with atl -245 ml... i bet 147.72/ish to get 314ish.. then i got 50 on dallas -2.. had a 100bean RR ..colora st -10 boo! utsa-15.5 and Ga-14... plus each a 100/90.90 strt... i this second typing you,have no fkn clue as how i did, this is not including 5dimes, i know i scopped a few 5$ parlays i see now for 39 bux... 107.50 for BC m.l! over fla st! wow.. so , to sum it up..i gave you my piks, howd i do? fkn co st,how they lose to air force man at home bro.
bigFnPOO
0
Posted:
#1068
So in a game where th skins are going to go up 16-7
Here is Hugh Jorgan’s first rate capping:
Their past 4 series:
Washington lines up for a FG blocked and returned to the 3 TD Dallas.
Fumble in Wash territory - FG Dallas
Fumble in awash Terioty - FG Dallas
Literally gained 30 yards on all three series. 13 points
My game?
1st and Goal on the 3 twice - 6 points
Fu**ing joke of a Capper
A guy picking a reduced juice 5 innings line that I didn’t think someone would stoop to and picking both sides of one game.
How can Covers have turned into this?
What a shi*hole of a site this has become because of the festering soars in this PBox.
Wow. I know why so many have left voluntarily!
0
Posted:
#1070
uhhh i didnt ride wif hugh,but i got dallas -125 on 5dimes and -2 here. i actually switched to dallas ...i had liked wash all week, but friday i was playing holdem with a kid ,had a dallas shirt on, well mannered, good character and then i saw his card holder was a purple heart, and i said go with Dallas Poopoo... so here we are...follow the signs i always said.
bigFnPOO
0
Posted:
#1071
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
So in a game where th skins are going to go up 16-7
So in a game where th skins are going to go up 16-7
Here is Hugh Jorgan’s first rate capping:
Their past 4 series:
Washington lines up for a FG blocked and returned to the 3 TD Dallas.
Fumble in Wash territory - FG Dallas
Fumble in awash Terioty - FG Dallas
Literally gained 30 yards on all three series. 13 points
My game?
1st and Goal on the 3 twice - 6 points
Fu**ing joke of a Capper
A guy picking a reduced juice 5 innings line that I didn’t think someone would stoop to and picking both sides of one game.
How can Covers have turned into this?
What a shi*hole of a site this has become because of the festering soars in this PBox.
Wow. I know why so many have left voluntarily!
0
Posted:
#1072
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
So in a game where th skins are going to go up 16-7
So in a game where th skins are going to go up 16-7
Here is Hugh Jorgan’s first rate capping:
Their past 4 series:
Washington lines up for a FG blocked and returned to the 3 TD Dallas.
Fumble in Wash territory - FG Dallas
Fumble in awash Terioty - FG Dallas
Literally gained 30 yards on all three series. 13 points
My game?
1st and Goal on the 3 twice - 6 points
Fu**ing joke of a Capper
A guy picking a reduced juice 5 innings line that I didn’t think someone would stoop to and picking both sides of one game.
How can Covers have turned into this?
What a shi*hole of a site this has become because of the festering soars in this PBox.
Wow. I know why so many have left voluntarily!
You are one of those guys who think you have superpowers, and by staring at your tv screen you are going to influence the outcome of a sporting event, arent you?
Please scal...stick to what you know....HOT DOGS!!!
MAGAm Yisrael Chai
0
Posted:
#1074
What an embarrassment of capping:
I'd literally be blushing at the window to cash a Cowboys ticket after this debacle.
Put me down for a loss in that game and let me keep my integrity, something Hugh will never have.
That's why I always said, it is better to LOSE with Scal on correctly capped plays, then play the junk that is in the forum. And the junk is all here, clear as day.
BWS knows a little bit. That is why I lay off on him with regard to picks. His writing style is equivalent to a 10 year old who doesn't know what a paragraph is but there seems to be some neurons firing somewhere. At least after knowing Penn State would coved. But that's about it. Go to the hockey forum and the guy treats wins like the Israelites treated leprosy.
At least BWS would play straight up. He'd never play two sides trying for a middle with no cash on the line. That is a fu**ing sham, especially when you go 0-3 on the day and that is your only win.
And then to play a no juice middle.
At least Packers, where, when I went to check the score for two low level Bolsheviks (it might have been a squash match for all I know), I was diverted to a Russian bride site and probably got a virus on my PC in the process, played it straight up.
But not Madoff.
This scumbag is playing a reduced juice 5 inning line. After getting called out for a 2 side bet. You'd think there would be honor, even amongst Sodomites.
May the gambling gods rain hellfire on him. Dump the ancient rock oil on his entire roll and set it aflame.
Let me partake in dancing around it with glee with you dear gambling gods.
Let him rot. May this 5 inning pick give him be the pick that ruins him.
I ask this of you dear gambling gods. Bring me Justice. Drop this justice like an anvil on the head of sawdust of Madoff.
I say any -110 pick. HUNDREDS to choose from. He takes a -125 line with a site discount. For shame for shame for shame......
0
Hot Forum Topics
