Posted:
#326
Scal Pick #7
Tennessee -2.5 over South Carolina
0
SCALABRINE vs. PACKERSBACKERS - Loser Leaves Covers for Eternity
Posted:
#327
Quote Originally Posted by packersbackers:
Even more remarkable is your hot 3-3 start after 6.
I.....
Can't.....
Why would a 3-3 record in a 6 game sample be 'remarkable'? It's six games. What did you expect 6-0
and nothing less? The only two other results that are reasonable are 5-1 and 4-2. And as I said for the 10,000th time that you keep ignoring, I played 2.5 quarters with a QB who shouldn't play for a junior college in Detmer. So much so, they trotted out Mangum this week and he's clearly about 50%. Which they saw as a BETTER option than the QB that HAD to come in in my game.
and nothing less? The only two other results that are reasonable are 5-1 and 4-2. And as I said for the 10,000th time that you keep ignoring, I played 2.5 quarters with a QB who shouldn't play for a junior college in Detmer. So much so, they trotted out Mangum this week and he's clearly about 50%. Which they saw as a BETTER option than the QB that HAD to come in in my game.I'm sure it's all whining and what not. Suit yourself. You're leaving the site.
You clearly don't know what you are doing.
0
Posted:
#329
Quote Originally Posted by packersbackers:
Omg you and your vagina still havent gotten over your BYU loss?
Omg you and your vagina still havent gotten over your BYU loss?
Wow man, get help with your life after February 4th 2018...you will have alot of time to reassess your life once you are no longer here...defeated by the peoples champ Pack 
Amazing how you dont hear a peep about all my bad beats..."i should be 9-3" is exactly how you would be spinning this if you were me...you have zero chance in winning this cap off...the sooner you realize that, the sooner you can begin rebuilding your life, online and off 
No I don't have 'my vagina hurt' (high school insults...sheesh).
YOU were the one who said it was 'remarkable' to be 3-3 after 6. This coming from someone who is 6-6 after 12 btw. It takes stones and stupidity to say it folks.
So I said I could easily be 4-2. That was it. No one is hurt. That's 50% to 66% in one game that you think is 'remarkable'.
Again, you are leaving the site. End of story.
0
Posted:
#337
Ok whatever you say.
I'm so meager at capping that Hugh is forever confined to the PB for what reason? Why do you think he's in here? He's here because he just couldn't stop talking shi* about my threads IN MY threads.
So the mods clearly value me. I bring content, picks and mucho eyeballs to this site. Conversation. Debate. Controversy and passion. I'm like a one-act play where the ending is when you get your money's worth.
You're ...not that. And Hugh most certainly is not that.
But you go ahead and keep using insults I've used against BWS to come after me. It's only, ya know, my material (i.e., verbal diarreah).
0
Posted:
#338
Quote Originally Posted by packersbackers:
You are so delusional that you actually believe you coinphrased or have trademarked certain expressions used constantly here? Grow up kid, you are nothing special here, except a 6 foot long turd that has backed up the covers handicapped toilet for the past decade...thank goodness for the peoples champ Pack to take it upon himself and flush you out of here once and for all
You are so delusional that you actually believe you coinphrased or have trademarked certain expressions used constantly here? Grow up kid, you are nothing special here, except a 6 foot long turd that has backed up the covers handicapped toilet for the past decade...thank goodness for the peoples champ Pack to take it upon himself and flush you out of here once and for all
I'm guessing 5'9" in heels....
0
Posted:
#340
Again, you always make provocative statements about me (you're so delusional, in part for claiming Hugh is here because Mods value me, which lends itself to the idea I actually contribute meaningful content here, which then lends itself to the point of how little you matter, since you contribute virtually nothing)...
Then when you get called out on it and I specifically address the provocation, your response always strays from your entire point ("I could care less!")
If you could care less, you wouldn't be here challenging me nor responding to me nor making false claims. You're a posting conundrum.
0
Posted:
#344
Do you think, after being challenged by me, that a single poster of worth here would support you in saying I SHOULD cap tennis ONLY????
I said you could make ALL your picks tennis if desired! But you can't make ME have a cap off with Tennis only as my selections.
NO ONE would agree to that and not a single poster has supported you when you offered that!!! And I STILL ask ONE poster to come forward and say that is a reasonable offer for a cap off where loser leaves the site forever!!!
0
Posted:
#345
Quote Originally Posted by idle_havoc:
Normally don't give a crap about these types of challenges but I will say there's 2 out of the 3 posters here in this cap-off that I would not miss at all if they were to never post again!
Normally don't give a crap about these types of challenges but I will say there's 2 out of the 3 posters here in this cap-off that I would not miss at all if they were to never post again!
I'm confident enough in my posting worth to know I'm not one of those two
0
Posted:
#348
Olympic qualifier ping-pong? Fact is, net sports don't translate well to a contest like this. Baseball either. Football and basketball because you go -110 bets across the board. A more thought out way for this contest to proceed would've been hypothetical bankroll, winner has the most loot. Then you could've bet tennis, soccer...UFC...WWF...whatever. You guys went for it in the simplest terms and I respect it. Makes it easier for the rest of us following in. May the best man (or whomever sucks the least, as it may be) win. Right now it's anybody's game.
R.I.P. #94 MARSHAWN KNEELAND - DC4L
0
Hot Forum Topics
