wrong? So you think every sportsbook has the same odds? You think VIP players in Vegas gets the same line as all the other books out there? shut the fuck you idiot.
If the Celtics were +300 in any book, then yes there is NO chance the Lakers series price ANYWHERE would of been -250. Sportsbooks can not set themselves up where someone could guarantee themself money with no risk by taking -250 and +300.
So while the lines are not exactly the same, there is NO CHANCE any book had Lakers -250 after game 3. None. None. None.
0
Quote Originally Posted by SuperiorInsight:
wrong? So you think every sportsbook has the same odds? You think VIP players in Vegas gets the same line as all the other books out there? shut the fuck you idiot.
If the Celtics were +300 in any book, then yes there is NO chance the Lakers series price ANYWHERE would of been -250. Sportsbooks can not set themselves up where someone could guarantee themself money with no risk by taking -250 and +300.
So while the lines are not exactly the same, there is NO CHANCE any book had Lakers -250 after game 3. None. None. None.
If the Celtics were +300 in any book, then yes there is NO chance the Lakers series price ANYWHERE would of been -250. Sportsbooks can not set themselves up where someone could guarantee themself money with no risk by taking -250 and +300.
So while the lines are not exactly the same, there is NO CHANCE any book had Lakers -250 after game 3. None. None. None.
you think your some kind of sports genius. I'll offer the same challenge I did to ice. Lets escrow 10k and bet 100 games in MLB, NFL, NBA, College football. best record 100 games ATS. I'm offically calling you out. Please dont talk a big game and back down.
0
Quote Originally Posted by rangerz2478:
If the Celtics were +300 in any book, then yes there is NO chance the Lakers series price ANYWHERE would of been -250. Sportsbooks can not set themselves up where someone could guarantee themself money with no risk by taking -250 and +300.
So while the lines are not exactly the same, there is NO CHANCE any book had Lakers -250 after game 3. None. None. None.
you think your some kind of sports genius. I'll offer the same challenge I did to ice. Lets escrow 10k and bet 100 games in MLB, NFL, NBA, College football. best record 100 games ATS. I'm offically calling you out. Please dont talk a big game and back down.
you think your some kind of sports genius. I'll offer the same challenge I did to ice. Lets escrow 10k and bet 100 games in MLB, NFL, NBA, College football. best record 100 games ATS. I'm offically calling you out. Please dont talk a big game and back down.
I have not once claimed to be a great game by game bettor. Those who know me on this site know I make most (90%) of my sports gambling money on future bets. And when it comes to future bets, I will blow your ass out of the water with my eyes closed.
0
Quote Originally Posted by SuperiorInsight:
you think your some kind of sports genius. I'll offer the same challenge I did to ice. Lets escrow 10k and bet 100 games in MLB, NFL, NBA, College football. best record 100 games ATS. I'm offically calling you out. Please dont talk a big game and back down.
I have not once claimed to be a great game by game bettor. Those who know me on this site know I make most (90%) of my sports gambling money on future bets. And when it comes to future bets, I will blow your ass out of the water with my eyes closed.
you think your some kind of sports genius. I'll offer the same challenge I did to ice. Lets escrow 10k and bet 100 games in MLB, NFL, NBA, College football. best record 100 games ATS. I'm offically calling you out. Please dont talk a big game and back down.
Meanwhile you managed to dodge my point. Are you claiming the Lakers were -250 after game 3 ANYWHERE? Yes or no? If your answer is yes, you are wrong. 100%. Dead. Wrong.
0
Quote Originally Posted by SuperiorInsight:
you think your some kind of sports genius. I'll offer the same challenge I did to ice. Lets escrow 10k and bet 100 games in MLB, NFL, NBA, College football. best record 100 games ATS. I'm offically calling you out. Please dont talk a big game and back down.
Meanwhile you managed to dodge my point. Are you claiming the Lakers were -250 after game 3 ANYWHERE? Yes or no? If your answer is yes, you are wrong. 100%. Dead. Wrong.
I have not once claimed to be a great game by game bettor. Those who know me on this site know I make most (90%) of my sports gambling money on future bets. And when it comes to future bets, I will blow your ass out of the water with my eyes closed.
Lets see, I called Florida NCCB, LSU NCCF, Steelers twice, Ducks NHL, Blackhawks NHL, and Yankess last year. All of this within the last 5 years. Alll for around 80k. I will admit I lost around 15 to 20k. Yeah you really will blow me out of the waters
0
Quote Originally Posted by rangerz2478:
I have not once claimed to be a great game by game bettor. Those who know me on this site know I make most (90%) of my sports gambling money on future bets. And when it comes to future bets, I will blow your ass out of the water with my eyes closed.
Lets see, I called Florida NCCB, LSU NCCF, Steelers twice, Ducks NHL, Blackhawks NHL, and Yankess last year. All of this within the last 5 years. Alll for around 80k. I will admit I lost around 15 to 20k. Yeah you really will blow me out of the waters
Meanwhile you managed to dodge my point. Are you claiming the Lakers were -250 after game 3 ANYWHERE? Yes or no? If your answer is yes, you are wrong. 100%. Dead. Wrong.
Ok I'll give you -270 at the most. It was -270 and im willing to bet that if you want
0
Quote Originally Posted by rangerz2478:
Meanwhile you managed to dodge my point. Are you claiming the Lakers were -250 after game 3 ANYWHERE? Yes or no? If your answer is yes, you are wrong. 100%. Dead. Wrong.
Ok I'll give you -270 at the most. It was -270 and im willing to bet that if you want
Who cares what the Celtics were. I'm just talking about the Lakers were man
Let me ask you an extremely simple question...
KNOWING the online series prices were in the -330/+300 range, do you think there was a sportsbook out there STUPID enough to allow Lakers -250? If your answer is yes, you know one fucking retarded sportsbook.
0
Quote Originally Posted by SuperiorInsight:
Who cares what the Celtics were. I'm just talking about the Lakers were man
Let me ask you an extremely simple question...
KNOWING the online series prices were in the -330/+300 range, do you think there was a sportsbook out there STUPID enough to allow Lakers -250? If your answer is yes, you know one fucking retarded sportsbook.
KNOWING the online series prices were in the -330/+300 range, do you think there was a sportsbook out there STUPID enough to allow Lakers -250? If your answer is yes, you know one fucking retarded sportsbook.
He's already admitted of having to paying too much juice...so the retarded bad credit sportsbook is all he can play...
0
Quote Originally Posted by rangerz2478:
Let me ask you an extremely simple question...
KNOWING the online series prices were in the -330/+300 range, do you think there was a sportsbook out there STUPID enough to allow Lakers -250? If your answer is yes, you know one fucking retarded sportsbook.
He's already admitted of having to paying too much juice...so the retarded bad credit sportsbook is all he can play...
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.