Posted:
#26
Another chicken dinner for me, another loss by Hustleman. NBA, its fannnnnntastic
0
***Kobe "The Fraud" Bryant appreciation
nice one 
Posted:
#34
Quote Originally Posted by hustle_man:
Sorry... Thats 9-23-2 ATS in their last 34.
Funny how this fact is presented without the acknowledgement Luke Walton missed most of those games. As if its all down to Kobe's failure as a player. How important is he (Walton) compared to Odom this season?
LA this season without Odom playing, but with Kobe and Walton playing, is 15-13 SU & 11-12-3 ATS (opening lines).
LA this season without Walton playing, but with Odom playing (remember everyone, Odom is hustle's love muse), is 7-10 SU & 7-10 ATS (opening lines).
During this same stretch, LA without both Odom & Walton? 0-5 SU & 1-4 ATS. I'm not even mentioning the inujury to Radmanovic.
Questions -
How well exactly is a team largely disrupted by ongoing injuries meant to do in the toughest of the 2 Conferences?
And how pathetic is someone reaching for injury hit figures to justify his hate of 1 player?
How much of a joke is such misuse of said figures?
BTW, How is Mike Vick enjoying that Super Bowl win he was meant to achieve before Peyton Manning managed said same feat?
LMFAO
0
Posted:
#35
Quote Originally Posted by BetCrimes1984:
Funny how this fact is presented without the acknowledgement Luke Walton missed most of those games. As if its all down to Kobe's failure as a player. How important is he (Walton) compared to Odom this season?
LA this season without Odom playing, but with Kobe and Walton playing, is 15-13 SU & 11-12-3 ATS (opening lines).
LA this season without Walton playing, but with Odom playing (remember everyone, Odom is hustle's love muse), is 7-10 SU & 7-10 ATS (opening lines).
During this same stretch, LA without both Odom & Walton? 0-5 SU & 1-4 ATS. I'm not even mentioning the inujury to Radmanovic.
Questions -
How well exactly is a team largely disrupted by ongoing injuries meant to do in the toughest of the 2 Conferences?
And how pathetic is someone reaching for injury hit figures to justify his hate of 1 player?
How much of a joke is such misuse of said figures?
BTW, How is Mike Vick enjoying that Super Bowl win he was meant to achieve before Peyton Manning managed said same feat?
LMFAO
Exactly. No point in presenting facts to this individual. He just disappears in hopes it dies.
0
Posted:
#38
Quote Originally Posted by hustle_man:
The point is... The more Bryant shoots it, the more the opposition's chances of winning the game increase.
Let's watch tonight's game and see if the trend will continue.
Since I last posted... The trend continued and what happens? The Lakers almost lose twice... Failing to cover the spread last night at home against Golden State. Almost losing at home to a team that had a horrid .228 winning percentage on the road.
Good thing that one of the scrubs on the team was 8-11 from the field and 8-10 from the free throw line with 25 points 19 rebounds and 4 steals or the Lakers would've blew it.
By the way... How does a guy go 46 minutes dominating the ball without an assist? 
Make that 10-24-2 ATS 
0
Posted:
#39
Quote Originally Posted by westcoastTrojan:
Another chicken dinner for me, another loss by Hustleman. NBA, its fannnnnntastic
Well when you're losing at the rate you have been, only hitting 10 of your last 36 bets, I guess all you can afford is a bucket of chicken from KFC.
Sorry fella but I didnt bet either of those games, and didnt state I was in this thread,. Just pointing out to covers who the NBA's true "money player" is 
0
Posted:
#40
Quote Originally Posted by BetCrimes1984:
Funny how this fact is presented without the acknowledgement Luke Walton missed most of those games. As if its all down to Kobe's failure as a player. How important is he (Walton) compared to Odom this season?
LOL... It's so much backtracking and deceit in this thread I dont know where to start. (InDebt)Crimes proving once again you cant win off of the stats... Let's see what other misinformation he presents...
LA this season without Odom playing, but with Kobe and Walton playing, is 15-13 SU & 11-12-3 ATS (opening lines).
LOL... Getting hyped up over winning 53% of games and a LOSING ATS record? Why dont you post for covers what the team's record WITHOUT Bryant is... SU and ATS
LA this season without Walton playing, but with Odom playing (remember everyone, Odom is hustle's love muse), is 7-10 SU & 7-10 ATS (opening lines).
So that would prove that Walton is more important than Bryant right? Because the common theme here is that. Post what the Lakers record this year is without Odom in the lineup ATS and SU?
12-14 (oncee again posting another LOSING season without Odom - just like I promised would happen) and even worse ATS 11-14-1 ( But then again 44% is better than 41%)
During this same stretch, LA without both Odom & Walton? 0-5 SU & 1-4 ATS. I'm not even mentioning the inujury to Radmanovic.
I wonder how many of those games Bryant played in?
How well exactly is a team largely disrupted by ongoing injuries meant to do in the toughest of the 2 Conferences?
LOL... Outside of the Western Conference elite the Western conference is not much better than the East. and last I checked, the west could pad their record against weak teams like the Hornets, Grizzlies, Trailblazers, the entire Pacific division, etc.
And how pathetic is someone reaching for injury hit figures to justify his hate of 1 player?
No hate, I post factual information. Your love for another man is why you cant see the truth. And I thought you were a stats guru?
How much of a joke is such misuse of said figures?
Not as bad as the information you intentionally omitted. I wonder why? Oh yeah, because I would have been proven correct in everything I've said about the Lakers. (Which isnt a surprise)
BTW, How is Mike Vick enjoying that Super Bowl win he was meant to achieve before Peyton Manning managed said same feat?
Vick's team is no where near as good as the Colts. But I acknowledged before the game I hoped that the Colts would win it for DUNGY. But you're right, I was wrong on that account... Just like you were wrong about the Mavericks last year in the NBA, the Cardinals MLB, the Tigers vs. the Yankees in MLB, Ohio State in the BCS bowl and countless other series. 
I wonder why? You'll get enough of laying chalk in championship series kid 
0
Posted:
#41
Why dont you post for covers what the team's record WITHOUT Bryant is... SU and ATS
LA this season without Kobe, on the road, is 0-2 S & ATS
LA this season without Kobe, at home, is 3-0 SU & ATS
If you cant win on the road in the NBA, you are going nowhere fast. So looks like you fall flat with your mindless parroting. Countless teams win at home without star players, thats why its called home advantage.
3-2 SU doesnt compare to LA's (actual) 13-9 SU & 10-10-2 ATS record with Kobe & Walton but no Odom (I posted the wrong figures (late at night/sheet mix up - obvious when the ATS total of 26 games didnt add up to the SU total of 28 games. But when you're not interested in real figures anyway that slips by, eh). NOT 53%, its 59%. Close enough to 60%, a winning percentage all of 2 teams in the Eastern Conf have (or better) at this time (DET & CLE, while at the same time 5 Western teams have a winning % of 60% or more. For those among us who cant count, thats more than twice as many as the East has (and extends outside the elite trio of PHX, DAL & SAS. Or is your use of excusuing the Elite from the superior Conf assertion going to extend into multi digit amount of teams if necessary (should any more teams get their marks up to 60%+?). And all those other Western teams get extra contests against those 5 teams as what Eastern teams do vs their magnificent duo (The East actually has 2 whiole division without a team winning at least 60% of their games. Damn having those pesky Western sides on one's season schedule, otherwise they might actually hve had a chance of doing so.)
). And all those other Western teams get extra contests against those 5 teams as what Eastern teams do vs their magnificent duo (The East actually has 2 whiole division without a team winning at least 60% of their games. Damn having those pesky Western sides on one's season schedule, otherwise they might actually hve had a chance of doing so.)the Cardinals MLB, the Tigers vs. the Yankees in MLB, Ohio State in the BCS bowl and countless other series.
I love it when your lies are so transparent. Every at this site familiar with me, and w=elsewhere, kknows I do not bet college spports, any sport. I couldnt have begun to have an opinion on ANY college bowl game because I have no idea about it at all. I wouldnt know how many conferences there are, let alone who to bet at anytime. I simply dont care. I have my own national regional sports to interest my betting attention when the 4 major American ones hold nothing of appeal for me to bet on. In following on from this most basic of facts, it is quite contrary to the reality you assert that I took a position on the BCS Bowl game. Once again posters here can see the true nature of this joke of covers.
As for the Cardinals, I made my postion known I felt Detroit would win, that (1) didnt stop me from not betting the Tigers to win the series (since I dont eat that futures chalk, so this line You'll get enough of laying chalk in championship series kid is simply more wayward playing with the truth. No mention, also of my getting +1100 for Houston to win the National league pennant in 05, posted on covers? oh dear, such value wouldnt serve your need to somehow paint, with your college BCS bullshit, my somehow being a chalk square) and (2) stop me betting the Cardinals in games 4 & 5. And why you bring up the Tigers/Yanks, just like the BCS bullshit, I have no idea. I didnt place a side bet in that series (in fact I wasnt even at this site, so going back to my cardinal opnion, for you to have known that meant youre visiting a certain other site. Its founders will geta chuckle over that one when I tell them such.).
You need to learn the difference between truth and lies/self serving stories
0
Posted:
#42
Quote Originally Posted by hustle_man:
Well when you're losing at the rate you have been, only hitting 10 of your last 36 bets, I guess all you can afford is a bucket of chicken from KFC.
Sorry fella but I didnt bet either of those games, and didnt state I was in this thread,. Just pointing out to covers who the NBA's true "money player" is
Where do you get your facts from? I NEVER post my picks stupid! Making up something again? Pathetic.
0
Posted:
#43
Quote Originally Posted by BetCrimes1984:
Why dont you post for covers what the team's record WITHOUT Bryant is... SU and ATS
LA this season without Kobe, on the road, is 0-2 S & ATS
LA this season without Kobe, at home, is 3-0 SU & ATS
If you cant win on the road in the NBA, you are going nowhere fast. So looks like you fall flat with your mindless parroting. Countless teams win at home without star players, thats why its called home advantage.
3-2 SU doesnt compare to LA's (actual) 13-9 SU & 10-10-2 ATS record with Kobe & Walton but no Odom (I posted the wrong figures (late at night/sheet mix up - obvious when the ATS total of 26 games didnt add up to the SU total of 28 games. But when you're not interested in real figures anyway that slips by, eh). NOT 53%, its 59%. Close enough to 60%, a winning percentage all of 2 teams in the Eastern Conf have (or better) at this time (DET & CLE, while at the same time 5 Western teams have a winning % of 60% or more. For those among us who cant count, thats more than twice as many as the East has (and extends outside the elite trio of PHX, DAL & SAS. Or is your use of excusuing the Elite from the superior Conf assertion going to extend into multi digit amount of teams if necessary (should any more teams get their marks up to 60%+?). And all those other Western teams get extra contests against those 5 teams as what Eastern teams do vs their magnificent duo (The East actually has 2 whiole division without a team winning at least 60% of their games. Damn having those pesky Western sides on one's season schedule, otherwise they might actually hve had a chance of doing so.)
). And all those other Western teams get extra contests against those 5 teams as what Eastern teams do vs their magnificent duo (The East actually has 2 whiole division without a team winning at least 60% of their games. Damn having those pesky Western sides on one's season schedule, otherwise they might actually hve had a chance of doing so.)the Cardinals MLB, the Tigers vs. the Yankees in MLB, Ohio State in the BCS bowl and countless other series.
I love it when your lies are so transparent. Every at this site familiar with me, and w=elsewhere, kknows I do not bet college spports, any sport. I couldnt have begun to have an opinion on ANY college bowl game because I have no idea about it at all. I wouldnt know how many conferences there are, let alone who to bet at anytime. I simply dont care. I have my own national regional sports to interest my betting attention when the 4 major American ones hold nothing of appeal for me to bet on. In following on from this most basic of facts, it is quite contrary to the reality you assert that I took a position on the BCS Bowl game. Once again posters here can see the true nature of this joke of covers.
As for the Cardinals, I made my postion known I felt Detroit would win, that (1) didnt stop me from not betting the Tigers to win the series (since I dont eat that futures chalk, so this line You'll get enough of laying chalk in championship series kid is simply more wayward playing with the truth. No mention, also of my getting +1100 for Houston to win the National league pennant in 05, posted on covers? oh dear, such value wouldnt serve your need to somehow paint, with your college BCS bullshit, my somehow being a chalk square) and (2) stop me betting the Cardinals in games 4 & 5. And why you bring up the Tigers/Yanks, just like the BCS bullshit, I have no idea. I didnt place a side bet in that series (in fact I wasnt even at this site, so going back to my cardinal opnion, for you to have known that meant youre visiting a certain other site. Its founders will geta chuckle over that one when I tell them such.).
You need to learn the difference between truth and lies/self serving stories
No sense in fighting him BetCrimes. This guy is an idiot. He loves to show some facts, such as what the Laker record was without Kobe during the past few yearsm which therefore meant the Lakers were better without Kobe, but when I post the fact that Miami is 11-3 without Wade this year, and Cleveland is 9-2 (3-0 this year) without Lebron, he runs for cover. I think people are realizing the true fraud he is.
0
Posted:
#44
Quote Originally Posted by BetCrimes1984:
LA this season without Kobe, on the road, is 1-2 S & ATS
LA this season without Kobe, at home, is 2-0 SU & ATS
*My ESPN printed sheet had LA's 2nd game of the season at home vs GDS when I printed it in October of last year, hence my slight error. The subsequent observation still stands.
Westcoast, many a messageboard is witness to those who think their modicum of Xs & Os knowledge of a sport makes them the next coming of (in this case) Red Auerbach. Yet they can't (again in this instance) identify the influence a venue setting would have on a team minus its best player, and as a result misread the figures in play as meaning something they don't. Boggles the mind really. Of course LA is going to have a better record at home vs on the road when they're without Kobe. Another prime example that witnesses this fact is Seattle. 5-3 SU at home minus Ray Allen, 0-6 SU on the road without him. Teams cope better at home than they do on the road sans their best player.
0
Posted:
#45
Quote Originally Posted by BetCrimes1984:
*My ESPN printed sheet had LA's 2nd game of the season at home vs GDS when I printed it in October of last year, hence my slight error. The subsequent observation still stands.
Westcoast, many a messageboard is witness to those who think their modicum of Xs & Os knowledge of a sport makes them the next coming of (in this case) Red Auerbach. Yet they can't (again in this instance) identify the influence a venue setting would have on a team minus its best player, and as a result misread the figures in play as meaning something they don't. Boggles the mind really. Of course LA is going to have a better record at home vs on the road when they're without Kobe. Another prime example that witnesses this fact is Seattle. 5-3 SU at home minus Ray Allen, 0-6 SU on the road without him. Teams cope better at home than they do on the road sans their best player.
Absolutely dead on. This guy likes to say we are the clueless ones, even when top personnel in the league think the way we do. He's like a child who won;t let go and believe Santa is fake. 
0
Posted:
#48
Quote Originally Posted by westcoastTrojan:
Where do you get your facts from? I NEVER post my picks stupid! Making up something again? Pathetic.
LOL... It is pathetic isnt it? Now you know how I feel listening to 100% of your posts.
Especially your "top personnel" in the NBA quote. LOL what a moron you are sir.
As far as Bet Crimes, he cant even post data correctly, let alone bring valid arguments. He's more emotionally charged than tangerinelime hence all of his contradictions. Stick to posting stats in baseball, because you're in over your head on this one. LOL @ guys like BetCrimes that got owned last year trying to talk the game without ever watching hold grudges for almost a full year.
0
Posted:
#49
Quote Originally Posted by hustle_man:
LOL... It is pathetic isnt it? Now you know how I feel listening to 100% of your posts.
Especially your "top personnel" in the NBA quote. LOL what a moron you are sir.
As far as Bet Crimes, he cant even post data correctly, let alone bring valid arguments. He's more emotionally charged than tangerinelime hence all of his contradictions. Stick to posting stats in baseball, because you're in over your head on this one. LOL @ guys like BetCrimes that got owned last year trying to talk the game without ever watching hold grudges for almost a full year.
Again, making up shit like you always do. HAve I ever made a pick on this forum? Ever? But yet, I somehow went 10 out of the last 36? Seriously, where did you get that fuckin info? You're an absolute fucking liar! Making up shit like that is uncalled for. How long did it take to make that up? Huh? You couldn't come up with something better than that? Thats like a yo momma joke. You couldn't come up with anything better, so lets make something up. I feel sorry for you. You didn;t get enough hugs as a child? Your momma just sat you in front of the tv and said watch the NBA, which thereby, made you a basketball genius? So sad, so sad.
0
Posted:
#50
westcoast - making things up, cherry picking stats to suit his delusions, taking both sides of an argument with differnet posters at different times to *come out on top* (which he thought noone would notice [otherwise why do something so stupid, but I caught him out on]). This guy has done it all, and continues to do so. HE stopped posting picks once his season went into the shit house. At least he had some semblence of sense in that situation.
0
Hot Forum Topics
