2 or maybe 3 HUGE plays this week

 

First of all, I wouldn't say that Kansas is playing great. They haven't faced anyone yet, and the best two teams they faced so far were SMISS and Iowa State. And guess what, both teams almost got the W at Memorial Stadium. SMISS lost by 7 with horrible rushing offense and were tied at 28 at the end of the 3rd quarter, while Iowa State lost by 5 after leading on 4 different occasions. Kansas hosts Oklahoma next week, and yes, a 5-0 team can be looking ahead to a meeting vs a 3-2 team.

Colorado benched their QB because he was ineffective. When a dad benches his son, it is clear to me that they had no other option. T.Hansen will start for Colorado and last season he got a W in his first start and the rushing offense got improved immediately. He will run and pass, but he will probably be replaced by Hawkins on obvious passing downs. Hansen has 70 passing attempts and 68 rushing attempts as Colorado QB. Last season he had 261 rushing yards in limited playing time. That,s a whole new game plan defensively for Kansas and with this news being released wednesday, Kansas has only 2 days to get ready for a new offense. By the way, I expect Colorado to run a lot more than usual and in that stadium, with the thin air, it is not easy to defend a team that rushes a lot. Colorado is 9-2 SU and 10-1 ATS in last 11 games when rushing at least 32 times and 8-0 ATS when rushing 35+ times. Their last three home dog wins, including a huge upset win against Oklahoma a few years ago came in this spot.

kansas is getting some sharp action.  i believe that line will climb a little.  will wait.  thanks for the info.  good stuff

so research

you just pick a play with no explanation to support your pick...

and you are supposedly the guru...

and all these degenerates are agreeing with your pick..

maybe you could convince me if you at least explained why a bad team like smu who barely beat a terrible team in ecu will beat a team that destroyed rice and almost beat ohio state at the horseshoe...maybe you can convince me that a SMU's D who practices against a run and shoot type offense is going to stop a methodical running attack like Navy who's QB can throw if he needs to...

I honestly don't give a shit if this degenerates worship you or not or whether you are right or wrong.  I would just just like to read an explanation and rationale for your picks...GL

 

so what is research's publicly posted large play record over the last 2 years?  i think this idol worship is all bullshit and you degernates who are either too lazy or stupid to do their research rely on a free anonymously post blog with unsubstantiated returns...

let's call this the idiot string...

 

Do I have to post a writeup ? No.

Do I have to post my plays ? No.

Do you have to read my threads ? No.

Do you have to follow my plays ? No.

Are you jealous because people like my posts ?

Probably. Just because you say that you are not...

Have a nice evening bud.

to be honest, we're not jealous at anyone especially you. Jealous for what? do you give us money? If you have your rational then we may make a case but you're not and you're telling us that playing SMU, Middle tenn, and Conn are your biggest bets? be real man and don't try to be a hero picking nonsense teams.  It is okay to play them but please don't tell me they're the biggest bets.  We're here to make money and to be honest, I think your bets look real bad. Only idiots keep pounding bad teams and unknown teams by going back to look at old records. I'm sure you're just one of the idiots out there trying to be a super hero by playing these games.
AND I WILL LOOK AT THE SCORE TO SEE IF YOU WIN. The most you can go is 1 out of 3. By the way, Kansas rolls for sure.

this is jus idiotic what does it matter its not like hes picking 24 point underdogs that have no shot at winning he picks games that dogs have a chance of actually winning, many times they do, and most of the gamese he bets the linees are fucked up and he capitalizes if you cant see that then youre prob one of the ones that gets suckered in by the lines and is astonished how such a low spread against an inferior team gets broken.  keep betting easy looking favs and youll be broke by seasons end

24 points underdogs always have a shot!

GL research

[Quote: Originally Posted by wait_for_chance]

24 points underdogs always have a shot!

haha gotta love the odds!

TO ALL BASHER including you wait for chance just get lost from research thread if you dont like his play then you should just start your own thread and post whatever you want in your own thread... ok? 

GL this week research

i'm trying to help you not to lose money. Oh well, at least I tried. But you guys are too crazy. Go ahead and worship this guy. We'll see how long he will last.

Research was 2-11 last week, so be careful.

THANK YOU MAN FOR GOING BACK TO LOOK AT THAT. These degenerates are fuck up with their heads. I can't stand idiots.  They are too fucking lazy to cap their own game and rely on stupid source such as "This is the biggest game of the year shit threat" and worship the plays such as SMU, Middle Tn st, and Colorado. WOW!!! and make the case worse is that they think they are legit. How stupid can you be???? are you 2 years old that don't have the brain to think like an adult? what did your parents teach you when you're a kid? think with logic people! I'm out of words to say and good luck to you all degenerates.

 

Why does it upset you so much? Chill out bro.

LOL thanks a million for your kindness to trying to help me not to lose money... so now will you all BASHER just get lost... please feel free to start your own maybe i'll visit your thread but i doubt it.
Thank you and thank you so very much if you stop bashing in here....  

I'll admit I did go back and check his picks from last week after seeing this thread when it got started. 2-11 isn't a great record for anyone, but it doesn't take a genius to realize when someone's tossing out that many picks they aren't going to be a hundred percent. Like you said, we gotta think like adults and weed out which ones we think are going to hit and which ones aren't, so take his picks and go with the ones you think will hit or go with none of them, heck go the opposite way if you want to.

I'll admit I was a little skeptical about the three picks outlined in this thread, but when questioned on each of them he backed them up with his reasoning as to why he's taking them, and his reasoning seems sound to me. I'll admit I may not even play any of the three one way or the other, but I will sit back and watch to see if they hit or not before moving along elsewhere for advice on which picks to take.

If you don't agree, then that's fine, but really what's the point in getting foul about it and bashing the guy on the thread? Does that make the picks invalid? Does it support your picks over his? Not really. If you're going to disagree, then back it up with solid information as to why you disagree. Otherwise stop taking up space on the threads.

Miss St will win and cover the 4 pts this week.