Should New Zealand be a test playing nation?
Posted:
#29
Quote Originally Posted by Rostos:
I just cant wait till James Pattison and Starc come thumping back down top earth....
I just cant wait till James Pattison and Starc come thumping back down top earth....
why ? I'm all for weeding out the genuine frauds like Mitchell Johnson but Pattinson has a lot to like - he bowls with serious pace at times and swings the ball away.
And as underwhelming as Starc has been thus far at least he's shown an ability to consistently shape the ball back into the right hander - the quintessential for any left armer.
At least Australia is on the right track by picking these blokes instead of spinning their wheels with blokes who will never succeed consistently like Johnson et al.
Quote Originally Posted by Rostos:
I just cant wait till James Pattison and Starc come thumping back down top earth....
I just cant wait till James Pattison and Starc come thumping back down top earth....
why ? I'm all for weeding out the genuine frauds like Mitchell Johnson but Pattinson has a lot to like - he bowls with serious pace at times and swings the ball away.
And as underwhelming as Starc has been thus far at least he's shown an ability to consistently shape the ball back into the right hander - the quintessential for any left armer.
At least Australia is on the right track by picking these blokes instead of spinning their wheels with blokes who will never succeed consistently like Johnson et al.
Posted:
#33
Quote Originally Posted by rod_steel:
It's times like these I wish you can edit the title of threads on covers
It's times like these I wish you can edit the title of threads on covers
As long as we got Chris Sandow our lives will flourish my fellow Eels God like figure
Quote Originally Posted by rod_steel:
It's times like these I wish you can edit the title of threads on covers
It's times like these I wish you can edit the title of threads on covers
As long as we got Chris Sandow our lives will flourish my fellow Eels God like figure
Posted:
#37
Quote Originally Posted by Jive_Turkey:
why ? I'm all for weeding out the genuine frauds like Mitchell Johnson but Pattinson has a lot to like - he bowls with serious pace at times and swings the ball away.
And as underwhelming as Starc has been thus far at least he's shown an ability to consistently shape the ball back into the right hander - the quintessential for any left armer.
At least Australia is on the right track by picking these blokes instead of spinning their wheels with blokes who will never succeed consistently like Johnson et al.
![]()
In Cummins and Pattinson they have a promising rotation to build around ![]()
Quote Originally Posted by Jive_Turkey:
why ? I'm all for weeding out the genuine frauds like Mitchell Johnson but Pattinson has a lot to like - he bowls with serious pace at times and swings the ball away.
And as underwhelming as Starc has been thus far at least he's shown an ability to consistently shape the ball back into the right hander - the quintessential for any left armer.
At least Australia is on the right track by picking these blokes instead of spinning their wheels with blokes who will never succeed consistently like Johnson et al.
![]()
In Cummins and Pattinson they have a promising rotation to build around ![]()
Posted:
#43
Hughes should have been out for a duck....
LUCK - nothing more nothing less......
How many times has this guy been out for single figures only for the opposition not to review it...
I count now 3 times....
Some people are just born under a lucky star
Hughes should have been out for a duck....
LUCK - nothing more nothing less......
How many times has this guy been out for single figures only for the opposition not to review it...
I count now 3 times....
Some people are just born under a lucky star
Posted:
#46
NZ have been by far the better team in this test series and actually deserve to win it 2-0
Turning points
Clarke bowled on no ball for 23 in 1st test in the 1st innings9NZ would have had a healthy 1st innings lead)
Hughes given not out on 0 in the 2nd test in the 2nd innings(Australia would have collapsed)
Well done NZ on your 2-0 victory
Turning points
Clarke bowled on no ball for 23 in 1st test in the 1st innings9NZ would have had a healthy 1st innings lead)
Hughes given not out on 0 in the 2nd test in the 2nd innings(Australia would have collapsed)
Well done NZ on your 2-0 victory
NZ have been by far the better team in this test series and actually deserve to win it 2-0
Turning points
Clarke bowled on no ball for 23 in 1st test in the 1st innings9NZ would have had a healthy 1st innings lead)
Hughes given not out on 0 in the 2nd test in the 2nd innings(Australia would have collapsed)
Well done NZ on your 2-0 victory
Turning points
Clarke bowled on no ball for 23 in 1st test in the 1st innings9NZ would have had a healthy 1st innings lead)
Hughes given not out on 0 in the 2nd test in the 2nd innings(Australia would have collapsed)
Well done NZ on your 2-0 victory
Hot Forum Topics
-
🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵
449,280
-
🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets
259,584
-
PART DEUX
324
-
Saturday 09/19/2026
660
-
Flawed Logic & Bad Decisions: CFB Edition
2,796
-
The Three-Day Money Train
5,790
-
NFL LOCKED IN!
98,201
-
NCAA FOOTBALL. 151
23,260
-
Trump's legacy?
25,522
-
Public Indicator Calculations 2026
14,176
Warning - External Link
Report User
Thank you for reporting
This content is abusive or harmful
This post is spam
An error has occurred
This post is spam
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
Delete Post
Are you sure you would like to remove this post?
Remove Thread
Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?
Scan Results
Login/Register
Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
