Posted:
#326
Guess he just wanted to brag a little bit. Not my style, even when I win, always comes back to bite ya. Easy to toot your horn after the result is in.
General Sharps 2014-2015 NHL Picks
Posted:
#328
Again you are arguing which team was better, and I am saying that the better team does not always win. I am curious to see how you do throughout the year with a static model. I personally don't think a static model can beat the house because they use static models. Anyway, good luck and watch that hubris (for your own sake).
Posted:
#329
Quote Originally Posted by magyarsvensk:
Again you are arguing which team was better, and I am saying that the better team does not always win. I am curious to see how you do throughout the year with a static model. I personally don't think a static model can beat the house because they use static models. Anyway, good luck and watch that hubris (for your own sake).
Again you are arguing which team was better, and I am saying that the better team does not always win. I am curious to see how you do throughout the year with a static model. I personally don't think a static model can beat the house because they use static models. Anyway, good luck and watch that hubris (for your own sake).
Stopped reading here
Posted:
#333
Quote Originally Posted by Russ-SVTF150:
Just curious, maybe im the only but what exactly is a static model? Rather hear from here than google it... and what are your thoughts Gen on it???
It's basically a robotic betting system. My models, as I stated multiple times, are updated daily. Dynamic is changing variables. For example, if you just take stats from a stat site on goals scored, your data is flawed. Simply being, if you don't account for lineup changes, injuries, etc... you are using flawed data. That is why I keep my own database.
Posted:
#334
Quote Originally Posted by magyarsvensk:
No need to get cranky, now. Lol
No need to get cranky, now. Lol
Not cranky at all, you just being an idiot and are twisting words. You are showing how immature and juvenile you are with stupid posts like these. This thread is for helping people win money. Not entertain your boring life. Grow up.
Posted:
#338
Quote Originally Posted by magyarsvensk:
Quote Originally Posted by Nifn:
Magyarsvensk nobody cares about you, just leave please..
Really? Nobody? I'm typically not into schadenfreude, but General is just so ripe with narcissism, I couldn't resist.Magyarsvensk nobody cares about you, just leave please..
Please stop with your useless forum clogging posts
Posted:
#339
Thanks for the info Gen, I would think that a static model wouldn't make sense and a dynamic, or your model, that takes into account changing variables would prove in the long run to be more effective. Sometimes I find it is tough to avoid stats though, like a football team being say 8-1 ats and their o/u being 7-2, how could you not take that team and the over??? Like in last night's MNF game Pitts hadn't lost a home MNF game since like '92 or something crazy like that..... again thanks to all for the info and discussion
Hot Forum Topics
