Just reviewing. My bad I calculated how teams do after they WON by 30 or 40. Nonetheless, we found some solid angles on that side. I will calculate how teams do after LOSING by 30 or 40, shortly.
Just reviewing. My bad I calculated how teams do after they WON by 30 or 40. Nonetheless, we found some solid angles on that side. I will calculate how teams do after LOSING by 30 or 40, shortly.
Just reviewing. My bad I calculated how teams do after they WON by 30 or 40. Nonetheless, we found some solid angles on that side. I will calculate how teams do after LOSING by 30 or 40, shortly.
Just reviewing. My bad I calculated how teams do after they WON by 30 or 40. Nonetheless, we found some solid angles on that side. I will calculate how teams do after LOSING by 30 or 40, shortly.
How teams do in thier next game after losing by 40 or more points, with normal rest.
Since 1989......
Overall: 16-12 ATS (2-0 this year)
Home teams: 13-5 ATS (1-0 this year)
Road teams: 3-7 ATS
Favs: 10-1 SU and 7-4 ATS (2009 last play)
Dogs: 9-8 ATS (2-0 this year)
30 or more coming up
How teams do in thier next game after losing by 40 or more points, with normal rest.
Since 1989......
Overall: 16-12 ATS (2-0 this year)
Home teams: 13-5 ATS (1-0 this year)
Road teams: 3-7 ATS
Favs: 10-1 SU and 7-4 ATS (2009 last play)
Dogs: 9-8 ATS (2-0 this year)
30 or more coming up
How teams do in thier next game after losing by over 30, with normal rest.
Since 1989......
Overall: 104-74-6 ATS (58.4%)
Home teams: 60-42-4 ATS (58.8%)
Road teams: 44-32-2 ATS (57.8%)
Favs: 26-19-1 ATS (57.7%)
Dogs: 78-51-5 ATS (60.4%)
DD Dogs: 13-3-1 ATS (since 2005)
How teams do in thier next game after losing by over 30, with normal rest.
Since 1989......
Overall: 104-74-6 ATS (58.4%)
Home teams: 60-42-4 ATS (58.8%)
Road teams: 44-32-2 ATS (57.8%)
Favs: 26-19-1 ATS (57.7%)
Dogs: 78-51-5 ATS (60.4%)
DD Dogs: 13-3-1 ATS (since 2005)
Whoever gave you this, it absolutley correct!
In this situation, these teams are 9-28 ATS since 1991. And since beginning of the 1999 season these teams are 4-20 ATS!! The situtation went 4-0 last year with the NE/NYJ Div game. Great FADE situation!
Whoever gave you this, it absolutley correct!
In this situation, these teams are 9-28 ATS since 1991. And since beginning of the 1999 season these teams are 4-20 ATS!! The situtation went 4-0 last year with the NE/NYJ Div game. Great FADE situation!
tafter, if you have a particular angle regarding TO's or anything else that you want checked into let me know.
OC
tafter, if you have a particular angle regarding TO's or anything else that you want checked into let me know.
OC
tafter, if you have a particular angle regarding TO's or anything else that you want checked into let me know.
OC
tafter, if you have a particular angle regarding TO's or anything else that you want checked into let me know.
OC

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.