Very well could be right. NE was/is the best team. That game that the packers lost has given them a lot of confidence, much like the giants losing to ne in '07 regular season.
The stars lined up for the Giants that year in spite of Tom Terrifc Coughlin and the stars can line up too for the packers and Mike Mc Carthy , sometimes the players can overcome the coaches
the '07 giants did (it helped they played wade phillips who has no luck in the playoffs) and the '10 packers can too!
Very well could be right. NE was/is the best team. That game that the packers lost has given them a lot of confidence, much like the giants losing to ne in '07 regular season.
The stars lined up for the Giants that year in spite of Tom Terrifc Coughlin and the stars can line up too for the packers and Mike Mc Carthy , sometimes the players can overcome the coaches
the '07 giants did (it helped they played wade phillips who has no luck in the playoffs) and the '10 packers can too!
I have also felt this way. Its very possible. We might even see Donald Driver catch a key first down off his shoe to help secure a Super Bowl Victory. Ala David Tyree !
I have also felt this way. Its very possible. We might even see Donald Driver catch a key first down off his shoe to help secure a Super Bowl Victory. Ala David Tyree !
why do you think the bears played their starters the entire game week 17 at green bay? they did not want this team to get in the tournament. why do you think the bears then gameplanned 2 weeks ago to play the saints? 1. they thought the saints would beat seattle and 2. they knew after playing this team that the eagles didnt stand a chance.
why do you think the bears played their starters the entire game week 17 at green bay? they did not want this team to get in the tournament. why do you think the bears then gameplanned 2 weeks ago to play the saints? 1. they thought the saints would beat seattle and 2. they knew after playing this team that the eagles didnt stand a chance.
You r 100% wrong action here coming in slightly more on Falcons right now. $ line more so Pack but at less than 3 that is expected 99% of the time. This one is 50/50 w/ side action but any Falcon backer out there wants to distort the facts and pretend he is opposite public action.....too funny....face it dude this one is 50/50 right where they want it and didn't even have to go to 3 to get it there which tells us a lot. Pack getting less then FG on road and they are still hammering Falcons enough to keep it balanced so why move it?
You r 100% wrong action here coming in slightly more on Falcons right now. $ line more so Pack but at less than 3 that is expected 99% of the time. This one is 50/50 w/ side action but any Falcon backer out there wants to distort the facts and pretend he is opposite public action.....too funny....face it dude this one is 50/50 right where they want it and didn't even have to go to 3 to get it there which tells us a lot. Pack getting less then FG on road and they are still hammering Falcons enough to keep it balanced so why move it?
my pre season pick for the superbowl was the packers and ravens..... packers have to many injuries.... not a good running game...... ya for one game but hate to say it the falcons got em this weekend
my pre season pick for the superbowl was the packers and ravens..... packers have to many injuries.... not a good running game...... ya for one game but hate to say it the falcons got em this weekend
MajicBoy, ye of little faith. A man that has that avatar? C'mon, Man. The Pack can get it done. My pre-season pick was GB/PGH Don't give up on them now.
GL
MajicBoy, ye of little faith. A man that has that avatar? C'mon, Man. The Pack can get it done. My pre-season pick was GB/PGH Don't give up on them now.
GL
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.