• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Kalshi Referral Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • Polymarket Referral Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • Betr Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
      • Gemini Predictions Promo Code
    • NFL Week 2
      NFL Week 2
      • NFL Odds
      • NFL Picks
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | NFL Betting Forum

    NFL PLAYOFFS .............................................................................2022 season

    «First Previous 234 ... 91011 Next Last»
    theclaw
    JoeyMargs
    Digitalkarma
    spottie2935
    demoman
    ...
    Participants:
    Search model icon
    Views: 14932
    Posts: 258
    «First Previous 234 ... 91011 Next Last»
     
    theclaw
    theclaw
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2008
    Posts: 12148
    Posted: Jan. 12, 2023 - 8:08 PM ET #26

    Quote Originally Posted by undermysac:

    Thanks Claw

     

    peace_5

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by undermysac:

    Thanks Claw

     

    peace_5

     
    theclaw
    theclaw
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2008
    Posts: 12148
    Posted: Jan. 12, 2023 - 8:09 PM ET #27

    Quote Originally Posted by WilliamMunny:

    I’m on Dallas as well  GL

     

    Nice .......peace_5...... BOL to us .....

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by WilliamMunny:

    I’m on Dallas as well  GL

     

    Nice .......peace_5...... BOL to us .....

     
    theclaw
    theclaw
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2008
    Posts: 12148
    Posted: Jan. 12, 2023 - 8:10 PM ET #28

    Quote Originally Posted by Fuse:

     

    peace_5 

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by Fuse:

     

    peace_5 

     
    theclaw
    theclaw
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2008
    Posts: 12148
    Posted: Jan. 12, 2023 - 8:12 PM ET #29

    Quote Originally Posted by Buffalobob89074:

    Always a good read. A key for some in the Dallas @ Tampa matchup is the improving health of the Bucs' Oline. Now the center might start on MNF and if Tampa could get a semblance of a running attack, it might open up the passing game for TB? All the best and BOL

     

    Interesting , I am aware of that I actually did a bigger writeup on the game but went over the allowed 4000 characters allowed.

    I erase that part unfortunately.

    Bucs have a couple of angles favoring then 

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by Buffalobob89074:

    Always a good read. A key for some in the Dallas @ Tampa matchup is the improving health of the Bucs' Oline. Now the center might start on MNF and if Tampa could get a semblance of a running attack, it might open up the passing game for TB? All the best and BOL

     

    Interesting , I am aware of that I actually did a bigger writeup on the game but went over the allowed 4000 characters allowed.

    I erase that part unfortunately.

    Bucs have a couple of angles favoring then 

     
    theclaw
    theclaw
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2008
    Posts: 12148
    Posted: Jan. 12, 2023 - 9:59 PM ET #30

    POWER RATING I ..............

    My lines ...........

    Jags -5.84 over Chargers

    Forgot to post this line above.

    We have a play with a 6 pt difference. Also 2 other methods have a play on Jags. Get to those soon.

    Was hoping to get 3 but everytime it gets close it comes back.

    Jags +2.5 (-115) over Charges --- 2.2 units

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    POWER RATING I ..............

    My lines ...........

    Jags -5.84 over Chargers

    Forgot to post this line above.

    We have a play with a 6 pt difference. Also 2 other methods have a play on Jags. Get to those soon.

    Was hoping to get 3 but everytime it gets close it comes back.

    Jags +2.5 (-115) over Charges --- 2.2 units

     
    theclaw
    theclaw
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2008
    Posts: 12148
    Posted: Jan. 12, 2023 - 10:03 PM ET #31

    Giants +3 over Vikes --- 1.1 units

    Giants a play with a 3 pt difference in close wins method which rarely has finished with a losing record in playoffs.

    Did pretty well last year and the year before 6-2 ATS last year if I remember correctly, will post results over the years soon.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Giants +3 over Vikes --- 1.1 units

    Giants a play with a 3 pt difference in close wins method which rarely has finished with a losing record in playoffs.

    Did pretty well last year and the year before 6-2 ATS last year if I remember correctly, will post results over the years soon.

     
    theclaw
    theclaw
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2008
    Posts: 12148
    Posted: Jan. 12, 2023 - 10:42 PM ET #32

    Did they change the overtime rule for playoffs ? Didn't see anyone post about it.

    Even if team scores a TD the other team will get the ball for one drive to tie the game.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    1
    Report User

    Did they change the overtime rule for playoffs ? Didn't see anyone post about it.

    Even if team scores a TD the other team will get the ball for one drive to tie the game.

     
    theclaw
    theclaw
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2008
    Posts: 12148
    Posted: Jan. 13, 2023 - 10:16 AM ET #33

    I had this written down, got it somewhere..................................

     

    QB's in their first career playoff start are.........

    8-28 SU

    3-11 ATS as a fav

    7-15 ATS as a dog

    Unders are 27-15

     

    this going into Josh Allen first playoff start. Don't know the records since.

    wow, fav have a very poor ATS record. Are you ready Brock ?

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    I had this written down, got it somewhere..................................

     

    QB's in their first career playoff start are.........

    8-28 SU

    3-11 ATS as a fav

    7-15 ATS as a dog

    Unders are 27-15

     

    this going into Josh Allen first playoff start. Don't know the records since.

    wow, fav have a very poor ATS record. Are you ready Brock ?

     
    theclaw
    theclaw
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2008
    Posts: 12148
    Posted: Jan. 13, 2023 - 10:31 AM ET #34

    CLOSE WINS ....................................................

    2005 - 2021 with a 3 pt difference ...... 57-31-1 ATS 64.6% 

    in those 17 years has but 1 losing season, that in 2015 going 2-3 ATS, has 2 .500 years in 2014 and 2017.

    so in 17 years has 14 years of winning ATS records, 

    close wins are not repeatable on average over time.

    method went through a period of regression in 2014 - 2017 going 9-8 ATS BUT SINCE has rebounded to a very nice 15-8-1 ATS 64.6% Right on it's long term ave.

     

    Giants by 7 over Vikes
    Seahawks by 4over 9ers

    Jags by 4 over Chargers

    Dolphins by 2 over Bills

    Bucs by 1 over Boys

    Ravens by 1 over Bengals

     

    3 plays with close wins on ....... Jags, Giants and Seahawks

    Are you ready Brock ?

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    CLOSE WINS ....................................................

    2005 - 2021 with a 3 pt difference ...... 57-31-1 ATS 64.6% 

    in those 17 years has but 1 losing season, that in 2015 going 2-3 ATS, has 2 .500 years in 2014 and 2017.

    so in 17 years has 14 years of winning ATS records, 

    close wins are not repeatable on average over time.

    method went through a period of regression in 2014 - 2017 going 9-8 ATS BUT SINCE has rebounded to a very nice 15-8-1 ATS 64.6% Right on it's long term ave.

     

    Giants by 7 over Vikes
    Seahawks by 4over 9ers

    Jags by 4 over Chargers

    Dolphins by 2 over Bills

    Bucs by 1 over Boys

    Ravens by 1 over Bengals

     

    3 plays with close wins on ....... Jags, Giants and Seahawks

    Are you ready Brock ?

     
    theclaw
    theclaw
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2008
    Posts: 12148
    Posted: Jan. 13, 2023 - 11:11 AM ET #35

    Historically the hottest team coming into playoffs has not been a good play.

     

    That'd be the 9ers winning 10 SU. This looks similar to 2019 Ravens who won 10 or 11 and then lost SU in first playoff game.

    The Bills couple years ago then failed to cover VS Colts but did squeak out a 3 pt win were the hottest team then with many riding them.

    I was on the Colts that game. Still remember Bills rolling opps coming into playoffs.

    I don't think there was a hot team last season

    Be careful what you wish for regarding 9ers.

    But 2 seeds VS 7's have only been around for 2 years so history doesn't really include them.

    2 seeds are 3-1 ATS past 2 years of existence.

    3 wins by 11 pts or more, the only ATS loss, yep those  2 seed Bills VS 7 seed  Colts.

    Are you ready Brock ?

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Historically the hottest team coming into playoffs has not been a good play.

     

    That'd be the 9ers winning 10 SU. This looks similar to 2019 Ravens who won 10 or 11 and then lost SU in first playoff game.

    The Bills couple years ago then failed to cover VS Colts but did squeak out a 3 pt win were the hottest team then with many riding them.

    I was on the Colts that game. Still remember Bills rolling opps coming into playoffs.

    I don't think there was a hot team last season

    Be careful what you wish for regarding 9ers.

    But 2 seeds VS 7's have only been around for 2 years so history doesn't really include them.

    2 seeds are 3-1 ATS past 2 years of existence.

    3 wins by 11 pts or more, the only ATS loss, yep those  2 seed Bills VS 7 seed  Colts.

    Are you ready Brock ?

     
    JoeyMargs
    JoeyMargs
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2016
    Posts: 535
    Posted: Jan. 13, 2023 - 12:00 PM ET #36

    Claw- good luck- I actually just saw this morning they did change the rule for OT. If both teams get a TD it goes to sudden death

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Claw- good luck- I actually just saw this morning they did change the rule for OT. If both teams get a TD it goes to sudden death

     
    Digitalkarma
    Digitalkarma
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2013
    Posts: 57580
    Posted: Jan. 13, 2023 - 12:45 PM ET #37

    Gl claw 

     

    Yea that winstreak is a bit scary for Niners. It's not a matter of if but when. Hope they didn't peak too early. May fade Niners on the spread next round if they play Brady again. Maybe Giants could cover too if they make it next round.. Giants have usually played 49ers tough in the past... 

    Sip on that plus money honey!
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Gl claw 

     

    Yea that winstreak is a bit scary for Niners. It's not a matter of if but when. Hope they didn't peak too early. May fade Niners on the spread next round if they play Brady again. Maybe Giants could cover too if they make it next round.. Giants have usually played 49ers tough in the past... 

     
    theclaw
    theclaw
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2008
    Posts: 12148
    Posted: Jan. 13, 2023 - 2:08 PM ET #38

    Quote Originally Posted by JoeyMargs:

    Claw- good luck- I actually just saw this morning they did change the rule for OT. If both teams get a TD it goes to sudden death

    Thanks .............peace_5

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by JoeyMargs:

    Claw- good luck- I actually just saw this morning they did change the rule for OT. If both teams get a TD it goes to sudden death

    Thanks .............peace_5

     
    theclaw
    theclaw
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2008
    Posts: 12148
    Posted: Jan. 13, 2023 - 2:14 PM ET #39

    Quote Originally Posted by Digitalkarma:

    Gl claw    Yea that winstreak is a bit scary for Niners. It's not a matter of if but when. Hope they didn't peak too early. May fade Niners on the spread next round if they play Brady again. Maybe Giants could cover too if they make it next round.. Giants have usually played 49ers tough in the past...

     

    I did see on YouTube a person said some very smart groups are on Seahawks with a number of angles favoring then.

    That's why the line dropped according to him.

    He did mention winning 5 straight has been good fading those teams.

    I think when it's 7 or better it's even higher probability fading them and if the team is winning by Big margins even better 

    I think also he said division opps in WC round back the dog was the higher probability.

     

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by Digitalkarma:

    Gl claw    Yea that winstreak is a bit scary for Niners. It's not a matter of if but when. Hope they didn't peak too early. May fade Niners on the spread next round if they play Brady again. Maybe Giants could cover too if they make it next round.. Giants have usually played 49ers tough in the past...

     

    I did see on YouTube a person said some very smart groups are on Seahawks with a number of angles favoring then.

    That's why the line dropped according to him.

    He did mention winning 5 straight has been good fading those teams.

    I think when it's 7 or better it's even higher probability fading them and if the team is winning by Big margins even better 

    I think also he said division opps in WC round back the dog was the higher probability.

     

     
    spottie2935
    spottie2935
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jun, 2001
    Posts: 23161
    Posted: Jan. 13, 2023 - 2:23 PM ET #40

    Quote Originally Posted by kcblitzkrieg:

    @theclaw just posted this elsewhere.... Brady also 0-4 ATS this season in night time prime time games.... it was 0-11 going back to 2021 until he covered on the road last year vs the hapless Giants. So now something like 1-15 ATS prime time night games as a Buccaneer.

     

    https://killersports.com/nfl/query?output=default&sdql=team+%3D+Buccaneers+and+season%3E2019+and+start+time%3E1630+and+F&submit=++S+D+Q+L+%21++

    Spottie2935 on socials
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by kcblitzkrieg:

    @theclaw just posted this elsewhere.... Brady also 0-4 ATS this season in night time prime time games.... it was 0-11 going back to 2021 until he covered on the road last year vs the hapless Giants. So now something like 1-15 ATS prime time night games as a Buccaneer.

     

    https://killersports.com/nfl/query?output=default&sdql=team+%3D+Buccaneers+and+season%3E2019+and+start+time%3E1630+and+F&submit=++S+D+Q+L+%21++

     
    spottie2935
    spottie2935
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jun, 2001
    Posts: 23161
    Posted: Jan. 13, 2023 - 2:25 PM ET #41

    Quote Originally Posted by kcblitzkrieg:

    @theclaw just posted this elsewhere.... Brady also 0-4 ATS this season in night time prime time games.... it was 0-11 going back to 2021 until he covered on the road last year vs the hapless Giants. So now something like 1-15 ATS prime time night games as a Buccaneer.

     

    The problem is they also win a lot of games here.  They are the dog here so if they continue to win this would be a cover. 

     

    Lines are the big deal 

    Spottie2935 on socials
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by kcblitzkrieg:

    @theclaw just posted this elsewhere.... Brady also 0-4 ATS this season in night time prime time games.... it was 0-11 going back to 2021 until he covered on the road last year vs the hapless Giants. So now something like 1-15 ATS prime time night games as a Buccaneer.

     

    The problem is they also win a lot of games here.  They are the dog here so if they continue to win this would be a cover. 

     

    Lines are the big deal 

     
    theclaw
    theclaw
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2008
    Posts: 12148
    Posted: Jan. 13, 2023 - 2:42 PM ET #42

    I have another metrics that of the top 2 teams, one of those makes the SB around 70% of the years.

    Top 2 are .........

    1. 9ers

    2. Bills

    This hasn't worked past 2 years but maybe because of COVID and could be regression.

    We'll see if it holds up this season. alot of times these type metrics will bounce back just like close wins I posted above did after a period of non success.

    Another reason I bought off on 9ers winning NFC and SB along with 9ers passing the Eagles on the final week to be no. 1 ranked team.

    Although they are under a rating of 12 I will have more on this later.

    Bills I don't know, Allen to much a TO machine. Some saying Allen affected by losing off coach Dabol, Bills don't rate all that strong in high probability passing stats. 

    9ers appear to be more balanced team and better overall but with a rookie QB with few games under his belt.

    But the Bills do rate strong , no. 1in another indicator I'll post later. With 9ers 2cd.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    I have another metrics that of the top 2 teams, one of those makes the SB around 70% of the years.

    Top 2 are .........

    1. 9ers

    2. Bills

    This hasn't worked past 2 years but maybe because of COVID and could be regression.

    We'll see if it holds up this season. alot of times these type metrics will bounce back just like close wins I posted above did after a period of non success.

    Another reason I bought off on 9ers winning NFC and SB along with 9ers passing the Eagles on the final week to be no. 1 ranked team.

    Although they are under a rating of 12 I will have more on this later.

    Bills I don't know, Allen to much a TO machine. Some saying Allen affected by losing off coach Dabol, Bills don't rate all that strong in high probability passing stats. 

    9ers appear to be more balanced team and better overall but with a rookie QB with few games under his belt.

    But the Bills do rate strong , no. 1in another indicator I'll post later. With 9ers 2cd.

     
    theclaw
    theclaw
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2008
    Posts: 12148
    Posted: Jan. 13, 2023 - 11:55 PM ET #43

    POWER RATING II ............................................

    more balance heavy where run game carries more weight and defense carries more weight and off don't turn ball over carry more weight.

    1. 9ers 11.64 ..... not including game 1 w/Lance

    2. Eagles 11.07

       9ers 10.63 .............. all games

    3. Ravens 8.53 .....w/Lamar

         Ravens 6.82 ....... all games

    4. Boys 6.52 ..... not including final game 

    5. Bills 5.94 

        Boys 4.91 ..... all games

    6. KC 4.66

    7. Dolphins 3.01 ....w/Tua

     8. Bengals .59

      Dolphins (-1.27)........ w/Skylar

     

    I didn't do all teams as fell to far behind during the season, rates teams each week then the ave per week, once I fall behind not much chance to catch up. I tried to keep up with the best teams.

     

     

    Interesting facts on PR II & PR I ......................... 2009 -2021

    8 TEAMS rated 12 or more IN PR II 6 made  the SB. Only 2009 Vikings and the 2019 Ravens did not. But 2009 Vikes 13.83 did lose to no. 1 team in PR I Saints 14.04

    Three times no. 1 teams in each PR played each other, 2015 Panthers 15.29 NO. 1 in PR II beat no. 1 in PR I Seahawks 12.86. And the 2014 Seahawks 13.29 beat the Packers 11.21 under 12, in each case the higher rated no.1 team won.

    If we throw those out then PR II is 6 of 7 teams making SB rated 12 or better.

    PR I is 5 of 7 no. teams rated 12 or better making the SB.

    No. 1 in both PR I & II LIKE the 9ers 4-1 Making the SB  but each team rated 12 or better in one PR or both which 9ers don't. 3 of 4 rated 12 or better in both.

     

    Teams that didn't rate 12 or better in PR II ........................

    2016 Boys 10.83 , lost opening game

    2018 Texans 9.7, lost 1st game

    2020 Saints 9.14 , lost 

    2021 Packers 9.95 lost

     

    You can see all these teams very weak, All weakest teams rated under 11, so maybe teams over 11.5 could be good teams to back like the 9ers this year.  I made the number 12 but that number is not etched in stone. When we look at PR I we see the same result, all weakest teams are under 11, except 2020 Packers 11.03, barely above and the 2014 Packers 11.21 was the best of the weakest rated teams BUT THEY lost to NO.1 rated Seahawks in PR II.

    So just maybe the number could be around 11.5, I don't know but something worth considering since 2014 Packers led the Seahawks into I think the final minute when Wilson throws like a 40 yard TD pass  so those Packers came very close as a 11.21 rated no. 1 team, maybe 11.5 is a good solid team to make the SB.NO. 1 

     

    No. 1 rated teams in PR II rated 12 or better have been spectacular ATS going 7-2 in opening playoff game with one of those losses being 2013 Seahawks losing by .5 pt when Saints scored on 4th down with 28 seconds left. Still remember that loss.

     

    This maybe could be the 9ers but will pass with 9ers to hot coming in.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    POWER RATING II ............................................

    more balance heavy where run game carries more weight and defense carries more weight and off don't turn ball over carry more weight.

    1. 9ers 11.64 ..... not including game 1 w/Lance

    2. Eagles 11.07

       9ers 10.63 .............. all games

    3. Ravens 8.53 .....w/Lamar

         Ravens 6.82 ....... all games

    4. Boys 6.52 ..... not including final game 

    5. Bills 5.94 

        Boys 4.91 ..... all games

    6. KC 4.66

    7. Dolphins 3.01 ....w/Tua

     8. Bengals .59

      Dolphins (-1.27)........ w/Skylar

     

    I didn't do all teams as fell to far behind during the season, rates teams each week then the ave per week, once I fall behind not much chance to catch up. I tried to keep up with the best teams.

     

     

    Interesting facts on PR II & PR I ......................... 2009 -2021

    8 TEAMS rated 12 or more IN PR II 6 made  the SB. Only 2009 Vikings and the 2019 Ravens did not. But 2009 Vikes 13.83 did lose to no. 1 team in PR I Saints 14.04

    Three times no. 1 teams in each PR played each other, 2015 Panthers 15.29 NO. 1 in PR II beat no. 1 in PR I Seahawks 12.86. And the 2014 Seahawks 13.29 beat the Packers 11.21 under 12, in each case the higher rated no.1 team won.

    If we throw those out then PR II is 6 of 7 teams making SB rated 12 or better.

    PR I is 5 of 7 no. teams rated 12 or better making the SB.

    No. 1 in both PR I & II LIKE the 9ers 4-1 Making the SB  but each team rated 12 or better in one PR or both which 9ers don't. 3 of 4 rated 12 or better in both.

     

    Teams that didn't rate 12 or better in PR II ........................

    2016 Boys 10.83 , lost opening game

    2018 Texans 9.7, lost 1st game

    2020 Saints 9.14 , lost 

    2021 Packers 9.95 lost

     

    You can see all these teams very weak, All weakest teams rated under 11, so maybe teams over 11.5 could be good teams to back like the 9ers this year.  I made the number 12 but that number is not etched in stone. When we look at PR I we see the same result, all weakest teams are under 11, except 2020 Packers 11.03, barely above and the 2014 Packers 11.21 was the best of the weakest rated teams BUT THEY lost to NO.1 rated Seahawks in PR II.

    So just maybe the number could be around 11.5, I don't know but something worth considering since 2014 Packers led the Seahawks into I think the final minute when Wilson throws like a 40 yard TD pass  so those Packers came very close as a 11.21 rated no. 1 team, maybe 11.5 is a good solid team to make the SB.NO. 1 

     

    No. 1 rated teams in PR II rated 12 or better have been spectacular ATS going 7-2 in opening playoff game with one of those losses being 2013 Seahawks losing by .5 pt when Saints scored on 4th down with 28 seconds left. Still remember that loss.

     

    This maybe could be the 9ers but will pass with 9ers to hot coming in.

     
    demoman
    demoman
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2006
    Posts: 1065
    Posted: Jan. 14, 2023 - 12:22 AM ET #44

    Brady might not be what he once was but Dak was never any good at big games.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Brady might not be what he once was but Dak was never any good at big games.
     
    theclaw
    theclaw
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2008
    Posts: 12148
    Posted: Jan. 14, 2023 - 11:39 AM ET #45

    Quote Originally Posted by demoman:

    Brady might not be what he once was but Dak was never any good at big games.

     

    True ..... But Cowboys are just the better all-around team to me.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by demoman:

    Brady might not be what he once was but Dak was never any good at big games.

     

    True ..... But Cowboys are just the better all-around team to me.

     
    theclaw
    theclaw
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2008
    Posts: 12148
    Posted: Jan. 14, 2023 - 12:00 PM ET #46

    BONUS POINTS ........................................

    I developed this method because of Brady always beating my meterics. He and his teams were always the master of yards per pts which is a very good meterics but not included in my PR's. I've tried to add it in but didn't really change much to make it worth doing. So I came up with a method to basically take me off fading Brady.

     

    1. Bills 13.7

    2. 9ers 13.4

    3, Eagles 10.26

    4. KC 9.89

    5. Boys 9.58 ....... not including final game

        Boys 7.72 ....... all games

    6, Bengals 6.83

    7. Jags 3.06

    8. Ravens 2.95

    9. Dolphins .87

    9. Chargers .87

    11. Seahawks .03

    12. Gmen (-1.08)

    13. Vikings (-1.22)

    14. Bucs (-2.86)

     

    Wow has Brady sunk to the bottom of the ocean. Once the master but now a disaster. Boys 3rd in yards per pts margin while the Bucs 30th. I did hear guys saying Bucs receivers have gotten healthy and Bucs and Brady have been playing better but even if they improved, by how much ? Maybe 15th at best ? Brady has been at the top year after year in yds per pts now sadly at the bottom. 

    MY LINES .............................

    Bills -15.83 over Dolphins

    9ers -16.37 over Seahawks

    Boys -9.44 over Bucs ...... not including final game

    Boys -7.58 over Bucs .... all games

    Bengals -6.88 over Ravens

    Jags -5.19 over Chargers

    Vikings -2.86 over Giants

    we have a play with a 4.5 difference to closing line  ...... plays on 9ers, Boys and Jags

    we can make a strong case for a play on Bills with Skylar, another 3 pts gives us a 5.33 diff. With the season Tua had VS Skylar who would be the worst QB in QBPR every year 3 pts seems low.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    BONUS POINTS ........................................

    I developed this method because of Brady always beating my meterics. He and his teams were always the master of yards per pts which is a very good meterics but not included in my PR's. I've tried to add it in but didn't really change much to make it worth doing. So I came up with a method to basically take me off fading Brady.

     

    1. Bills 13.7

    2. 9ers 13.4

    3, Eagles 10.26

    4. KC 9.89

    5. Boys 9.58 ....... not including final game

        Boys 7.72 ....... all games

    6, Bengals 6.83

    7. Jags 3.06

    8. Ravens 2.95

    9. Dolphins .87

    9. Chargers .87

    11. Seahawks .03

    12. Gmen (-1.08)

    13. Vikings (-1.22)

    14. Bucs (-2.86)

     

    Wow has Brady sunk to the bottom of the ocean. Once the master but now a disaster. Boys 3rd in yards per pts margin while the Bucs 30th. I did hear guys saying Bucs receivers have gotten healthy and Bucs and Brady have been playing better but even if they improved, by how much ? Maybe 15th at best ? Brady has been at the top year after year in yds per pts now sadly at the bottom. 

    MY LINES .............................

    Bills -15.83 over Dolphins

    9ers -16.37 over Seahawks

    Boys -9.44 over Bucs ...... not including final game

    Boys -7.58 over Bucs .... all games

    Bengals -6.88 over Ravens

    Jags -5.19 over Chargers

    Vikings -2.86 over Giants

    we have a play with a 4.5 difference to closing line  ...... plays on 9ers, Boys and Jags

    we can make a strong case for a play on Bills with Skylar, another 3 pts gives us a 5.33 diff. With the season Tua had VS Skylar who would be the worst QB in QBPR every year 3 pts seems low.

     
    theclaw
    theclaw
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2008
    Posts: 12148
    Posted: Jan. 14, 2023 - 12:27 PM ET #47

    BONUS POINTS ................................. 2009 -2021

    5 of 11 no.1 ranked teams over 12 went to SB. Last season Bills no. 1 at 14.81 and no. 1 again.

    Not as strong as PR I & II at getting no. 1 ranked team over 12 to the SB. But this method hasn't gone 3 years without getting a no. 1 team into the SB. 2019 Ravens and last year's Bills didn't make it, NOW in the 3rd year Bills should do it.  This method hangs about 50%, it gets ahead then falls back, it gets behind then wins so this should be a year the no. 1 gets to the SB since it is 1 game under 50%.

    no. 1 ranked teams over 12 are 6-5 ATS in opening game of playoffs

    no 1 ranked teams that made the SB are 4-1 ATS in opening playoff game. Losing only by .5 when Saints scored on 4th down with 28 seconds left. So if you think Bills make the SB don't be afraid to lay the points.

     

    teams with a 4.5 diff in WC Round are ........................................

    10-8 ATS ... not a great record for sure. But this method was once 8-2 ATS, at 80% not likely to sustain such a great record, so now it has regressed but not likely to sustain that regression either. going 2-6 ATS past 8 games.  I'm thinking this method will bounce back and get it done this year.  

    The method backs the 9ers, I can't bet against the 9ers with too many indicators on them but I can't back the hottest team coming into the playoffs, although we don't have any history on the 2 seed VS 7seed as the hottest team. I would rather just pass on the game.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    BONUS POINTS ................................. 2009 -2021

    5 of 11 no.1 ranked teams over 12 went to SB. Last season Bills no. 1 at 14.81 and no. 1 again.

    Not as strong as PR I & II at getting no. 1 ranked team over 12 to the SB. But this method hasn't gone 3 years without getting a no. 1 team into the SB. 2019 Ravens and last year's Bills didn't make it, NOW in the 3rd year Bills should do it.  This method hangs about 50%, it gets ahead then falls back, it gets behind then wins so this should be a year the no. 1 gets to the SB since it is 1 game under 50%.

    no. 1 ranked teams over 12 are 6-5 ATS in opening game of playoffs

    no 1 ranked teams that made the SB are 4-1 ATS in opening playoff game. Losing only by .5 when Saints scored on 4th down with 28 seconds left. So if you think Bills make the SB don't be afraid to lay the points.

     

    teams with a 4.5 diff in WC Round are ........................................

    10-8 ATS ... not a great record for sure. But this method was once 8-2 ATS, at 80% not likely to sustain such a great record, so now it has regressed but not likely to sustain that regression either. going 2-6 ATS past 8 games.  I'm thinking this method will bounce back and get it done this year.  

    The method backs the 9ers, I can't bet against the 9ers with too many indicators on them but I can't back the hottest team coming into the playoffs, although we don't have any history on the 2 seed VS 7seed as the hottest team. I would rather just pass on the game.

     
    theclaw
    theclaw
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2008
    Posts: 12148
    Posted: Jan. 14, 2023 - 12:39 PM ET #48

    Bills -13 (-120) over Dolphins

    Bills to win AFC +200 --- 2 units

    pending plays .................

    Jags +2.5 over Chargers --- 2.2 units

    Giants +3 over Vikings --- 1.1 units

    Boys -2.5 over Bucs --- 1.1 units

    pending futures ..........................

    9ers & Eagles to win NFC

    9ers and Eagles to win SB

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Bills -13 (-120) over Dolphins

    Bills to win AFC +200 --- 2 units

    pending plays .................

    Jags +2.5 over Chargers --- 2.2 units

    Giants +3 over Vikings --- 1.1 units

    Boys -2.5 over Bucs --- 1.1 units

    pending futures ..........................

    9ers & Eagles to win NFC

    9ers and Eagles to win SB

     
    busters1469
    busters1469
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2005
    Posts: 160
    Posted: Jan. 14, 2023 - 12:43 PM ET #49

    Claw…no play on niners game?

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Claw…no play on niners game?

     
     
    theclaw
    theclaw
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2008
    Posts: 12148
    Posted: Jan. 14, 2023 - 12:44 PM ET #50

    Allen being a TO machine really is concerning but I'll back the bonus pts no. 1 team.

    Also another meterics which of the top 2 teams one makes the SB about 70% of the years, hasn't won last couple of years so should be due according to regression. I love playing this type of regression. 

    Top 2 are 9ers and Bills, I'm very confident one of these teams makes the SB and in a good number of years both do.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Allen being a TO machine really is concerning but I'll back the bonus pts no. 1 team.

    Also another meterics which of the top 2 teams one makes the SB about 70% of the years, hasn't won last couple of years so should be due according to regression. I love playing this type of regression. 

    Top 2 are 9ers and Bills, I'm very confident one of these teams makes the SB and in a good number of years both do.

    All Forums | NFL Betting Forum
    «First Previous 234 ... 91011 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • Serious Streak Survivor Strategies 1,918,167 Covers arrow
    • PART DEUX 186 Covers arrow
    • Colts vs chiefs in-game live 1,726 Covers arrow
    • NFL LOCKED IN! 99,466 Covers arrow
    • Monday 09/21/2026 386 Covers arrow
    • ?? KBO Plays 🥎 14,637 Covers arrow
    • Dogs biting today? 4,197 Covers arrow
    • Week Two-Post Plays Here 1,355 Covers arrow
    • NCAA FOOTBALL. 151 23,377 Covers arrow
    • New York Giants @ Los Angeles Rams 2,075 Covers arrow

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.