Hold, boston etc., hope u all enjoyed the debacle at the end of GB game..21 pts in what, 3 min??..After being "completely dominated" for all but the last couple min. of game....Again, watch the guys hands on the onside kick....lol..That's supposed to be the HANDS TEAM for onsides] kicks...lol......Yeah, I had GB ML..... But totally unloaded on the pts...Would have cleaned their clocks good, but made out well...I think the biggest money maker for the Super Bowl will be Wilson versus Belichick, Brady....LUCK'S turn will come....He;s just that good!....But hey, knowing how this crap goes, N.E. isn't an entire shoo in yet...Good luck guys and may the tanking continue,,,,!
0
Hold, boston etc., hope u all enjoyed the debacle at the end of GB game..21 pts in what, 3 min??..After being "completely dominated" for all but the last couple min. of game....Again, watch the guys hands on the onside kick....lol..That's supposed to be the HANDS TEAM for onsides] kicks...lol......Yeah, I had GB ML..... But totally unloaded on the pts...Would have cleaned their clocks good, but made out well...I think the biggest money maker for the Super Bowl will be Wilson versus Belichick, Brady....LUCK'S turn will come....He;s just that good!....But hey, knowing how this crap goes, N.E. isn't an entire shoo in yet...Good luck guys and may the tanking continue,,,,!
Well, as I mentioned,they get the MONEYMAKER that they want.....HAWKS versus Brady......Brady's 6th appearance!.....Will look at OPENING LINE AND FIRST MOVES....Hawks weren't supposed to be there....Call it what u want!.....Right now, can't see them winning 2 in a row SB'S!.....But, depends on line, and movements plus public perception......
0
Well, as I mentioned,they get the MONEYMAKER that they want.....HAWKS versus Brady......Brady's 6th appearance!.....Will look at OPENING LINE AND FIRST MOVES....Hawks weren't supposed to be there....Call it what u want!.....Right now, can't see them winning 2 in a row SB'S!.....But, depends on line, and movements plus public perception......
Guys,, I can almost guarantee that the seahawks will be the underdog in the superbowl... I can also guarantee a bloodbath on a global scale... This could rival last years bloodbath with denver
0
Guys,, I can almost guarantee that the seahawks will be the underdog in the superbowl... I can also guarantee a bloodbath on a global scale... This could rival last years bloodbath with denver
Normally the team that looks better game before Super Bowl loses the big game
Seahawks back 2 back champs is my initial lean.
That angle makes alot of sense to me... Wilson looked constipated the whole first half.. Brady looked like brady... However you can't just go by that angle,, because if you look back,, there were multiple times where both teams won the game by a margin of 4 or less,, that's when Brady played the Giants... But either way I will be on the seahawks closing number... This time i may even put some on the ML... Hope this number flips by game time...
0
Quote Originally Posted by kaboons:
Normally the team that looks better game before Super Bowl loses the big game
Seahawks back 2 back champs is my initial lean.
That angle makes alot of sense to me... Wilson looked constipated the whole first half.. Brady looked like brady... However you can't just go by that angle,, because if you look back,, there were multiple times where both teams won the game by a margin of 4 or less,, that's when Brady played the Giants... But either way I will be on the seahawks closing number... This time i may even put some on the ML... Hope this number flips by game time...
Come to think of it guys,, Rogers has been nagging about his injury since the Saints game... He made it alllll the way to the final four... This is indeed one way to scare off the chips... 1 thirty second clip of Rogers and his injury could mean millions per game in V... Reminds me of last years backup qbs... They were covering spreads at a really high rate... Look at zona this year ,,, covered every spread and knocked out in the first round simply because that's were the SB will be hosted... Been a good season guys,, my best so far... But lets end it with a real punch... Just wanted to throw some angles out there to share with everyone that i dont always remember...
In the back of my head im just thinking,, Brady and Wilson never met.. And when Wilson takes down brady on the big stage... The next episode will be Brady vs Rogers as Manning will soon retire and Luck is born,, with a horseshoe stamped on his head...
This superbowl will be the biggest play i have ever made... Brady looked just as dominate as without Moss and welker when they tanked the last two superbowls... Im seeing this as another repeat.. This will be a huge lopsided game... Everyone and their moms will be on Brady and they would rather eat crap than to lay anything on the hawks... Gosh if there was ever a bigger bloodbath ,, i wouldnt be suprised if the seahawks win 3 in a row,, Jordan did it a few times.. lol... Thanks boston for this wonderful thread and everyone else that pitched in... Will be in vegas,, i can only imagine the amount of patriots jersey down the strip...
0
Come to think of it guys,, Rogers has been nagging about his injury since the Saints game... He made it alllll the way to the final four... This is indeed one way to scare off the chips... 1 thirty second clip of Rogers and his injury could mean millions per game in V... Reminds me of last years backup qbs... They were covering spreads at a really high rate... Look at zona this year ,,, covered every spread and knocked out in the first round simply because that's were the SB will be hosted... Been a good season guys,, my best so far... But lets end it with a real punch... Just wanted to throw some angles out there to share with everyone that i dont always remember...
In the back of my head im just thinking,, Brady and Wilson never met.. And when Wilson takes down brady on the big stage... The next episode will be Brady vs Rogers as Manning will soon retire and Luck is born,, with a horseshoe stamped on his head...
This superbowl will be the biggest play i have ever made... Brady looked just as dominate as without Moss and welker when they tanked the last two superbowls... Im seeing this as another repeat.. This will be a huge lopsided game... Everyone and their moms will be on Brady and they would rather eat crap than to lay anything on the hawks... Gosh if there was ever a bigger bloodbath ,, i wouldnt be suprised if the seahawks win 3 in a row,, Jordan did it a few times.. lol... Thanks boston for this wonderful thread and everyone else that pitched in... Will be in vegas,, i can only imagine the amount of patriots jersey down the strip...
Again im gonna dwell a bit on what happened in the Seahawks game. I was confident - even when down big that Seahawks would come back to win this game, but give Rodgers the cover. Rodgers 100% healthy and Packers wouldnt have covered, thats just how it works and you gotta relate to it. How is it possible for Seahawks to make so many mistakes in one week when they play so perfectly in another week? How can you do that? And btw, we know Seahawks have a great defense right? DOESNT MATTER, theres no good defenses in NFL, theres only good defenses when NFL wants team to play good defense, but Seahawks defense was absolutely terrible EVEN with a unhealthy Aaron Rodgers, its absolutely mind boggling that it turned out this way. Ive said all the way that if a team is going to win the Super Bowl Back to back its this years Seahawks if they dont, no1 will ever do it again probably. I also said a few years ago that Brady would get another ring before retiring, so either of these things will happen. Either Seahawks only team in the next 20 years to win back to back or Brady gets his ring. But anyways, i was confident Seahawks was gonna win this one so i took them +2.5 ingame and they managed to came out on top. But let me tell you what lost them this game; terrible decision making. Packers lost to just that. You know, Packers played conservative WHICH IS GREAT, DO THAT IF YOU WANNA HANG AROUND (not like Falcons - Giants a few years ago where Falcons went for every 4th and 1 and lost the game based off that) but here is the thing, Packers took a field goal when they could risk it for the touchdown but that is GREAT decision making in my book. But here is where Packers went away from conservative playcalling, when Packers where standing on Seahawks 29 yard line they had an "easy" field goal, so what they should have done here is run the ball get the few yards going and get out of here with 3 points on the board. But what did Packers do? They decided to throw the ball 3 EFFING TIMES, 3 TIMES MAN. Why would you throw on all 3 downs, absolutely stupid. But they did, and they got intercepted and they got away with NOTHING, absolutely NOTHING. Why would you ever want to throw the ball 3 out of 3 times with an INJURED Quarterback against a GOOD defense that has made so many interceptions? WHY, its so stupid. WHY WHY WHY WHY. It lost you the god damn game! This was the first time they did it, then they got within field goal range again a couple of drives later and then they made the same mistake all over AGAIN, and that was when i realized this game was good game and i decided to pull the trigger on Seahawks +2.5. They lost the game due to 2 decisions where they had 2 easy field goals, decided to throw the ball and got intercepted, and it all came down to this. If they had decided to RUN the ball (the running game had been perfect all game) and Lacy was running perfectly then they woulda won this game. Whether it was intentional or not for Packers to get intercepted twice so they could lose the game idk, but THIS was what meant Packers were not gonna get out on top to me, and thats why i backed Seahawks after i saw these 2 missed opportunities that the public fail to see.
0
Again im gonna dwell a bit on what happened in the Seahawks game. I was confident - even when down big that Seahawks would come back to win this game, but give Rodgers the cover. Rodgers 100% healthy and Packers wouldnt have covered, thats just how it works and you gotta relate to it. How is it possible for Seahawks to make so many mistakes in one week when they play so perfectly in another week? How can you do that? And btw, we know Seahawks have a great defense right? DOESNT MATTER, theres no good defenses in NFL, theres only good defenses when NFL wants team to play good defense, but Seahawks defense was absolutely terrible EVEN with a unhealthy Aaron Rodgers, its absolutely mind boggling that it turned out this way. Ive said all the way that if a team is going to win the Super Bowl Back to back its this years Seahawks if they dont, no1 will ever do it again probably. I also said a few years ago that Brady would get another ring before retiring, so either of these things will happen. Either Seahawks only team in the next 20 years to win back to back or Brady gets his ring. But anyways, i was confident Seahawks was gonna win this one so i took them +2.5 ingame and they managed to came out on top. But let me tell you what lost them this game; terrible decision making. Packers lost to just that. You know, Packers played conservative WHICH IS GREAT, DO THAT IF YOU WANNA HANG AROUND (not like Falcons - Giants a few years ago where Falcons went for every 4th and 1 and lost the game based off that) but here is the thing, Packers took a field goal when they could risk it for the touchdown but that is GREAT decision making in my book. But here is where Packers went away from conservative playcalling, when Packers where standing on Seahawks 29 yard line they had an "easy" field goal, so what they should have done here is run the ball get the few yards going and get out of here with 3 points on the board. But what did Packers do? They decided to throw the ball 3 EFFING TIMES, 3 TIMES MAN. Why would you throw on all 3 downs, absolutely stupid. But they did, and they got intercepted and they got away with NOTHING, absolutely NOTHING. Why would you ever want to throw the ball 3 out of 3 times with an INJURED Quarterback against a GOOD defense that has made so many interceptions? WHY, its so stupid. WHY WHY WHY WHY. It lost you the god damn game! This was the first time they did it, then they got within field goal range again a couple of drives later and then they made the same mistake all over AGAIN, and that was when i realized this game was good game and i decided to pull the trigger on Seahawks +2.5. They lost the game due to 2 decisions where they had 2 easy field goals, decided to throw the ball and got intercepted, and it all came down to this. If they had decided to RUN the ball (the running game had been perfect all game) and Lacy was running perfectly then they woulda won this game. Whether it was intentional or not for Packers to get intercepted twice so they could lose the game idk, but THIS was what meant Packers were not gonna get out on top to me, and thats why i backed Seahawks after i saw these 2 missed opportunities that the public fail to see.
Talking about a game wot already happened means nothing to bettors.
Let's talk wot will happen
It does. You can use it later looking back at what happened previously, it will help you cap games. Even this game will help you cap the Patriots - Seahawks game. Because Patriots blew out colts and seahawks won a tight game, its up to you how youll use this information if you value these outcomes.
0
Quote Originally Posted by midnightprowl:
Talking about a game wot already happened means nothing to bettors.
Let's talk wot will happen
It does. You can use it later looking back at what happened previously, it will help you cap games. Even this game will help you cap the Patriots - Seahawks game. Because Patriots blew out colts and seahawks won a tight game, its up to you how youll use this information if you value these outcomes.
Totally agree Asomugha.....The NFL plays big mind games.....As I said earlier, whoever went to Seattle yesterday was going to win outright, or at least cover...GB escaped versus Dallas, Rodgers leg , Seattle's big win the week before, Seattle's playoff record at home etc.....NOTHING pointed at GB, yet out of the blue they totally dominate a defense that was akin to the STEEL CURTAIN of the Steelers years back...GB pounds them in every phase of the game BUT the last 3 minutes or so....The NFL is nothing but glorified pro wrestling!.....Yet many of John Q. Public buy into it!!!!!!!
0
Totally agree Asomugha.....The NFL plays big mind games.....As I said earlier, whoever went to Seattle yesterday was going to win outright, or at least cover...GB escaped versus Dallas, Rodgers leg , Seattle's big win the week before, Seattle's playoff record at home etc.....NOTHING pointed at GB, yet out of the blue they totally dominate a defense that was akin to the STEEL CURTAIN of the Steelers years back...GB pounds them in every phase of the game BUT the last 3 minutes or so....The NFL is nothing but glorified pro wrestling!.....Yet many of John Q. Public buy into it!!!!!!!
The companies that run this Sh!t will not allow rogers to get shut out.. Which explains why the Seahawks had 10 flags against them in the first half... If it wernt for the refs seattle coulve easily shut out greenbay as most people would believe so,, just look at past matchups... No company would invest millions of dollars in ad space to watch arron rogers get shut out again... And im pretty sure the people that took greenbay in the past got burned one too many times so they ended up taking Seattle and the under.... considering Rogers was moaning about his injury alll season... Games that are supposed to go under went over,, and the Brady and luck game goes under... Now the brady game was completely for ad revenue and hype,, the seattle win will not be convincing enough for the millions of squares to take the Hawks again in the superbowl... But they will be all fooled,, take away those penalties and ad revenue and the game wouldve went as expected...
And the same people that took denver last year... Will take Brady this year....
0
SEA/GB
The companies that run this Sh!t will not allow rogers to get shut out.. Which explains why the Seahawks had 10 flags against them in the first half... If it wernt for the refs seattle coulve easily shut out greenbay as most people would believe so,, just look at past matchups... No company would invest millions of dollars in ad space to watch arron rogers get shut out again... And im pretty sure the people that took greenbay in the past got burned one too many times so they ended up taking Seattle and the under.... considering Rogers was moaning about his injury alll season... Games that are supposed to go under went over,, and the Brady and luck game goes under... Now the brady game was completely for ad revenue and hype,, the seattle win will not be convincing enough for the millions of squares to take the Hawks again in the superbowl... But they will be all fooled,, take away those penalties and ad revenue and the game wouldve went as expected...
And the same people that took denver last year... Will take Brady this year....
I think vegas is begging for action on Seahawks? You guys see new article on covers frontpage where an oddsmaker claims that the deflated balls thingy could affect Patriots in a negative reaction. Such claims by oddsmakers makes me think they want action on Seahawks.
0
I think vegas is begging for action on Seahawks? You guys see new article on covers frontpage where an oddsmaker claims that the deflated balls thingy could affect Patriots in a negative reaction. Such claims by oddsmakers makes me think they want action on Seahawks.
Just for now, I think with the line at only pick 'em, after that destruction by Ne, John Q. Public gotta love NE.....Add that to the fact that Seattle should have lost, and yes, reminds me of the Denver tanking last year....But gotta watch this next week or so, line, ML etc,,,Will be in touch!.......
0
Just for now, I think with the line at only pick 'em, after that destruction by Ne, John Q. Public gotta love NE.....Add that to the fact that Seattle should have lost, and yes, reminds me of the Denver tanking last year....But gotta watch this next week or so, line, ML etc,,,Will be in touch!.......
I think vegas is begging for action on Seahawks? You guys see new article on covers frontpage where an oddsmaker claims that the deflated balls thingy could affect Patriots in a negative reaction. Such claims by oddsmakers makes me think they want action on Seahawks.
This is a great angle to look at! I agree Asomugha! Vegas needs some She-Hawks money coming in to even out the action
0
Quote Originally Posted by Asomugha:
I think vegas is begging for action on Seahawks? You guys see new article on covers frontpage where an oddsmaker claims that the deflated balls thingy could affect Patriots in a negative reaction. Such claims by oddsmakers makes me think they want action on Seahawks.
This is a great angle to look at! I agree Asomugha! Vegas needs some She-Hawks money coming in to even out the action
Well, line is now Seattle plus 1....So the 'dinero' is going on N.E......... IF this continues, gotta go Hawks, esp. after looking pathetic the last game!.....So, will still watch!...Can't trust tv, newspapers, internet etc....They help indirectly to control it all too....Ever stop to think that they DON'T want a cheating team to win?....hmmmmmmmmmmm!!!!!!!!!!!
0
Well, line is now Seattle plus 1....So the 'dinero' is going on N.E......... IF this continues, gotta go Hawks, esp. after looking pathetic the last game!.....So, will still watch!...Can't trust tv, newspapers, internet etc....They help indirectly to control it all too....Ever stop to think that they DON'T want a cheating team to win?....hmmmmmmmmmmm!!!!!!!!!!!
[Quote: Originally Posted by inthetank]Well, line is now Seattle plus 1....So the 'dinero' is going on N.E.........IF this continues, gotta go Hawks, esp. after looking pathetic the last game!.....So, will still watch!...Can't trust tv, newspapers, internet etc....They help indirectly to control it all too....Ever stop to think that they DON'T want a cheating team to win?....hmmmmmmmmmmm!!!!!!!!!!![/Quote
Really a cheating team....the only people who say pats cheat are the ones who hate them....this scandal is smoke screen to get money pouring in on Seattle...smoke sreen....open ur eyes
0
[Quote: Originally Posted by inthetank]Well, line is now Seattle plus 1....So the 'dinero' is going on N.E.........IF this continues, gotta go Hawks, esp. after looking pathetic the last game!.....So, will still watch!...Can't trust tv, newspapers, internet etc....They help indirectly to control it all too....Ever stop to think that they DON'T want a cheating team to win?....hmmmmmmmmmmm!!!!!!!!!!
Hot Forum Topics
