All Forums | NFL Betting Forum

Giants -3 over Jaguars. I don't care how square you think that pick is.There is good reason 2takeit.

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 24130
Posts: 300
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #226
Quote Originally Posted by benhogan76:

Weak sauce, hard to defend you with comments like this.  Its the NFL you can research all you want and look like smartest guy in the room for 55 minutes and still , sack up and take the  loss.  You keep backing terrible teams, this one on the road giving points.  You cant be surprised that GMen sh it the bed.

They didn't garbage the bed. They fumbled the game away.

Not only did they fumble it alway. Those fumbles resulted in half their scoring output.

Jags D - one if the worst second quarters of the year by any team. So for all the lauding, man did they stink it up for a half.

jags offense - before the final drive? 180 yards of total offense (90 passing 90 rushing) wow. Great bet. I only told you there Offense was shi* half a dozen times with a QB that has a worse QBR than Geno Smith. Did they prove it outside of one drive. Yeah, by leaps and bounds.

Giants injuries? More came. Right tackle on a line that has nothing already and the guy who rushes for near 100 yards and 2 TD's? Gone. Putting the ball in the hands of the ultra skittish Eli at the worst possible time.

A fu**ing luck box bet that paid off like a broken fu**in slot machine.

What a fuc*in joke.

I keep backing terrible teams....except the guy on the other side was backing the WORST TEAM in the league with a push line requiring a win. Try paying attention to what the hell you are saying before you say it. 

The team played like total shi* and I'll
Say it again, the crowd gave a MOCKING cheer when it was 21-3 like a "heeeeeeeeey....we got one!!!"

Of COURSE two fumbles can put you back in the game. If little sisters of the poor ran two fumbles back for TD's they may cover a number against the Jags.

Now you can "weak sauce" my a**. I watched the game. Did you?

Jags were an awful play with an awful awful team that were revitalized with not one but two fumble recoveries. How convenient..

Great play! See ya at the window waiting for your teams to luck into some more bullshi t covers. What a disgrace. Just like the Denver backers over the jets. Disgusting. A mockery to world of capping
To hand money over to the jags side. It's like meth money. Dirty cash all the way.

Time to get off this POS site.


 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2011
Posts: 9317
Posted: #227
Get em next time Scal, at least you provided reasons for liking your pick. Looking forward to your next play and GL on a bounceback 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 1472
Posted: #228
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:


They didn't garbage the bed. They fumbled the game away.

Not only did they fumble it alway. Those fumbles resulted in half their scoring output.

Jags D - one if the worst second quarters of the year by any team. So for all the lauding, man did they stink it up for a half.

jags offense - before the final drive? 180 yards of total offense (90 passing 90 rushing) wow. Great bet. I only told you there Offense was shi* half a dozen times with a QB that has a worse QBR than Geno Smith. Did they prove it outside of one drive. Yeah, by leaps and bounds.

Giants injuries? More came. Right tackle on a line that has nothing already and the guy who rushes for near 100 yards and 2 TD's? Gone. Putting the ball in the hands of the ultra skittish Eli at the worst possible time.

A fu**ing luck box bet that paid off like a broken fu**in slot machine.

What a fuc*in joke.

I keep backing terrible teams....except the guy on the other side was backing the WORST TEAM in the league with a push line requiring a win. Try paying attention to what the hell you are saying before you say it. 

The team played like total shi* and I'll
Say it again, the crowd gave a MOCKING cheer when it was 21-3 like a "heeeeeeeeey....we got one!!!"

Of COURSE two fumbles can put you back in the game. If little sisters of the poor ran two fumbles back for TD's they may cover a number against the Jags.

Now you can "weak sauce" my a**. I watched the game. Did you?

Jags were an awful play with an awful awful team that were revitalized with not one but two fumble recoveries. How convenient..

Great play! See ya at the window waiting for your teams to luck into some more bullshi t covers. What a disgrace. Just like the Denver backers over the jets. Disgusting. A mockery to world of capping
To hand money over to the jags side. It's like meth money. Dirty cash all the way.

Time to get off this POS site.


  Insufferable.  Arrogance and ineptitude beyond belief. 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2013
Posts: 886
Posted: #229
Cash the heat -3.5!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 11-0
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2013
Posts: 886
Posted: #230
Dolphins -7 tomorrow. Scalabrine is the best. Why did you guys scare him off the site. Now I have no one to fade anymore smh
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 8541
Posted: #231
Keep your chin up . You will get them next time or the next after that or the next after that or the next after that or the next after that or the next after that
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2006
Posts: 19693
Posted: #232
When you bet garbage, you get garbage.

At least you have a damn idea. At least you make more than one point. And it's not like you're 1-7..............

If you need to walk away, then you are smarter than most that keep betting because they are "due"

I hope you reconsider. It would be nice if there was a rebuttal to point out how the Jags could win ("I pretty much think if they can run back two fumbles for touchdowns, they have a chance") instead of the classic "you suck" punchline. 

The number of "people" with less than 1500 or even 500 posts, and not even an avatar (is it that hard? You can afford to bet, but you can't afford an avatar? Really?) is truly amazing. Whenever I see that, I know that person really cares, and will have a good take. Not.

Hope to see you before the playoffs.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #233
Quote Originally Posted by LeagueCapper:

Get em next time Scal, at least you provided reasons for liking your pick. Looking forward to your next play and GL on a bounceback 


Ah, if there is an next time.

Good luck with everything in capping and in life.

I'd go back and play the NBA but the minute I start fading the fuking Knicks they'll go on a winning streak. 

I should put my whole bankroll on the jets and end this shi* right now and go out with the team that's fu**** me for 26 years.

Maybe I'll do that.

Maybe I'll just dump it all on the Jets ML
and then I won't have anything to write up again?


I'll think about it.

Jets ML for all the beans...

Now you're talking...


LC thank you for the inspiration on this one! I'm gonna sleep on it!


 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #234
Quote Originally Posted by The Hawk:

When you bet garbage, you get garbage.

At least you have a damn idea. At least you make more than one point. And it's not like you're 1-7..............

If you need to walk away, then you are smarter than most that keep betting because they are "due"

I hope you reconsider. It would be nice if there was a rebuttal to point out how the Jags could win ("I pretty much think if they can run back two fumbles for touchdowns, they have a chance") instead of the classic "you suck" punchline. 

The number of "people" with less than 1500 or even 500 posts, and not even an avatar (is it that hard? You can afford to bet, but you can't afford an avatar? Really?) is truly amazing. Whenever I see that, I know that person really cares, and will have a good take. Not.

Hope to see you before the playoffs.
And I hope the jets win tomorrow because I have an itchy mouse clicking finger at the moment and my 5 dimes account is wide open like the doors of a brothel in Bangkok.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2013
Posts: 1923
Posted: #235
Stay away from the NY teams, living in NY doesn't make you an expert at capping NY games. Just saying 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 17917
Posted: #236
Just chill out.

you had the right side.  As I said, the teams stink, so you're taking a chance one may fold-and the Giants did.

Don't let the people get to you.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2014
Posts: 1364
Posted: #237
This thread.needs a nap....tomorrow is a new day Scal
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2011
Posts: 7891
Posted: #238
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:



Had to come back for this comment.

"jags were within the number for 28 minutes of game time"

That of course is taking a 0-0 first quarter into play.

So because a game starts 0-0, the side that takes the jags is justified somehow or legitimized before anyone even scores because the spread is +3 and therefore the Jags are inside the number for the time it takes the Giants to score.

Well I guess when Alabama plays Idaho and lays 50, the Idaho bettor can lose 57-0 on a Bama TD with 7 minutes left in the 4th can say, "hey come on now, I was inside the number for 53 minutes!"


And the second comment where I said the Giants would be motivated.

21-0 isn't motivated because the giants didn't score consistently for 60 minutes guys! I mean, two fumble recoveries for TD's aren't deflating!!!?!! And 21-0 of course means nothing. It's only about as much as a team this bad can score in 1/2 of football (this isn't the Packers we are talking about).

Dude, shut up before I have to tear you apart a third time.

Wow, you really are a girl.  

You like to spout off a lot of hot air man.  Real gamblers don't behave like you do when you lose.  You're like that crybaby poker player berating other players when they play bad and get a lucky win.  Take your loss like a man and move on.  No wonder you are on a cold streak, your head is running a million miles a minute.  I mean just look at all these long-winded responses.  You're a total crackhead!!!!!  

I mean for real, I just typed that out and it felt like it took forever, and that is just a normal sized thread title for you,.

Hey, you sought the attention with your wanna-be-writer style and your "meatiest" run-on-sentence write ups.  So now you got it.  You can't even take a loss without a complete melt-down.  

Good luck with your plays man, I couldn't care less if you made a few losing plays, I don't root for people to lose.  But you have a serious attitude problem, and your head ain't right.  I think you have serious delusion issues when it comes to analyzing whether you made a good play.  

Giants were the right side, fine, no argument,.  They lost.  Deal with it.  It happens, to everyone.  It definitely happens MORE when bet on $hitty teams and you completely the discount the motivation of opposing players.  Not to mention, you are completely unqualified to comment on ANYONE's motivation (aside from your own), especially a group of professional athletes.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 2234
Posted: #239
Ya man take a step away for a couple days and rebound.  I always read your threads but you really are so tilted right now its crazy.  My advice is stop trying to predict these horrendous ny teams before they ruin you.  This is the worst I have ever seen these new york teams talent, effort, coaching, and consistency wise.  Including the knicks and nets.  Aside from rare occasions I am currently only look to fade these teams because even if you get the game wrong they might still not show up for a half or crap down their pants.

You are only a couple games under 500 you can recover easy as long as you weren't betting over your head.  Just take a step back and youll be fine.  Also, stop worrying so much about your writeups and the covers community.  And don't blow your roll on the jets.  It's ok if they cover and you don't bet on them, infact you might feel good doing so.  You can find a better spot with another team. GL man.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2011
Posts: 7891
Posted: #240
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:




"jags were within the number for 28 minutes of game time"

That of course is taking a 0-0 first quarter into play.



As for this.  What can I say.  It's just a fact.  You know what a FACT is, don't  you?  And LOL comparing a 50 point fave to this game with a small spread.  My point was that it wasn't like the Giants were covering the ENTIRE game, like that one guy was alluding to.  

You're a total crybaby.  You even tried to say Notre Dame was the right side when they lost to Louisville.  The trailed most of the 4th quarter (if not all of it), were a home fave and LOST.  LOOOSSTT.  As a home favorite, they couldn't even play their opponent to a DRAW.  They even had a chance to save the day and go to OT, and they couldn't even execute a simple field goal! They suck!!  You have nerve trying to say you had the right side when you are laying points and the game almost went to OT.  LOL. That's comical.  But, they didn't get OT did they, because they LOST.    Sorry, I was on Louisville that day, and it WAS the right side, and it WAS the right result.  

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2010
Posts: 6718
Posted: #241
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:

I'd go back and play the NBA but the minute I start fading the fuking Knicks they'll go on a winning streak.



Try not to let the haters get to you scalabrine.
I appreciate your contributions to this website and have done so for a number of years now and I'm sure many others do as well.
Will check out your next lean/s.

Good luck
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2014
Posts: 5903
Posted: #242
I thought he left, he’s posting in the NBA already.  
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 4008
Posted: #243
Scal more write ups need one for Monday Night Football. 10,000 word minimum. 
I have a huge man crush on BLB
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2013
Posts: 6803
Posted: #244
lol funny when it was halftime it was dead quite

keep chuggin thru
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 2241
Posted: #245
Because halftime is no time to count your winnings/loses. The real problem is his attitude though 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2014
Posts: 5903
Posted: #246
Scal, what can I do to get on your good side? 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2002
Posts: 532
Posted: #247

Quote Originally Posted by CAPT-DOUCHE:

Scal, what can I do to get on your good side? 

Officer Darren Wilson,

why did you use deadly force on an innocent, church going, future college student, fun loving, friendly, caring law abiding citizen young unarm African American male sir?  Wasn't there an alternative solution to your deadly force decision?

please explains....

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2013
Posts: 15769
Posted: #248
Quote Originally Posted by CAPT-DOUCHE:

Scal, what can I do to get on your good side? 

dude,seriously over 1300 posts in a cupple months and most of them berating/mocking scalabrine(whilst pretending that youre not mocking/berating him)?????..........jeez,and i thought I wasted a little too much time in this cesspit.
how bout going and spending sum time with family or loved ones instead of breathing down this dudes neck every minute of every fu.ken day??
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 4008
Posted: #249
Capt-Douche are you waiting for Scal's MNF write up or what? I can't wait for him to pick the Jets again trying to tell us they will be extremely motivated for this game against the Fins?
I have a huge man crush on BLB
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2014
Posts: 97
Posted: #250
Quote Originally Posted by bk1374:


Wow, you really are a girl.  

You like to spout off a lot of hot air man.  Real gamblers don't behave like you do when you lose.  You're like that crybaby poker player berating other players when they play bad and get a lucky win.  Take your loss like a man and move on.  No wonder you are on a cold streak, your head is running a million miles a minute.  I mean just look at all these long-winded responses.  You're a total crackhead!!!!!  

I mean for real, I just typed that out and it felt like it took forever, and that is just a normal sized thread title for you,.

Hey, you sought the attention with your wanna-be-writer style and your "meatiest" run-on-sentence write ups.  So now you got it.  You can't even take a loss without a complete melt-down.  

Good luck with your plays man, I couldn't care less if you made a few losing plays, I don't root for people to lose.  But you have a serious attitude problem, and your head ain't right.  I think you have serious delusion issues when it comes to analyzing whether you made a good play.  

Giants were the right side, fine, no argument,.  They lost.  Deal with it.  It happens, to everyone.  It definitely happens MORE when bet on $hitty teams and you completely the discount the motivation of opposing players.  Not to mention, you are completely unqualified to comment on ANYONE's motivation (aside from your own), especially a group of professional athletes.

All Forums | NFL Betting Forum
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gambling
Betting Sites
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
21+
Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
Covers is verified safe by:
Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.