• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
    • NFL Week 2
      NFL Week 2
      • NFL Odds
      • NFL Picks
      • Lions-Bills Early Leans
      • Early Survivor Picks
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | NFL Betting Forum

    Giants -3 over Jaguars. I don't care how square you think that pick is.There is good reason 2takeit.

    «First Previous 123 ... 101112 Next Last»
    lmb4321
    PuckHound
    snowman76
    St2ee
    DeLoreanStylez
    ...
    Participants:
    Search model icon
    Views: 24130
    Posts: 300
    «First Previous 123 ... 101112 Next Last»
     
    lmb4321
    lmb4321
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2014
    Posts: 12395
    Posted: Dec. 1, 2014 - 1:33 AM ET #251

    Scal...you will bounce back.....this was a weird game to say the least....got lucky on the Jags....but your input on your picks are still pertinent......win or lose.....keep posting....
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Scal...you will bounce back.....this was a weird game to say the least....got lucky on the Jags....but your input on your picks are still pertinent......win or lose.....keep posting....
     
    PuckHound
    PuckHound
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2013
    Posts: 164
    Posted: Dec. 1, 2014 - 1:48 AM ET #252

    Wow, this guy is on the right side a lot for someone who is 5-7. I bet he's never won a game by getting lucky either. He probably only has bad beats. That's how you know a true loser. When they only complain about bad beats and pretend they never got a lucky bounce. Real gamblers know that stuff all evens out. I mean, how can things go bad for the Giants? They're 3-9. Things never go bad for a 3-9 team.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Wow, this guy is on the right side a lot for someone who is 5-7. I bet he's never won a game by getting lucky either. He probably only has bad beats. That's how you know a true loser. When they only complain about bad beats and pretend they never got a lucky bounce. Real gamblers know that stuff all evens out. I mean, how can things go bad for the Giants? They're 3-9. Things never go bad for a 3-9 team.
     
    snowman76
    snowman76
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2009
    Posts: 8383
    Posted: Dec. 1, 2014 - 2:02 AM ET #253

       oh this is great Scal steals my winning GB pick, and loses his devil and the pitchfork Giants   Hes 5-7, im 4-6,  you are crappy as me Scal.    Bwahahahaha   
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
       oh this is great Scal steals my winning GB pick, and loses his devil and the pitchfork Giants   Hes 5-7, im 4-6,  you are crappy as me Scal.    Bwahahahaha   
     
    St2ee
    St2ee
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2010
    Posts: 7947
    Posted: Dec. 1, 2014 - 2:12 AM ET #254

    Quote Originally Posted by CAPT-DOUCHE:

    Scal, what can I do to get on your good side? 

    You are such a loser bro.  You know what you can do buddy, grow the f up.  This forum is suppose to be a place to gather information to help you win.  Not a place to harass people like Scal who are trying to help.  Find another hobby, this is not healthy for you. 

    Scal don't sweat it buddy, we have all been on cold streaks.  People just tend to comment more than when its going the other way.  Most of these clowns are jealous attention seekers hoping for a poster to lose.  I just laugh at the sadness of their lives. 

    Take comfort in these words and regroup buddy.....

    “What does it mean to be the best? It means you have to be better than the number two guy. But what gratification is there in that? He's a loser—that’s why he's number two.”


    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by CAPT-DOUCHE:

    Scal, what can I do to get on your good side? 

    You are such a loser bro.  You know what you can do buddy, grow the f up.  This forum is suppose to be a place to gather information to help you win.  Not a place to harass people like Scal who are trying to help.  Find another hobby, this is not healthy for you. 

    Scal don't sweat it buddy, we have all been on cold streaks.  People just tend to comment more than when its going the other way.  Most of these clowns are jealous attention seekers hoping for a poster to lose.  I just laugh at the sadness of their lives. 

    Take comfort in these words and regroup buddy.....

    “What does it mean to be the best? It means you have to be better than the number two guy. But what gratification is there in that? He's a loser—that’s why he's number two.”


     
    DeLoreanStylez
    DeLoreanStylez
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2012
    Posts: 934
    Posted: Dec. 1, 2014 - 12:03 PM ET #255

    Quote Originally Posted by bk1374:


    As for this.  What can I say.  It's just a fact.  You know what a FACT is, don't  you?  And LOL comparing a 50 point fave to this game with a small spread.  My point was that it wasn't like the Giants were covering the ENTIRE game, like that one guy was alluding to.  

    You're a total crybaby.  You even tried to say Notre Dame was the right side when they lost to Louisville.  The trailed most of the 4th quarter (if not all of it), were a home fave and LOST.  LOOOSSTT.  As a home favorite, they couldn't even play their opponent to a DRAW.  They even had a chance to save the day and go to OT, and they couldn't even execute a simple field goal! They suck!!  You have nerve trying to say you had the right side when you are laying points and the game almost went to OT.  LOL. That's comical.  But, they didn't get OT did they, because they LOST.    Sorry, I was on Louisville that day, and it WAS the right side, and it WAS the right result.  



    Are you fuking retarded ? The giants were covering up until 12minutes of the 4th quarter.... so YES they were covering pretty much the ENTIRE game.  When Jax scored the td and went for 2 , if they had converted the 2 it would have been a 24-24 game , forcing whoever scored next to at least push on the spread. You are fuking clueless sometimes with your pointless bashing.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by bk1374:


    As for this.  What can I say.  It's just a fact.  You know what a FACT is, don't  you?  And LOL comparing a 50 point fave to this game with a small spread.  My point was that it wasn't like the Giants were covering the ENTIRE game, like that one guy was alluding to.  

    You're a total crybaby.  You even tried to say Notre Dame was the right side when they lost to Louisville.  The trailed most of the 4th quarter (if not all of it), were a home fave and LOST.  LOOOSSTT.  As a home favorite, they couldn't even play their opponent to a DRAW.  They even had a chance to save the day and go to OT, and they couldn't even execute a simple field goal! They suck!!  You have nerve trying to say you had the right side when you are laying points and the game almost went to OT.  LOL. That's comical.  But, they didn't get OT did they, because they LOST.    Sorry, I was on Louisville that day, and it WAS the right side, and it WAS the right result.  



    Are you fuking retarded ? The giants were covering up until 12minutes of the 4th quarter.... so YES they were covering pretty much the ENTIRE game.  When Jax scored the td and went for 2 , if they had converted the 2 it would have been a 24-24 game , forcing whoever scored next to at least push on the spread. You are fuking clueless sometimes with your pointless bashing.
     
    bonchie123
    bonchie123
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2013
    Posts: 884
    Posted: Dec. 1, 2014 - 12:23 PM ET #256

    I won on the Jags. Part of my system is home dogs + the other side being a huge public favorite. In other words, go against the squarest of the squarest plays and you come out ahead in the long run.

    But, that's not important.

    Why would you play this if you didn't want to take the Jags? There were a dozen other games to choose from. Just go no play. Noway should you fall into such an easily recognizable trap game. The line made no sense from the start.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    I won on the Jags. Part of my system is home dogs + the other side being a huge public favorite. In other words, go against the squarest of the squarest plays and you come out ahead in the long run.

    But, that's not important.

    Why would you play this if you didn't want to take the Jags? There were a dozen other games to choose from. Just go no play. Noway should you fall into such an easily recognizable trap game. The line made no sense from the start.
     
    Macwestie1
    Macwestie1
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2004
    Posts: 171094
    Posted: Dec. 1, 2014 - 1:01 PM ET #257

    Man oh man does this thread ever END?

    Let's Move on PPL still Bashing & Trolling? .... sheeeeez!

    What do you call an Eternal Optimist? An accordion player with a beeper!
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Man oh man does this thread ever END?

    Let's Move on PPL still Bashing & Trolling? .... sheeeeez!

     
    FreeThinker_MD
    FreeThinker_MD
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2013
    Posts: 652
    Posted: Dec. 1, 2014 - 1:59 PM ET #258

    Quote Originally Posted by Macwestie1:

    Man oh man does this thread ever END?

    Let's Move on PPL still Bashing & Trolling? .... sheeeeez!


    Nope 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by Macwestie1:

    Man oh man does this thread ever END?

    Let's Move on PPL still Bashing & Trolling? .... sheeeeez!


    Nope 
     
    bk1374
    bk1374
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2011
    Posts: 7891
    Posted: Dec. 1, 2014 - 2:00 PM ET #259

    Quote Originally Posted by DeLoreanStylez:



    Are you fuking retarded ? The giants were covering up until 12minutes of the 4th quarter.... so YES they were covering pretty much the ENTIRE game.  When Jax scored the td and went for 2 , if they had converted the 2 it would have been a 24-24 game , forcing whoever scored next to at least push on the spread. You are fuking clueless sometimes with your pointless bashing.

    They Giants didn't score until early in the 2nd quarter, so they weren't covering until then.  Someone said the Jags got the cover in the final 2 minutes, and I was just pointing out that they did not.  As I said, the Giants were covering about half of the game (28/32), which is 100% accurate.  

    Is it important or even relevant as to how long the Giants were covering for?  No, not really.  I was just stating the facts and correcting/clarify the previous post.


    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by DeLoreanStylez:



    Are you fuking retarded ? The giants were covering up until 12minutes of the 4th quarter.... so YES they were covering pretty much the ENTIRE game.  When Jax scored the td and went for 2 , if they had converted the 2 it would have been a 24-24 game , forcing whoever scored next to at least push on the spread. You are fuking clueless sometimes with your pointless bashing.

    They Giants didn't score until early in the 2nd quarter, so they weren't covering until then.  Someone said the Jags got the cover in the final 2 minutes, and I was just pointing out that they did not.  As I said, the Giants were covering about half of the game (28/32), which is 100% accurate.  

    Is it important or even relevant as to how long the Giants were covering for?  No, not really.  I was just stating the facts and correcting/clarify the previous post.


     
    GhostfacePitta
    GhostfacePitta
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2014
    Posts: 30
    Posted: Dec. 1, 2014 - 2:13 PM ET #260

    Quote Originally Posted by bonchie123:

    I won on the Jags. Part of my system is home dogs + the other side being a huge public favorite. In other words, go against the squarest of the squarest plays and you come out ahead in the long run.

    But, that's not important.

    Why would you play this if you didn't want to take the Jags? There were a dozen other games to choose from. Just go no play. Noway should you fall into such an easily recognizable trap game. The line made no sense from the start.

    this wasnt a trap game, the giants were the obvious right side...couple unfortunate TOs cost them the game...if you bet the jags be happy you got very lucky...if you bet the giants, be happy you played the side w/ value and just hope for better turnout next time around...id play the g men in this spot every single time...
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by bonchie123:

    I won on the Jags. Part of my system is home dogs + the other side being a huge public favorite. In other words, go against the squarest of the squarest plays and you come out ahead in the long run.

    But, that's not important.

    Why would you play this if you didn't want to take the Jags? There were a dozen other games to choose from. Just go no play. Noway should you fall into such an easily recognizable trap game. The line made no sense from the start.

    this wasnt a trap game, the giants were the obvious right side...couple unfortunate TOs cost them the game...if you bet the jags be happy you got very lucky...if you bet the giants, be happy you played the side w/ value and just hope for better turnout next time around...id play the g men in this spot every single time...
     
    FreeThinker_MD
    FreeThinker_MD
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2013
    Posts: 652
    Posted: Dec. 1, 2014 - 2:22 PM ET #261

    Quote Originally Posted by GhostfacePitta:


    this wasnt a trap game, the giants were the obvious right side...couple unfortunate TOs cost them the game...if you bet the jags be happy you got very lucky...if you bet the giants, be happy you played the side w/ value and just hope for better turnout next time around...id play the g men in this spot every single time...
    TOs happen to bad teams more often! 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by GhostfacePitta:


    this wasnt a trap game, the giants were the obvious right side...couple unfortunate TOs cost them the game...if you bet the jags be happy you got very lucky...if you bet the giants, be happy you played the side w/ value and just hope for better turnout next time around...id play the g men in this spot every single time...
    TOs happen to bad teams more often! 
     
    bonchie123
    bonchie123
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2013
    Posts: 884
    Posted: Dec. 1, 2014 - 2:55 PM ET #262

    Quote Originally Posted by GhostfacePitta:


    this wasnt a trap game, the giants were the obvious right side...couple unfortunate TOs cost them the game...if you bet the jags be happy you got very lucky...if you bet the giants, be happy you played the side w/ value and just hope for better turnout next time around...id play the g men in this spot every single time...

    And you'd lose more then 50% of the time. 

    The right side was the Jags. They covered. 

    That line stayed at -2.5 even as everyone and their mother bet the Giants. That should of tipped anyone off to go Jags or no play. The Giants were nowhere near the "right side." They were a road favorite with only three wins.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by GhostfacePitta:


    this wasnt a trap game, the giants were the obvious right side...couple unfortunate TOs cost them the game...if you bet the jags be happy you got very lucky...if you bet the giants, be happy you played the side w/ value and just hope for better turnout next time around...id play the g men in this spot every single time...

    And you'd lose more then 50% of the time. 

    The right side was the Jags. They covered. 

    That line stayed at -2.5 even as everyone and their mother bet the Giants. That should of tipped anyone off to go Jags or no play. The Giants were nowhere near the "right side." They were a road favorite with only three wins.
     
    statfreak
    statfreak
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2007
    Posts: 2241
    Posted: Dec. 1, 2014 - 3:04 PM ET #263

    Quote Originally Posted by GhostfacePitta:


    this wasnt a trap game, the giants were the obvious right side...couple unfortunate TOs cost them the game...if you bet the jags be happy you got very lucky...if you bet the giants, be happy you played the side w/ value and just hope for better turnout next time around...id play the g men in this spot every single time...

    Those are not fluke TOs... They always commit turnovers, lots of them, why do you guys still think it's some rare fenomenom or super bad beat? That's the way their games go
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by GhostfacePitta:


    this wasnt a trap game, the giants were the obvious right side...couple unfortunate TOs cost them the game...if you bet the jags be happy you got very lucky...if you bet the giants, be happy you played the side w/ value and just hope for better turnout next time around...id play the g men in this spot every single time...

    Those are not fluke TOs... They always commit turnovers, lots of them, why do you guys still think it's some rare fenomenom or super bad beat? That's the way their games go
     
    CAPT-DOUCHE
    CAPT-DOUCHE
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2014
    Posts: 5903
    Posted: Dec. 1, 2014 - 3:14 PM ET #264

    QUOTE Originally Posted by CAPT-DOUCHE:

    Scal, what can I do to get on your good side? 

    dude,seriously over 1300 posts in a cupple months and most of them berating/mocking scalabrine(whilst pretending that youre not mocking/berating him)?????..........jeez,and i thought I wasted a little too much time in this cesspit.
    how bout going and spending sum time with family or loved ones instead of breathing down this dudes neck every minute of every fu.ken day??


    I think you have a charchter identification problem, slow the pace down, don’t hit the keys so hard bro.  

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    QUOTE Originally Posted by CAPT-DOUCHE:

    Scal, what can I do to get on your good side? 

    dude,seriously over 1300 posts in a cupple months and most of them berating/mocking scalabrine(whilst pretending that youre not mocking/berating him)?????..........jeez,and i thought I wasted a little too much time in this cesspit.
    how bout going and spending sum time with family or loved ones instead of breathing down this dudes neck every minute of every fu.ken day??


    I think you have a charchter identification problem, slow the pace down, don’t hit the keys so hard bro.  

     
    snowman76
    snowman76
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2009
    Posts: 8383
    Posted: Dec. 1, 2014 - 4:05 PM ET #265

       GB moneyline,  lay the points in the superbowl on Pats
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
       GB moneyline,  lay the points in the superbowl on Pats
     
    melossinglet
    melossinglet
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2013
    Posts: 15769
    Posted: Dec. 1, 2014 - 4:20 PM ET #266

    Quote Originally Posted by CAPT-DOUCHE:

    QUOTE Originally Posted by CAPT-DOUCHE:

    Scal, what can I do to get on your good side? 

    dude,seriously over 1300 posts in a cupple months and most of them berating/mocking scalabrine(whilst pretending that youre not mocking/berating him)?????..........jeez,and i thought I wasted a little too much time in this cesspit.
    how bout going and spending sum time with family or loved ones instead of breathing down this dudes neck every minute of every fu.ken day??


    I think you have a charchter identification problem, slow the pace down, don’t hit the keys so hard bro.  


    wat are you talking about,"BRO"???no character identification problem here....youre the one im referring to CAPT-DOUCHE,the one who is in every single one of scalabrines threads every single time he posts having a god old laugh at his expense while trying to buddy up to him and act as if everythings cool at the same time.....are you that impossibly thick that you dont realise sumone can just search your history to confirm this??
    im hitting the keys with just the requisite amount of force thanks very much

    again,go and talk to your wife or kids or sumthing and stop scratching and clawing at scalabrines sack....you'd be surprised at wat it will do for your sense of well-being,"BRO"
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by CAPT-DOUCHE:

    QUOTE Originally Posted by CAPT-DOUCHE:

    Scal, what can I do to get on your good side? 

    dude,seriously over 1300 posts in a cupple months and most of them berating/mocking scalabrine(whilst pretending that youre not mocking/berating him)?????..........jeez,and i thought I wasted a little too much time in this cesspit.
    how bout going and spending sum time with family or loved ones instead of breathing down this dudes neck every minute of every fu.ken day??


    I think you have a charchter identification problem, slow the pace down, don’t hit the keys so hard bro.  


    wat are you talking about,"BRO"???no character identification problem here....youre the one im referring to CAPT-DOUCHE,the one who is in every single one of scalabrines threads every single time he posts having a god old laugh at his expense while trying to buddy up to him and act as if everythings cool at the same time.....are you that impossibly thick that you dont realise sumone can just search your history to confirm this??
    im hitting the keys with just the requisite amount of force thanks very much

    again,go and talk to your wife or kids or sumthing and stop scratching and clawing at scalabrines sack....you'd be surprised at wat it will do for your sense of well-being,"BRO"
     
    CAPT-DOUCHE
    CAPT-DOUCHE
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2014
    Posts: 5903
    Posted: Dec. 1, 2014 - 4:32 PM ET #267

    I can’t help it that he makes silly predections with silly results, I thought he wanted attention, his threads posts indicate that no?

    Did you get your tenderizer today melosinglet? Did you read your fire points melosinglet? Do you get it or do you need the lights off and I’ll ya story? 

    Wow, funny posts deseve funny comments, what am I missing here? 


    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    I can’t help it that he makes silly predections with silly results, I thought he wanted attention, his threads posts indicate that no?

    Did you get your tenderizer today melosinglet? Did you read your fire points melosinglet? Do you get it or do you need the lights off and I’ll ya story? 

    Wow, funny posts deseve funny comments, what am I missing here? 


     
    Pipe-Light
    Pipe-Light
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2009
    Posts: 2587
    Posted: Dec. 1, 2014 - 4:33 PM ET #268

    Quote Originally Posted by Fademaster:

    Officer Darren Wilson,

    why did you use deadly force on an innocent, church going, future college student, fun loving, friendly, caring law abiding citizen young unarm African American male sir?  Wasn't there an alternative solution to your deadly force decision?

    please explains....

    This must have been his second shooting. Because the KID I seen in the store was a nasty hood livin, dope smoking, white hating kid who figure out he was big enough to get his way and tried everyone that came along...

    Ever notice when watching "The first 48" As they describe the ONE SHOT "dead" they throw in... He was planning on returning to school, or had aspirations of a pro career in Basketball, or, had 3 loving kids, or, wanted to attend the local community college. All just the comment giving when they ask the closest family member.. ."If he hadn't been shot, what good do you think he would have done and what were his dreams"

    Right now, had this kid not been the one shot, He would have about 3K worth of Ace hardware tools in his bedroom and NOT know what to do with them...

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by Fademaster:

    Officer Darren Wilson,

    why did you use deadly force on an innocent, church going, future college student, fun loving, friendly, caring law abiding citizen young unarm African American male sir?  Wasn't there an alternative solution to your deadly force decision?

    please explains....

    This must have been his second shooting. Because the KID I seen in the store was a nasty hood livin, dope smoking, white hating kid who figure out he was big enough to get his way and tried everyone that came along...

    Ever notice when watching "The first 48" As they describe the ONE SHOT "dead" they throw in... He was planning on returning to school, or had aspirations of a pro career in Basketball, or, had 3 loving kids, or, wanted to attend the local community college. All just the comment giving when they ask the closest family member.. ."If he hadn't been shot, what good do you think he would have done and what were his dreams"

    Right now, had this kid not been the one shot, He would have about 3K worth of Ace hardware tools in his bedroom and NOT know what to do with them...

     
    CAPT-DOUCHE
    CAPT-DOUCHE
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2014
    Posts: 5903
    Posted: Dec. 1, 2014 - 4:44 PM ET #269

    Anyone see the pic of him pointing a gun at himself in the mirror with cocaine stuffed in his face? Apparently it’s on the internet. 

    However, without doubt this thug was no college student and a big brother his little sister looked up to. For crying out loud he just stole from a conveneience store and pushed the guy trying to get his merchandise back, what animal acts like this? 

    Still to me,death wasn’t warranted but it was only a matter of time before the guy got three square meals a day with a nice jump suit. 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Anyone see the pic of him pointing a gun at himself in the mirror with cocaine stuffed in his face? Apparently it’s on the internet. 

    However, without doubt this thug was no college student and a big brother his little sister looked up to. For crying out loud he just stole from a conveneience store and pushed the guy trying to get his merchandise back, what animal acts like this? 

    Still to me,death wasn’t warranted but it was only a matter of time before the guy got three square meals a day with a nice jump suit. 
     
    RodWoman
    RodWoman
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2009
    Posts: 1472
    Posted: Dec. 1, 2014 - 4:45 PM ET #270

    Quote Originally Posted by GhostfacePitta:


    this wasnt a trap game, the giants were the obvious right side...couple unfortunate TOs cost them the game...if you bet the jags be happy you got very lucky...if you bet the giants, be happy you played the side w/ value and just hope for better turnout next time around...id play the g men in this spot every single time...
      Love these morons who keep saying, "the Giants had value".  No, they did not have value.  If they are favored on the road they do not have value.  They are 3-9, a very bad football team. Doesn't matter if they are playing Jax or Oakland or any other team.  They can't have "value" if they're favorite on road.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by GhostfacePitta:


    this wasnt a trap game, the giants were the obvious right side...couple unfortunate TOs cost them the game...if you bet the jags be happy you got very lucky...if you bet the giants, be happy you played the side w/ value and just hope for better turnout next time around...id play the g men in this spot every single time...
      Love these morons who keep saying, "the Giants had value".  No, they did not have value.  If they are favored on the road they do not have value.  They are 3-9, a very bad football team. Doesn't matter if they are playing Jax or Oakland or any other team.  They can't have "value" if they're favorite on road.
     
    Julespussy
    Julespussy
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jun, 2012
    Posts: 2069
    Posted: Dec. 1, 2014 - 4:59 PM ET #271

    Quote Originally Posted by RodWoman:

    Quote Originally Posted by GhostfacePitta:



    this wasnt a trap game, the giants were the obvious right side...couple unfortunate TOs cost them the game...if you bet the jags be happy you got very lucky...if you bet the giants, be happy you played the side w/ value and just hope for better turnout next time around...id play the g men in this spot every single time...
      Love these morons who keep saying, "the Giants had value".  No, they did not have value.  If they are favored on the road they do not have value.  They are 3-9, a very bad football team. Doesn't matter if they are playing Jax or Oakland or any other team.  They can't have "value" if they're favorite on road.

    Another idiot who doesn't know the meaning of the word value - I would love to hear your definition!
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by RodWoman:

    Quote Originally Posted by GhostfacePitta:



    this wasnt a trap game, the giants were the obvious right side...couple unfortunate TOs cost them the game...if you bet the jags be happy you got very lucky...if you bet the giants, be happy you played the side w/ value and just hope for better turnout next time around...id play the g men in this spot every single time...
      Love these morons who keep saying, "the Giants had value".  No, they did not have value.  If they are favored on the road they do not have value.  They are 3-9, a very bad football team. Doesn't matter if they are playing Jax or Oakland or any other team.  They can't have "value" if they're favorite on road.

    Another idiot who doesn't know the meaning of the word value - I would love to hear your definition!
     
    1pumpchump
    1pumpchump
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2007
    Posts: 3216
    Posted: Dec. 1, 2014 - 5:07 PM ET #272

    Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet:


    dude,seriously over 1300 posts in a couple months and most of them berating/mocking scalabrine(whilst pretending that youre not mocking/berating him)?????..........jeez,and i thought I wasted a little too much time in this cesspit.
    how bout going and spending sum time with family or loved ones instead of breathing down this dudes neck every minute of every fu.ken day??
    Wow, 1300 posts in 60 day, what a A$$CLOWN....AT LEAST HE CAME UP WITH THE PROPER SCREEN NAME...
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet:


    dude,seriously over 1300 posts in a couple months and most of them berating/mocking scalabrine(whilst pretending that youre not mocking/berating him)?????..........jeez,and i thought I wasted a little too much time in this cesspit.
    how bout going and spending sum time with family or loved ones instead of breathing down this dudes neck every minute of every fu.ken day??
    Wow, 1300 posts in 60 day, what a A$$CLOWN....AT LEAST HE CAME UP WITH THE PROPER SCREEN NAME...
     
    CAPT-DOUCHE
    CAPT-DOUCHE
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2014
    Posts: 5903
    Posted: Dec. 1, 2014 - 5:13 PM ET #273

    1301 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    1301 
     
    naesiy
    naesiy
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 2005
    Posted: Dec. 1, 2014 - 5:35 PM ET #274

    Quote Originally Posted by The Hawk:

     


    The number of "people" with less than 1500 or even 500 posts, and not even an avatar (is it that hard? You can afford to bet, but you can't afford an avatar? Really?) is truly amazing. Whenever I see that, I know that person really cares, and will have a good take. Not.

    Hope to see you before the playoffs.
     

    Is that the determining factor in legitimacy, if you have an Avatar or not?  That's the most obtuse thing I've ever read on covers, and that's saying a lot.  Congrats.  

    So because I haven't averaged over a post a day the last three years that somehow makes my "takes" worthless?  I better get on starting the common "Fixed", "Lock", "troll/hater" type threads/posts to get my post count up.  Wouldn't want to have nothing worthwhile to contribute.  
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by The Hawk:

     


    The number of "people" with less than 1500 or even 500 posts, and not even an avatar (is it that hard? You can afford to bet, but you can't afford an avatar? Really?) is truly amazing. Whenever I see that, I know that person really cares, and will have a good take. Not.

    Hope to see you before the playoffs.
     

    Is that the determining factor in legitimacy, if you have an Avatar or not?  That's the most obtuse thing I've ever read on covers, and that's saying a lot.  Congrats.  

    So because I haven't averaged over a post a day the last three years that somehow makes my "takes" worthless?  I better get on starting the common "Fixed", "Lock", "troll/hater" type threads/posts to get my post count up.  Wouldn't want to have nothing worthwhile to contribute.  
     
     
    BIGfnPOO
    BIGfnPOO
    MVP
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jun, 2006
    Posts: 18880
    Posted: Dec. 2, 2014 - 12:42 PM ET #275

    "the Giants had value".  No, they did not have value.  If they are favored on the road they do not have value.  They are 3-9, a very bad football team. Doesn't matter if they are playing Jax or Oakland or any other team.  They can't have "value" if they're favorite on road."

    ^^^^ this is true, same as miami last night, a decent rd tm laying 7 on mnf is insane. no value...plenty on jets.!   hm tm, cold, mnf etcetc whole world on miami..gd lk, 
    bigFnPOO
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    "the Giants had value".  No, they did not have value.  If they are favored on the road they do not have value.  They are 3-9, a very bad football team. Doesn't matter if they are playing Jax or Oakland or any other team.  They can't have "value" if they're favorite on road."

    ^^^^ this is true, same as miami last night, a decent rd tm laying 7 on mnf is insane. no value...plenty on jets.!   hm tm, cold, mnf etcetc whole world on miami..gd lk, 
    All Forums | NFL Betting Forum
    «First Previous 123 ... 101112 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 447,383 Covers arrow
    • Tuesday 09/15/2026 639 Covers arrow
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 257,128 Covers arrow
    • NFL LOCKED IN! 97,294 Covers arrow
    • PART DEUX 174 Covers arrow
    • Couple Beers 3,064 Covers arrow
    • Tuesday 2,716 Covers arrow
    • Week One-Post Week One Plays Here 1,902 Covers arrow
    • Couple Beers 2,711 Covers arrow
    • We have picked a terrible time to have the stupidest president ever 26,738 Covers arrow

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.