Found 2 games earlier in the season where 1U teams were facing each other as opponents. So, that means we can take away 2 1U wins and 2 1U losses, as we would not have played those games at the time.
That means, YTD we are: 1U: 27-18 2U: 15-4
This week there are 4 1U teams that are facing each other in 2 games. So, 4 of our picks are knocked off the board (ten,was,kcc,ari). The remaining picks are:
1U: min +3.5 (buy .5 pt if have to) pit -7.5 nyg +3.5
2U: car +10.5
Good luck to all.
0
Found 2 games earlier in the season where 1U teams were facing each other as opponents. So, that means we can take away 2 1U wins and 2 1U losses, as we would not have played those games at the time.
That means, YTD we are: 1U: 27-18 2U: 15-4
This week there are 4 1U teams that are facing each other in 2 games. So, 4 of our picks are knocked off the board (ten,was,kcc,ari). The remaining picks are:
1U: min +3.5 (buy .5 pt if have to) pit -7.5 nyg +3.5
Week 12 Board ... the one Thanksgiving play is cin:
1U: cin +8.5 car +10.5 ari +0.5
2U: nyg -7.5
3U (1U & 2U): min +2.5 ten +0.5 ?
The ari game is actually a 1U (sff) vs. a 2U (ari), so ari gets bumped from a 2U to a 1U play just by mathematical cancellation, and of course, sff becomes a no-play.
Good luck everyone and Happy Thanksgiving.
0
YTD -- 1U: 28-20 -- 2U: 15-5
Week 12 Board ... the one Thanksgiving play is cin:
1U: cin +8.5 car +10.5 ari +0.5
2U: nyg -7.5
3U (1U & 2U): min +2.5 ten +0.5 ?
The ari game is actually a 1U (sff) vs. a 2U (ari), so ari gets bumped from a 2U to a 1U play just by mathematical cancellation, and of course, sff becomes a no-play.
Well, this is going to seem kind of silly, but I'm going to do a 180 and remove the clause from the system that made us lessen the exposure to the Week 13 Tennessee loss.
We're going to go with the theory that the more a team loses ATS, the more attractive a play they become. So, we are going to absorb that original ten -3.5 loss, and then play them again vs. Indy, which means that our Indy -3.5 2U loss is wiped out, and we will also get a ten +3.5 win for 1U on top of that.
Soooo ..... we will change our 1U record from 34-24 to 34-25. Then, we will convert our ind -3.5 2U play last night to a ten +3.5 1U play, which is a win. Don't ask why this happens. It just does.
Now, our YTD record will be: 1U: 35-25 2U: 19-9
I'll follow up tomorrow with Sunday's plays.
0
Well, this is going to seem kind of silly, but I'm going to do a 180 and remove the clause from the system that made us lessen the exposure to the Week 13 Tennessee loss.
We're going to go with the theory that the more a team loses ATS, the more attractive a play they become. So, we are going to absorb that original ten -3.5 loss, and then play them again vs. Indy, which means that our Indy -3.5 2U loss is wiped out, and we will also get a ten +3.5 win for 1U on top of that.
Soooo ..... we will change our 1U record from 34-24 to 34-25. Then, we will convert our ind -3.5 2U play last night to a ten +3.5 1U play, which is a win. Don't ask why this happens. It just does.
1U: was +1.5 W buf pk W car +7.5 L sdc -6.5 W nyj -5.5 L
2U: ari +4.5 W
Week: 1U: 3-2 2U: 1-0
YTD: 1U: 38-27 2U: 20-9
Been reading your thread, curious how the Jets could have been a play against the Phins. The Phins lost the prior week to the Browns straight up - they were favored by 3.
0
Quote Originally Posted by tuttleberry:
Thx for the support, harley and k4.
Let's tally the results
1U: was +1.5 W buf pk W car +7.5 L sdc -6.5 W nyj -5.5 L
2U: ari +4.5 W
Week: 1U: 3-2 2U: 1-0
YTD: 1U: 38-27 2U: 20-9
Been reading your thread, curious how the Jets could have been a play against the Phins. The Phins lost the prior week to the Browns straight up - they were favored by 3.
rob3996: The setup for the system is a team must lose by more 10 or more vs. the spread. The Jets were a setup after losing 45-3, and the Phins were not a setup as they lost by less than 10 vs. the spread.
Byharley: a 3U play happens if a team loses by 10 or more vs. the spread twice in a row.
The 3U record YTD is a combo of the 1U and 2U record. I honestly don't know what it is, but I'm confident the win pct is at least 60% and probably higher than that.
Thanks for the interest.
0
rob3996: The setup for the system is a team must lose by more 10 or more vs. the spread. The Jets were a setup after losing 45-3, and the Phins were not a setup as they lost by less than 10 vs. the spread.
Byharley: a 3U play happens if a team loses by 10 or more vs. the spread twice in a row.
The 3U record YTD is a combo of the 1U and 2U record. I honestly don't know what it is, but I'm confident the win pct is at least 60% and probably higher than that.
rob3996: The setup for the system is a team must lose by more 10 or more vs. the spread. The Jets were a setup after losing 45-3, and the Phins were not a setup as they lost by less than 10 vs. the spread.
Byharley: a 3U play happens if a team loses by 10 or more vs. the spread twice in a row.
The 3U record YTD is a combo of the 1U and 2U record. I honestly don't know what it is, but I'm confident the win pct is at least 60% and probably higher than that.
Thanks for the interest.
Thanks much for the explanation - think your system is something that makes alot of sense. I was doing something similar awhile back - one other thing that I was taking into consideration is turnover margins for the previous game. If a team was a bouncback team PLUS their turnover margin was equal to or preferably worse than the team they were playing - it qualified as a play.
Only thing im not 100% clear on is your 2U criteria? I saw you mention bye week, so its for teams coming off byes. What is the other piece im missing?
Thanks Buddy
0
Quote Originally Posted by tuttleberry:
rob3996: The setup for the system is a team must lose by more 10 or more vs. the spread. The Jets were a setup after losing 45-3, and the Phins were not a setup as they lost by less than 10 vs. the spread.
Byharley: a 3U play happens if a team loses by 10 or more vs. the spread twice in a row.
The 3U record YTD is a combo of the 1U and 2U record. I honestly don't know what it is, but I'm confident the win pct is at least 60% and probably higher than that.
Thanks for the interest.
Thanks much for the explanation - think your system is something that makes alot of sense. I was doing something similar awhile back - one other thing that I was taking into consideration is turnover margins for the previous game. If a team was a bouncback team PLUS their turnover margin was equal to or preferably worse than the team they were playing - it qualified as a play.
Only thing im not 100% clear on is your 2U criteria? I saw you mention bye week, so its for teams coming off byes. What is the other piece im missing?