We had an awesome night yesterday. For tonight, I only have one pick, but I'm not in love with it. However, out of principle -- I must place a wager. So, I'm going with my minimum size of half a unit.
Rising Dogs System (current record: 3 - 1)
Washinton Wizards Full Game +1
@Trapperdan33
Thanks, man. I appreciate it.
As I mentioned, I had a very bad feeling about this pick. The line was weak at a mere +1 and Washington is not a good team to back especially against a newly formed Pacers team. I could have completely avoided it, but I wanted to stay true to the system. These modifications to the unit size (when done correctly) can be a huge positive to bankroll management.
Until the next pick...
Oh and I don't post my other personal (non-system) picks here in this thread, but I hope some of y'all caught it. I went 5-0 tonight including a +320 odds teaser. Follow along if you can. Playoff contention edge games are going to start getting pretty hot this season...
@alapaha
I used to perform a study on RLM and it resulted in a mediocre (at best) type of result. RLM can mean so many things that it's difficult to quantify into actionable metrics. For example, last minute player absences or inclusions can move the line so much that it looks like RLM. RLM based on money can also be a tool that sharps use to corral the public onto one team just so there's enough action on that side before doubling down on the other side. There's so many things that can be deduced from RLM that I don't pay any attention to it anymore.
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
