cmjohnson...you know your bball, and I believe my last 39replies werent directed towards you, but towards people with brain tumors and people who think they can guarantee who will win a contest.
now he plays coy and feels bad when you wanna drop it..what a little shit....
his major contributions to the forums
threads about fucking seat cushions and his girlfriend going to jury duty...yeah...that shit will help people cap games...and he has the fucking nerve to throw ANYTHING at someone actually capping a game...trends or no trends...at least he had some kind of basis even if you agree with it
someone ban this prick...
0
Quote Originally Posted by samuelsosa:
cmjohnson...you know your bball, and I believe my last 39replies werent directed towards you, but towards people with brain tumors and people who think they can guarantee who will win a contest.
now he plays coy and feels bad when you wanna drop it..what a little shit....
his major contributions to the forums
threads about fucking seat cushions and his girlfriend going to jury duty...yeah...that shit will help people cap games...and he has the fucking nerve to throw ANYTHING at someone actually capping a game...trends or no trends...at least he had some kind of basis even if you agree with it
now he plays coy and feels bad when you wanna drop it..what a little shit....
his major contributions to the forums
threads about fucking seat cushions and his girlfriend going to jury duty...yeah...that shit will help people cap games...and he has the fucking nerve to throw ANYTHING at someone actually capping a game...trends or no trends...at least he had some kind of basis even if you agree with it
someone ban this prick...
DUDE, YOU TRIED TO BE SLICK AND GET SOME PROPS FOR GUARANTEEING A FUCKING SLAM DUNK CONTEST? ARE YOU SOME KIND OF IDIOT? How the fuck can you guarantee something that IS VOTED ON BY AMERICA? I dont fucking get it. I like penis, I like seat cushions, I have a GF that went to jury duty. Does that change the FACT that you thought [keyword] you can guarantee a slam dunk contest? No. I'm sorry you were wrong. Very sorry. I always have sex with the 2 men in my avatar. Happy? Are you still wrong? Yes. Dickface. I will be tuning in next year when you guarantee who will win the SKILL CHALLENGE
0
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
now he plays coy and feels bad when you wanna drop it..what a little shit....
his major contributions to the forums
threads about fucking seat cushions and his girlfriend going to jury duty...yeah...that shit will help people cap games...and he has the fucking nerve to throw ANYTHING at someone actually capping a game...trends or no trends...at least he had some kind of basis even if you agree with it
someone ban this prick...
DUDE, YOU TRIED TO BE SLICK AND GET SOME PROPS FOR GUARANTEEING A FUCKING SLAM DUNK CONTEST? ARE YOU SOME KIND OF IDIOT? How the fuck can you guarantee something that IS VOTED ON BY AMERICA? I dont fucking get it. I like penis, I like seat cushions, I have a GF that went to jury duty. Does that change the FACT that you thought [keyword] you can guarantee a slam dunk contest? No. I'm sorry you were wrong. Very sorry. I always have sex with the 2 men in my avatar. Happy? Are you still wrong? Yes. Dickface. I will be tuning in next year when you guarantee who will win the SKILL CHALLENGE
Why the fuck would I be banned? I speak the truth. You tried to be slick and fell right on your face Mr. I 100% guarantee the slam dunk champion. Thats a fact. Me being gay? That's just you being childish and upset that you were wrong. We are all wrong sometimes, I guess some of us deal with it better than others. See ya.
0
Why the fuck would I be banned? I speak the truth. You tried to be slick and fell right on your face Mr. I 100% guarantee the slam dunk champion. Thats a fact. Me being gay? That's just you being childish and upset that you were wrong. We are all wrong sometimes, I guess some of us deal with it better than others. See ya.
sore loser?...do you even read the NBA forum threads?
You're not just a prick...you're an illiterate prick...get the fuck outta here and get back to your gang bang with your inbred family
I read alot of threads. One of my all time favorites is when some idiot thought he can GUARANTEE a contest in which PEOPLE AT HOME vote on. One of my favorite threads of all time, actually.
0
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
sore loser?...do you even read the NBA forum threads?
You're not just a prick...you're an illiterate prick...get the fuck outta here and get back to your gang bang with your inbred family
I read alot of threads. One of my all time favorites is when some idiot thought he can GUARANTEE a contest in which PEOPLE AT HOME vote on. One of my favorite threads of all time, actually.
jesus...you really are illiterate...learn how to use a mouse and a clicker...
go have fun trying to be a cook in NYC...hopefully one of your fellow chefs will bobbit your cock off and feed it to ya...now get back in the penalty box with your other degenerates...we don't need shitheads like you around here
0
Quote Originally Posted by samuelsosa:
someone is mad because they were wrong very mad.
jesus...you really are illiterate...learn how to use a mouse and a clicker...
go have fun trying to be a cook in NYC...hopefully one of your fellow chefs will bobbit your cock off and feed it to ya...now get back in the penalty box with your other degenerates...we don't need shitheads like you around here
I read alot of threads. One of my all time favorites is when some idiot thought he can GUARANTEE a contest in which PEOPLE AT HOME vote on. One of my favorite threads of all time, actually.
one of my favorite was about fucking seat cushions..what a contribution to humanity
0
Quote Originally Posted by samuelsosa:
I read alot of threads. One of my all time favorites is when some idiot thought he can GUARANTEE a contest in which PEOPLE AT HOME vote on. One of my favorite threads of all time, actually.
one of my favorite was about fucking seat cushions..what a contribution to humanity
THE SHEEP GET SLAUGHTERED AND by sheep i eman nit wit cover posters thinkign they know it all. Magic were easiest bet of seasona s i stated in some ones thread early yesterda. I won my 1000 plus on magic +125 series bet after winning game 1 of series.
yes i guess they can go 32-1 buddy :)
u and everyone on ehre and the 66% public got hamemred by vegas.
0
THE SHEEP GET SLAUGHTERED AND by sheep i eman nit wit cover posters thinkign they know it all. Magic were easiest bet of seasona s i stated in some ones thread early yesterda. I won my 1000 plus on magic +125 series bet after winning game 1 of series.
yes i guess they can go 32-1 buddy :)
u and everyone on ehre and the 66% public got hamemred by vegas.
read what CMJ said... what you guys don't understand is that HISTORICAL TRENDS (which are extremely powerful predictors, not only in sports, but in every phase of life) are not predicated on the same specific conditions... that is an impossibility...
you say it's meaningless because (e.g.) Rondo wasn't even alive during much of that run... that is really really a stupid statement... but if you're stupid, you of course won't realize that...
the same statement could have been said last year... and it could have been said about someone else back in '86, or '75... or any other year...
when Bird won his first title, that trend was in full effect... but anyone could have said... that trend is meaningless... those wins came with Havlicek and Russell... that has no effect here...
that's utterly retarded and completely misses the point of the trend...
HISTORICAL TREND: look it up! it did NOT help Boston win tonight... but the factors that created that trend DID impact the game, just like they did 32 other times... including once this year... with Rondo... who wasn't even born when most of those other wins took place...
there's just no way to make your argument without looking very uneducated...
0
Quote Originally Posted by MrArmageddon:
The trend is and always was meaningless.
read what CMJ said... what you guys don't understand is that HISTORICAL TRENDS (which are extremely powerful predictors, not only in sports, but in every phase of life) are not predicated on the same specific conditions... that is an impossibility...
you say it's meaningless because (e.g.) Rondo wasn't even alive during much of that run... that is really really a stupid statement... but if you're stupid, you of course won't realize that...
the same statement could have been said last year... and it could have been said about someone else back in '86, or '75... or any other year...
when Bird won his first title, that trend was in full effect... but anyone could have said... that trend is meaningless... those wins came with Havlicek and Russell... that has no effect here...
that's utterly retarded and completely misses the point of the trend...
HISTORICAL TREND: look it up! it did NOT help Boston win tonight... but the factors that created that trend DID impact the game, just like they did 32 other times... including once this year... with Rondo... who wasn't even born when most of those other wins took place...
there's just no way to make your argument without looking very uneducated...
one of my favorite was about fucking seat cushions..what a contribution to humanity
we get it. you read all my threads. what is your point? i dont understand. Id rather ask a question about a massage chair than try to a "100% guarantee" on ALL STAR WEEKEND ACTIVITIES. Sick fuck.
0
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
one of my favorite was about fucking seat cushions..what a contribution to humanity
we get it. you read all my threads. what is your point? i dont understand. Id rather ask a question about a massage chair than try to a "100% guarantee" on ALL STAR WEEKEND ACTIVITIES. Sick fuck.
read what CMJ said... what you guys don't understand is that HISTORICAL TRENDS (which are extremely powerful predictors, not only in sports, but in every phase of life) are not predicated on the same specific conditions... that is an impossibility...
you say it's meaningless because (e.g.) Rondo wasn't even alive during much of that run... that is really really a stupid statement... but if you're stupid, you of course won't realize that...
the same statement could have been said last year... and it could have been said about someone else back in '86, or '75... or any other year...
when Bird won his first title, that trend was in full effect... but anyone could have said... that trend is meaningless... those wins came with Havlicek and Russell... that has no effect here...
that's utterly retarded and completely misses the point of the trend...
HISTORICAL TREND: look it up! it did NOT help Boston win tonight... but the factors that created that trend DID impact the game, just like they did 32 other times... including once this year... with Rondo... who wasn't even born when most of those other wins took place...
there's just no way to make your argument without looking very uneducated...
historical trends that were made when big baby and rondo were sperm in a fuckin penis you guys dont cease to amaze me
0
Quote Originally Posted by Ice4Blood:
read what CMJ said... what you guys don't understand is that HISTORICAL TRENDS (which are extremely powerful predictors, not only in sports, but in every phase of life) are not predicated on the same specific conditions... that is an impossibility...
you say it's meaningless because (e.g.) Rondo wasn't even alive during much of that run... that is really really a stupid statement... but if you're stupid, you of course won't realize that...
the same statement could have been said last year... and it could have been said about someone else back in '86, or '75... or any other year...
when Bird won his first title, that trend was in full effect... but anyone could have said... that trend is meaningless... those wins came with Havlicek and Russell... that has no effect here...
that's utterly retarded and completely misses the point of the trend...
HISTORICAL TREND: look it up! it did NOT help Boston win tonight... but the factors that created that trend DID impact the game, just like they did 32 other times... including once this year... with Rondo... who wasn't even born when most of those other wins took place...
there's just no way to make your argument without looking very uneducated...
historical trends that were made when big baby and rondo were sperm in a fuckin penis you guys dont cease to amaze me
HERE IS AN EXAMPLE. IT IS 2012 and I am on the CELTICS. the streak has gone to an amazing 35-0.
We were up in the series 3-2, and now it has gone to GAME 7.
I am in my first GAME 7[irrelevant].
Someone tell me how Bird's 20 game 7 wins in the 1980's, and PIERCE's 15 game 7 victories in the 00's [which makes the streak 35lets say] HELPS ME?!?! how the fuck does that help me in 2012?? I swear I will suck someone off if they give me that fucking answer. If someone answers that question logically I will leave COVERS and I swear to fucking god. Otherwise. FUCK OFF!
now i know those 2 people werent the only people involved...lots and lots of players have made that streak possible.
i am waiting.
0
HERE IS AN EXAMPLE. IT IS 2012 and I am on the CELTICS. the streak has gone to an amazing 35-0.
We were up in the series 3-2, and now it has gone to GAME 7.
I am in my first GAME 7[irrelevant].
Someone tell me how Bird's 20 game 7 wins in the 1980's, and PIERCE's 15 game 7 victories in the 00's [which makes the streak 35lets say] HELPS ME?!?! how the fuck does that help me in 2012?? I swear I will suck someone off if they give me that fucking answer. If someone answers that question logically I will leave COVERS and I swear to fucking god. Otherwise. FUCK OFF!
now i know those 2 people werent the only people involved...lots and lots of players have made that streak possible.
Now do you guys realize why these trends are absolutely meaningless? You HAVE to take the current situation into account. In how many of those 32 wins was Boston's best player out?
You can find trends to justify whatever side you want to bet, but they are all meaningless unless you take into account the current situation.
0
Well, now your trend is 32-1
Now do you guys realize why these trends are absolutely meaningless? You HAVE to take the current situation into account. In how many of those 32 wins was Boston's best player out?
You can find trends to justify whatever side you want to bet, but they are all meaningless unless you take into account the current situation.
Now do you guys realize why these trends are absolutely meaningless? You HAVE to take the current situation into account.In how many of those 32 wins was Boston's best player out?
You can find trends to justify whatever side you want to bet, but they are all meaningless unless you take into account the current situation.
it doesnt matter. they were 32-0. its a historical trend. it doesnt matter that kg was out. it doesnt matter that marbury was in. all that mattered were the 32 prior victories, FOR SOME CRAZY CRAZY reason that no one will be able to give me
0
Quote Originally Posted by Bling:
Well, now your trend is 32-1
Now do you guys realize why these trends are absolutely meaningless? You HAVE to take the current situation into account.In how many of those 32 wins was Boston's best player out?
You can find trends to justify whatever side you want to bet, but they are all meaningless unless you take into account the current situation.
it doesnt matter. they were 32-0. its a historical trend. it doesnt matter that kg was out. it doesnt matter that marbury was in. all that mattered were the 32 prior victories, FOR SOME CRAZY CRAZY reason that no one will be able to give me
historical trends that were made when big baby and rondo were sperm in a fuckin penis you guys dont cease to amaze me
ok, here it is in a nutshell... the stupidity test... we finally got to the bottom of it...
historical trends that were made when... WHO GIVES A FUCK!? do you understand what a historical trend is or not? the whole idea of a historical trend is that it doesn't matter what players were involved... that is the definition of a historical trend...
but let me dumb it down for you...
YOU = STUPID
0
Quote Originally Posted by samuelsosa:
historical trends that were made when big baby and rondo were sperm in a fuckin penis you guys dont cease to amaze me
ok, here it is in a nutshell... the stupidity test... we finally got to the bottom of it...
historical trends that were made when... WHO GIVES A FUCK!? do you understand what a historical trend is or not? the whole idea of a historical trend is that it doesn't matter what players were involved... that is the definition of a historical trend...
it doesnt matter. they were 32-0. its a historical trend. it doesnt matter that kg was out. it doesnt matter that marbury was in. all that mattered were the 32 prior victories, FOR SOME CRAZY CRAZY reason that no one will be able to give me
Don't keep beating the dead horse. The trend has no bearing on the game whatsoever. However, it did have a psyche effect on some bettors, thus affecting the line.
0
Quote Originally Posted by samuelsosa:
it doesnt matter. they were 32-0. its a historical trend. it doesnt matter that kg was out. it doesnt matter that marbury was in. all that mattered were the 32 prior victories, FOR SOME CRAZY CRAZY reason that no one will be able to give me
Don't keep beating the dead horse. The trend has no bearing on the game whatsoever. However, it did have a psyche effect on some bettors, thus affecting the line.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
...yeah...that shit will help people cap games...and he has the fucking nerve to throw ANYTHING at someone actually capping a game...trends or no trends...at least he had some kind of basis even if you agree with it
In how many of those 32 wins was Boston's best player out? 
Hot Forum Topics
