All Forums | NBA Betting Forum

Can you really go against 32-0?

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 7022
Posts: 149
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 1921
Posted: #26
SO WHILE U ARE GUESSING JOHNSON WHAT WILL BE THE SCORE OF THE HOUST/LAL GAME...BOL
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 1921
Posted: #27
SO WHILE U ARE GUESSING JOHNSON WHAT WILL BE THE SCORE OF THE HOUST/LAL GAME???
 
BOL
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2003
Posts: 11923
Posted: #28
Ray Allen shows up today, Celts' need him today and he knows it!!  Nice prop bet today, 22.5 pts, rebounds and assists for Ray,
 -110. I'm on it, he'll cover that in points alone today.
 
B.O.L  TO ALL!
"I'm afraid all we may have done is awakened a sleeping giant."
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 10988
Posted: #29
This guy is sick. He thinks BigBaby and Scalabrine had anything to do with the 32-0 trend ....the C's might win by 74points tonight, but it has NOTHING to do with that meaningless trend.
 
I'm gonna bet on the Bulls because they are 16-2 in game 6's at home even though 15 of those wins came during the Jordan-era.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2005
Posts: 315
Posted: #30
CMJ- Good look to you today
Like Houston myself but looking at the Magic in the second game.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 10988
Posted: #31
I would like to know how many of these 32 GAME SEVENS did BigBaby Davis START, with DOC RIVERS coaching?
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 10988
Posted: #32
1?
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 11845
Posted: #33
God people are stupid on these forums...
 
 
32-0 is NOT a meaningless trend... i don't care how far back it goes... it is 32 and ZERO... if 32 and ZERO is a meaningless trend, then there simply are NO meaningful trends...
 
 
seriously, i am not trying to support a Boston play here... but i GUARANTEE that the oddsmakers are very aware of 32-0, and do not consider it to be a meaningless trend... if you are sitting here argueing that 32-0 is a meaningless trend, then i can pretty much assume that you spend your days bending over and letting the sportsbooks shove pineapples up your ass!
 
like i said, not supporting a Boston play... but there is no way anyone with working brain cells should be saying 32-0 is a meaningless trend... that's fucking retarded!
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 11845
Posted: #34
for the slow-witted... the REASON 32-0 IS a meaningful trend, regardless of how far back it stretches... is this:
 
 
they are 32-0 because, other than being up 3-2 in an NBA finals as the team without homecourt, every other situation involves the Celtics getting at least 1 closeout opportunity at home... and when the Celtics get a chance to closeout a team at home, they almost always do it...
 
 
so Samuel... is it STILL a meaningless trend?  or is this starting to make a little sense for you?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 4992
Posted: #35
Celtics romp??...Not a chance!!! Orlando is the better team..
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 922
Posted: #36
Orlando will win this game, homer simpson
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 686
Posted: #37
Quote Originally Posted by JakeLake720:

Celtics romp??...Not a chance!!! Orlando is the better team..


WRONG.

Orlando has the better talent but not the better team. Their coach is terrible and Orl pissed down their leg in Game 5 when they could've taken control of the series.

Orl should have won this series. But they lack the composure, heart, and coaching to get it done in pressure situations. And it doesn't come any tougher than a Game 7 on the road.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 10988
Posted: #38
Quote Originally Posted by Ice4Blood:

for the slow-witted... the REASON 32-0 IS a meaningful trend, regardless of how far back it stretches... is this:
 
 
they are 32-0 because, other than being up 3-2 in an NBA finals as the team without homecourt, every other situation involves the Celtics getting at least 1 closeout opportunity at home... and when the Celtics get a chance to closeout a team at home, they almost always do it...
 
 
so Samuel... is it STILL a meaningless trend?  or is this starting to make a little sense for you?

Are you retarted? Or do you just play one on covers? This core of players is 1-0 in Game7's. If Larry Bird is playing today then ok, it is meaningful. Like I said, If the BULLS ARE 17-0 in game 7's, BUT 16 of those wins have come in series' that Michael Jordan was in...HOW THE FUCK does that have anything to do with the BEN GORDON, DERRICK rose bulls? Or for a better example HOW MANY TIMES OUT OF THE 32 WAS Big Baby the starter, and had SCALABRINE come off the bench? 1 time. THIS TREND IS SO RIDICULOUS.

"32 is 32" yeah, when your THE LARRY BIRD C'S...or the C'S with KG PIERCE ALLEN...but this is not one of those CELTICS teams, this CELTICS team has contributed 1 game to those 32 and all of a sudden THEY ARE 32-0

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 10988
Posted: #39
Quote Originally Posted by Ice4Blood:

for the slow-witted... the REASON 32-0 IS a meaningful trend, regardless of how far back it stretches... is this:
 
 
they are 32-0 because, other than being up 3-2 in an NBA finals as the team without homecourt, every other situation involves the Celtics getting at least 1 closeout opportunity at home... and when the Celtics get a chance to closeout a team at home, they almost always do it...
 
 
so Samuel... is it STILL a meaningless trend?  or is this starting to make a little sense for you?
  how many  times have they done it with BIG BABY starting? answer the question, stupid. Will BILL RUSSELL play in this game, or just Larry Bird? Stephon Marbury was in during how many of those 32 game 7's? oh wait 1?? crazy fking ppl. I swear.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 10399
Posted: #40
Quote Originally Posted by samuelsosa:

Are you retarted? Or do you just play one on covers? This core of players is 1-0 in Game7's. If Larry Bird is playing today then ok, it is meaningful. Like I said, If the BULLS ARE 17-0 in game 7's, BUT 16 of those wins have come in series' that Michael Jordan was in...HOW THE FUCK does that have anything to do with the BEN GORDON, DERRICK rose bulls? Or for a better example HOW MANY TIMES OUT OF THE 32 WAS Big Baby the starter, and had SCALABRINE come off the bench? 1 time. THIS TREND IS SO RIDICULOUS.

"32 is 32" yeah, when your THE LARRY BIRD C'S...or the C'S with KG PIERCE ALLEN...but this is not one of those CELTICS teams, this CELTICS team has contributed 1 game to those 32 and all of a sudden THEY ARE 32-0

They are 4-0. Also Sunday home teams do very well.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 10988
Posted: #41
stephon marbury on the c's is 4-0 in game 7's?? Wow I must be stuck in a bubble...I missed 3 game 7;s this yr
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 10988
Posted: #42
By core I mean the C's roster, not just because PIERCE and rondo and allen are on the team they are 4-0.......Marbury is on the team.This CELTICS TEAM [with marbury,big baby, scalabrine, rondo] IS 1-0 in game sevens. END OF STORY. You can say 32-0 , 100-0, 31-8..it doesnt matter.THIS CELTICS TEAM [kg-less] is 1-0 in game 7's. If you want to say 32-0 then you are just looking for a reason to back them , or declare them winners. SORRY. 1-0 in game 7's. CELTICS of the last 20 yrs? 32-0.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 439
Posted: #43
Quote Originally Posted by Cavs_Lover:

I like your trend of 32-0. If you believe in that trend then go big on Boston.

One thing I don't like is your argument that Orl needed home calls to pull Game 6 out. If you're going to use that argument then you can also say Bos needed Orl to piss down their leg in Game 5 or this series would be over.

I really think this game is a coin flip. I'm waiting for a halftime wager after I can see a half and get a better read on both teams.


Ha, you don't consider halftime being just as much of a coin flip in this series. Teams losing double didgit leads in the last 5 minutes of a game. The dominate team in the 1st half hasn't really closed out games in these past 4.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 4992
Posted: #44
Nothing better to spoil the ultimate homer thread than a little MAGIC!
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 686
Posted: #45
Quote Originally Posted by UnkleSam:

Ha, you don't consider halftime being just as much of a coin flip in this series. Teams losing double didgit leads in the last 5 minutes of a game. The dominate team in the 1st half hasn't really closed out games in these past 4.



No. I get a much better read on the teams and the totals after watching 24 mins.

8-2 last 10 halftime wagers this round of the playoffs.


 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 439
Posted: #46
i can believe u totals wise, but no way u could tell me you saw celts comming back down big all game, or the magic comming back last game
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 1223
Posted: #47
Quote Originally Posted by CMJohnson1:

That's one of the only thing that scares me about this game Gennaro.  A lot of the "experts" are on the Celtics and Vegas has this line set a little bit low.  But I'm looking at it just the same as Game 6.  They set the line high for the Magic and they covered.  This game will be the same.



I don't get your logic here. Game 6 had a big line that raised some eyebrows. This line is low and I am surprised more people aren't commenting on it.

This line isn't high and that's why I am on the Magic. The line was high in game 6 and a lot of people lost money on the C's. It's almost the same scenario, but in Boston. I think this line is eerily low and the C's can't cover and/or lose SU. Only a small play though as it looks like the Lakers and the under are gonna hit it big for me.

And I do think the all the C's franchise trends are pointless because we did see the Hawks win on the road in the playoffs this year and a lot of people were throwing that around in that series and taking the Heat at home. The Bulls have a terrible record in game 7's but 6 titles. Jordan didn't play in many game 7's because he didn't have to. If the Jazz took Jordan to game 7 in Chicago would you bet against the Bulls based on their bad record? Neither would I.


And if you're paranoid, David Stern would prefer the ratings just as much if not more if two of the best young stars in the game faced off in Howard and James so he has the fix in for the Magic to pull this one out.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 11845
Posted: #48

Quote Originally Posted by samuelsosa:

  how many  times have they done it with BIG BABY starting? answer the question, stupid. Will BILL RUSSELL play in this game, or just Larry Bird? Stephon Marbury was in during how many of those 32 game 7's? oh wait 1?? crazy fking ppl. I swear.

i was hoping you would use this retarded argument... seriously... shut up and do not respond to this... it's an argument that you are incredibly overmatched in!

 

of the 32-0... Big Baby, Paul Pierce, Ray Allen, even Brian Scalabrine... are 5-0...

 

is that enough of a meaningful trend?  what the fuck does it matter if it's Bill Russell, Larry Bird or Paul Pierce?  you are so fucking thickheaded you can't understand that is not the issue?

 

the issue is very simple:  the Celtics do not lose closeout games at home!

 

THESE Celtics are 5-0 when leading 3-2 in a series... does that make it more meaningful for you, dipshit?

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 4506
Posted: #49
I am betting on the Celtics but they are capable of losing a game 7 at home.  Remember the Indiana vs. Boston series in Reggie Miller's last year?  Pierce and Antoine walker shit the bed in a pathetic home blowout.
 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 11845
Posted: #50
Quote Originally Posted by samuelsosa:

I would like to know how many of these 32 GAME SEVENS did BigBaby Davis START, with DOC RIVERS coaching?

 

on a bright note: i think i've found the stupidest person on Covers...

All Forums | NBA Betting Forum
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.