Yep public goes down much as we expected. And the game marked the first non double digit win .
And The magical shooting Celtics with all those lucky rim bouncing shots were terrible shooting the ball again, just over 40%.
LBJ was incredible again, 17 of 28... 60.7 %, only 1 of 4 on 3's but 9 of 13 on FT and again a great ratio of shots from the field to FT attempts 13 to 28 or 2.15 ratio , well under 3.
LBJ did not come close to a triple double with 5 rebs and only 3 assists.
But because he was aggressive and attacking the basket he shot well and got to the line which contributes alot to helping his team win.
Look at all the times we mention this, when he scores more with great shooting Cavs mostly win even if he does not get a triple double.
How many times have we seen him get a triple double but shoot poorly and Cavs lost the game almost everytime.
But triple doubles are meaningful ??? Triple doubles do not contribute the same to helping a team win as shooting the ball well does.
LBJ scored 40 in playoffs 6 times now, this is the first time he has had 6... 40 pt games in a playoff run, MJ did it 3 times including doing it 7 times once which is the 2cd most in history.
It took LBJ this long to do it once but he has all those triple doubles.
It took LBJ many, many finals games before he ever shot 55% in back to back finals games, I think his 1st time was VS Spurs in 2014 when they lost and most of his damage came with big deficits.
MJ did it his very 1st and 2cd finals games when off a loss in game 1 to LA , MJ shot 84%.
Most other great players did it without needing many finals games.
Shoot well and you win, regardless of triple doubles.