I took him in the first round of my fantasy draft.......I am getting very close to driving up to NYC and punching him right in his horseteeth
It's useless going to NYC now. The Yankees are in Baltimore currently.
Doesn't Prado have the 2nd best average in the NL right now?
He should be a billionaire according to your philosophy.
Doesn't Prado have the 2nd best average in the NL right now?
He should be a billionaire according to your philosophy.
What about 2004? He had 38 Homers and 112 RBIs.
What about 2005? He had 43 Homers and 144 RBIs.
What about 2006? He had 33 Homers and 110 RBIs.
What about 2007? He had 30 Homers and 105 RBIs.
What about 2008? He had 33 Homers and 121 RBIs.
He must have a flukey career.
What about 2004? He had 38 Homers and 112 RBIs.
What about 2005? He had 43 Homers and 144 RBIs.
What about 2006? He had 33 Homers and 110 RBIs.
What about 2007? He had 30 Homers and 105 RBIs.
What about 2008? He had 33 Homers and 121 RBIs.
He must have a flukey career.
OK...so Vernon Wells' great start means to forget about his last few seasons and that he DESERVES his $15.6 million?
OK...so Vernon Wells' great start means to forget about his last few seasons and that he DESERVES his $15.6 million?
What about 2004? He had 38 Homers and 112 RBIs.
What about 2005? He had 43 Homers and 144 RBIs.
What about 2006? He had 33 Homers and 110 RBIs.
What about 2007? He had 30 Homers and 105 RBIs.
What about 2008? He had 33 Homers and 121 RBIs.
He must have a flukey career.
What about 2004? He had 38 Homers and 112 RBIs.
What about 2005? He had 43 Homers and 144 RBIs.
What about 2006? He had 33 Homers and 110 RBIs.
What about 2007? He had 30 Homers and 105 RBIs.
What about 2008? He had 33 Homers and 121 RBIs.
He must have a flukey career.
OK...so Vernon Wells' great start means to forget about his last few seasons and that he DESERVES his $15.6 million?
OK...so Vernon Wells' great start means to forget about his last few seasons and that he DESERVES his $15.6 million?
I'm confused. How can you POSSIBLY say last season was a fluke seeing that his power numbers have been 30+ Homers and 100+ RBIs for his entire career?
Luis Gonzalez had a flukey year. He hit 57 homers and had 142 RBIs in 2001 when he had 59 combined for the 2000 and 2002 seasons and had only 2 seasons in his career where he hit over 30 homers. That could be considered a fluke (or roids).
But Tex has consistantly put up those kind of numbers and to say it's was a fluke to do it again is confusing.
And yes...he's having the worst April of his career. What's the point? He had an awful April last season. It wasn't as bad obviously...but he certainly didn't deserve a penny of what he was given with that start either. And last season he had Jeter and Damon in front of him who had a .350 and .385 OBP respectively in April as opposed to Jeter and Johnson who have a .329 and .384 OBP respectively this season. So he also had more chances last year to get RBIs.
But you have to know this thread will be bumped all season long.
I'm confused. How can you POSSIBLY say last season was a fluke seeing that his power numbers have been 30+ Homers and 100+ RBIs for his entire career?
Luis Gonzalez had a flukey year. He hit 57 homers and had 142 RBIs in 2001 when he had 59 combined for the 2000 and 2002 seasons and had only 2 seasons in his career where he hit over 30 homers. That could be considered a fluke (or roids).
But Tex has consistantly put up those kind of numbers and to say it's was a fluke to do it again is confusing.
And yes...he's having the worst April of his career. What's the point? He had an awful April last season. It wasn't as bad obviously...but he certainly didn't deserve a penny of what he was given with that start either. And last season he had Jeter and Damon in front of him who had a .350 and .385 OBP respectively in April as opposed to Jeter and Johnson who have a .329 and .384 OBP respectively this season. So he also had more chances last year to get RBIs.
But you have to know this thread will be bumped all season long.
From time to time I do. It's even worse knowing that I'm having a serious discussion here trying to defend Mark Teixeira as a ballplayer. But...I do it anyway.
From time to time I do. It's even worse knowing that I'm having a serious discussion here trying to defend Mark Teixeira as a ballplayer. But...I do it anyway.
From time to time I do. It's even worse knowing that I'm having a serious discussion here trying to defend Mark Teixeira as a ballplayer. But...I do it anyway.
From time to time I do. It's even worse knowing that I'm having a serious discussion here trying to defend Mark Teixeira as a ballplayer. But...I do it anyway.
A-Rod actually had 6 RBIs in the WS...1 HR.
But Cano was awful. Should you take away his WS ring?
Swisher had 1 HR and 3 RBIs while hitting no higher than .150 in any postseason series. Take away his ring?
I'll tell you who you can take a World Series ring away from. Edwar Ramirez. He got a ring with 22 IP and a 5.73 ERA and wasn't even on the team post All-Star Break.
A-Rod actually had 6 RBIs in the WS...1 HR.
But Cano was awful. Should you take away his WS ring?
Swisher had 1 HR and 3 RBIs while hitting no higher than .150 in any postseason series. Take away his ring?
I'll tell you who you can take a World Series ring away from. Edwar Ramirez. He got a ring with 22 IP and a 5.73 ERA and wasn't even on the team post All-Star Break.
People are ignorant. However...he does have to watch his fouls (even though I know some were BS calls). But I'm cheering for the Hawks against your Magic. Knicks are first for me but who am I kidding? And yes...the Hawks WILL advance. Take tonight's game and finish it up in Milwaukee. ![]()
People are ignorant. However...he does have to watch his fouls (even though I know some were BS calls). But I'm cheering for the Hawks against your Magic. Knicks are first for me but who am I kidding? And yes...the Hawks WILL advance. Take tonight's game and finish it up in Milwaukee. ![]()
People are ignorant. However...he does have to watch his fouls (even though I know some were BS calls). But I'm cheering for the Hawks against your Magic. Knicks are first for me but who am I kidding? And yes...the Hawks WILL advance. Take tonight's game and finish it up in Milwaukee. ![]()
People are ignorant. However...he does have to watch his fouls (even though I know some were BS calls). But I'm cheering for the Hawks against your Magic. Knicks are first for me but who am I kidding? And yes...the Hawks WILL advance. Take tonight's game and finish it up in Milwaukee. ![]()
Yea...I really don't expect them to beat the Magic...but I'll hope for it. And all the Hawks have to do is what the Lakers did last night. Pound the paint and they will win easily. Just like they did in Game 1 and 2.
Yea...I really don't expect them to beat the Magic...but I'll hope for it. And all the Hawks have to do is what the Lakers did last night. Pound the paint and they will win easily. Just like they did in Game 1 and 2.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.