• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Kalshi Referral Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • Polymarket Referral Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • Betr Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
      • Gemini Predictions Promo Code
    • NFL Week 2
      NFL Week 2
      • NFL Odds
      • NFL Picks
      • NFL Moneyline Picks
      • NFL AI Predictions
      • NFL Underdogs
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | MLB Betting Forum

    I hear the word "Capping"

    «First Previous 123 ... 567 Next Last»
    BookieKillerNag
    HappyKane
    ironchef69
    BergeyJ06
    sniperswife
    ...
    Participants:
    Search model icon
    Views: 4198
    Posts: 155
    «First Previous 123 ... 567 Next Last»
     
    BookieKillerNag
    BookieKillerNag
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2010
    Posts: 424
    Posted: Apr. 19, 2010 - 12:21 AM ET #126

    New to covers. Been following for awhile.  Since baseball is my fav sport to bet in decided to join to chime in.  I think I know what you are trying to say dmc.  If you look at best teams in baseball, say angels last year who won about 95 of their 163 games, that is still only a roughly 58 % rate of winning.  So considering this, taking the huge line on favs every game is not a good strategy to win money in long run.  It could also lead you to believe even the best teams win 58 percent on any given game.  This is true of course, but keep in mind this is a long term stat measured over course of a season.

    Were "capping" or whatever you want to call it comes in is deciding based on game game odds and many factors that change each game, which side is favorable.  You are failing to consider pitching matching ups vs specific teams, different batting lineups, hot and cold streaks, batters vs pitchers, travel, night game followed by day game, teams who have worn out bullpen in previous games etc (i could go on for awhile).  Considering all of these factors + the line i have no doubt in my mind you can pick over 50%.  If you do not believe this you are not putting enough effort and research in to games that you are capping imo. 

     

    As far as capping bullpens. I disagree that is not possible. Take dodgers last year. Was comfortable betting them when I thought a pitcher could deliver a quality start due to their bullpen.  Troncoso/belisario in 7th, sherril in 8th, broxton in 9th. That combo was very good all year.  Various combinations of relievers can be recognized in every team.  I agree while you cant predict every reliever that comes in in every game, you know which teams bullpen is reliable or not.  I hope this helps.

     

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    New to covers. Been following for awhile.  Since baseball is my fav sport to bet in decided to join to chime in.  I think I know what you are trying to say dmc.  If you look at best teams in baseball, say angels last year who won about 95 of their 163 games, that is still only a roughly 58 % rate of winning.  So considering this, taking the huge line on favs every game is not a good strategy to win money in long run.  It could also lead you to believe even the best teams win 58 percent on any given game.  This is true of course, but keep in mind this is a long term stat measured over course of a season.

    Were "capping" or whatever you want to call it comes in is deciding based on game game odds and many factors that change each game, which side is favorable.  You are failing to consider pitching matching ups vs specific teams, different batting lineups, hot and cold streaks, batters vs pitchers, travel, night game followed by day game, teams who have worn out bullpen in previous games etc (i could go on for awhile).  Considering all of these factors + the line i have no doubt in my mind you can pick over 50%.  If you do not believe this you are not putting enough effort and research in to games that you are capping imo. 

     

    As far as capping bullpens. I disagree that is not possible. Take dodgers last year. Was comfortable betting them when I thought a pitcher could deliver a quality start due to their bullpen.  Troncoso/belisario in 7th, sherril in 8th, broxton in 9th. That combo was very good all year.  Various combinations of relievers can be recognized in every team.  I agree while you cant predict every reliever that comes in in every game, you know which teams bullpen is reliable or not.  I hope this helps.

     

     
    HappyKane
    HappyKane
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2003
    Posts: 34979
    Posted: Apr. 19, 2010 - 1:04 AM ET #127

    If anyone on covers.com have bullpen handicapping down to a "t", let us know.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    If anyone on covers.com have bullpen handicapping down to a "t", let us know.

     
    HappyKane
    HappyKane
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2003
    Posts: 34979
    Posted: Apr. 19, 2010 - 1:24 AM ET #128

    Quoted June 16, 2009:
     
    "Baseball is about luck," Jair Jurrjens, "You can pitch good and not get the win. You can pitch bad and not get the loss."
     
    Prime example for Sunday, April 18th: The Cubs' Ryan Dempster pitched 7-2/3 innings and left the game with a 2-0 lead. Astros win the game 3-2.
     
    No one can deny that baseball handicapping falls into the lot of the demise of starting pitchers. Unless that pitcher can pitch a full game.
     
    Not even a 5-run lead is safe. Just ask Brian Bannister who out-dueled Dontrelle Willis earlier this week.
     
    And even the top 10 best bullpens will falter now and then. The White Sox's bullpen numbers are very good; but Matt Thornton or Scott Linebrink will have their days. Yes, last season, the Rangers' bullpen was one of the best; but some longmen like CJ Wilson & Neftali Feliz will have their off-days. No doubt about it.
     
    To the subject at hand, i get the jist of what the thread starter is saying but thats because he may not have a system or handicapping regimen that allows him to find the "values" of betting on baseball. The beauty of Moneyline sports like this is, you can be profitable being a 50% handicapper. And more power to you if you can float over 60% betting on 500-plus games per season.
     
     
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quoted June 16, 2009:
     
    "Baseball is about luck," Jair Jurrjens, "You can pitch good and not get the win. You can pitch bad and not get the loss."
     
    Prime example for Sunday, April 18th: The Cubs' Ryan Dempster pitched 7-2/3 innings and left the game with a 2-0 lead. Astros win the game 3-2.
     
    No one can deny that baseball handicapping falls into the lot of the demise of starting pitchers. Unless that pitcher can pitch a full game.
     
    Not even a 5-run lead is safe. Just ask Brian Bannister who out-dueled Dontrelle Willis earlier this week.
     
    And even the top 10 best bullpens will falter now and then. The White Sox's bullpen numbers are very good; but Matt Thornton or Scott Linebrink will have their days. Yes, last season, the Rangers' bullpen was one of the best; but some longmen like CJ Wilson & Neftali Feliz will have their off-days. No doubt about it.
     
    To the subject at hand, i get the jist of what the thread starter is saying but thats because he may not have a system or handicapping regimen that allows him to find the "values" of betting on baseball. The beauty of Moneyline sports like this is, you can be profitable being a 50% handicapper. And more power to you if you can float over 60% betting on 500-plus games per season.
     
     
     
    ironchef69
    ironchef69
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2010
    Posts: 169
    Posted: Apr. 19, 2010 - 1:53 AM ET #129

    Quote Originally Posted by dcmc34f:

    alot in baseball. Don't you people realize that in baseball it's a 50/50 chance of winning on every game played. You are just wasting your time, "Capping". Example, yesterday with Little Timmy L pitching, the Giants are still  only going to win that game between 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5 or 6 times out of 10. The Nationals are going to beat the Philllys 40%-60% of the time they play them. The Phillys are going to beat the Braves 45%-55% of the time, and so on and so on. Find a team you like, don't look at the line, and play it. Of games played this year won,  Favs 102,or 59%, Dogs, 70, or 41%, pretty close. Next month it will be 53% Fav winners, 47% Dog winners. So "Cap" away.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by dcmc34f:

    alot in baseball. Don't you people realize that in baseball it's a 50/50 chance of winning on every game played. You are just wasting your time, "Capping". Example, yesterday with Little Timmy L pitching, the Giants are still  only going to win that game between 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5 or 6 times out of 10. The Nationals are going to beat the Philllys 40%-60% of the time they play them. The Phillys are going to beat the Braves 45%-55% of the time, and so on and so on. Find a team you like, don't look at the line, and play it. Of games played this year won,  Favs 102,or 59%, Dogs, 70, or 41%, pretty close. Next month it will be 53% Fav winners, 47% Dog winners. So "Cap" away.

     
    BergeyJ06
    BergeyJ06
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2006
    Posts: 1030
    Posted: Apr. 19, 2010 - 2:22 AM ET #130

    Im not exactly sure what he is saying but I think he means the team he thinks should be favored will win 51 percent of the time. 

    He made some sense when he said that a sport with a point spread would cover 40-60 percent of the time however I am completely lost on his baseball theories.

     

    There is no way in hell the + money in baseball covers 49 percent of the games.  If this were true every friking bettor in the world would have picked up on this and be betting dogs every day.

     

    People that claim betting is nothing more than a coin flip are the ones that never win and have no idea about the sport they are spending their money on so I generally ignore them.

     

    I am interested in where you are getting this 51 percent number?  Do you even look at the lines or do you just think in your head that the Yankees should be favored over the Red Sox so you keep your numbers that way?

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Im not exactly sure what he is saying but I think he means the team he thinks should be favored will win 51 percent of the time. 

    He made some sense when he said that a sport with a point spread would cover 40-60 percent of the time however I am completely lost on his baseball theories.

     

    There is no way in hell the + money in baseball covers 49 percent of the games.  If this were true every friking bettor in the world would have picked up on this and be betting dogs every day.

     

    People that claim betting is nothing more than a coin flip are the ones that never win and have no idea about the sport they are spending their money on so I generally ignore them.

     

    I am interested in where you are getting this 51 percent number?  Do you even look at the lines or do you just think in your head that the Yankees should be favored over the Red Sox so you keep your numbers that way?

     
    sniperswife
    sniperswife
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2006
    Posts: 5973
    Posted: Apr. 19, 2010 - 3:33 AM ET #131

    Archive it!!!!!!

    ROFLMAO

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Archive it!!!!!!

    ROFLMAO

     
    Call82
    Call82
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2007
    Posts: 1107
    Posted: Apr. 19, 2010 - 6:24 AM ET #132

    This thread is sooo funny...
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    This thread is sooo funny...
     
    Iw1nBets
    Iw1nBets
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2008
    Posts: 58493
    Posted: Apr. 19, 2010 - 8:41 AM ET #133

    Quote Originally Posted by dcmc34f:

    alot in baseball. Don't you people realize that in baseball it's a 50/50 chance of winning on every game played. You are just wasting your time, "Capping". Example, yesterday with Little Timmy L pitching, the Giants are still  only going to win that game between 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5 or 6 times out of 10. The Nationals are going to beat the Philllys 40%-60% of the time they play them. The Phillys are going to beat the Braves 45%-55% of the time, and so on and so on. Find a team you like, don't look at the line, and play it. Of games played this year won,  Favs 102,or 59%, Dogs, 70, or 41%, pretty close. Next month it will be 53% Fav winners, 47% Dog winners. So "Cap" away.

     

    Welp Bud you better start to condition yourslef to get ready to bunk up with a fella that goes by the name of WhiskeyBadgers in the Archives. See ya there

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by dcmc34f:

    alot in baseball. Don't you people realize that in baseball it's a 50/50 chance of winning on every game played. You are just wasting your time, "Capping". Example, yesterday with Little Timmy L pitching, the Giants are still  only going to win that game between 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5 or 6 times out of 10. The Nationals are going to beat the Philllys 40%-60% of the time they play them. The Phillys are going to beat the Braves 45%-55% of the time, and so on and so on. Find a team you like, don't look at the line, and play it. Of games played this year won,  Favs 102,or 59%, Dogs, 70, or 41%, pretty close. Next month it will be 53% Fav winners, 47% Dog winners. So "Cap" away.

     

    Welp Bud you better start to condition yourslef to get ready to bunk up with a fella that goes by the name of WhiskeyBadgers in the Archives. See ya there

     
    goscots56
    goscots56
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2006
    Posts: 1373
    Posted: Apr. 19, 2010 - 9:48 PM ET #134

    You 50/50 guys are SOFA KING WE TODD IT

    IF what you are saying is true, that at the end of the year it is going to be 50/50, then all you need to do is bet ALL of the dogs everyday!

    If baseball is 50/50, and in most cases you are gettting +130 to +170, and in some cases you are getting 200+

    So, lets do some simple math - if you guarantee 51/49, and lets just assume that the average dog is +150 (because there are several +200+).

    If you lose 51% of the 2430 games, then you lose 1240 units.

    If you win 49% of the 2430 games, then you win 1190 games, but since you are betting the DOGS and getting on average +150 per game, then you will win 1785 units for a profit of 545 units per year!

    And for you math donkeys out there, that would be a $545,000 yearly profit if you bet a dime per game!

    So you 50/50 donks.  Since you are so sure of the 50/50, and the math is obviously pretty easy.  Then you should stop arguing and start betting as much as your book will allow on the dogs!

     

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    You 50/50 guys are SOFA KING WE TODD IT

    IF what you are saying is true, that at the end of the year it is going to be 50/50, then all you need to do is bet ALL of the dogs everyday!

    If baseball is 50/50, and in most cases you are gettting +130 to +170, and in some cases you are getting 200+

    So, lets do some simple math - if you guarantee 51/49, and lets just assume that the average dog is +150 (because there are several +200+).

    If you lose 51% of the 2430 games, then you lose 1240 units.

    If you win 49% of the 2430 games, then you win 1190 games, but since you are betting the DOGS and getting on average +150 per game, then you will win 1785 units for a profit of 545 units per year!

    And for you math donkeys out there, that would be a $545,000 yearly profit if you bet a dime per game!

    So you 50/50 donks.  Since you are so sure of the 50/50, and the math is obviously pretty easy.  Then you should stop arguing and start betting as much as your book will allow on the dogs!

     

     
    goscots56
    goscots56
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2006
    Posts: 1373
    Posted: Apr. 19, 2010 - 9:53 PM ET #135

    I realize that I might have confused some math donkeys out there, and they are going to say that the average dog is NOT +150.

    SOOOOOOOOOOOO, lets just say the average dog is +120 (which we know the number is much higher than that)

    Then you lose 51% of the time -1240 units, and you win 49% of the time at +120 (1190 games) +1388 units.  For a yearly profit of 188 units!

    Which once again, would lead to a 6 figure yearly profit by just betting a dime on EVERY dog all year long.  No capping, no thinking, just a dime a dog!

    So if you're so sure about it, quit that day job and start betting some dogs

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    I realize that I might have confused some math donkeys out there, and they are going to say that the average dog is NOT +150.

    SOOOOOOOOOOOO, lets just say the average dog is +120 (which we know the number is much higher than that)

    Then you lose 51% of the time -1240 units, and you win 49% of the time at +120 (1190 games) +1388 units.  For a yearly profit of 188 units!

    Which once again, would lead to a 6 figure yearly profit by just betting a dime on EVERY dog all year long.  No capping, no thinking, just a dime a dog!

    So if you're so sure about it, quit that day job and start betting some dogs

     
    electricladylnd
    electricladylnd
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2008
    Posts: 1947
    Posted: Apr. 19, 2010 - 9:58 PM ET #136

    Quote Originally Posted by dcmc34f:

    Sure, how can I get into touch with you. I am up $775 for the week. I know, you don't believe me. I never said that I win or lose games.

     

    add me as a friend and PM me, we can start tomorrow

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by dcmc34f:

    Sure, how can I get into touch with you. I am up $775 for the week. I know, you don't believe me. I never said that I win or lose games.

     

    add me as a friend and PM me, we can start tomorrow

     
    vanzack
    vanzack
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2001
    Posts: 60107
    Posted: Apr. 19, 2010 - 10:01 PM ET #137

    Quote Originally Posted by dcmc34f:

    Van my man, I will do some research and will get back with you, take care dude  and GL to you

    Do that research yet?  Still waiting for you to get back to me....

    Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by dcmc34f:

    Van my man, I will do some research and will get back with you, take care dude  and GL to you

    Do that research yet?  Still waiting for you to get back to me....

     
    KVEGAS
    KVEGAS
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2007
    Posts: 6810
    Posted: Apr. 19, 2010 - 10:12 PM ET #138

    Can you please explain the point of this thread? Their are people wagering on baseball games (like myself and unlike you), that make money not by betting all dogs, but by picking and choosing, and at the end of the year being in the black...so whats wrong with 'capping'?

    SELECTIVENESS=SUCCESS
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Can you please explain the point of this thread? Their are people wagering on baseball games (like myself and unlike you), that make money not by betting all dogs, but by picking and choosing, and at the end of the year being in the black...so whats wrong with 'capping'?

     
    dcmc34f
    dcmc34f
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2007
    Posts: 5363
    Posted: Apr. 19, 2010 - 10:25 PM ET #139

    Van, I have no idea where to look to find how many fav wins  compared to dogs wins in the years past. I looked and can't find anything on that issue. In the above math, plug in 57% winners of favs, and 43% winners of dogs at a average of +150, and aren't you still postive 145 units, or $145,000, even at those percentages.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Van, I have no idea where to look to find how many fav wins  compared to dogs wins in the years past. I looked and can't find anything on that issue. In the above math, plug in 57% winners of favs, and 43% winners of dogs at a average of +150, and aren't you still postive 145 units, or $145,000, even at those percentages.
     
    dcmc34f
    dcmc34f
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2007
    Posts: 5363
    Posted: Apr. 19, 2010 - 10:29 PM ET #140

    Quote Originally Posted by KVEGAS:

    Can you please explain the point of this thread? Their are people wagering on baseball games (like myself and unlike you), that make money not by betting all dogs, but by picking and choosing, and at the end of the year being in the black...so whats wrong with 'capping'?

    Just for the record, I don't just play dogs all the time, never said I did. But with  the above math, why shouldn't we. It shows a profit at %57 fav winners, and at season's end,  it's below that.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by KVEGAS:

    Can you please explain the point of this thread? Their are people wagering on baseball games (like myself and unlike you), that make money not by betting all dogs, but by picking and choosing, and at the end of the year being in the black...so whats wrong with 'capping'?

    Just for the record, I don't just play dogs all the time, never said I did. But with  the above math, why shouldn't we. It shows a profit at %57 fav winners, and at season's end,  it's below that.
     
    dcmc34f
    dcmc34f
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2007
    Posts: 5363
    Posted: Apr. 19, 2010 - 10:44 PM ET #141

    Quote Originally Posted by KVEGAS:

    Can you please explain the point of this thread? Their are people wagering on baseball games (like myself and unlike you), that make money not by betting all dogs, but by picking and choosing, and at the end of the year being in the black...so whats wrong with 'capping'?

    Isn't the reason why they have threads on Covers is for this reason. Start a thread, see if it gets some hits , and have fun with it. This thread got interesting, no one got mad, it got a lot of run, a lot of people got their 2 cents in, explained things in their own way. A bunch of people got in.  I guess that was the purpose of this thread. I enjoyed it.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by KVEGAS:

    Can you please explain the point of this thread? Their are people wagering on baseball games (like myself and unlike you), that make money not by betting all dogs, but by picking and choosing, and at the end of the year being in the black...so whats wrong with 'capping'?

    Isn't the reason why they have threads on Covers is for this reason. Start a thread, see if it gets some hits , and have fun with it. This thread got interesting, no one got mad, it got a lot of run, a lot of people got their 2 cents in, explained things in their own way. A bunch of people got in.  I guess that was the purpose of this thread. I enjoyed it.
     
    vanzack
    vanzack
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2001
    Posts: 60107
    Posted: Apr. 19, 2010 - 10:46 PM ET #142

    Quote Originally Posted by dcmc34f:

    Van, I have no idea where to look to find how many fav wins  compared to dogs wins in the years past. I looked and can't find anything on that issue. In the above math, plug in 57% winners of favs, and 43% winners of dogs at a average of +150, and aren't you still postive 145 units, or $145,000, even at those percentages.

    Who says the average dog is +150?  You just love pulling stats out of your ass.  Stop guessing please.  You have no clue.

    If you want to back up the statement you made at least 5 times in this thread, that favs only cover 51% of the games -  I will give you 10 years and 2-1.  And I will find a source to definitively give us the answer.

    But please - stop insulting everyones intelligence with your bullshit guesses that you try to pass as facts.

    Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by dcmc34f:

    Van, I have no idea where to look to find how many fav wins  compared to dogs wins in the years past. I looked and can't find anything on that issue. In the above math, plug in 57% winners of favs, and 43% winners of dogs at a average of +150, and aren't you still postive 145 units, or $145,000, even at those percentages.

    Who says the average dog is +150?  You just love pulling stats out of your ass.  Stop guessing please.  You have no clue.

    If you want to back up the statement you made at least 5 times in this thread, that favs only cover 51% of the games -  I will give you 10 years and 2-1.  And I will find a source to definitively give us the answer.

    But please - stop insulting everyones intelligence with your bullshit guesses that you try to pass as facts.

     
    vanzack
    vanzack
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2001
    Posts: 60107
    Posted: Apr. 19, 2010 - 10:48 PM ET #143

    Quote Originally Posted by dcmc34f:

    Just for the record, I don't just play dogs all the time, never said I did. But with  the above math, why shouldn't we. It shows a profit at %57 fav winners, and at season's end,  it's below that.

    And BTW - you are once again showing how little you understand math and simple concepts like averages.

    You cant make the assumptions you make in your example.  It doesnt work that way.  What if small dogs win at a higher percentage than big dogs (likely) - than your average assumptions above are totally incorrect.

    Give it up, go buy a math book or go back to school.  You are digging the hole bigger and bigger.

    Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by dcmc34f:

    Just for the record, I don't just play dogs all the time, never said I did. But with  the above math, why shouldn't we. It shows a profit at %57 fav winners, and at season's end,  it's below that.

    And BTW - you are once again showing how little you understand math and simple concepts like averages.

    You cant make the assumptions you make in your example.  It doesnt work that way.  What if small dogs win at a higher percentage than big dogs (likely) - than your average assumptions above are totally incorrect.

    Give it up, go buy a math book or go back to school.  You are digging the hole bigger and bigger.

     
    vanzack
    vanzack
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2001
    Posts: 60107
    Posted: Apr. 19, 2010 - 10:50 PM ET #144

    Quote Originally Posted by dcmc34f:

    Isn't the reason why they have threads on Covers is for this reason. Start a thread, see if it gets some hits , and have fun with it. This thread got interesting, no one got mad, it got a lot of run, a lot of people got their 2 cents in, explained things in their own way. A bunch of people got in.  I guess that was the purpose of this thread. I enjoyed it.

    The problem is that you reported opinions as facts.

    If you want to start a thread with a theory, or a stated opinion - that is what covers is about.  But you stated MADE UP STATISTICS AS FACTS.  And everyone called bullshit.  Then you backed it up with more made up bullshit, and everyone is calling bullshit again.

    Opinions are fine, no matter how stupid.  But misrepresenting facts wont fly.

    Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by dcmc34f:

    Isn't the reason why they have threads on Covers is for this reason. Start a thread, see if it gets some hits , and have fun with it. This thread got interesting, no one got mad, it got a lot of run, a lot of people got their 2 cents in, explained things in their own way. A bunch of people got in.  I guess that was the purpose of this thread. I enjoyed it.

    The problem is that you reported opinions as facts.

    If you want to start a thread with a theory, or a stated opinion - that is what covers is about.  But you stated MADE UP STATISTICS AS FACTS.  And everyone called bullshit.  Then you backed it up with more made up bullshit, and everyone is calling bullshit again.

    Opinions are fine, no matter how stupid.  But misrepresenting facts wont fly.

     
    Kelly_Slater
    Kelly_Slater
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2009
    Posts: 7621
    Posted: Apr. 19, 2010 - 10:52 PM ET #145

    You can't be serious with this POS thread.

    Please do not throw US into YOUR shitty "flip a coin" Mantality, Record, and Approach.

    I come to win. Oddly enough Ive gone 5/6 on the season in Baseball. Some days I skip it all together. NBA is money right now and Im killing it but took a tough Phoenix loss last night. I obviously knowthat im not always going to when but at the end of EVERYDAY I am a fucking winner.

    I am a winner in leisure, competition, work, and in most things I do. Hell, even when I lose Im a fucking winner.

    You obviously have been on the wrong side of a thousand 's.

    Perhaps Sports betting is not for you. If someone needs to explain why Away/Home, Injuries, Weather, Sociology, Press, Fans, "Fan Nights" - all play a vital roll in each and every game then you sir are a dumbass.

    It could be as simple as knowing Kobe's Bryants FAVORITE place to play is Madison Square Garden and NOT Staples Center. So wager accordingly.

    That's part of capping and applies in NBA, MLB, NHL, Nascar, Tennis, Cricket, Curling, Volleyball and virtually every sport in the world....

    You either dont do your homework, or you simply dont know how.

    Dont be a hater.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6UCtdlmSeuw

     

     

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    You can't be serious with this POS thread.

    Please do not throw US into YOUR shitty "flip a coin" Mantality, Record, and Approach.

    I come to win. Oddly enough Ive gone 5/6 on the season in Baseball. Some days I skip it all together. NBA is money right now and Im killing it but took a tough Phoenix loss last night. I obviously knowthat im not always going to when but at the end of EVERYDAY I am a fucking winner.

    I am a winner in leisure, competition, work, and in most things I do. Hell, even when I lose Im a fucking winner.

    You obviously have been on the wrong side of a thousand 's.

    Perhaps Sports betting is not for you. If someone needs to explain why Away/Home, Injuries, Weather, Sociology, Press, Fans, "Fan Nights" - all play a vital roll in each and every game then you sir are a dumbass.

    It could be as simple as knowing Kobe's Bryants FAVORITE place to play is Madison Square Garden and NOT Staples Center. So wager accordingly.

    That's part of capping and applies in NBA, MLB, NHL, Nascar, Tennis, Cricket, Curling, Volleyball and virtually every sport in the world....

    You either dont do your homework, or you simply dont know how.

    Dont be a hater.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6UCtdlmSeuw

     

     

     
    Kelly_Slater
    Kelly_Slater
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2009
    Posts: 7621
    Posted: Apr. 19, 2010 - 10:54 PM ET #146

    https://tinyurl.com/y7day7o
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    https://tinyurl.com/y7day7o
     
    dcmc34f
    dcmc34f
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2007
    Posts: 5363
    Posted: Apr. 19, 2010 - 10:56 PM ET #147

    So what do you think the avg dog play is? It is not a opinion that the fav have won %56 of the games played right now. Why do think you are a mathematical GOD?
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    So what do you think the avg dog play is? It is not a opinion that the fav have won %56 of the games played right now. Why do think you are a mathematical GOD?
     
    dcmc34f
    dcmc34f
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2007
    Posts: 5363
    Posted: Apr. 19, 2010 - 11:05 PM ET #148

    Why do people insist on saying the I'm on the wrong side of betting. You people don't know who I play, granted, I did play  all dogs this past weekend, besides that, you people don't know what my bets are.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Why do people insist on saying the I'm on the wrong side of betting. You people don't know who I play, granted, I did play  all dogs this past weekend, besides that, you people don't know what my bets are.
     
    Kelly_Slater
    Kelly_Slater
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2009
    Posts: 7621
    Posted: Apr. 19, 2010 - 11:08 PM ET #149

    Quote Originally Posted by goscots56:

    I realize that I might have confused some math donkeys out there, and they are going to say that the average dog is NOT +150.

    SOOOOOOOOOOOO, lets just say the average dog is +120 (which we know the number is much higher than that)

    Then you lose 51% of the time -1240 units, and you win 49% of the time at +120 (1190 games) +1388 units.  For a yearly profit of 188 units!

    Which once again, would lead to a 6 figure yearly profit by just betting a dime on EVERY dog all year long.  No capping, no thinking, just a dime a dog!

    So if you're so sure about it, quit that day job and start betting some dogs

     

    This pretty much sums it up.

    Numbers dont lie.

    Jagoffs who would like to bet only dogs can use me exclusively as their  NEW sportsbook.

    I will be open for business 24hrs a day.

    Call me 1-800-Cant-Win

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by goscots56:

    I realize that I might have confused some math donkeys out there, and they are going to say that the average dog is NOT +150.

    SOOOOOOOOOOOO, lets just say the average dog is +120 (which we know the number is much higher than that)

    Then you lose 51% of the time -1240 units, and you win 49% of the time at +120 (1190 games) +1388 units.  For a yearly profit of 188 units!

    Which once again, would lead to a 6 figure yearly profit by just betting a dime on EVERY dog all year long.  No capping, no thinking, just a dime a dog!

    So if you're so sure about it, quit that day job and start betting some dogs

     

    This pretty much sums it up.

    Numbers dont lie.

    Jagoffs who would like to bet only dogs can use me exclusively as their  NEW sportsbook.

    I will be open for business 24hrs a day.

    Call me 1-800-Cant-Win

     
     
    dcmc34f
    dcmc34f
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2007
    Posts: 5363
    Posted: Apr. 19, 2010 - 11:10 PM ET #150

    All I'm saying is at seasons end, the percentages between fav wins and dog wins aren't going to be very far apart. So why should'nt we play dogs more. Never did I say, I PLAY DOGS EVERYDAY AND SO SHOULD EVERYONE ELSE.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    All I'm saying is at seasons end, the percentages between fav wins and dog wins aren't going to be very far apart. So why should'nt we play dogs more. Never did I say, I PLAY DOGS EVERYDAY AND SO SHOULD EVERYONE ELSE.
    All Forums | MLB Betting Forum
    «First Previous 123 ... 567 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 448,844 Covers arrow
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 257,919 Covers arrow
    • Friday 09/18/2026 673 Covers arrow
    • PART DEUX 189 Covers arrow
    • NFL LOCKED IN! 97,808 Covers arrow
    • Couple Beers 5,268 Covers arrow
    • DET/BILLS live in game comments welcome 707 Covers arrow
    • Dumb Political Statements 12,953 Covers arrow
    • Thursday 09/17/2026 739 Covers arrow
    • NCAA FOOTBALL. 151 20,677 Covers arrow

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.